This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Korjasin väärin käännetyt sanat artikkelista Runeberg's tart. Manteli on englanniksi almond ja rommi rum. JIP | Talk 11:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Kiitos --Pudeo 14:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your recent comment at Talk:Soviet partisans, I do agree with you. You may want to check my proposal at Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability#Index_of_.27sources_of_dubious_reliability.27_needed.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, agreed with that. --Pudeo 19:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Kyllä, olen suomalainen. (löytyykö meseä?)

Kurt.

I reverted the article back to a better version with more content. It just so happened that an image was lost. You're free to put it back in, I was just being careless. Very sorry.

Alexander VII 19:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Either you are very new to WP and don't know what 3RR is (WP:3RR), or this is personal attack. With 2 edits in 24 hours (and in weeks for that matter), 3RR is not even close. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 20:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

One revert more isn't "not even close". I hate those revert wars when people add biased content.. --Pudeo 18:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi, may I ask what happened with this edit? How come a big chunk of the article got cut? I believe there is an unfixed bug with some toolbars [1], maybe that was it?

Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 22:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, I certainly didn't notice that and didn't delete that text. --Pudeo 22:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I had Google spell checker installed and removed it so it probably was it.. --Pudeo 22:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it could be that. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 22:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, I had a look at that. I wondered how countries like Kazakhstan and Somalia (with a capital controlled by Al Qaeda) could be reckoned to be better at "Press Freedom" than Russia. And I found "A truly independent press exists in Russia, but Russia’s poor ranking is justified by the censorship of anything to do with the war in Chechnya, several murders and the recent abduction of the Agence France-Presse correspondent in Ingushetia." So nothing to do with the problem you are discussing. And to claim Alex Bakharev is biased, is plain silly and even bordering on defamotory. He recently increased Deng's block. --Pan Gerwazy 21:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Israeli reports can not be trusted as has been demonstrated by thier claims and high censorship levels.

Do you not know that Israel claims Hezbollah did it and that the UN Secretary-General is racist? By the way the Israeli foreign ministry has asked for volunteers to serf the net and launch a cmpaign to protect Israel. Here is the link.

http://uruknet.info/?p=m25177&hd=0&size=1&l=e

read this on by Wikipedia has an unusually large amount of vandalizing editors deleting facts that are incriminating for Israel...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2289232,00.html

this site is filled with evivence http://angryarab.blogspot.com/

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including ((WPMILHIST Announcements)) there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
• Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
• Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, or periods.
• Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 13:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi,

In my version of Khrushchev's memoirs, there is are no estimate whatsoever. Not 270,000, not one million, nothing at all regarding detailed casualties in the Winter War, only vague estimations "lots of thousands" or things like that. And the book was published 1999, so I have no reasons to think it was censored.

Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 20:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 12:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

On the disc. page you mention that the article would need a few new chapters to reach the level of a proper article. What do you exactly mean, what seems to be lacking ?. -- 84.231.165.135

I left a message concerning the GA nomination on the article talk page. Could you stop by and take a look? RelHistBuff 07:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the Barnstar. --Ilummeen 13:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment, but the nomination has been closed already! :-) Kirill Lokshin 16:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Meh, I don't know enough about WWII aerial warfare to say anything intelligent on the topic. My experience, though, is that he'll likely get bored and leave fairly quickly; if he doesn't, a request to WT:MILHIST and WT:WWII should gather enough outside editors to settle things in short order. Kirill Lokshin 18:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry for "screwing" the template. I noticed before that but i didn't know how to fix it. Could you tell me please how to fix it? I tried looking at your edit's diff but I couldn't find any differences. Your help would be appreciated --Nielswik_(talk) 13:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Aha~ no wonder. I couldn't see space in diff! Thanks --Nielswik_(talk) 14:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Finnish SS arm badges.png. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm headed to look at the Aimo Lahti page and see if I can't edit the grammar for you. I don't know anything about him, but I'm a good proofreader.

Resonanteye 14:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. --Pudeo (Talk) 14:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

I did my best, I took out very very little (one or two phrases that had no relevance and sounded awkward with the grammar) but added a whole lot of "the" and "a". Also I broke a few sentences in order to make reading easier, and added some commas and other punctuation to "smooth out" the text.

Since I don'thave direct knowledge of the topic, it might be good if you checked it to make sure I didn't accidentally change the intended meaning or content of the article in any places. By the way, I found this article really interesting. I've never read anything about those who design weapons before. Resonanteye 14:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

On November 20, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aimo Lahti, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello, Pudeo. It seems to have been established by Arbitration Committee that you are a sockpuppet of a banned disruptive user. Instead of being grateful that no action has been taken against you as yet, I saw you engage in incivility and call your opponents "wikistalinists". Please take a note that neither neonazism nor Holocaust Denial are acceptable in this project. Further outbursts of incivility may lead to blocks. Best, Ghirla ^-трёп- 08:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello, this information that I am supposed to be a sock puppet is new to me. Thanks for noting it to me. Whole "Kven User" is new to me and I haven't even edited articles related to Kvens or so, so I am not familiar with those issues. I have used this account from school networks so I believe it is due to that if it's not a mistake. When I edited from school, the IP had loads of edits. But since I have nothing to do it with, I rather ignore it. Oh and, "I am" not, but I am "suspected" because of my IP at school. Then, where have I engaged in incivility? Yes, I updated that article with a real image but removed it because of some people who adore partisans. Heck, there have been 5 edit wars in that article so I decided it leave so. Then a serious issue: , are you claiming that I am a neonazi and I deny Holocaust? Please show me an edit of mine that I propose neonazism. I find neonazism disgusting and I have never even thought about supporting it. Where the heck have I denied Holocaust? Ridiculous. There is a Finnish saying that you give a stupid answer to stupid accusions and questions, so I'll go ahead: "lol".

By the way, you are saying I have opponents in Wikipedia. Yes, I have seen your, Ghirla and Ipren's "wars" with Polish persons, and Irpen even said that Piotrus is his opponent in some talk page. I find this immature and foolish, please do not drag me into your "opponents"-business. I want to improve Wikipedia and be in a kind community, rather than argue about some city names whether they should be in Polish or Russian.

I demand an explanation, or I consider your message as a 'fooling around' accusation. --Pudeo (Talk) 12:19, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear Pudeo, please cool off. I don't accuse you of anything. I provided a diff where you refer to fellow wikipedians as "wikistalinists". This is an ad hominem, personal attacks which is not to be tolerated. I hope there will be no such incivil outbursts in the future. Best, Ghirla ^-трёп- 12:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

By all means. Do you know if there is a page somewhere with advice on how to go about it, word-length etc.?

Congratulations to you and your fellow editors on the FA thing, by the way.

qp10qp 00:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I think we should move this to the article talk; would you object? I don't see anything wrong with your version. Does this remain part of the article or is it a separate thing?

I didn't realise that editors had to apply for an article to be on the front page; I assumed they were just chosen from the pool of articles. What is the application process?

qp10qp 23:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Good work. I made some tiny changes. I don't see why it shouldn't capture the passing readers' interest. qp10qp 16:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I got those from Finnish Military Website- I will send link when I am free in 2 hours--Woogie10w 15:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi I reverted again to 95,000 war dead for Finland only because the MOD in Finland lists the names of 95,000 individuals dead in WW2 [2]. I suspect the higher number is due to the fact that wounded may have died in hospital and were not counted by the Army and missing individuals may have been declared dead after the war. --Woogie10w 17:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I made the mistake of changing the number to 95,000 in July without posting the link to the Finnish MOD website, sorry. Maybe you would want to post the link on Finnish Wikipedia for people who are researching family history. I really need to read the Wikipedia articles on the role of Finland in WW2, you guys have been doing a lot of good work on this topic. Best regards --Woogie10w 01:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

The Soviets listed 6,885,000 confirmed military war dead not counting MIA, POW deaths and losses of Militia and Partisans. The official statistic of 8,668,000 total military dead includes 1,283,000 additional POW deaths and 500,000 estimated MIA-dead. This is not credible. Soviet POW dead were between 2.5 & 3.0 million based on the consensus of western historians. Take the 6.9 million confirmed war dead add 500,000 missing killed in battle plus 2.5 -3.0 million POW deaths and we come to at least 10 million military war dead not counting the Militia and Partisan deaths. I suspect the official Soviet statistic of 8.7 million dead is understated in order to make the Soviet Army performance look better. What a coincidence that they list Axis losses at 8.6 million. In any case back in May 1965 the Soviet MOD claimed 10 million military war dead. Richard Overy is right when he says that we must view Soviet casualty statistics critically.--Woogie10w 18:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi. You are referred in the Talk:Continuation War#Par 2. Where did you get those 9 decisive battles Finns won in the end? --Whiskey 00:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

About the strength, the Soviet divisional structure had 650,000 men at its highest point. The Finnish and German forces are presented in a similar manner, first the operational strength, then the full strength in parenthesis. This discrepancy has been used by propagandists of different nations. You must multiply the numbers with at least by 2 to get the full number of soldiers participating to the theatre, meaning that the full Soviet contingent was something 1,300,000-1,400,000 men at Finnish front (maybe the quarter was against Germans by the Arctis Sea...) The casualty numbers are from Manninen's "Molotovin coctail, Hitlerin sateenvarjo", and I consider them the best available. --Whiskey 02:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Look, I simply look up all articles in Category:Russia and mark them as part of WikiProject Russia. I added the Low-importance parameter, so I absolutely agree that it is not that important for the Russian wiki project. You are however welcome to add the Wikipedia:WikiProject Finland template above the Russia project. Errabee 20:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

FCW is in scope of the Russia project, as it is defined as part of the Russian Revolution. Why are you playing these negative nationalistic games? Try resuscitating the Finland project instead, that would be a positive use of your energy (and mine). BTW, this was your third revert, better be careful. What a lame edit war you are conducting here. Errabee 17:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

You dare question my motives? How about assuming good faith? BTW, I wasn't aware of any competition between WikiProjects; I thought we are all working together to get a better encyclopedia. And in any rate, including your article in the Russian WikiProject only increases the chance of it getting included in the Release Version, so this article will gain from it as well.

And as for you being the contributor and nominator of this article for FA, well congratulations! That still doesn't excuse your behaviour, however. And trying to sollicit help from another editor in Finnish, a language I cannot comprehend, does not work in your favour either. Errabee 17:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I have said time and again that it is part of WikiProject Russia for at least two reasons: a) it is located within the category tree of Category:Russia and b) it is defined as being part of the Russian Revolution of 1917, which is a very big deal for Russian history.

And yes, I've been browsing FA-class articles, because I'm also trying to select candidates for inclusion in the Release Version, which requires an important subject and a high quality. It would be a shame if there were good candidates that never got selected because nobody nominated them.

I can only judge your conversation with Illumeen by seeing my comments quoted by you. So I can only assume you talked about more than just the article being part of the Russian WikiProject. Errabee 18:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps I can quote your edit summary: "rmv Wikiproject Russia. This has relatively less to do with Russia, sure the bolshevik army contributed with 4k-10k men, but Finland was already independent. Atleast when the WPP Russia box is so big!"

So how much has an article got to do with Russia before you allow it to be included in the Russia WikiProject? Who gave you the right to decide about the scope of a WikiProject you're not involved with?

On to the other points you raise in this edit summary: Nobody denies that Finland was already independent; I certainly don't. So what has that to do with FCW being in scope of WikiProject Russia? Battle of Austerlitz is also in scope, because a Russian army under Kutuzov fought there. How big a Russian army/many volunteers would it take before you allow it to be in scope?

And your last point: the template is so big. Yes sorry about that, I only use the tools I've been given. I'm no template wizard, so I don't know how to adjust the size, and frankly, I don't know if that's possible for project templates.

And for your contribution on my talk page: "I don't want any fight, but well, seeing a Russian flag first in the talk page (as well it's the biggest template) makes me confused, Russia?"

This does seem to infer that if another flag came first, presumably the Finnish flag, you wouldn't object (so much). And the remedy for this problem is not removing the Russia WikiProject template, but making sure the Wikipedia:WikiProject Finland is active. I don't mind if a Finland template goes first, for Russia this is only a marginal subject (hence the Low-importance, and if a lower importance rating was possible, it would get that rating).

Your next two edit summaries are not very kind, and do not address the point I made. You didn't do anything with my suggestion about the Finland Project; you just kept hammering that it has nothing to do with Russia. This I found to be offensive.

Even more offensive is your second comment on my talk page: "You yet fail to say, or even comment, why it is a Russian topic." I had already explained twice that all articles in the category tree of Category:Russia are in scope, and that the Russian Revolution is a big deal for Russian history. What more do you want?

Then your last comment on my talk page: "I didn't care that much at first, but after your comment (that I found offensive) I decided keep my valid point." I'm sorry, you didn't care that much? Why on earth did you revert three times before my comment that you found offensive, if you didn't care that much? I'm sorry but I don't believe you. Your actions speak against you. And btw, your point is not valid, as I've proven above.

And when you're in a dispute with a non-Finnish speaking person, it is *very* impolite to speak about that dispute in Finnish with another Finnish editor. I don't care what you're talking about or with whom, it gives the impression you're trying to hide something and it denies me the opportunity to defend my PoV. So I'm sorry if you're offended by it, but I still maintain my claim that you acted out of nationalistic feelings (maybe on a subconscious level) and that this is a very lame edit war (we're talking about the talk page here, and whether it is in scope of the Russia project or not, for crying out loud), that you started and maintained. Errabee 13:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for calming down. I really appreciate that. FCW being part of the WikiProject Sweden is a bit absurd, I admit. But then, FCW isn't part of a big event in the Swedish history, it is not in the category tree of Category:Sweden, so there's no need to include that WikiProject. As a show of good will on my part, I significantly expanded Akseli Gallen-Kallela. Errabee 23:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the small templates! :) Really an improvement. And best of luck with WikiProject Finland. Errabee 00:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

On February 5, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kaleva, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi:I got an E mail from your counrtys military archives, here is the text,

Dear Sir,

You have asked some information concerning the number of deaths in
Finnland during the WW II.

Based on the World War II database we have found follofing numbers
concerning the Finnish soldiers (include also the soldiers who died to
the diseases):
year 1939 5681
year 1940 21082
year 1941 27023
year 1942 9743
year 1943 6180
year 1944 22777
year 1945 140

Sincerely Yours

Mikko Karjalainen

M.A.
Archivist
Sota-arkiston Selvityspalvelu <selvityspalvelu@sota-arkisto.fi>
--Woogie10w 17:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to Location Maps for European countries.
New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From November 16, 2006 till January 31, 2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps.
As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before February 5, 2007 a survey started that will be closed at February 20, 2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries.
Please note that since January 1, 2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of February 4, 2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design.
Please read the discussion (also in other sections α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η, θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option.
There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 7 Feb2007 20:31 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance so far on the FIS Nordic World Ski Championships. I really appreciate it. Chris 16:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah well, I will do as much as I can on the following days also. But looking to your huge amount of edits on all FIS articles, it's stunning! Really valuable contributions, so keep up the good work! :) --Pudeo (Talk) 16:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

1 photo is good, yes. That was what I was proposing all along. Thank you. --Irpen 19:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Alright, fine with it. --Pudeo (Talk) 19:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

You can click on the FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007, then at the top where it shows a current sporting event. Click on that and it will lead you to the current event sports section and you can enter the information there. I hope this helps. Chris 17:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello Pudeo. Thanks for your support at the Military history elections. With your aid I was able to commision this ship to help plunder the coast of Military history. Na, just kidding. If you ever require any astance all you have to do is ask and you will see my ship on the horizon. Kyriakos 08:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello and thank your for contacting me. Regarding this move, I strongly recommend that you propose it on WP:RM (follow the instructions there). Your proposal will have to be discussed for five days in a poll on the talk page. If there's consensus to move after this period, the article shall be effectively moved. Regards, Húsönd 19:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Terve! I think you might be interested in

User:AlexNewArtBot/FinlandSearchResult

Wikipedia:WikiProject Finland/New article announcements

It works in test mode, but will be improved soon. Colchicum 01:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes I am working on a spoken version :-) it has been a very interesting article.

Cool, very much thanks for the pronunciations! It will help me get a lot closer! SpeakThings:Mellerbeck 16:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I have tried my hand on those maps you asked for, here you have. Chabacano 15:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

That user vandalised the Cars (film) article after somebody gave him a last warning. Could you block him? A•N•N•Afoxlover hello! 13:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

It's like a second civil war, vandals v the good guys (except we have better weapons)! I expected this, but I am disappointed we've had so few constructive edits that improve the article. The best for me was Jouten's. And this one was intriguing. Lacrimosus may have a point.

I hope you'll be able to talk Ilummeen into changing his decision. I am devastated that my comments and edits had that effect on him. The truth is that no one so far today has found anything to criticise in the article, which considering its complexity is an enormous tribute to Ilummeen's phenomenal work. We can soon restore the article to the point where he is happy with it again, I am sure.

Keep fighting those orcs! qp10qp 14:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, and still many hours to go.. I'd support better protection for main page FAs, IPs should not be able to edit.. And where are the admins? I don't know about Illumeen, perhaps he is a bit dissapointed because of the vandalism and the "last-minute" changes and other confusions because he did a lot of work to the article. But I hope he will stay here, there's no need to leave.. --Pudeo (Talk) 14:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for interupting, but I came arount to congratulate you on your FA and fighting the vandalism on it, when I noticed—in the comment above—you wished for FA protection; this is not done because new users often make their first edits there, and they may be dissapointed if they find they cannot edit the encyclopedia "that anyone can edit". Hope you'll understand. :-) · AO ^Talk 16:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps it's good that they can edit then, but this is quite hellish, heh. It would be nice to see more admins checking the edit history though, you can clearly see the persons who are in Wikipedia just to vandalize it.. But good job yourself too, you've also reverted a lot of vandalism there. --Pudeo (Talk) 17:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Hell is for Heroes my friend... Admins don't really have to check the article; just WP:AIV would suffice. Thanks for the compliment; another 60 or so to catch up to you. ;) · AO ^Talk 17:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey there. I know, those images are pretty bad. The only reason we did that (which I now regret) is so that all of them have the same names. Now, I'm absolutely no good with changing jpgs to pngs, but if you would be able to change all of them, it would be greatly appreciated. It's a good system, on that template, and they would look a whole lot nicer if they were in one of those formats (preferably svg, but some would probably have to be png, so make sure they all have the same extension).

Thank you, and if you're not able to do it, might you recommend someone who could? _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐  12:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't know how to. I just noticed on Helsinki Olympics that the jpg looked bad compared to the png I uploaded. Infact, I don't even really understand the system. So I can't help. --Pudeo (Talk) 12:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I really don't either. I just know that it works when on, but gives us crappy pictures. Thanks anyway. _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐  12:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I am just writing at Talk:Continuation War. Wait a few minutes. -- Petri Krohn 23:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Olympic logo 1952.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Looks better. But it always seemed to me that the most logical two colours would be white and red. qp10qp 21:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Catamenia_wp.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add ((Replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 09:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. It seems that there is a technical problem that affects some Commons hosted images (see WP:AN#STOP_DELETING_CSD.23I2_IMAGES) for more. The empty En-Wikipedia image page for this file was deleted per CSD I2 after the featured picture nomination was closed so it fell victim to this software bug then. The file in question should be hosted on Commons at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Koli.jpg but it doesn't work at the moment. Hopefully this will be fixed soon. Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 13:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

On 10 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aero Flight 311, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 08:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

WAY TO GO PUDEO! already you have accomplished a lot! Lipsticked Pig 09:39, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Heh, thanks! --Pudeo (Talk) 13:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Osaat näemmä paremmin enklantia. Osaisitko tarkistaa ja lisätä tuon Soviet-Finnish conflict 1921—1922 eli fi:Itäkarjalaisten kansannousun? Näemmä jonkun venäläisen tekemä. Kahkonen 17:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Juu, mutta voikohan sitä kutsua Soviet-Finnish wariksi, kun vapaaehtoisten tekemä. Minusta parempi olisi East Karelian Uprising. --Pudeo (Talk) 18:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Niin minustakin. Englanninkieliset lähteet tuskin sanovat mitään, mutta seurataanko käännöksessä suomalaista vai venäläistä nimeä? Kärsiikö neutraali näkökulma suomalaisesta versiosta? Venäläisestä näemmä kärsii. Kahkonen 18:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

No tuohan ei nyt edes puhu itäkarjalaisista mitään.. Voitko muuten katsoa ru-Wiki, yritän siirtää siellä ne yhteen artikkeliin, mutta on ongelmia nimen kanssa. --Pudeo (Talk) 18:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Ainakin tuossa Itä-Karjalan miehityksen artikkelissa nimi on "...в 1941—1944 годах" eli siihen malliin pitäisi olla "Финские экспедиции добровольца в 1918—1922 годах" Kahkonen 18:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Vaihdoin sen East Karelian Uprising. Made,V. The East-Karelian Uprising 1921-1922 and Estonia./ Akadeemia 9, 1997. ISSN 0235-07771. Sellainen ainakin englanniksi. Nyt pitää katsoa miten nuo reagoivat.. --Pudeo (Talk) 19:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Ai added som informeisson and referenssiis to tö artikl. Kahkonen 12:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:European Chemicals Agency logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:F-Secure logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi Pudeo, I did the Harvardianization to Bishop Henry now, what a tedious job but clearly worth the effort :) --Drieakko 14:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Good, looks a lot clearer now. I myself did that at FCW :p --Pudeo (Talk) 14:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

That looks such an interesting article, but I'm totally bogged down at the moment; I'm helping out with a demanding FAC, and am half way through trying to prepare William Shakespeare for FAC, and so I just can't help at the moment. I hope I will be able to copyedit the bishop sometime in the future, though.qp10qp 19:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Great find! I fully support replacing the existing Finnish army picture with the one you suggest. If you look at my reasoning on the talk page, I think your picture may actually prove that they are the same building. — George ^[talk] 21:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:OP Khiam from East.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:ISAF observation group in Afghanistan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Finnish Soldiers Skiing.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 10:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Of course Soviets temporarily occupied parts of disputed and Polish territories during that time, particularly during their 1920 offensive. I don't think we have an article on that yet. We do have one on Polish minority in the Soviet Union, and you can read a little in various PSW articles, such as Vilna offensive which discusses IIRC the fate of Vilnians during the war.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  16:54, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:ECHA logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stalin church 1939.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Väestönsuojelutyö poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Would you consider making a contribution to an exchange of views at either of the following:

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disaster management#Renaming 1703 Genroku earthquake?
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan#Renaming 1703 Genroku earthquake?

As you know, Wikipedia:WikiProject Disaster management came up with entirely reasonable guidelines for naming articles about earthquakes, fires, typhoons, etc. However, the <<year>><<place> <<event>> format leaves no opportunity for conventional nengō which have been used in Japan since the eighth century (701-1945) -- as in "the Great Fire of Meireki" (1657) or for "the Hōei eruption of Mount Fuji" (1707).

In a purely intellectual sense, I do look forward to discovering how this exchange of views will develop; but I also have an ulterior motive. I hope to learn something about how better to argue in favor of a non-standard exception to conventional, consensus-driven, and ordinarily helpful wiki-standards such as this one. In my view, there does need to be some modest variation in the conventional paradigms for historical terms which have evolved in non-Western cultures -- no less in Wikipedia than elsewhere. I'm persuaded that, at least in the context of Japanese history before the reign of Emperor Meiji (1868-1912), some non-standard variations seem essential; but I'm not sure how best to present my reasoning to those who don't already agree with me. I know these first steps are inevitably awkward; but there you have it.

The newly-created 1703 Genroku earthquake article pushed just the right buttons for me. Obviously, these are questions that I'd been pondering for some time; and this became a convenient opportunity to move forward in a process of building a new kind of evolving consensus. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 18:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

As you're an experienced Wikipedia editor, I was a bit surprised to see that you deleted my contribution to Finland. I would have understood adding a fact-tag, although I've stated I'll add the source, but deleting without any discussion is not the proper way to behave. As for the content, I'm the first to admit that I was a bit surprised by it myself when I first read it. On the other hand, it is the task of experts in every field to find new knowledge and of Wikipedians to try to add that knowledge to keep Wikipedia up to date and relevant. Professor Juha Janhunen is one of the most distinguished Finnish linguists, and definitely much more knowledgeable about this field than either you or I. Cheers JdeJ (talk) 13:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't see the issue being anything new, and I'd be very careful adding unsourced information to top level country articles as of today. By the way, even the very first inhabitants Åland were proto Finnic speakers.[3].It seems just an attempt by Ida Asplunds to ignore the Finnish heritage of Finnish Finland. Even more concerning is the add of some unspecified "Germanic indigenious language". You forget UN has classified Sami people as the sole indigenious people of the Nordic countries. Swedish speaking populations arrived to Finland in the 12th century at latest, although in Åland earlier. This is a widely accepted fact. Do you want to make corrections to Swedish-speaking Finns then, perhaps changing to arrival 4000 years back? You can find references for the fact that Proto-Finnic (Proto-Uralic, Proto-Finno ugric what ever, developed into Finnish anyway) has been around here for atleast 4000 thousands years. Finding such sources for Swedish is more difficult, as most sources suggest it has been around just from 12th Century, with the expection of Åland.

Anyway, I don't see any problems in the current version of the article (my revert). There is just says the modern scientific concensus without disputes. Remember that this is just a brief history of Finland, not Finns, Finnish language or main article History of Finland --Pudeo⺮ 20:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Finland, you will be blocked from editing. JdeJ (talk) 09:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Apart from vandalising Wikipedia, you're also behaving in a very dishonest way. My edit makes it very clear that there are conflicting views, you try to edit out the views you don't agree with in order to present your own view as the only truth. Not only do you do that, but to achieve this you gladly remove well-sourced material from a very reliable source, as Juha Janhunen is one of the leading Finnish linguists (check up his C.V.). What is more, I tried to assume good faith the first time, but both your edits and all your talk of Asplund and other irrelevant things to the article seems to suggest that you aren't here for improving Wikipedia but to push your own nationalist views. What does this Asplund have to do with any of this? I'm quoting one person, Juha Janhunen. As for Swedish speakers arriving 4000 years ago, that's also in no connection whatsoever to modern theories which suggest that both Finnish and Swedish arrived relatively late in Finland. I know that there are older sources that claim otherwise (there are still sources saying the earth is flat as well) and that is precisely why I haven't taken out any other theory but merely added a new one to make it clear that there isn't one accepted truth on this matter. What you're doing, unfortunately, is not to present the different theories around but vandalise Wikipedia to push your version as the only version. Please stop immediately! JdeJ (talk) 09:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Do you notice the same thing as I? According to Janhunen sounds very silly in a top level country article in a brief history section? --Pudeo⺮ 10:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, no. I think it's the most honest way to do it, to show that this is just one view. If you don't agree, well, I have no problem with that and can even removed those three words, but the answer is definitely not to remove the whole section. I don't know if you read the article, but this is not just Janhunen's view, he merely states what researchers currently believe. JdeJ (talk) 10:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate your efforts, but I can't agree with you in this. Hopefully someone else will notice the discussion at the talk page and comment. --Pudeo⺮ 10:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:OctopusNAS1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 18:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

do you want to punish me? just because you are one of the nationalist finnish friend of wikinist? yeah, smells not good--Orkh (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

do you want to punish me? just because you are one of the nationalist finnish friend of wikinist? yeah, smells not good--Orkh (talk) 16:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

This year marks the 200th anniversary on the Finnish War, which we are trying to show here on enwiki. I have recently begun translating the Finnish language wikipedia article into English in order to improve the enwiki article. Would you happen to be interested in helping out in the translation of the article? Otherwise I'll do it myself. It will just take longer. --MoRsE (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm bit busy right now (enough things with other "projects"). Perhaps on weekend. That is, if I'm motivated enough, as it looks like a lengthy project.. --Pudeo⺮ 00:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kyriakos (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:HIM logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Funny how you always seem to come to pages you have never edited before immediately after I've visited them. Pure coincidence, I'm sure. And equally funny how you can overrule a consensus that everybody else agrees on. Be prepared for a report considering WP:STALK JdeJ (talk) 13:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Well in fact I was editing Grand Duchy of Finland, of which Diet of Porvoo is quite important aspect. Noticed the move. Anyway, read Wikipedia:Requested moves. "Requesting potentially controversial moves", I think it can be classified as potentially controversial. For example, I've put up such request on almost every move I've proposed. By the way, stalking again? --Pudeo⺮ 14:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Had there been any controversy about it, I wouldn't have moved it. Every used on the talk page agreed, so there was a consensus about it. Sure, only three users but it's not a topic attracting much attention. So the move was entirely uncontroversial, in contrast to your reversion. Discussing it at the talk page before deciding that you yourself are better able to judge than three other users would have been a more responsible approach. JdeJ (talk) 14:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Finnish SS Cuff title.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 21:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hiroshima anniversary cartoon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for making the article Max Payne (film)! I've been wanting to get around to it since I knew filming had begun. Glad to see someone else took initiative! By the way, you do not have to worry about adding Category:Upcoming films to these articles; ((Future film)) automatically includes this category. Cheers! :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, there's not that much information available now but hopefully others will improve it (as usually the first step is the hardest it was good to create it now :). I didn't know that about the template, good to know then to not add duplicates. --Pudeo⺮ 13:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I collected a few headlines about the film-in-development some time ago; go to User:Erik/Future articles/M. Feel free to implement details from these headlines! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Pudeo!

We need your help regarding diacritics:

take look here [4] [5] [6]

--Anto (talk) 19:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

HI I am informing you on the following discussions referring to the usage of diacritics on en.wiki. It seem there is a movement/campaign of some peple (moreover administrators) which try to eliminate them from the usage on en .wiki. Or at least to minimize , even for personal names in Latin script

Since I have seen your name in some discussions I thought it would be nice to inform you. Pay attention to the following pages :WP:UE , Wikipedia:Usage of diacritics and similar ones if you are interested. Anto (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Sure, but it's kind of hard to just drop into some discussion. Please point out any votes or discussions, as I sure do support all Latin letter's variations. --Pudeo⺮ 21:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Image:Olympic logo 1952.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Olympic logo 1952.svg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

DUDE

I have seen petty, but you have taken the cake on the subject. IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER WHAT ORDER HIS MEDALS GO IN. Don't you think the table looks pretty dumb, and confusing when you separate medals from two different Olympic games, by putting the medals from one Olympics in between those of another? I'll tell you what, Show me a written Wikipedia rule, that says that the Medals MUST be placed the way, you have placed them. Since you say they have ALWAYS BEEN DONE THAT WAY there must be a written rule somewhere.--Subman758 (talk) 16:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Well yeah, even in Phelps article the World Championships are in that order, all golds first, then silvers and bronzer chronologically. By the claim "always been done that way" I meant that almost all articles about sportsmen have it that way, look around. Sure, it might not be done that way everywhere anymore. I don't think there's an official guideline, we should discuss it at the medal table template talk page and reach concensus. --Pudeo⺮ 18:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Joonasl on taas palannut wikipediaan niin jälki on sen mukaista. Minua on uhkailtu ja lopuksi annettiin esto, koska suomenkieliset nimet eivät saa olla vahvennettuina johdannossa. Ongelman aiheuttavia artikkeleja on mm. Apatiitti, Hiipinä ja Luujärvi jotka on pakotettu pakkovenäläiselle nimelle. Tarvitsen tukea, koska huomenna esto poistuu niin voin antaa takaisin Joonakselle korkojen kanssa. Kiitos tuestasi! --Inzulac (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Enpä siellä enää käy muokkailemassa, mutta huomasin kyllä uusimmat Joonasl:n kujeet (valitettavasti huonot).. --Pudeo⺮ 16:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Olympic logo 1960.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Olympic logo 1948.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Olympic logo 1956.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

This is just a response to your question at Talk:Michael Jackson, the following is a direct cut and paste from WP:BLP:

Biographies of living persons must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid paper; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. The possibility of harm to living subjects is one of the important factors to be considered when exercising editorial judgment.

Reliable sources

Material about living persons must be sourced very carefully. Without reliable third-party sources, it may include original research and unverifiable statements, and could lead to libel claims.

Material about living persons available solely in questionable sources or sources of dubious value should not be used, either as a source or as an external link (see above).

Never use self-published books, zines, websites, webforums, and blogs as a source for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the article (see below). "Self-published blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs. Some newspapers host interactive columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control. Where a news organization publishes the opinions of a professional but claims no responsibility for the opinions, the writer of the cited piece should be attributed (e.g., "Jane Smith has suggested..."). Posts left by readers may never be used as sources.

Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable; whether the material is being presented as true; and whether, even if true, it is relevant to an encyclopedia article about the subject. When less-than-reliable publications print material they suspect is untrue, they often include weasel phrases and attributions to anonymous sources. Look out for these. If the original publication doesn't believe its own story, why should we?

Be careful of "feedback loops" in which an unsourced and speculative contention in a Wikipedia article gets picked up, with or without attribution, in an otherwise-reliable newspaper or other media story, and that story is then cited in the Wikipedia article to support the original speculative contention.

Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material

Remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced; that is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see Wikipedia:No original research); or that relies upon self-published sources (unless written by the subject of the BLP; see below) or sources that otherwise fail to meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Verifiability.

The three-revert rule does not apply to such removals, though editors are advised to seek help from an administrator or at the BLP noticeboard if they find themselves violating 3RR, rather than dealing with the situation alone. Content may be re-inserted only if it conforms to this policy.

These principles apply to biographical material about living persons found anywhere in Wikipedia, including user and talk pages. Administrators may enforce the removal of such material with page protection and blocks, even if they have been editing the article themselves. Editors who re-insert the material may be warned and blocked. See the blocking policy and Wikipedia:Libel.

Administrators encountering biographies that are unsourced and negative in tone, where there is no neutral version to revert to, should delete the article without discussion (see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion criterion G10 for more details). The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 07:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

You've uploaded File:Sako.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SurfaceTensionHLS.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 05:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Ditto for File:Finnish SS arm badges.png. --Geniac (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Scuderia Ferrari Logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't think logos are supposed to be on the commons. If the image is copyrighted, it will be speedied. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

• Edit: AHA! Finland does allow these things. Well, we need to transfer the English logo to the commons, then. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
• I have uploaded the AIB Finland English logo to the commons. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, they are allowed because it's just a office of the Ministry of Justice. --Pudeo' 09:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Eurovision Song Contest 2002.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Camaron · Christopher · talk 13:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi! I edited, or actually rebuilt, the article of Winter War. Also as a part of the project I created the article Background of the Winter War. Both are now rated as B-class. I asked peer review and a copy-editing was requested. I was wondering do have a extra time/interest to do so, and also give some comments of the content. The aim is making both the GA-class (or even Featured) article for 30 November 2009, the 70th anniversary of the start of the war. Peltimikko (talk) 10:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Fiskars.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Template:Anglophone states , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.  —  ^{.`</sup>^) Paine Ellsworth<sup>diss`cuss} (^^`.  10:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:7.62-KK-MG-3.jpg as ((replaceable fair use)). If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add ((Replaceable fair use disputed)) to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 12:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:F-Secure logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 06:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Puedo.
Thanks for feedback on the suspects nationality. There is another article on the shooter Ibrahim Shkupolli. You might, if you have time, take a look at that too to make sure the cites are correct. I think it should be merged with this one as per my talk page comment there.
Is there any chance we can stick to English language sources?
And Happy New Year! (it is in Australia at least!) --220.101.28.25 (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, they should be definitely merged. English language sources are preferred of course, but at this point they are not that accurate as Finnish. Happy new year! --Pudeo' 14:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

But I can't read/speak Finnish!. They could be linking to the local church choir site for all I know! Oh, well I have go anyway. It's a shame for the Finns that this happened, bad way to end the year. Thanks again.--220.101.28.25 (talk) 14:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I have nominated Category:Governorates of the Grand Duchy of Finland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Assembled 7.62 RK 62.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. A333 (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Lotus f1 racing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:19, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 13:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 19:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

Moi! Joo en iha loppuun asti kattonut käyttölupaa, ennen kun läiskäsin sen mallineeseen. Vedin siis Uppsalan osakuntien mallineesta analogian, että koska Helsinginkin yliopistossa osakunnilla on samalla lailla erityinen asema, niin mallineessa tiivistä yhteyttä kuvaava logo olis kohdallaan. Olet näköjään[7] tuonut logon tänne, joten olisiko Sinulla mahdollista selvittää vaikka erityislupaa tms. sen käyttöön tossa osakuntamallineessa? Kiitos vaivannäöstä! :) -- Frous (talk) 01:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Heh, ihmettelin aluksi että mistähän ihmeestä on kyse, kun tuonkin logon olen ladannut Wikipediaan näköjään joskus 2006. Helsingin yliopiston logo on niin tuore, että se on kopiosuojattu toisin kuin monet muut yliopistojen logot ilmeisesti. Ilmeisesti ainoa mahdollisuus olisi laittaa fair use-mallinteita logon omalle sivulle joka sivusta, jolla "perustellaan fair use". Tosin suomenkielisessä Wikipediassa käytettäisiin luultavasti logoa tuosta vain, mutta täällä joku botti luultavasti poistaisi logon jokaiselta sivulta, jolle ei löydy fair use-mallinetta. En osaa sanoa, ei sitä varmaan voi käyttää mallineessa. --Pudeo' 20:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

Hei, toivon reagoitavan käyttäjän Fry1989 toimintaan Wikimedia Commonsissa: Military Roundel of Finland pre-1944.svg, Mannerheimkruis.svg (myös .jpg) jne. sekä myös Finnish Air Force, missä hän palauttaa lipun, jota ei olekaan. --WPK (talk) 13:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

When you add or change content, as you did to the article Jarkko Immonen (ice hockey b. 1984)‎, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources. Please provide a reliable source so the person's middle name can be verified. Thank you. Dolovis (talk) 02:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

Thanks for uploading File:University of Oulu logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I am 100% sure, since Albania is a NATO member it was stopped. You may have to search in albanian --Vinie007 10:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

Thanks for uploading File:University of Oulu logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a ((helpme)) template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed: Remembering conflict

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cultural racism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural racism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jason from nyc (talk) 15:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

It is actually OK for users to delete warnings from their talk pages. Deletion of warnings is taken as an assumption that they have been read. This particular user has already been reported to WP:AIV, so no further action is needed besides reverting his various page blankings. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 21:09, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, those warnings are not "nonsense" as he says, but yes, it's his talk page. Okay. --Pudeo' 21:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Pudeo - I've asked another admin to review your move[8] (Mother's Rights → Mothers' rights movement). Your edit summary states your reasoning as being a Requested move on another article. This is a highly unusual action. You should be aware that this action, as it is directly related to your comments on Talk:Men's rights movement and Talk:Fathers' rights movement, falls under the probation on men's rights (see here).
In the very least Pudeo moves should be discussed. In this instance the page is not about movements/organizations but rather about rights. The lede line uses the term 'movement' but the body of the article does not deal with this - these are grounds for discussion of the lede not renaming/moving the article. Mother's Rights Activism could be a more precise name if the page had focussed on bodies/organizations (since the organizations listed as advocating Mother's righst are inter-governmental/United Nations bodies), however as the page deals with the issues of rights not the movements the rename looks to be unwarranted. It is for these reasons that moves need discussion. Furthermore there is at least an appearance of point-making behaviour in moves of pages that reference other article's RfCs. Moves are handled on a page by page basis--Cailil ^talk 22:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Just a bold move in line with the father's rights movement move discussion, but I wasn't claiming it was requested by the other discussion – it's just a sister topic where the same policies apply. Actually I didn't even have to edit the article itself, since the lead starts with "Mother's rights movement" so the article was just about that. Yes, I also participated on those other move discussions, accepted the resolution and applied it to mother's rights movement. Is there a problem in that? Some other editors particiapted in all of them too. The body does not cover all of the the movement part (either) yet, because the article is only start class. You can't use the current chapter list of an article as a rationale for deciding its name: all articles are edited to some extent after an article move. The father's rights movement article is an example how it could be expanded. I can understand how this can be seen as WP:POINTy move, but no, I simply accept the result of the earlier votes. Unless there are some bizarre double standards, but most likely those views are seen without any point-making anyway.--Pudeo' 22:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Appreciate your willingness to point out some obvious biases on my Talk page. Memills (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm attempting to document the online community known as the "manosphere" in a neutral and impartial way. In particular I have an article waiting for publication that's very well sourced and would be difficult for even the most combative and biased editor to reject. However I'm beginning to become concerned that no one has yet looked at my submission. If you could forward this request to anyone in the position to approve my article if it meets Wikipedia standards that would help greatly. Ethicalv (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Joseph Goebbels, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.Retrolord (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, since I noticed that you had been active with the True Finns article, I thought that you might help me keep it clean from the new user Opfinland, who has been spamming that and some other articles related to the party with his own POV agenda and synthesis, writing in a scandalous fashion about issues that are already dealt with in a neutral tone, and simply lying (by trying to tie Breivik into everything). I fear that he is about to start edit warring. --Jaakko Sivonen (talk) 11:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. Atleast one article edits I saw were written in one of the most biased wording I've ever seen. Reverted that. --Pudeo' 12:15, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

The user may have a sockpuppet called Gdniken: investigation --Jaakko Sivonen (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Ranze proposed a WikiProject Men's Rights: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/WikiProject Men's rights.

I have gone ahead and created a candidate page for WikiProject Men's Issues and will make the page an actual WikiProject page once enough people sign up and give their input. I think it would be useful to have a place where work together to prepare material and arguments to respond to people who try to apply double standards to articles about men's rights.

Interested? Ummonk (talk) 04:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for You altered another editor's post to add a personal attack, and in the very same edit chastised him for the attack which you, yourself, had added. I do not have words for how wrong this is. TO REVEIWING ADMIN: See this edit.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  KillerChihuahua 06:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pudeo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

A very baffling ban. First I will explain my comment. It is a negative comment indeed, response to what I perceived as assuming bad faith from Cailil when he likened the people interested in the debated WP project to different kind of serious Wikipedia abuses. Apparently my edit has text inserted in the wrong place, after Cailil's message too. The "prejudiced as..." after Cailil's message is part of my original wording which I changed for the final comment. I must have written that in the wrong place after being disoriented by switching browser tabs while writing it. I apologize for not previewing changes and not noticing it before I posted it. What is the personal attack in my comment? I can't see it filling any descriptions from Wikipedia:WIAPA. It is a negative comment, a response to another negative comment, but that is not a personal attack. Of course, as a native Finnish speaker with a non-perfect English, I might not be able to catch all possible nuances of my text, but even so I can't understand how it even could be interpreted as a personal attack. WP:PA also states that: Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to blocks. I have been a member of the English Wikipedia since 2006 and I have never been warned of a personal attack or even received a block for any reason before this. Given that I feel my comment even isn't a personal attack, nor an egregious one, I am just perplexed. I would have protested a 24-hour ban as well, but I consider 1-week ban a very harsh measure. --Pudeo' 16:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC) I think I now understand KillerChihuahua's ban message better; he thought I intentionally added that text after Cailil's message. Does it look like I tried to fit it in? It's not even the right wording and doesn't make any sense in Cailil's comment. Compare it to my final comment: I changed the wording prejudice as to hint. --Pudeo' 16:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

First, note that this is a WP:BLOCK not a WP:BAN - the two are very different. I'm sorry but your comment about this being accidental makes zero sense whatsoever. In the exact same post you modify someone else's comment, and then respond to that addition - there's not possible way to claim this was a mistake: it's clear and utter falsification of someone else's comments. "Hint" and "prejudice as" certainly do not excuse any negative comments that you make towards an editor or group of editors, especially when easily attributed. In short, the block is valid, and I find your reasoning to be wholly implausible, bordering on a lie (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• As a point of order Pudeo I was/am assuming that the people involved in that proposed project WILL be helping prevent and/or mitigate bad behaviour from ppl offsite, just like everyone else. I assume that that Project will be working within our rules. I'm asking what's its plan is[9] and how it will avoid pit falls some of its supports already *have* fallen into. It was your assumption that I meant anything otherwise. Becuase I didn't label anyone as "hooligans"--Cailil ^talk 19:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply to my original comment. Certainly you did not label anyone, that's why I wrote "hint" and "prejudice as". However, it doesn't have much to do with the appeal and block that is based on the assumption that I intentionally tried to manipulate your post and then criticize it in the same edit, which is not true. I was browsing different websites at the same time, and I wrote one sentence in the wrong place when switching a browser tab - the sentence makes no sense in your comment. --Pudeo' 20:32, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Pudeo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

If I wanted to manipulate Cailil's message, what would I mean with "What steps will this project take to uphold wikipedia's values and its standards for conduct towards others (see Wikipedia:HARASS#Off-wiki_harassment) didn't prejudice a group of editors as a bunch of hooligans."? It's a nonsensical sentence. Is it really that bizarre that I happened to write part of my message in the wrong place? It shouldn't be too uncommon in Wikipedia to have a chunk of text on the wrong line. I'll make it very clear this time: 1) I'm writing a message that will include "prejudice as a bunch of hooligans". Before reaching that I preview changes to see if the lining is in order that the message will be in the right place. 2) Now, returning to the editor I have two signed messages (one that is mine - unpublished). I accidentally write a part of my message before the wrong signature (Cailil's above). 3) As I am not 100 % concentrated on the Wikipedia tab and writing the message, I probably think I must have erased that part already and write it with different wording anyway (prejudice as -> hint) 4) I publish the comment without previewing changes. I'm astonished you do not see it uses the same wording as my final comment. I'm astonished you think I would be so stupid to add a nonsensible sentence in someone else's message and then criticize it in the same edit with the same wording. Either I have not been able to present my case well, you are deliberately interpreting it in a malign way or you have not understood it properly. "didn't prejudice a group of editors as a bunch of hooligans." That's what I accidentally wrote on Cailil's line. But it even says didn't prejudice. How is it making Cailil look bad; again it doesn't make any sense? Absurd. Where is the personal attack? Editing someone else's talk page comment is strongly against Wikiquette, but unfortunately sometimes it happens with carelessness. Given that the part actually uses the same wording "bunch of hooligans" as my final comment and the fact that it absolutely makes no sense in Cailil's comment, I believe there's more ground to my claim of accidental insertion than intentional manipulation to make Cailil look bad. The block is needless and based on a silly confusion, one that I do not find amusing anymore. I also ask you to assume good faith, I again note that I've never been blocked before in 7 years. --Pudeo' 14:40, 11 July 2013 (UTC))

Accept reason:

Indeed, your explanation makes perfect sense. Even without it, the edit just looks to be in error. I am completely at a loss as to how the blocking admin, and another reviewing admin, completely failed to see that. If you were trying to put an attack in their mouth, you would have (a) put in words that made sense with the adjacent content and (b) actually put in something that was an attack (how is "didn't prejudice a group of editors as a bunch of hooligans" an attack?). At the very least, KillerChihuahua (talk · contribs) should have asked you, an editor with a clean seven-year record, for an explanation before handing out a one-week block. All told, especially in the absence of any evidence that you have a history of personal attacks, the block is, and always was, unwarranted. -- tariqabjotu 23:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Good call, Tariqabjotu. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 10:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for having the time to review it and having common sense. It really irked me to feel there was a "miscarriage of justice" and that either I wasn't able to explain it clearly enough (admittedly it was rather long/rambling) or the reviewer didn't understand it properly. --Pudeo' 19:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding me unblocking you. The thread is Bwilkins' response to my unblock of Pudeo. Thank you. -- tariqabjotu 22:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I am so sorry you were blocked, apparently in error or misunderstanding. I hope you will forgive the people involved as mistakes do occasionally happen. Jehochman ^Talk 02:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes I do, it's all OK now, just felt frustrated to not get my point across in the appeal. It's a shame the discussion got so heated. --Pudeo' 02:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Just as an aside Pudeo - I can see how that was a mistake but I do see where KC was coming from. Your explanation makes it clear there was just a mistake. Don't be bothered by what's happening on ANi its not about you (or me). And again I wasn't and am not assuming that the members of the mrm wikiproject are making trouble - I believe that the project will actually help prevent it. I just want to see how they plan to work together with the existing protocols here on WP--Cailil ^talk 14:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 17:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Since you contributed to or were otherwise involved in the original afD nomination, you may or may not wish to comment on the new afD nomination, found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jews and Communism (2nd nomination) I intend on leaving this note to everyone who edited the first AFD and has not yet contributed to the new discussion or been otherwise notified. Thanks! :) Flipandflopped (Discuss, Contribs) 16:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

I noticed your contributions to the white privilege page. There is a discussion on the talk page which you may be able to contribute to. Ancholm (talk) 13:48, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Pedeo, could you email me? Also, note that folks are "voting" on issues that you did not bring up for a vote at the AN: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Bbb23.27s_conduct_in_enforcing_article_probation

My note re this is at the bottom:

Hold on folks - this AN was NOT a request for votes re Bbb23 actions. The issues were whether (1) should Bbb23 continue enforcing the article probation on MRM articles? and (2) should there be a more diverse group of admins involved in the MRM pages? Those are the issues that were raised. My votes on these issues follow.

No: "should Bbb23 continue enforcing the article probation on MRM articles?" Non-neutral enforcement, personal involvement, etc.

Yes: "should there be a more diverse group of admins involved in the MRM pages?" This one is a no-brainer.

Memills (talk) 19:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, my Wikipedia email feature is not enabled and I don't really wish to enable it. Anyway, in case you'd be asking for assistance in some new appeal outside ANI, I'm afraid I've had enough of Wikipedia bureaucracy and don't feel like writing any more case reports (which by the way end up unnecessarily clumsy because I'm not a native speaker of English). In principle I support you with the probation issue - I don't think the article probation has been working ideally at all, but I don't want to be dragged too far in to the topic ban situation which you can see mostly results in me getting the flak (being called "men's rights editor" or that my description was "back asswards") and because I don't know your full sanction history. --Pudeo' 19:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Pudeo,

I passed your DYK, but have had problems affixing the icon. Thought you would want to know.

Georgejdorner (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Georgejdorner, thanks for the review. I'm not experienced with DYK reviews so I don't know what's wrong either, but I reckon the icon belongs just to your review comment and the "|passed=" field is only edited by the closing DYK admin? I moved the icon accordingly. --Pudeo' 16:31, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

On 9 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aero Flight 217, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aero Flight 217. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

On 10 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jalmari Jaakkola, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the historian Jalmari Jaakkola, who was criticized for overtly nationalist assertions and extensive speculation, chose the words "The seer of early Finnish history" for his memorial medal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jalmari Jaakkola. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

It's ((orfud)), which you have to subst: to have it work properly. I've added it, so you need not do anything. The point is that F1 is only for when the files have the same file format, so a .png file may only be F1 deleted if the other file is also a .png file. Nyttend (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Browningieae

added a link pointing to Stetsonia

Cereeae

added a link pointing to Cereus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment on the admin action page. I do believe this all ideology. You point to the afd thing and many people seem concerned about that, so I'll elaborate on what happened:

I'm pretty new to the more "advanced" editing features like templates and dispute resolution and so forth. I tried to mark the pages for deletion discussion, because it looked to me that they were just essays written by an academic, without proper sourcing; and one subject seemed not even noteable. When Roscelese put her "swift keep" vote in, I thought (mistakenly) that the effect was equivalent to when she was reverting the POV template to take if off another page (while that page was in POV-dispute discusson). So I reverted it. I did not think I was removing a vote, I thought I was undoing a reversion. Later, I was told that one of the deletion requests was improper in some way, apparently that I didn't complete the process in some respect. The person who told me that declined, however, to tell me in what respect it was incomplete, so I just don't know. Djcheburashka (talk) 21:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough. Many active Wikipedians "follow" other editors and check their recent contribs, but be careful not hound anyone. Although your opponents probably checked your contributions as much as you did theirs, so... I must say it's rather absurd if you are given an indefinitive block as a first measure as you do not have any previous block log. --Pudeo' 21:50, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 11, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 22:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

This request for arbitration (an archived copy of which is available here) has been declined by a majority of arbitrators. I have therefore archived it. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 23:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Hi, this was recently promoted to GA and at the time badly needed improvement. I'm trying to get it up to at least near GA status. I was wondering if you could translate the history from Finnish wikipedia or a decent source and I can help source it? I could decipher some of it. There's some text from a number of articles on Finnish wiki in here and sub categories which this article would directly benefit from too. I;ve managed to expand it by over 50% currently but struggling now! Can you see what you can add anyway? It's good that Finland has a GA, but it really does need to be even better to retain it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:22, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Good work on the article. Unfortunately the Finnish article on its history doesn't list sources, the one at the end is some general national history book so it would require quite a bit of effort. This website (despite its clumsy look has been funded by Education Ministry and written by the University of Oulu docent Reijo Heikkinen) has a bit on Kajaani history in Finnish. But what could be added with relative ease is more about religion and politics in the city, and the importance of the Kainuu Brigade based there. I'll look into adding that. --Pudeo' 17:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

OK thanks. Don't worry about sourcing for now though, I've already translated a bit and found external sources to support it. Only if the info can't be sourced then it will be no good.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

On 18 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hilja Riipinen, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the only female MP of the Finnish far-right Patriotic People's Movement, Hilja Riipinen, was also a women's rights and temperance advocate? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hilja Riipinen. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 11:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Pudeo, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Happy editing, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Spread the love by adding ((subst:Seasonal Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of ((U|Technical 13)) to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list

I've been married to a Finnish Beauty for 18 years of my life, and you have SISU, my friend. Thank you for your words.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 04:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Heh no problem. I like your style, too bad so many people seem to take figures of speech like that seriously. And BTW, the IP who filed the AE wasn't the editor I suspected it to be but the IP was blocked for 1 year anyway because of using an open proxy. So likely the person behind it wanted to hide their real IP and cause this kind of nonsense. --Pudeo' 04:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:SurfaceTensionHLS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I saw you have been here a while so I have a question. On the Spreading from the Ashes article would the first reference be considered self-published. It's not on the main band article which uses the same source. If not , could you remove the tag on the article (and the other two albums related to the band)? Big help if you could, thanks. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 22:01, 21 April 2015

Hi TheGracefulSlick. Self-published sources are accepted in certain cases, as for example when the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim. Therefore it should be accepted in this case. I removed the tag. --Pudeo' 02:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Appreciated, thanks for the help. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 22:17, 21 April 2015

You were recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sockpuppet investigation block. Given the legal, privacy and BLP implications of holding the case in public the Committee has decided to run the case completely in camera, to that effect there will be no public evidence submission or workshop. Editors with direct knowledge of the events and related evidence are requested to email their to arbcom-en-blists.wikimedia.org by May 7, 2015 which is when evidence submission will close. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country#RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

I have removed your PROD from this article because (a) it is different from the one previously deleted at AfD (for the same reason I declined another user's G4 speedy nomination), and (b) although it is unreferenced, references exist in the Swedish article sv:Kulturell rasism and could be added.

I am not saying that this article should be kept, but it needs another AfD discussion. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at [[10]] regarding Vandalism. The thread is [[11]].The discussion is about the topic Hair_fetishism. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NZ4Life (talk • contribs) 03:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

On 21 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alexei Vinogradov, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alexei Vinogradov was executed in front of his command, the Soviet 44th Rifle Division, after it was decimated at the Battle of Raate Road? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexei Vinogradov. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 16:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:DeathMatchClassic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Puedo.

Your evidence as the above link does not fall within the limited scope of the case as described on the evidence page.

Gamaliel's recent actions (both administrative and otherwise), especially related to the Signpost April Fools Joke. The case will also examine the conduct of other editors who are directly involved in disputes with Gamaliel. The case is strictly intended to examine user conduct and alleged policy violations and will not examine broader topic areas.

As the evidence presented is not within this scope it has been removed.

This has been carried out as a clerk action and should not be reverted with permission from the Arbitration Committee.

Amortias (T)(C) 13:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

The article Setec (Finnish company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

I have filed a dispute on the article of Fidel Castro. I do this because it is recommended "If you begin a discussion of another user on a common notice board, it is expected that you will notify the subject user by posting a message on their talk page". Do not report me as vandal. This is the only instance in which I will write something here. If this is not the way to do it, let me know how it is done. Jhaydn2016 (talk) 16:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Pudeo, you've been very active in the discussion. I wanted to make sure you knew that it's evolved into a Request for Comment and you had a chance to weigh in. Scaleshombre (talk) 00:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

You could try taking FreeKnowledgeCreator to the Administrator's Noticeboard if you are bothered by his behavior. I likely won't be back here until February. Otherwise you could put forward your other concerns about the Evola article (also note that he was found "innocent" of the charge of being a fascist in court), and how deeply unbalanced the article is with respect to the bulk of his work.

More use of Furlong's "Social and Political Thought of Julius Evola" might be appropriate, but here's the Italian Evola article for comparison: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Evola, and translation; https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=it&u=https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Evola&prev=search

Evola was a proponent of aristocratic radicalism, but see his critique of racism in this text: https://books.google.com/books?id=LRCiCgAAQBAJ

The esotericism is not dealt with at all, but its significance, and significant outside reaction, becomes evident if one reads the introductions to the yoga of power or the hermetic tradition - in "the path of cinnabar", he notes the London Pali society's recognition of the conformity of his interpretations with Buddhist thought.

Evola was a much more complex individual than the article paints him as. Some material from the Italian article might be able to point that out, and also the scholar E. Christian Kopff's introductions to the three English texts of Evola dealing with fascism should also be cited, if the primary source itself cannot be cited.

If the primary source could be cited, as for instance deeply selective partial excerpts from his Buddhist text, then his autobiography "The Path of Cinnabar" should be cited as an item dispelling most of the insinuations in the article.Gggtt (talk) 02:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Thanks for uploading File:Finnish SS arm badges.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Finnish SS Cuff title.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Regarding your edit here: Please review Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:No personal attacks, and WP:ASPERSIONS. Comments like the one you made are not acceptable. Thank you, Neutrality^talk 22:34, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

A righteous crusader who I often find making biased editing and yet calls himself "Neutrality" can't take civil criticism. Colour me surprised. --Pudeo (talk) 23:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

My last reply: No, making personal, evidence-free remarks is not "civil criticism" - it's personal attacks in violation of our explicit policy. This is not the first time that you've done the same thing. Our policy is clear: editors are required to be civil and not make wild accusations. Those who are unable to do so may be sanctioned. Thanks, Neutrality^talk 03:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

I've never done personal attacks in Wikipedia. I do have a cynical attitude to how things work (or rather, how they don't work) in Wikipedia, but that's not against the rules. --Pudeo (talk) 03:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

That's a lie - you tried to smear me on the talk page of the Damon article. You have a problem. 50.111.42.37 (talk) 01:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)HammerFilmFan

Thanks for uploading File:Football Association of Finland logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Pudeo, I removed this recent edit you made here. As I see you're an experienced editor, you obviously are aware that that kind of remark is an egregious violation of WP:BLP policy so there's no point in templating you. Please remember that it's unacceptable to attack living persons in this manner, especially without providing any supporting source material. Thanks. Hidden Tempo (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, no problem. --Pudeo (talk) 00:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Pretty sure that comment was sarcasm.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 03:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

SPECIFICO talk 00:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

[12]. Don't do that. Yes, this is a warning.Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Pudeo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Finland

Thank you for quality articles about Finnish topics, such as Finnish Civil War and Hilja Riipinen, adding ggod illustrations, for project work such as redirects and article talk pages, for "I do have a cynical attitude to how things work (or rather, how they don't work) in Wikipedia", for service from 2006, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Heh, thanks! --Pudeo (talk) 12:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 30, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)