In the Amharic language page has two different transcriptions for how to pronounce the native name of the language, on the bottom it says "አማርኛ Amarəñña, IPA: [ämärɨɲːä]" and on top it says "አማርኛ Amarəñña...[amärɨɲɲa]". So which one is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sion8 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wolf leslau.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Pete unseth! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DuncanHill 00:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thank you for uploading Image:Toom instrument.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi -- I just noticed your contributions to Onesimos Nesib and your creation of Aster Ganno, an article on an unjustly neglected person. For one, I'd like to extend my appreciation for your contributions, & hope that you can fill in some of the holes on Ethiopian topics. -- llywrch 06:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eugene Kellersberger, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Kellersberger. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good job over at Unvarnished New Testament. You've def improved the article. I've re-templated it to show that. MBisanz ^talk 03:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete! Good to see you at work in Wikipedia! I noticed your activity on the Majang vowel system. In principle, I agree with you that Majang probably has a 9-vowel system, and I am working currently on that, measuring formants, using the data of the two German students we had last year. Unfortunately, I think that there is no publication yet that states that Majang has a 9-vowel system. When I did the article, I set the link to Bender as a reference, and he only shows his 7 vowels. So either we have to remove the reference, and then the information would be original research, or we would have to go back to the old wording, which was still original research, but probably a little bit more subdued. I hope that I will be able to publish something like a phonology of Majang in the course of the next few years, and then I think the article could refer to that. But before that I guess we are stuck with Bender's publications on the matter, and we need to refer to them. Landroving Linguist (talk) 13:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC) (Andreas Joswig)Reply[reply]

Wow, that was a quick solution to the problem. I sent my message off to you, then checked the mail (I mean the real mail), and there was a parcel from Harrassowitz with the third volume of the Encyclopeadia Aethiopica, and that has your article on Majangir language in there, and here you write that there are nine vowels. So there is a published source as of today, and I will correct the link accordingly (tomorrow, I will go home now). Anyway, you can basically ignore what I have written in my above message. Landroving Linguist (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:JPS-1917 small.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:JPS-1917.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pete: I see you've just added another couple of languages. Great. But are you aware that there is currently discussion on the Talk:Bible translations by language page about restructuring this article? It would reduce drastically to be more or less just a table of contents (list of languages) with the actual information going into a separate article, such as "Bible translations (Cornish)". Your views would be welcome. Feline Hymnic (talk) 22:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for adding a useful book to the Further Reading list for the ITAE article. I see you've also listed four related films. Do you have any further information about them? Serious documentaries are worth mentioning, but docudramas can be misleading and probably shouldn't be listed. Can you put some details on the article's talk page? (I removed the mention of Branagh, I thought unnecessary). Cheers, Brianboulton (talk) 22:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Bagam script.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 15:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sacred name Bibles, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 08:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am hoping to include some information on the sacred name Bibles article you created. I don't really think it reads very well at the moment, and since you started the article, I thought I should let you know. In Citer (talk) 14:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

III. I will be making some changes to the Sacred name Bibles page. Since you expanded the article, I feel it needs to be fixed up and the sections shortened to a “digestible” and manageable length. I do have a query; why aren’t the popular Bibles such as the ASV and JB included in the Sacred Name Bible list table? I would be inclined to include them in the table. Should you be concerned about the size of the table, I suggest that we could divide the Sacred Name Bible table in to three groups: 1. That use sacred name in the OT 2. That use sacred name in the NT 3. Those that are incomplete or online. (I would prefer that the online Bibles be put on a different table, on a different page altogether.) Working together. In Citer (talk)

They are some discussions currently undergoing about user Jayjgs behaviour on reversing the edits made to the Sacred Scriptures Bethel Edition page and your feedback is wanted: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJayjg&diff=254454498&oldid=254389845, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:R%27n%27B#Sacred_Scriptures_Bethel_Edition_page_2 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Sacred_Scriptures_Bethel_Edition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.146.147 (talk) 18:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents

They want the AOY article deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.103.241.89 (talk) 12:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The publisher will not deny it. Pamela Stanford requested permission from the ISR to "consult" The Scriptures for her "Natsarim Translation Project".

The ISR is currently preparing the copyright violation case against the Publisher of "The Besorah". When confronted with the fact that she did not "consult" the text she did not deny it. What makes matters more serious is that the ISR The Scriptures 1998 text is copyrighted, and Pam Stanford in her publication claims to have a team of scholars working on the translation (bogus), and that the text is now public domain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billmeyer777 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yesterday I undid an edit of yours on List of Bible translators. I suspect I may have been too hasty, considering your history of good edits on Wikipedia. So my apologies for that. Feline Hymnic (talk) 21:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:M. Lionel Bender.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like ((PD-self)) (to release all rights), ((self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL)) (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Pete unseth. You have new messages at Paul A's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Back in 2008 you added to ejective consonant that some Eastern Cushitic languages have ejectives and a single retroflex implosive. That's almost certainly incorrect: besides the odd distribution that would make for, phonemic retroflex implosives are not known to actually exist, and the IPA does not even have a symbol for them. kwami (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Is it that both terms are regarded (OED?) as spurious, or just the one: byspel? Byword is a common synonym for a proverb in general, especially to help distinguish it from a Biblical proverb, and the Book of Proverbs (when used plurally). I think it would be beneficial to still include that term in the lead, due to the redirect from Byword. But byspel, no. That is more rare. Leasnam (talk) 15:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Dr. Unseth,

I have seen your picture of a full set of Tanakh scrolls, on Wikipedia, and I am curious as to where that picture was taken, with its full collection of Tanakh scrolls in one room. I tried emailing you at a GIAL address which I found through Google, but it bounce.

Thank you very much, and looking forward to hearing from you, Margavriel

(Please respond on my talkpage. Thanks.) Margavriel (talk) 01:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks so much! Interestingly, the scrolls seem to be of different ages, not from a set. Margavriel (talk) 03:11, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I know that I'm picking up a conversation from nearly seven years ago, but I would like to ask you whether you know the name of the curator of the Tanakh exhibit that you saw at the International Museum of Cultures. I would like to get in contactMargavriel (talk) 10:52, 30 July 2018 (UTC) with them, and ask them some questions. Thank you, MargavrielReply[reply]

Thanks, that was a very gentlemanly edit/standback, I saw you there. Feel free to go back and clean it up more, though there are many other more notable bios that could do with a fix too. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Pete unseth. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sacred Name Bibles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 09:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The alert is not illogical. However, having expertise in an area does not automatically create a conflict of interest. I trust I have lobbied for clarity and against definitions that are too limited to one group religious faction. (I am not a part of any organization that had a particular interest in Sacred Name Bibles.) I liked the recent deletion of the distinction between broad and narrow definitions, a complication created a few months ago. I'm happy a more neutral party deleted it. Thank-you. Pete unseth (talk) 01:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am very uncomfortable with you quoting yourself in an article. Perhaps you could post the relevant content on a talk page in future, and ask another editor to add it. StAnselm (talk) 06:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Prince Rabadash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proverbs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the Amharic correction. Do you know where I could find definitive information on which Ethiopic characters are used by which language? I'm looking for information on languages like Awngi, Bench, Me'en, Mursi, Qimant, Sebatbeit, Suri and Xamtanga (not just Amharic, Tigre, Tigrinya, and Blin). I've seen documents like N2747 (Unicode Extended Ethiopic Proposal) and Daneil Yacob's Ethiopic at the End of the 20th Century but nowhere can I find more comprehensive information. Any ideas? DRMcCreedy (talk)

The article Alula Pankhurst has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 11:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Bitis parviocula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rift Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Machine Head (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Waffle_iron_in_shape_of_Texas.JPG Tom Harrison ^Talk 23:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Gospel of Luke in Ulster Scots.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:12, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:English-Amharic-Spanish.JPG, which you've sourced to (store logo). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete. Thanks for providing the links to the ISO application and subsequent rejection of the same. This should prove useful in determining a more accurate definition of Llanito. --Gibmetal 77^{talk 2 me} 11:42, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey. I happened to notice that you added back the list of roads serving Berwick, Pennsylvania to the geography section, saying that I had removed useful information. However, I had only moved the list of major roads to its own section, so perhaps either the section on major roads or the list of major roads in the geography section should be removed. King jakob c (talk) 00:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Pete, this is probably partly my fault. Please take a look at User_talk:Bringshalom22. Bringshalom was repeatedly trying to add "HalleluYah Scriptures" to the list, but was getting shot down by a number of other editors (not me). It got to the point of edit-warring, but I finally got Bringshalom to engage in a discussion about the sourcing for these entries on Bringshalom's User Talk page. The issue is that in the list of translations, only Stern's has a reliable secondary source. Of the other three, one is entirely unsourced, and the other two are insufficiently sourced--they are sourced only to the individual Bible publishers' own websites. Bringshalom was getting frustrated that HalleluYah kept getting removed, but the others were being allowed to stay. I mentioned to Bringshalom that the others actually were in equal danger of being removed as equally unsourced/insufficiently sourced. I think then Bringshalom took this as license to remove them. I wasn't going to remove them myself, but honestly my view of it is that Bringshalom's edits are justifiable due to the sourcing problems. Any joker out there can publish a translation, no matter how awful, and put up a website for it, this is why there needs to be independent reliable secondary sourcing for the entries. Anyway, I'm not going to edit the article, but I'm sure Bringshalom is going to come back frustrated after I explained the sourcing problems with the other entries and told Bringshalom, "someone should find sources for them before they are challenged and removed--all three could be removed at this point as unsourced." Cheers... Zad68 03:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bonga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gambela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:"Big fish eat litle fish" proverb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Language survey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Instituto Lingüístico de Verano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete,

Re. Yiddish SL, I've tried to verify this exists, but have come up empty. The closest I've gotten is a comment by a deaf Hassidic Jew that the Hassidim of Israel speak Yiddish, but that deaf Hassidim have nothing but home sign. There have been ISO codes for several spurious languages, so that's not good evidence it exists. I mean, even the Joshua Project couldn't locate anyone. It would be nice if we could verify or disconfirm this, as most of the other SLs are at least mentioned in the lit even if we know nothing about them. — kwami (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I'm not asking for it to be removed, only tagging it as needing references, which it does. The E17 entry only says that it's "apparently" distinct from ISL, which suggests they don't actually know anything about it. I don't know where they got their info, but maybe someone, somewhere, will have a ref we can use for the list or maybe even enough to create an article. Or a ref that there is no such thing. Either way; meanwhile IMO it's good to have it in the list but tagged as needing confirmation. — kwami (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dari language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Calormen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proverbs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Culture of Afghanistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proverbs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aklan language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proverbs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JPS-1917 small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of book-burning incidents shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Saddhiyama (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eisegesis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the decisions made by translators are criticized by those who disagree as "eisegesis".<ref>[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/327621650 Disagreements about New World Translation</ref> Some

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:29, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kurdish grammar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Creissels''. Ed. Franck Florici et al. Lyon: ENS Editions, 2010. 243-250</ref> and Kurmanjî.<ref>[http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/uhlcs/LENCA/LENCA-2/information/datei/14-haig.pdf Abstract on origins

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tavira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for looking over my edits on the Oromo Liberation Front page. However, I had a few concerns;

1. The people supposedly killed by the OLF a month before the 2005 elections were not Oromos or OPDO. Citation 16, which is a Nelson Institute report, states the following;

"In one instance, just one month before the 2005 election, some 400 members of the Gebera, an ethnic group in Oromia with strong
 ties to the government, were slain."

This means that those slain were not Oromo but Gebera. The second citation (17) is defunct. The lack of more information on this incident leads me to believe that it might be false. I have tried to find more reports on the massacre but I have found none. That same year, the Ethiopian government massacred 200 protestors and it made big news, a massacre of 400 should have more reports. What do you think?

2. The paragraph about the Bodeno Massacre has only one citation and it is defunct. However, after doing some research, I have noticed that there are conflicting reports as to who instigated the massacres. In these articles; http://nazret.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/10/ethiopia_tesfaye_gebrab_on_bedeno_and_ar?blog=15 http://www.ethiopianreview.com/forum/viewtopic.php? http://www.solidaritymovement.org/historyOfHumanRightsViolations.php

the writers state that the OPDO (Oromo party of the ruling EPRDF coalition) were the instigators of the massacre. In other articles (such as this one; http://www.ethiolion.com/Pdf/021309_Tamirat_Layne.pdf , it blames the OLF.

I'll wait for your reply before making any changes.

LencaOromo (talk) 23:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dubious? Ya, you bet! Did you want to sign your post or should I use the unsigned template and pipe it to Ole? Rivertorch (talk) 16:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What was wrong here: Bilingual sign? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.113.59.254 (talk) 12:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Inserting "Czechia" for the established term Czech Republic is not helpful. This term is not listed in the "Czech Republic" article as an alternative. So I reverted it. Trying to be peacefully constructive.Pete unseth (talk) 12:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pete, I have to cut in. You are absolutely not right. Inserting Czechia is only solution to finally stop the mess in Czech things in English Wikipedia. After all, you can see that the link is functional. Why only one country should not use geographical name and be restricted only to political ? Czech republic is simply (ane more than apparently) NOT enough to describe the country and its personalities in more than 1100 years long history. To make some circumventions is confusing and silly. Czechia, however not commonly used, is geographical name of the country and its equivalent is used in all other languaqes. Look at some categories like "people from the Czech republic", where are included personalities that have never lived in contemporary Czech state, it is embarrassing and shortsighted. Stop continue in organization of a mess. If somebody does not like the name, such a subjective attitude does not have place in the issue Askave (talk) 16:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Czechia is an official English geographical name of the Czech Republic. Czechia was in English first used in 1866. If You have any problem with th word Czechia, please write it here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.168.13.98 (talk) 13:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regarding this edit. First Malayalam dictionary is not by Gundert. It is by Benjamin Bailey in 1846. The scan of that dictionary is available here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Benjamin_Bailey_Malayalam-English_Dictionary-1846.pdf Also there is one more Malayalam dictionary by Richard Collins in 1860s. --Shijualex (talk) 06:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pete, thank you for rational attitude and action (reinserting the link that a.amitkumar removed) in Name of the Czech Republic. Askave (talk) 21:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balochi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pete, I have no intention of pushing an agenda or being personal. I just enjoy using academic sources to =create good articles. Please feel safe to criticise what I do. PiCo (talk) 11:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Pete unseth. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

Hi Pete. I was wondering if you would mind taking a look at this? It concerns the Somali Sign Language. As someone knowledgeable on the languages of the Horn of Africa, your insight on the matter would be certainly appreciated. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 15:13, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:This is the cover of a book containing the Gospel of Luke in both Ulster Scots and the 1611 AV.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete. When you have the time, would you mind also taking a look at ancient Somali script? The details are here. Please see this for the page as it was. If possible, I would also like to add a new section on the script's form, which was apparently based on vowel sound. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 18:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, any info on this – that it actually existed, its date, form, and language, would be appreciated. Our sources are so bad that, as it stands, the article should simply be deleted. — kwami (talk) 18:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article on the The Art of Not Being Governed (2009) was recently improved to the point I felt that it and its referenced term Zomia (geography) added a 21st century perspective to the mufti-ethnic support for what the Thai called the Holy Man's Rebellion of 1902-3, and the similar resistance by Ong Keo that lasted until 1910; and by his lieutenant, Ong Kommandam that lasted at least until 1936. There's very little information on the ethnic minorities as opposed to the much larger immigrant groups that have almost swallowed them up, so I try to add a bit here and there. Do you think maybe I could get away with adding the same to the Paiute people? --Pawyilee (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete, would you please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced material to the article? I'm trying to maintain it so that it doesn't deteriorate. There are plenty of academic sources that discuss this concept (and this article is about the concept, rather than any of its practical applications), so there's no reason to use non-academic sources or blogs such as www.purewatergazette.net. [1]

Also, I think you may have misunderstood the idea. Arguments against speciesism do not involve treating apes, dogs and flies in the same way. No one argues in favour of that, so it is pointless to post an argument against it. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 02:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm copying your post here, so the discussion is in one place (but better still to continue it on article talk):

The question about whether speciesism views different species seems non-trivial to me. If those against speciesism treat primates, dogs, cats, rats, worms, vinegar eels, and termites differently, is that not a form of speciesism? I want to understand a clear definition, and the article does not yet give it. Some days ago, I asked for a clearer definition along these lines. Nobody has responded yet. Any insight is happily received, though I will now be out of contact for a couple days. Gently, Pete unseth (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's not a form of speciesism if there are morally relevant differences. That's the key: not species membership, but morally relevant differences, as the lead says. Those differences may or may not boil down to species membership depending on the situation, but it's the morally relevant properties that are weighed, not the species membership alone.

If you believe there's no clear definition in the article, the way to proceed is to read the academic sources and add one, but there's no point in adding unsourced opinion, or opinion sourced to a blog, and continuing to add it over objections. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 03:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete,

I agree that we should have s.t. about polygamy in the debate over SSM, but we should say something substantive if we do. Some of the concerns have been raised on the talk page. Do you want to draw s.t. up? It doesn't look like anyone else is going to. — kwami (talk) 00:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you!!!

Thank you, Pete unseth for editing that...I missed that when I was removing the other stuff to the Konsoid page. I apologize for missing that.

Hi Pete. Does your new ref demonstrate that this is the first language of deaf Yolngu? I understand that hearing-community SLs are not always used by the deaf in the community. Also, is it still said to be a signed code for oral Yolngu? I think a proposal was made to give it an ISO code, but that wouldn't be appropriate if it's not actually a separate language. — kwami (talk) 00:41, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pete the link works it is a Free registration Language school like Livemocha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clowningar (talk • contribs) 23:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mosaic may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[[[File:Texas mosaic tiles.jpg|thumb|left|Mosaic in restroom of rest area along Interstate-20, Texas.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited H. Harvard Arnason, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guggenheim Foundation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your upload of File:Centenary Translation.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Proverb may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 2011, pp. 139-148. [http://www.paremia.org/wp-content/uploads/13.GONZALEZ.pdf Electronic access]]</ref>
• Eds. Wolfgang Mieder and Alan Dundes, 275-283. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. (Originally in ''Fatalistic Beliefs in Religion, Folklore and Literature'', Ed. Helmer Ringgren.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Duncanville, Texas may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[[[File:Duncanville, Texas northern water tower.jpg|thumb|Water tower in the Fairmeadows

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eugene Nida may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.Reply[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | death_place = Madrid, Spain <ref>http://www.unitedbiblesocieties.org/news/794-eugene-nida-dies/]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Jewish Bible translators, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Laubach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benton, PA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure why you marked my edit as disambiguation.This is what you wrote:(Reverted "see also" which takes reader to disambiguation page, not to an article. Am I missing something) I added Tetractys to the "see also" section on the Tetragrammaton page because: You ask what are you missing? Well as you can see on the Tetractys page "Tetragrammaton" is clearly mentioned on the page under the Kabbalist Symbol section. This would indicate that I can add Tetractys to Tetragrammaton "see also" section. Not sure what you are missing about this. "There are some who believe that the tetractys and its mysteries influenced the early kabbalists. A Hebrew Tetractys in a similar way has the letters of the Tetragrammaton (the four lettered name of God in Hebrew scripture) inscribed on the ten positions of the tetractys, from right to left. It has been argued that the Kabbalistic Tree of Life, with its ten spheres of emanation, is in some way connected to the tetractys, but its form is not that of a triangle. The well known occult writer Dion Fortune mentions:"

I have reverted back to my original edit. Let me know your thoughts. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg1wiki (talk • contribs) 16:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, Pete, I was wondering whether you could possibly offer your input on the recent changes - and reverts of those changes - on the Muslim conquests article. Thank you very much for your time. Torontas (talk) 22:29, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for the edit as I wish to remain within the standards of Wikipedia. However, I am a bit confused as to your comment. The source for my statement was referenced and sourced.

Hi Pete, I received your comment and I do agree with it! I will reinstate my Wiki submission with a rewrite to address this.Mikeprescott (talk) 19:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 13:29, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linguistic landscape, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My Google search showed no other hits for "Hadiya Sultanate", only yours. There is much evidence and precedent for calling it a kingdom, but not for calling it a sultanate. I can see no reason for this change. If there is no valid evidence for this, then it should be restored to its previous label. Pete unseth (talk) 22:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete. The Hadiya polity was a Muslim sultanate, as noted by Ulrich Braukämper in the Encyclopaedia Aethiopica (please see here). Its rulers were also styled as Garads/Sultans, including the slain Mahiko. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow linguist. Thanks for supporting my ideas about the conservation status of languages. I wanted to propose a change to the language infobox that adds a section concerning language conservation and vitality. I was hoping we could throw the idea around of making a language conservation template or diagram of some kind that could be used on each language's page in the infobox to help the reader visualize the vitality of the language, similar to the endangered species one. Each language in the world has a status and vitality, as do species.

Here is my current idea about language conservation statuses we could have in the infobox (I am always open to discussion and other ideas):

• Global/Least Concern(for international or national languages used for wider communication like English and French)
• Developing/Vigorous/near Thriving (for littler languages that still yield considerable vitality; children are still learning them but they are not yet widespread and may have limited official/regional status)
• Vulnerable/threatened (the language is spoken by all generations but is a minority language, and its use maybe restricted to certain domains; perhaps the language community needs some kind of conservation to maintain their language)
• Shifting/moribund (the language is no longer spoken/acquired by children as a first language, but is in use among the parent generation and older who could theoretically turn around and start speaking the language to their children)
• nearly extinct (only a few elders remain)
• dormant/dead (no known living first language speakers, but perhaps revitalization attempts)
• extinct (completely gone)

Here is the endangered species diagram, which I was hoping the language status diagram might look like:

However, the problem with language conservation status is there is a not a concrete source as there is for defining the conservation status of species (the Red List of Endangered Species). UNESCO can be reliable for language conservation status, but it appears to struggle with original research and has trouble differentiated between a language and a dialect. Ethnologue by SIL International is generally reliable and does provide a status for each language, but it is a missionary resource and is thus biased; some of the data is manipulated and linguists do not agree on its accuracy. I was thinking that the Catalogue of Endangered Languages by the University of Michigan and the University of Hawaii looks reliable, and well defines the various degrees of language endangerment/vitality, but I'd like to hear everyone's ideas. We need a source that linguists agree is generally reliable to prevent potential edit warring between users knit picking various sources.

~~user:Neddy1234~~

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whitehorse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Wuerzele (talk) 19:18, 3 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Reply[reply]

--NikeThyrsus (talk) 16:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you.

	chivalry
	Please do , i would really appreciate this , as i blame and find a faulty in myself and it bothers me , it would be highly dignifying and assuring on both ends if you will revise it :) i saw your contributions and attributions impressive an act of chivalry :] NikeThyrsus (talk) 16:25, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well done , appreciated!

--NikeThyrsus (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete. I'm looking at p.989 of that 1998 Futures article by Jan Mair. Her one parenthetical comment is: "Notice not just the Dylan Thomas rip off ('Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night’) but also how the speech is reminiscent of George Bush’s address prior to ‘Operation Desert Storm ..." Now I'd agree that half-sentence might help explain where the script writers stole the line. It might even illuminate the ethos of the film (Mair's actual subject in her paper). But I'm really not sure it's a good example of the use of Dylan's poem "in popular culture"? The fact that the original Elsevier paper is (usually) behind a $41.95 pay-wall, means that readers can't even judge for themselves. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:45, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fan S. Noli may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• at [[Harvard]] <ref name="Thernstrom"/> (1912), the [[New England Conservatory of Music]] 1938), and finally his Ph.D. from [[Boston University]] (1945)<ref>p. 175. William Paul. 2003. ''English

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Devorah Baron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Mandate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete, I noticed that you reverted an edit on the Languages of Ethiopia page, calling it unexplained deletions. At first glance I was getting the same impression as you, but then noted that this was actually a good edit. It separated the East Cushitic languages into Highland East Cushitic and Lowland East Cushitic. None of the languages got deleted in this edit, but were moved to their proper subfamily. I therefore suggest that you undo you own revert. Best wishes, Landroving Linguist (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unisex name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leslie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I see you reverted my edit on Waldensians. I had reverted the edit by the anonymous editor who removed cited material. After doing the edit, I realized that the reason I gave didn't make a lot of sense. I meant to say that I reverted it because the anonymous editor had removed cited material. Furthermore, it seemed to be an edit that was not a neutral edit, removing the opposing viewpoint that refuted the claim of the Waldensians being 7th-day keepers (I personally have not seen that in my own readings, but it could be that some did). I suggest that both citations be kept, as a "compromise," but the wording needs to be changed back to "claimed," not "showed," to keep it neutral. Thanks. Mikeatnip (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've just read your response to my question on the Cherokee Syllabery page and was wondering if you could give me the source about those Mexicans that thought they were using Sequoyah's script for their indigenous language? -- sion8 ^{talk page} 01:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nora A. Gordon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nora A. Gordon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:African American missionaries, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have voted in favour of your category, but you need to provide it with a headnote to explain exactly what its scope is, so that it does not pick up for example white American missionaries to Africa. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry. -- PK2 (talk) 06:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Music
	10 to 31 January 2016 Please join us in the worldwide virtual edit-a-thon hosted by Women in Red.

--Ipigott (talk) 10:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bruceville-Eddy, Texas may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[[[File:Bruceville-Eddy watertower.png|thumb|Water tower at Bruceville-Eddy, TX, highlighting the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:31, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Demographics of Cuba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fritz Pollard, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Marshall Law School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You added the bilingual manhole cover, but your cutline should explain what "no basura" means, since this is the English wikipedia. I'm a little unsure, or I'd do it - do they mean no littering? Or don't lift up the cover and toss something down? or something else? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 22:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pierre Pélissier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gourdon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helvetic Confessions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grynaeus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you meant "language death is the result of language shift" instead of "language death is the result of language death". - dcljr (talk) 01:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cover of Gods New Covenant, A New Testament Translation.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Samson Benderly, Pete unseth!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added some more sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bogumił Šwjela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sorbian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wellerism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sumerian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings! Could you please vet the etymology on Abyssinians? It is a bloated mess. Much of it appears to be based on the root "Habesh", which has led to various tangents on Bantus, Nilotes, "ferenj", and Habeshistan centered in Suakin, among other non-Abyssinian stuff. You seem to be genuinely knowledgeable in this area, so your expertise here would be most appreciated. Kind Regards -- Soupforone (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devil in the Details. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not hesitate to delete this msg from myself at = North Alabama 000 (talk) 11:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Regarding this transaction --> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bible_concordance&diff=next&oldid=746789168

Your assertion was = .... "no close relationship to article".
Here next is a related quote from --> Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#.22See_also.22_section
"The links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics"

As i myself perceive it....
Within the "See Also" sections, the standard of what-is-close-enough is intentionally lowered.
Since the more tenuously connected subjects of "See Also" are useful for idiots like me.
We who have not yet found the article we were looking-for.
Who are not blessed with the vocabulary or wisdom skills that others have.
And which allow those others to directly arrive-at the right article they seek.

Concepts which are closely inter-related, as you preferred in this instance...
They would surely be worthy of an appositive mention and wiki-link within the main body sections of the article.
And additionally (but paradoxically) NOT within "See Also"....
As is implied by this next quote from the Manual_of_Style article cited above:
"As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes."

In closing i am guilty of displaying definitively-zero diplomacy skills.
For your benefit i should have expended the additional energy in order to add a large layer of heart-speak atop the sterile logic.
The phrase "should have" is fitting because....
From seeing your contributions-listing it is plainly established that you have invested a lot of effort into wonderful Wikipedia.
I hope-that... just as i have done in other cases... a large fraction of the other people you revert are expending the small energy required in order to thank you.
I pray i did not accidentally cause your heart to somehow be hurt.
But if unfortunately so, then please somehow let me know, so i can grieve alongside you.

Hello, Pete unseth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For fantastic work on the Proverbs page! Alarichall (talk) 11:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Pete, I reverted the change of position of the reference to this work in The Dog in the Manger. It was my fault for not making clear that the work deals with sexual jealousy and selfishness, which I have now remedied. As such it really belongs in the section dealing with sexual interpretations. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I see you reverted my edit to the above article. Are you aware that Category:Translators of the Bible does not exist, it is a red link? Rather than returning the non-existent category to the article, it would be much preferable to create the category. Thanks, Gjs238 (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Shortly after my first edit to Injera a friend told me that yes, "traditionally only the right hand is used for eating" and you mentioned that too. So now I'm looking for sources supporting that claim. One source has already been removed (hehe); the Right hand article does't mention this at all. Do you have better sources that could be added as a reference to that "traditionally" statement? Thanks! -- Evilninja (talk) 16:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ever since C.S. Lewis introduced Archenland, Calormen, Telmar, etc, there's been a certain ambiguity between the land of Narnia and the world of Narnia... AnonMoos (talk) 22:30, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spilt Milk album cover from Jellyfish.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Proverb you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 02:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Ronald Lockett, Pete unseth!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 17:39, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Pete unseth. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Proverb you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Proverb for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 21:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Terms claimed to be racist despite non-racist origins, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 02:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berwick, Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Curry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How do translate a Bible to sign language?Editor2020 (talk) 02:54, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translating a Bible into a sign language is done by video. The product is not a paper book.Pete unseth (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well of course! Editor2020 (talk) 01:45, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See for yourself:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Infobox_person_using_religion&pageuntil=Kanyerezi%2C+Richard%0ARichard+Kanyerezi#mw-pages
Gene Wilson (talk) 23:05, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Have a look at our article on predatory open access. These journals have no effective peer review, so they are basically self-published sources. There are very few examples where we would use a predatory journal as a source, but you're welcome to ask at the reliable source noticeboard if you don't want to take my word for it. Guy (Help!) 07:45, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your edits in the pecan wiki have several errors. The picture of young pecans was actually a picture of young persimmons. The links for insects have several errors such as phylloxera which links to grape phylloxera. This is not the same as pecan phylloxera. I replaced the persimmon picture but will take a lot of time to fix the rest of the errors. Please be more careful with edits! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnickeringBear (talk • contribs) 10:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please check to see if this is the photo you uploaded. What I see is persimmons.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/41/Young_pecans.jpg/800px-Young_pecans.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnickeringBear (talk • contribs) 22:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The photo which SnickeringBear identified as a persimmon tree has born pecans for over 20 years, visible from my front door. I will reinstate the photo in the Pecan article. Pete unseth (talk) 13:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sindhi folklore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Pete unseth. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spanish language billboard in Dallas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Pete unseth. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Hello, Pete unseth. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Hello, Pete unseth. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.diu.edu/documents/gialens/Vol11-3/Unseth-WPs.pdf, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Translators of the Bible into English who were not native speakers, which you created, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:Translators of the Bible into English. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Be sure to sign your Keep vote at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#Category:Esperanto speakers of Jewish descent. Whether we agree or not on my nomination, I want to make sure your input is considered! RevelationDirect (talk) 22:57, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Names and titles of God in the New Testament has been nominated for deletion. As this is an article you may have an interest in, you are invited to comment at [2]. PiCo (talk) 08:59, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Youtube links in any article are general prohibited unless there is a damn good reason - and I mean a damn good reason - why they should be allowed to stand. In this case, your youtube link provides nothing per se that wasn't already in the article to begin with. By contrast, we had a link in the article Ted Briggs that cited a youtube video with an interview given by Briggs on his account of the sinking of the battlecruiser HMS Hood, and since the information wass from a survivor of the battle was judged to contribute to the article by both showing the man and allowing him to recount the details of battle from his perspective. Additionally, Nevada holds a bronze star for featured status, so us MILHIST guys are usually very picky about what we accept when people edit the articles (and I mean that factually, not judgmentally). If you can show that the youtube link you want to add would add something important, meaningful, or otherwise necessary to the article that isn't already there, go ahead and bring it up on the article's talk page, otherwise I'd think it best if the link remained out of the article since Wikipedia's youtube policy is that articles should generally not include youtube links unless the link forms a vital part of article (such as having a link to youtube in the article on youtube). TomStar81 (Talk) 08:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nora Stone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 8 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yoruba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file you uploaded, File:Money cant buy happiness.png, has been listed at Files for Deletion. I recently deleted the file from the one article it was listed in because the article has way too many photos for its length and this image was the blurriest image in the file. Outside of that article, I can't see an apparent use for the file, and combined with its lower resolution, I listed the file at FfD. Please feel free to comment on the file's deletion discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 21:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC) :Wrong forum. It's listed at the Commons deletion requests now. Hog Farm (talk) 22:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC) Withdrawn. Sorry about the mess. Hog Farm (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merry Christmas to you and best wishes for the new decade! Hog Farm (talk) 04:59, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glossary of rail transport terms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shoofly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Sutherland Rattray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adinkra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would like very much use this jpg in the Esperanto version of the article about Ethnologue. Would be kind to add it there. User:Alifono

Stop inserting variations on the word "Marxism" into the Cullors biography. A great deal of discussion on the topic has already taken place. You appear to be interested in the word used as a dismissive label, which is a big part of the complaint about it in past discussions. Binksternet (talk) 22:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:English & Spanish alcohol warning sign.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Book censorship in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antifa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Digraphia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sindhi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Named military operations in World War II has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Pete, it appears as if you added Sara Petrollino's grammar to the bibliography although it was already there. Now we have it twice. Was that a mistake or did you have a reason for that? Warm greetings, Andreas - Landroving Linguist (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My mistake, thanks for pointing it out.Pete unseth (talk) 17:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:People for whom the U.S. Navy named ships has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:36, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In reference to names that she went by, one was Boinaiv, Shoshoni for "Grass Child," which was handed down to her via her grandmother, who also was named Boinaiv for her fascination with the tall grasses moving in the wind like the waves of the ocean.

Also, Sacajawea/Sacagawea/Sakakawea are all different spellings of her name.

1. "Sacajawea" was first used by George Shannon, a 17 year old member of the Lewis and Clark Expedition.

2. In the journals of Lewis and Clark about their expedition, they used different ways of spelling her name, such as "Sa-car-gar-wea," and more prevalent, "Sacagawea". Subsequently, the National Park Service adopted this spelling, as it was most commonly chosen across the nation. This version is also a Shoshoni word, meaning "Boat Launcher," for her skill and deftness in launching and guiding a Mandan bull boat.

3. The third spelling, "Sakakawea," was used by the peoples in and around the Hidatsa territory/tribe, which means "Bird Woman". It is a Hidatsa word, "Sakaka" meaning "bird," and "wea" meaning "woman". ShayneJayce (talk) 03:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Mbiti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Healey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unfortunately, your addition to this article was somewhat done in a somewhat inept way, since the title of what you added is debunking "The medieval chastity belt", while serious 20th-century scholarship came to the conclusion that chastity belts were much more of a Renaissance phenomenon than medieval, which creates a disconnect of sources talking past each other. See towards the bottom of Talk:Chastity_belt/Archive_1 for previous comments on this issue... AnonMoos (talk) 23:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bock (bagpipe), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blata.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Angelo Traina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is sourced to one brief mention in a highly specific source on bible translators that credits the subject with being one of two translators on a version of the bible. This seems insufficient under WP:ACADEMIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Christian counselors and psychologists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 10:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited N.S. Puleng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parallelism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 09:57, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of slaves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bannerman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, you are right, that sort of source is not acceptable; Wikipedia views self-published sources as not meeting WP:RS, so we simply can't use them. The only exception would be if such a book were itself to become notable for some reason (a scandal or a lawsuit perhaps), and had been discussed in multiple reliable sources itself. I've never heard of such a case but it must be possible.

On the neighbouring sentences not being cited, the article is in fact fully-cited, and the text is then summarized in a lead section which does not repeat the article's citations (I guess if we didn't have that policy, we'd repeat all the citations in the lead, which would certainly reduce some of the IP editing we get there, and would make copying and citing a "main" article summary in other articles a deal easier, but that isn't the policy at the moment). Anyway, if there were uncited materials there, that would be a cause for seeking reliable sources, not for adding sources not in that category. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you please stop, you can't add a 'new' source, even if it is actually reliable (which has not been demonstrated). The lead is only a summary, we do not add anything "new" there, specially not already established claims cited vaguely to the entire book! Your editing is becoming disruptive here. It looks as if you are trying to "sell" the book, too, which is forbidden. Please stop. Chiswick Chap (talk) 02:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, genuinely trying to be helpful. Only trying to cite relevant, overlooked source. Amicably, Pete unseth (talk) 14:15, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Many thanks. I suspect that the book won't tell us much that the article doesn't say already, but if it's going to, then it needs to be in the main text and cited to page. I'd not heard of the publisher (before the self-published edition) but it seems to be bone fide. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pete! With respect to this edit, short descriptions are not meant to be a definition and should in most cases be shorter than 40 characters. This short description was twice that length. As the purpose of a short description is just for a reader to check that they understand the topic of an article, I fail to see what scope information is not conveyed by "LGBT terminology". What else might a person reading "Straightwashing: LGBT terminology" think the article is about? What other information do they need to have before clicking on the link to identify if they are clicking on the right topic? — Bilorv (talk) 20:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Diplomats who were scholars where they worked has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. gidonb (talk) 05:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christianity and homosexuality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Reformed Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:10 Books that Screwed up the World has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 23:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metu, Ethiopia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orthodox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Academics who falsely claimed Native American ancestry indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see you posted to the talk page. It looks like a pretty terrible article. Probably needs TNT. I’ve taken it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America. Doug Weller talk 20:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Academics who falsely claimed minority ancestry has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MediaKill13 (talk) 10:21, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I see you restored the category to Elizabeth Warren's page. I'd just like to elaborate on why I felt it was not appropriate. WP:BLPCAT states: Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources. The name of the category you created is "Academics who falsely claimed minority ancestry". The problem with this is that I haven't seen a reliable source which states that she "falsely claimed minority ancestry." Sure, I've seen reliable sources affirming that she is not a member of a tribe, and that she should not be considered 'racially' Native American. But I haven't seen any source debunking the idea that she had a Native American ancestor, which is what your category name is saying. As to whether I would support renaming to "incorrectly", that doesn't solve the issue that she could indeed have a Native American ancestor somewhere. In any case, I wouldn't want to consider renaming until the deletion discussion is complete, because of the other issues with the category that I noted when listing it for discussion. Regards, MediaKill13 (talk) 10:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of massacres in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decimation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've sorted it alphabetically (ish), but what it should be sorted by is by last name (i.e. WP:SORTKEY) for most of those, i.e. Doyle, Hume, The Inklings, Jonson, Kant, Loneger, Rand, etc... Great list btw. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Journals about philosophers and Category:Periodicals about writers probably contain more entries as well. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angela Murdaugh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hidalgo County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ethnologue.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited African divination, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adynaton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please my response to you at Talk:Food_desert#Shoplifting.

Thank you.

SquirrelHill1971 (talk) 21:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Thank you for your edits on the food deserts article. I drafted some content to add to the "Causes of food deserts" section of the "Food Desert" article; however, because food deserts are primarily a Western concept, all the sources I found only gave potential causes of food deserts in the U.S. I also plan to create a new article titled "Food Deserts in the US" using some of the sections of the existing parent article (such as the initiatives section); would you recommend I add my drafted "causes" section into the existing "Food Desert" article or move it to the new article that focuses on the U.S? You can view my drafted section in my sandbox (User:Cd631874/Food desert). Thank you!!Cd631874 (talk) 03:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Black composers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Black aviators has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duncan Williamson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adynaton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sumerian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]