Daily pageviews of User:Pyraminxsolver A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Hello, Pyraminxsolver. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Google Stadia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Pyraminxsolver. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amar Bharati".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AI boom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 Titan submersible incident, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:31, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nuclear Rabbit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A00:23EE:1998:5351:3538:BEA:A5C2:62D9 (talk) 12:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Nuclear Rabbit, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:1998:5351:3538:BEA:A5C2:62D9 (talk) 12:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nuclear Rabbit, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of books considered the best, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of books considered the best, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of books considered the best, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Percy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of books considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Pyraminxsolver,

Thank you for creating Killer symbol.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Only one of the sources cited uses the term "killer symbol," and even then it does so in quotes. Are there any sources that can be added to demonstrate this term itself is actively used or understood?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|FULBERT)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 13:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Finke Desert Race, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killer symbol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killer symbol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deauthorized. ^(talk) 00:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the ((Ctopics/aware)) template.

lizthegrey (talk) 01:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

i know Pyraminxsolver (talk) 01:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

oh you're that person... Pyraminxsolver (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Pyraminxsolver. Could you please elaborate on the meaning of this comment? Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 02:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

except for my observation that the world is indeed quite small and sometimes that fact will surprise me, and that my personal viewpoints don't disrupt how i edit and i look at facts, i'll disacknowledge any comments requesting further testimony as i don't wish to incriminate myself. Pyraminxsolver (talk) 03:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If this isn't going to be a recurring thing, then I won't press the matter. However, could you please amend the part of your comment that misgenders Lizthegrey? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 03:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	2023 Optus outage is a good page. Well done! Kiwiz1338 (talk) 05:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree! And thank you and all the other contributors involved. -106.70.91.181 (talk) 03:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Game Awards 2023, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 03:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 outstation murder-suicide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 outstation murder-suicide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

duffbeerforme (talk) 12:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your edits at My War have been reverted now more than once, and not just by me. Your archiving of the talk page was obviously not for maintenance, but to attempt to clear the way for more of your tendentious edits. You make your bad faith the more obvious when you reverted my edit at Johnny Ramone to restore an unsourced, obviously counterfactual statement with the gibberish rationale "unsourced removal". There's no way to justify that edit.

Are you trying to provoke people? If you don't stop, the above is more than enough evidence to request a block. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 20:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

no comment Pyraminxsolver (talk) 08:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nobody wants a comment. You'll stop, or there will be consequences. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 22:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

off topic question, but what is with the ip that edited my page? are you editing pages outside of your username or is this a mistake with you not logging in or genuine sockpuppetry (without ill intent) Pyraminxsolver (talk) 04:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]