1, 2

Welcome to my talk page. This operates as a normal talk page: you write a message, I reply. After a while I tend to delete items that have been dealt with,* such as notices, complaints and old issues. I do tend to keep nice things around for much longer, so keep that in mind. (*I started archiving in May 2021! There is a two-year gap in archiving that my secretary hasn't been able to explain.)

Despite your previous assumption, I am not Will Graham. He is a notable figure in the tattoo industry in Canada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fauxkingmedia (talk • contribs) 23:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. It was this page that made me think you were. Is Fauxkingmedia a play on words or a company? Paid editing on Wikipedia needs to be declared. --- Possibly ☎ 23:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fauxkingmedia: Also, please don't revert my edits to that page. You cannot have a list of external links in the article that link to his tattoo businesses. It is considered to be advertising. I have edited thousands of articles, you would be wise to accept my help, as I am correcting things that will prevent the publication of the article. --- Possibly ☎ 23:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may recall that when we discussed this a few months ago, I promised to get a few pictures while I was down for Homecoming. Well...I did. :-) Have a look at Commons, but I think the one currently in the article is the best by far. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have been away from Wiki for about 5 years, so I am a little rusty!

Thank you for your professional assistance, especially with the COI issue.

I appreciate your help.

Best wishes, Andrewincowtown (talk) 17:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since you created the article about the contemporary art museum in Lima and you helped me with the contemporary art museum in Bogota, maybe you would be interested in this draft, I don't know if I should submit it for review or add more content, what do you think?--Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 22:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job! Museums of that size are notable. I moved it to article space. --- Possibly ☎ 23:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Possibly: Thank you for approving my draft, some time ago I did an article about a fine arts museum in Argentina, it is called Provincial Museum of Fine Arts "Dr. Pedro E. Martínez" it is in the city of Paraná, I also plan to do another article about the Provincial Museum of Fine Arts "Dr. Juan R. Vidal" in Corrientes, by the way, the MACBA article could be considered as "start-class"?--Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 23:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JSeb05: yes I just marked it as start class, using the rater tool. See the edit history of the talk page. These are good articles, you do not need to ask anyone if they are good enough. Just use the Page menu at top and click "move" to Article space! --- Possibly ☎ 01:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your work on the entry for my work as an artist. Just yesterday someone alerted me to the fact that I now have a page on Wikipedia, and I am very pleased to have finally made it! I'm inexperienced with Wikipedia and not very familiar with the etiquette, so forgive me if I'm going about this all wrong. As far as I can tell, someone made an entry back in 2020 which was rejected, and you then picked up the ball and ran with it to get the page up, which I gather from your info is something you regularly do. I note that you prioritise women artists in your searches, which is great. I made two simple factual corrections myself (I have dual nationality, and the year of my Berlin show was incorrect), but there is a slightly more complex issue which I assume it would be unethical for me to change, so I'm wondering if you could correct when you have time. If you don't have the time or the inclination, don't worry, I'll try to get someone else to do it. In the penultimate paragraph, there is conflation between two projects I did with transplant patients. Both were collaborations with (now deceased) photographer Tim Wainwright... Transplant was the first project, done in 2008-9, after a year-long residency in the heart and lung transplant centre at Harefield Hospital near London. This resulted in an installation, book, radio piece, and various other outputs detailed here: http://www.sensitivebrigade.com/Transplant.htm Transplant and Life was a separate project, done in 2016-17, after a residency with abdominal (liver, kidney, pancreas) transplant patients at the Royal Free Hospital in London. (We also revisited some of the heart and lung transplant recipients from the first project as part of T&L.) The main output from this was the exhibition at the Hunterian Museum, and it is that exhibition that the Lancet review is talking about: http://www.sensitivebrigade.com/Transplant_and_Life.htm After Tim died in 2018, I made a 90 minute video installation from our visual and sonic materials from this project for Science Gallery London, in 2019. http://www.sensitivebrigade.com/Birds.htm

And finally - again no problem if you don't have the time or inclination or if adding to an article is not something the subject can or should request - the article mentions two projects with endangered languages but only describes one, Hearing Voices. The other one was with speakers of one of Canada's endangered indigenous languages, and it showed twice at the Museum of Anthropology in Vancouver as well as at the Surrey Art Gallery and the 'Ksan cultural centre, close to the Kispiox reserve in Gitxsan territory. http://www.sensitivebrigade.com/Anspayaxw.htm

Thanks again, and apologies if I'm not conforming to the proper etiquette!

Sensitive Brigade (talk) 10:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please use the Wikipedia:Edit requests process to request changes to a page for which you have a conflict of interest. --- Possibly ☎ 12:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Identity of user Sensitive Brigade confirmed. VRT Ticket No. 2021110210006341 Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 15:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You made a couple of small edits to this draft on September 25th but it has languished in draft state since then. I know drafts can take a long time to get approved, but I'd love to see this one moved out of the draft stage. It is well-researched and heavily sourced. Can you help? Thanks. Brooklinehistory (talk) 11:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Possibly: I hope everything is ok. scope_creep^Talk 12:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda Anderson (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Anderson (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Itcouldbepossible (talk) 09:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Possibly: Hi Mr. Possibly I nominated this for deletion also because it did not go through AfC. ANd I don't think https://mocaga.org/ is a reliable source. It is clearly for promotion as clearly stated here [1]. They specifically want to place their artists in what they call 'a global context'. So that is why I thought that there must be a discussion about this page. You can also give your views in the discussion page. Have a great day and regards. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 09:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Itcouldbepossible, it seems that Possibly may be on a Wiki-break right now. Highly experienced users like Possibly have permissions to bypass AfC. They are well respected for their stubs on artists that are always properly sourced. My suggestion to you is to learn more about the encyclopedia, gain more experience with how things work on WP including deletion guidelines before nominating additional articles so as not to waste the time of volunteer editors. Also, you should not be messing around with other people's templates on their user subpages uninvited as you did here: [2] and here [3]. Netherzone (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Netherzone: Yes, I understand you, but he clearly stated that anyone can edit them, so I don't think there is something wrong in editing the template. And please can you explain me how you can say 'properly sourced' when an article has only 4 references, that too of websites that have been made for promotional purposes? Regards. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 12:42, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Itcouldbepossible thanks for your reply. Their user page states If you have suggestions on how to improve the template, let me know on my talk page, or if you are experienced in such matters, just edit the template!; you are clearly not an experienced editor with only about 90 total edits. The courteous thing to do would have been to make suggestions on this talk page. On the other matter, the four refs substantiate the notable museum collections, and are not promotional. Netherzone (talk) 12:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Netherzone Ok, but you see many of the articles created by this user has only 4-5 sentences in them. And each of them has been created without Afc. So is that legal considering that an article must have at least a couple of sentences to qualify for an article. Please correct me if I am saying something wrong. Regards. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 13:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the subject of a short "stub" article (see WP:STUB) is notable, per our guidelines for notability (see WP:N) and the sources are reliable (see WP:RS) and verifiable (see WP:V), it's fine. So yes, even very short articles on notable subjects are permitted. The user Possibly has been here for many years and is well respected. They know what they are doing and are trusted by the community for their expertise. They have made tens of thousands of edits to the encyclopedia. Please consider creating content and making improvements to the encyclopedia before rushing in to delete articles - that's just a suggestion. Netherzone (talk) 13:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Netherzone Ok, I take your suggestion. Actually I was a little confused about this article. I had seen many articles, that had little content in it, and got itself deleted. So I thought that a delete discussion must be started on this article. That is why, I did not send it for speedy deletion. I am also confused, about which sources are reliable and which are not. Some articles had many sources, but got deleted because they did not have reliable sources. So that's why I had made an XFD page for this article. Ok, but now I have made this mistake, what is to be done now. Please close the delete discussion, and remove the delete tag from the article. Tell me if I can help in any way. Waiting for your valuable reply. Regards. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 05:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Itcouldbepossible, I am copying this discussion to your talk page, as it seems Possibly is on an extended break. If they come back and want to participate, they will find the rest of the discussion there. Netherzone (talk) 13:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Netherzone As you please. Your are free to use my talk page. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 13:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decision on LA article was KEEP. David notMD (talk) 15:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Possibly, if you are checking your WP mail....I just sent you an email. Hope you are well! Netherzone (talk) 23:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Possibly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saline Valley salt tram, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Possibly: I've not seen or heard from your for more than a month now. Hope you are all right. scope_creep^Talk 09:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello scope_creep, I too am wondering how Possibly is doing, and miss seeing them around. I saw in the message above that there is in old draft of theirs that might get deleted: Draft:Saline Valley salt tram. It would be a shame to see that good work disappear. I made some improvements to it today, adding a source, and the NRHP infobox. I think it's safe to move to main space without concerns about its notability, but wanted to ask what you thought. Netherzone (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Netherzone: Yes he just stopped, which is a bit worrying. I hope he is alright. I posted that Afc. Nice wee article. scope_creep^Talk 15:25, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scope_creep kindly sent the Saline Valley Salt Tram draft to main space just now. Thanks Scope! @Possibly: - you are a rock star, and are very much missed around here! Please let us know how you are doing, if you see this and feel like logging on. I know that sometimes we all need time to ourselves, but I too am a little worried. Netherzone (talk) 15:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@scope_creep. I'm new to this wikipedia editing. I see you were friends with possibility. He was my uncle. He has passed away and will be a memorial service in January if you would like to join.

https://www.legacy.com/ca/obituaries/theglobeandmail/name/daniel-jolliffe-obituary?pid=200715086

My username is helpfuleconomist if you want to reach out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helpfuleconomist (talk • contribs) 05:12, December 23, 2021 (UTC)

repeating ping of user:Scope creep (and adding user:Netherzone) for new user since original attempt failed. Meters (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so deeply saddened to hear of this news. Possibly [ThatMontrealIP] was a brilliant, generous person who tirelessly shared his time, energy and intellect with this community and the readers. I'm too shocked to say much more at this moment other than he was my friend and I will miss him very much. Netherzone (talk) 13:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, such terrible news. Possibly was a highly appreciated and liked fellow editor. Deepest condolences to his family and friends. He will be very much missed here. --bonadea contributions talk 16:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry to hear this. I had noticed Possibly's absence and hoped it would be temporary as he did excellent work here. He will be sorely missed. Spicy (talk) 05:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saline Valley salt tram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 15:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Possibly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clara Wheatley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is already an article on her - Clara Pope so I think it is safe to delete the draft. (It is the same artist, Pope is her maiden name, Wheatley her married name. Any talk page watchers care to weigh in? Netherzone (talk) 19:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Netherzone I think so.. there is no need to keep the draft. This source tells us that both are the same. And anyway, whats up with Possibly? Wish he is ok. ― Itcouldbepossible^Talk 06:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	Bring on the cheer!
	Hi Possibly, May you have a bright and beautiful holiday season, thank you for all the support you have given me over the years, and for everything you have done for women artists, the encyclopedia and the community. Have a happy and healthy 2022, hope to see you around again soon! Netherzone (talk) 17:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Netherzone (talk) 17:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas, Possibly! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 22:55, 21 December 2021 (UTC) [reply]

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

And a Happy New Year!

May your holidays be filled with peace and joy. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Adapted from ((Xmas6)). Spread the cheer by adding ((subst:User:Altamel/Christmas)) to their talk page.