Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedias and fansites are not acceptable or reliable sources. The Cambridge Dictionary doesn't mention a 'palladium jubilee'.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Palladium jubilee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Palladium jubilee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Peter Ormond! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Unbroken Chain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not sure that this merits an article but what I am sure of is that the phrase "It was better known as her "annus horribilis" - one of the most difficult periods of her reign – as her chidren’s marriages were in tatters and public opinion turned against the Royals" is a direct quote adding the word family doesn't change that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Unbroken Chain (talk) 01:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 11:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Peter Ormond! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I'm not a huge Royals or royalty person, but Queen Elizabeth II's Jubilees are typically fairly notable since even someone like myself, who doesn't go out of their way to consume media about them has heard of it. I left a message on the royalty WikiProject, which focuses on royalty related articles on Wikipedia, about the article and yourself. Hopefully someone can help you flesh it out! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:08, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Unbroken Chain (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Peter Ormond, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		For diligent work on the new article: Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II. AussieWikiDan (talk) 05:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! It means a lot. Peter Ormond (talk) 08:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

This topic likely results from [[WP:CITOGENESIS citogenesis]], and references should be found before this topic was mentioned on Wikipedia, in this case May 2019.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Palladium jubilee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Palladium jubilee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 13:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I stumbled across this...[1] and can't quite think how to factor it into the article that you've worked so hard on. All the best! No Swan So Fine (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have added. Check if it is fine. Thank you. :) Peter Ormond (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks wonderful, thank you. I like the new title, it's an unofficial/official concept anyway! No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Glad you like it. :) Peter Ormond (talk) 11:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peter, thank you so much for your incredible and relentless royal work over the last year, and the last week in particular. No Swan So Fine (talk) 13:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your many contributions are also very much appreciated. Thanks! Peter Ormond 💬 18:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For continued excellence in the editing of the article regarding the Death and funeral of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. XxLuckyCxX (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much! Peter Ormond (talk) 16:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This is a superb article. Thank you so much for making Wikipedia better. ◦ Trey Maturin 17:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Trey Maturin: Thanks a ton! It means a lot. 😊 Peter Ormond 💬 21:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the future, we'll need an RFC covering all the 'former' monarchy articles that had Elizabeth II as their only monarch. Basically a re-do of the August 2021 RFC, only with Barbados added. Gotta get'em in sync, be it Monarchy of country or Queen of country. I don't really care which, just as long as 'one' is adopted for all of them. GoodDay (talk) 05:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The RM at Monarchy of Barbados has been closed as no move, which goes opposite of the August 2021 RM. It's likely that the RM at Queen of Nigeria will be closed as no move, which goes along with the August 2021 RM. These two articles-in-question are basically the same articles - monarchies that had (will have) only 'one' monarch. So, why are we getting different results? Scratching my head, over the likely different outcomes. GoodDay (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think the August 2021 RM should be again opened. And if an independent monarchy existed in that country before, then parenthetical disambiguation of years (e.g. Monarchy of Nigeria (1960–1963)) should be used for the Elizabethan monarchy. Peter Ormond 💬 05:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agreed, also Monarchy of Fiji needs to be split into two articles. GoodDay (talk) 05:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think it should be split into Tui Viti and Monarchy of Fiji (1970–1987). The content about Cakobau's reign is not so great, so I don't think it deserves a stand-alone monarchy article. It could be mentioned at Tui Viti. The Elizabethan monarchy could be covered at Monarchy of Fiji (1970–1987). Also, the Fijian chiefs still recognising The Queen as Tui Viti even after the 1987 coup, can also be covered at Tui Viti. Peter Ormond 💬 05:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agreed. GoodDay (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Holy smokes, I think my big plea on November 4, got the ball rolling for the Nigerian monarchy article's name. Congrats, now 'many more' to go :) GoodDay (talk) 17:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Queen of Sierra Leone and Queen of Tanganyika are ready for a move. Peter Ormond 💬 17:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure if it'll help. But, I went through a nervous breakdown that lasted for two months. If you look at my contribs history (this year) you'll know 'when'. Among my many phobias is my 'mortality'. Being an atheist, it's something that can be overwhelming. GoodDay (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Peter, all the very best to you. WP (although it can be frustrating) is to a degree a community. We become acquainted here and there. Take it easy. Errantius (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Content you added to the above articles appears to have been copied from the BBC website and the Government of Saint Lucia website, neither of which are released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, most of the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Diannaa: Could you email me the thing which you removed from Golden Jubilee of Elizabeth II. Thank you. Peter Ormond 💬 21:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

YGM— Diannaa (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your edit to Draft:State visit by Elizabeth II to Saudi Arabia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Diannaa: You can see I have got copyright problems for some of my edits. I haven't got a high proficiency in English, so I cannot completely write the text in my own words. Please tell me who to turn to on Wikipedia for help. Also, please email me the full source of the draft as it appeared at 21:02 revision. Peter Ormond 💬 21:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Content has to be written in your own words and not include any wording from the source material. One thing I find that works for me is to read over the source material and then pretend I am verbally describing the topic to a friend in my own words. Stuff should also be presented in a different order where possible. Summarize rather than paraphrase. This will typically result in your version being much shorter than the source document. There's some reading material on this topic at Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing and/or have a look at the material at Paraphrase: Write It in Your Own Words. Check out the links in the menu on the left for some exercises to try. Or study this module aimed at WikiEd students.

Please don't add copyright content to Wikipedia, not even temporarily for editing. Please do your amendments before you save the page, or use an external editor such as Microsoft Word or Google Docs and work on it there until you are sure it's completely original. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 23:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I hope you enjoyed your stay in my Guest Room.
Here is a refreshing Icee as a thank you, complimentary.
Visiting my Guest Room also means you've gained a new talk page watcher!
––FormalDude ^talk 07:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure how to handle Barbados, in that article. GoodDay (talk) 05:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Check if it's fine. Peter Ormond 💬 06:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Peter Ormond, I took the Canadian GG out of the G20 box, but left the Australian in, because of the Australian head of state dispute. I personally don't know enough about the Australian situation to comment, so I left it in. Will be interesting to see if anyone responds to either of our deletions. ;) Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 18:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Mr Serjeant Buzfuz! It was decided by an RfC that we should refer to The Queen as head of state of Australia, on Wikipedia. :) Peter Ormond 💬 18:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was not aware of that, thank you! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 19:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't know if an RFC is required, concerning categories & sub-categories. But, I'm planning on one, as many of the commonwealth realm governors-general have 'head of state of their countries' in such categories & sub-categories. I was reverted by an editor at the governors-general of Australia category, for example. GoodDay (talk) 21:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We already have the 2016 RfC concerning Australia, and there is no "head of state dispute" in any other Commonwealth realm. So, I don't think there's a need for any new RfC. I suggest you should start the work in Categories and Sub-categories. Peter Ormond 💬 21:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peter & @Mr Serjeant Buzfuz:, I agree. But, editor StAnselm, appears to resist. GoodDay (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

StAnselm says, "POV edit which would require consensus." Tell him of the already established consensus.[2] Peter Ormond 💬 22:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

He doesn't think the categories & sub-categories are covered by it. PS - You'll note, he's one of the 'tiny few' who were against the Australian monarch being described as Australia's head of state, in the 2016 RFC. GoodDay (talk) 22:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They you may open a new RfC regarding categories & sub-categories. But I think it's entirely unnecessary and a waste of time. Peter Ormond 💬 22:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree with you, that it would be a waste of time. PS - You can speak to him if you want, to avoid the headache. I've just contacted him, second ago. GoodDay (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've completed the removals from the categories. GoodDay (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for that! :) Peter Ormond 💬 03:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Season's Greetings
		Here's wishing you a marvellous holiday and the best of 2022 Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Happy Holidays and have a healthy and prosperous new year. Peter Ormond 💬 01:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you please check for any errors in the article Royal Indian Air Force (if not removed). Cookersweet (talk) 18:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So nice of you to help me! Utkarsh555 (talk) 09:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Utkarsh555: My pleasure! Peter Ormond 💬 11:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey PO, I saw you created Category:1962 disestablishments in Tanganyika using the autopopulate template; that template adds the cat you created to other categories, two of which do not exist. Do you plan to create those additional two categories (and additional ones that they may be in once created), or do you expect other editors to do tht work? Thanks in in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@UnitedStatesian: Check the cats now. Peter Ormond 💬 15:36, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All look good, thank you so much. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Peter Ormond. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Commonwealth Mace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much for help! Love + Respect from India! (6 days prior to my own B'Day😁) Utkarsh555 (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you and happy birthday in advance! Peter Ormond 💬 04:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Commonwealth Barnstar of Merit
		Completed this forgotten barnstar in order to present it to you in recognition of your extensive contributions to the article for the Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II. These are greatly appreciated. thorpewilliam (talk) 04:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Thorpewilliam: Thank you so much, friend! I'm greatly humbled and grateful to you for this recognition. I will continue to make good contributions to Commonwealth-related articles as I have been doing since I joined this encyclopedia. I thank you from a full heart. ❤ Peter Ormond 💬 08:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peter Ormond You're welcome, mate! Glad to hear you'll keep it up. thorpewilliam (talk) 10:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

May I second that with my own sword tapping? Stunning work on the Jubilee trees today. No Swan So Fine (talk) 13:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey you mind if I use a couple of your user boxes, I'm making a decent looking user page for myself.

Regards TheEditorInChiefofAU (talk) 08:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Of course, you can! Good luck! Peter Ormond 💬 11:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Peter Ormond

Thank you for creating Royal tours of Antigua and Barbuda.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

From one commonwealth (British) citizen to another, I think your user page is great.

Have a nice day -Mugtheboss. Mugtheboss (talk) 20:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! Well I don't think it is great, but I am delighted that you liked it. Feel free to use any of those userboxes or any other ideas, if you want. :) Peter Ormond 💬 20:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 2 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I ain't disputing ya, but who are the 55th & 56th members of the Commonwealth? I'm guessing these additions occurred during the government heads meeting. GoodDay (talk) 17:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Togo and Gabon. Peter Ormond 💬 17:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Peter hope all is well - Am wondering if you can tell me how your phone displays these 2 duplicate articles 1 & 2 - Do you see any difference / issues, other than the images coming before the table on (1) as opposed to the images coming behind the table on (2) - Thanks - FOX 52 ^talk! 01:16, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi FOX! I don't see any issue apart from the placing of images. Only the names of some aircraft are different (although they link to the same page). Regards, Peter Ormond 💬 01:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you appreciate your input - FOX 52 ^talk! 01:52, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can use ((GWOIA)) now. I can export them to Commons if necessary. Mike Rohsopht (talk) 06:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Similar photos:[3] [4][5]--Mike Rohsopht (talk) 07:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, so much Mike Rohsopht! :) Peter Ormond 💬 12:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nova Scotia Platinum Jubilee Medal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Everything alright, Peter? You ain't been around the old 'pedia, for a few days now. GoodDay (talk) 14:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was really stressed and needed a short break. I'm back now. Thanks for your concern. :) Peter Ormond 💬 12:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. When the RfD has run its course & depending on its result. I'm going to propose changing the 14 redirects, into their own pages. Just not sure, where I would need to make that proposal. PS - I realise that we don't need those 14 redirects changed to pages, instantly. One at a time, would likely be the best way :) GoodDay (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think only Canada, Australia, and New Zealand merit their own succession pages if the proposal gets support. Peter Ormond 💬 19:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I too believe, those would be the primary ones. The 11 others would later be changed, if those 3 were. GoodDay (talk) 19:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I figured I'd avoid any future disputes over which countries to list in the leads of those pages. Why are Elizabeth II's Diamond & Platinum Jubilees treated differently from her Silver & Golden Jubilees? Two show "United Kingdom and the other Commonwealth realms", while two don't. GoodDay (talk) 07:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consistent now? Peter Ormond 💬 07:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yup & remember, Queen isn't a part of her name, which is why "Queen Elizabeth II" is proper, just like President isn't a part of Biden's name, which is why "President Joe Biden" is proper :) GoodDay (talk) 07:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jerusalem on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Trans woman on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:The Queen smiling.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/queen-elizabeth-ii-visits-the-floriade-flower-festival-on-news-photo/129686912?adppopup=true. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 14:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jinnah, GG of Pakistan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 18:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Reactions to the death of Elizabeth II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an unsourced and inappropriate content fork.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! You seem to have an interest in the recent death of Elizabeth II, so I wanted to invite to the WikiProject of Current Events new task force The London Bridge Task Force, which will be working on improving all the articles around the death of Elizabeth II. A task force is similar to a WikiProject, which is where you can communicate with other editors who all have the same goal, which is improving all the articles around a specific topic. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When adding dignitaries to List of dignitaries at the state funeral of Elizabeth II make sure to add a source and to specifically name and link the individual. Example would be please don't simply add 'President of Hungary', please add the specific officeholder such as Katalin Novák, President of Hungary. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:19, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, there. I just thought I would let you know that the reason I added the photos of some leaders to the Reactions to the death of Elizabeth II article was to make the article more "visually appealing" I suppose, as much of the article is a long list of names (hence why some sections I had previously paragraphed). Do you reckon that we could possibly add some photos back or do something to change the fact that the article is a super long and unattractive-looking list? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:10, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have added few pics. We should add pictures related to the event (such as people signing condolence books), not portraits of some politicians which makes the article look very awkward. Peter Ormond 💬 05:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Of course. Also, please ensure that you cite references properly and not just put in the link. Thanks. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 06:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Canadian Parliament illumination for the Queen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 00:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you upload this here instead of at c:? Seems like it would be fine per c:Commons:Freedom of panorama. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhodesia ten shillings 1968.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhodesia one pound 1968.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhodesia five pounds 1966.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UDI signing.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reckon we're gonna be stuck with Barbados in Elizabeth II's entry at the List of longest-reigning monarchs page. GoodDay (talk) 00:36, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FWIW, I've no objections to your proposed change at List of dignitaries at the state funeral of Elizabeth II. But, I know there might be resistance to highlighting only the UK. GoodDay (talk) 19:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I highlighted the UK because that's where her funeral and internment took place. If there is resistance to it, then the UK could also be grouped under "Commonwealth realms". Peter Ormond 💬 19:41, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'd oppose grouping the UK under "Commonwealth realms", as it's the main realm in the entire page. Indeed, the realm where the very death & state funeral-in-question, occurred. GoodDay (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Take a peek at the latest developments. GoodDay (talk) 21:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, you reverted my addition of a column in the page List of current heirs apparent, but did not explain why you did it. I am assuming it was a good faith edit, but it is more useful if you explain your motivation for reverting the work of others. That way you respect other editors' work and help understand your perspective. Thanks. Thinker78 (talk) 03:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. That column was superfluous, and 15 realms ranging from the Caribbean, Pacific, Europe and the Americas were grouped just under "Europe". Hence, I removed it. Peter Ormond 💬 09:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One thing is being superfluous another thing is that you consider it superfluous. I added the column precisely because I was trying to read about the monarchs according to the region they are in. Maybe you have no use for such functionality, but I did. And likewise, probably other editors would find that filter useful as well. Therefore it was not superfluous.

Regarding the realms of the British monarch outside of Europe, he is head of state there due to the British colonization. It would be misleading to have listed the British monarch as monarch of each one of those individual realms like if he was a native monarch of those places.

They do belong to the Commonwealth of Nations. Although in theory each one of them is free and equal, the fact is they have as monarch someone not native of their nation. Jamaica doesn't have a Jamaican monarch, they have a British monarch. Likewise for the rest of them. Therefore it makes sense listing all the nations where the British monarch is head of state as under Europe, because they have a European monarch. Thinker78 (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Queen's Service Order you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 20:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 annexation referendums in Russian-occupied Ukraine on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Peter Ormond, hope you are doing well. Just wanted to let you know that I had to revert your recent edit on Diana, Princess of Wales, because it seems that a consensus is needed with regards to how reigning former spouses of deceased or divorced individuals need to be listed in their respective infoboxes. I have started a discussion on the article's talk page with pages that use different methods and you are welcome to share your opinion or add other examples. I will be looking forward to your feedback. Cheers. Keivan.f^Talk 23:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Keivan.f. I'm good and hope you are doing great too. I don't have a strong preference for any option as long as the form of spouse's name is consistent across all pages. Thanks for opening the discussion, and thank you for your tireless work during the last month in particular. :) Peter Ormond 💬 19:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		Thank you for cleaning up all of those Commonwealth pages from inappropriate references to His Majesty. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 23:06, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you Mr Serjeant Buzfuz! Peter Ormond 💬 00:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've reported AaaronLestonBaptiste to WP:AN, due to his unconstructive edits to several related pages. GoodDay (talk) 23:16, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. And something needs to be done with CandyStalnak as well. Peter Ormond 💬 00:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

From what I can tell, CandyStalnak will eventually be reported to WP:ANI. He's increasingly annoying long-term established editors. GoodDay (talk) 00:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

sock? Peter Ormond 💬 00:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I believe so. GoodDay (talk) 01:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Elizabeth II for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. John (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, your recent change on the House of Windsor page was unnecessary. The photo used before you reverted it was much better, and he was looking at the camera. By you changing the photo, you had extended a problem that had long been over. Please do not change the photo once more, the photo there is currently a temporary fix due to a culprit that changed it. I reverted the edit and the photo before the one you'd uploaded is now up. Please note that the photo there now is the temporary and will be changed once The Royal Family has released an official picture/portrait. Please refrain from changing it again, unless consensus is made on the talk page.

If you have any questions or concerns please find my talk page.

BillClinternet (talk) 23:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That image was used at List of British monarchs, so I used it at House of Windsor for the sake of consistency. And there is no discussion on the talk page about your preferred picture to be used. You have no right to issue warnings as it is you who is edit-warring and forcing your things into the article without discussing at the article's talk page. Peter Ormond 💬 10:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charles, Prince of Wales in NZ.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Howdy, I restored my changes to the intro of the Coronation of Elizabeth II page & also took care of the repetition concerns. In the meantime, if you still oppose the changes? I'll open an RFC on both Elizabeth II's & Charles III's coronation pages. IMHO, they should be the same, concerning the UK & the other Commonwealth realms. PS - Liz had the UK & six others, where's Chuck has the UK & 14 others, of course. GoodDay (talk) 06:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Please don't make any changes when the discussion is not over. The Queen's case (and that of her successors) is different from her predecessors. At the coronation in 1953, the Queen was the first monarch to be crowned with separate titles in each of her then-seven realms. Coronation Contingents and fleet review ships were sent from every realm, and guard was held at Buckingham Palace by troops of every realm. And each realm's Coronation Standard was marched in the procession. Every realm was represented at the ceremony. Removing all the realms and substituting it with "UK and six other Commonwealth realms" is WP:UNDUE. As far as consistency is concerned, the King also has a separate title in each of his 15 realms, like his mother. When sources appear listing the King's realms at his coronation, then we can add them. Opening an RfC will just be a waste of time as the King's coronation has not been held yet, and even if the RfC is held I'm sure ill-informed editors will vote for a nonsense proposal without knowing the above stated facts. Peter Ormond 💬 20:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And if you like consistency so much, then please restore the text of all the proclamations at Proclamation of accession of Elizabeth II, to make the article consistent with Proclamation of accession of Charles III. The proclamations at the Queen's article were removed citing WP:NOTMIRROR, but I can't figure out why that doesn't apply to the King's article. Peter Ormond 💬 20:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm going to open up an RFC at WP:ROY concerning both Elizabeth II's & Charles III's coronation intros. We can't ignore that the coronations took place in the United Kingdom & that the UK was announced first in the coronation oath. In the meantime, I will leave the intros different in both pages, as to 'highlight' the RFC's requirement. GoodDay (talk) 20:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I haven't ignored that the ceremony took place in the United Kingdom and that the UK was announced first in the coronation oath, as the United Kingdom appears first in the list of realms in my preferred version. Peter Ormond 💬 21:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's been open. One way or the other, the two intros will become consistent. GoodDay (talk) 20:58, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RFC was closed & so I implemented the change to Coronation of Elizabeth II, to match with Charles III's coronation intro, via the RFC decision. GoodDay (talk) 00:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Howdy Peter. Even though the WP:ROY's RFC tag is about to expire in about a day. I'll hold off from seeking the RFC's closure, for two weeks. In the last few hours, we've had other editors chime in, due to my contacting the Elizabeth II & Charles III pages (which I should've thought of, at the beginning) for more input. GoodDay (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Peter, wondering if you can chime in here, just looking for a different perspective. - cheers FOX 52 ^talk! 22:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Just in case you missed it, there's a task force up at WP:CIII which you may be interested in. There is, of course, no obligation to participate, but if you do, it is very much appreciated.

Best wishes, Tim O'Doherty (talk) 17:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Overall I think your edits to this article an improvement, Peter, but you didn't leave an edit summary for either of your major changes. It's quite alarming to see -3000 with no reason given, so I'd encourage you to leave a summary in the future. A.D.Hope (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will keep that in mind. Thanks. Peter Ormond 💬 10:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem, and thank you again for the edits. They really have made the article better! A.D.Hope (talk) 16:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Christian IV reigned for over 59 years. This is an absolute, uncontentious historical fact. You have misread and misunderstood the source. DrKay (talk) 06:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My bad. Thank you for correcting me. Peter Ormond 💬 07:33, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Fixed penalty notice on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Queen of Pakistan letter to King of Iraq.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
46		Wedding of Prince Willem-Alexander and Máxima Zorreguieta Cerruti (talk)	Add sources
427		Chevrolet Traverse (talk)	Add sources
12		Willi und die Windzors (talk)	Add sources
982		Frederik IX of Denmark (talk)	Add sources
453		Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld (talk)	Add sources
86		Kingdom of Fiji (talk)	Add sources
5,829		Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (talk)	Cleanup
384		Queen Mathilde of Belgium (talk)	Cleanup
12		Dom language (talk)	Cleanup
56		Sandline affair (talk)	Expand
18		Queen's Anniversary Prize (talk)	Expand
9		Index of Greenland-related articles (talk)	Expand
2,792		Parliamentary system (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,625		Monarchy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
116		Temple name (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
309		Kingdom of Bosnia (talk)	Merge
34		Intel 80188 (talk)	Merge
126		Scalar projection (talk)	Merge
20		Regalia of Romania (talk)	Wikify
2,151		Abdul Taib Mahmud (talk)	Wikify
56		Irish Republican Army–Abwehr collaboration (talk)	Wikify
4		Behkadeh Raji (talk)	Orphan
3		Anthony Trimingham (talk)	Orphan
1		Arnold B. Heine (talk)	Orphan
14		The Prince's School of Traditional Arts (talk)	Stub
39		North Greenland (talk)	Stub
5		Prince of Wales Prize for Municipal Heritage Leadership (talk)	Stub
5		Youth Business Scotland (talk)	Stub
6		New Generation Party (Papua New Guinea) (talk)	Stub
2		Sharq (magazine) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Barbenheimer on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Switzerland on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Speaker of the United States House of Representatives on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hamas on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hamas on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mike Johnson (Louisiana politician) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2023 Lewiston shootings on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Yom Kippur War on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Otzma Yehudit on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Clarence Thomas on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of hereditary peers removed under the House of Lords Act 1999 on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, ¿why redirect the article, and not leave it independently, because it will have encyclopedic value as time goes by, brother? Lmpesantezt (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Lmpesantezt. The information regarding King Frederik's proclamation is already covered and is within the scope of the article regarding Queen Daisy's abdication. Therefore a separate article for a mere announcement of accession by Mette Frederiksen is not justified, and per WP:SAMETYPEFORK: "the more recent article should be merged into the main article". Peter Ormond 💬 22:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

....... Then keep it there until it has encyclopedic scope of utmost importance when the moment comes after the proclamation when it is an article highly valuable independent of the main article Lmpesantezt (talk) 04:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For such bold move, I suggest you take input from other editors either at Talk:Frederik, Crown Prince of Denmark or Talk:Abdication of Margrethe II. Peter Ormond 💬 05:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, are the prime ministers of Tuvalu and Solomon Islands really appointed by the Crown? I cannot find this from their Constitutions. 219.79.89.205 (talk) 08:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Schedule 2 of both the Consitution of Tuvalu and the Constitution of Solomon Islands highlights the role of the governor-general (the representative of the Crown) in the appointment of the country's prime minister. The functions of the governor-general under this schedule are performed in his/her own deliberate judgment. Peter Ormond 💬 11:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

From the book The Veiled Sceptre pp145-146: [6]

In the Solomon Islands and Tuvalu, the chief minister is elected by the Members of Parliament from amongst their number. ... . The reason why South Pacific countries diverged from the Westminster practice of the Prime Minister being appointed by the Sovereign or Governor-General was ‘both the underdeveloped state of political parties and the wish to enhance the role and authority of the legislature’.

219.79.89.205 (talk) 08:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In realms which have a party system, the leader of the party (or coalition) with the most seats after an election is received by the governor-general (or the Sovereign in the case of UK), and invited to form a government. The Sovereign or the governor-general, on behalf of The Crown, then appoints the leader as prime minister and administers the required oaths.^[1][2]

In Solomon Islands and Tuvalu, due to the underdeveloped party system, a majority of the members of parliament are elected as 'Independents'. There isn't any party who forms a majority so that its leader be appointed prime minister. Because of this, it is the elected members of parliament who elect the prime minister, and this happens during an election meeting presided over and conducted by the governor-general.^[3] After the election, the governor-general announces the result, and declares the winner to have been elected prime minister.^[4]

So, even though the prime ministers of Solomon Islands and Tuvalu are elected by parliament, it is the governor-general who formally swears in the prime minister.^[5] In Papua New Guinea, the governor-general himself is elected by parliament, but it is the Sovereign who formally appoints him to the office.^[6] Peter Ormond 💬 08:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]