Reply

Hi WikiDan61. Thanks for your concern and for checking up on me - great community ethos. Definitely new at this and I am sure I am making mistakes. Right:

1. You are correct: I thought that as an organisation we might all want to edit nano-related stuff, but I will change this to a reflect it is only my log in, everyone else will be instructed to create their own account if they wish to contribute.

2. I am aware of the potential conflict of interest. I thought my first page would be about what I knew, which is the palce I work. I have put forward what there is in the building and, more importantly, some of the features of the building design. It is (or was) the first of its kind and many organisations have visited to look at features they could incorporate into their own buildings. This is the information I have given. Also, we are an intra-university building and as such are not advertising for people to use us. However, if you (or any other editor) feel that I am not being neutral than please say and I will amend. I have an additional section on the history of the building to write, which will include the lengthy delays in getting it built, floods, snagging and the current loss of performance due to building works next door.

Any comments would be greatly appreciated & I will act on what os suggested

Hi, Pete. I'm glad you took the messages to heart. Neutrality is one of the key concerns at Wikipedia. Writing about what you know is great, but writing about your workplace may not be the best idea because of the difficulty in maintaining neutrality. Regarding your article, it needs references to sources published by someone other than the NSQI itself. (See WP:Primary sources and WP:Reliable sources for relevant guidelines.) Surely either the academic work or the centre's architecture have garnered notice somewhere. External articles should be used as a source of information as much as possible. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:20, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan61. Have added a series of outside references, it was lazy of me not to do so at the beginning. There are a few more to add as additional sections come on line. Better?

How do I get the warning box at the top of the article removed? I take it that it is not for me to remove it...

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Inside the Centre for NSQI.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 13:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]