Archives

1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9

An interesting read, I hope you are well. — R² 20:21, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I enjoyed reading that. Yes, I'm doing well, thanks. Hope you are too. Pyrrhus16 15:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The editor is beyond help, and keep your opinion and your personal attacks to yourself.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know how you can come to the conclusion that the editor is beyond help when you haven't bothered your backside to try. Pyrrhus16 23:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You really should review her history - my conclusion is quite well supported. And in the interest of full disclosure, I have reported her to WP:ANI and referred to my diff and your diff as part of my post. I don't mention you by name in the body of the post, but the diff, of course, shows your name.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

• Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
  • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
  • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing ((User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox)) on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pyrrhus, great work on E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (album). I'm not sure if you've seen yet, but I put down some comments and questions at FAC yesterday. I've also got an article up for review, in fact directly above yours in the listings: FAC/Cracker Barrel Old Country Store. It's somewhat unusual as a FAC, because the topic is somewhat contentious (the company history includes discrimination claims), and because a significant contributor was hired to research and rewrite it (that would be me). My contract with them has since expired, but I've been helping this process at the margins with Silver seren and other volunteers who are now making the direct edits. I think we're getting pretty close, but If you get a chance to give it a look, we'd certainly appreciate it. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 17:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I'll go and address the comments you left at the E.T. FAC, and then read and review the Cracker Barrel article. :) Pyrrhus16 19:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Pyrrhus16. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cracker Barrel Old Country Store/archive1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Since you have an album at FAC, you are surely familiar with the types of issues that might be relevant to the "Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)" FAC nomination. Can I request that you make some comments.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure. I'm away to bed just now but will take a look tomorrow morning. Thanks. Pyrrhus16 22:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think I have addressed all your concerns. Can you strike your concerns as you feel appropriate (and of course consider supporting).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:16, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Sony/ATV Music Publishing artists, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:34, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you think this is a canard? There are several rumours about Michael Jackson's presumed fourth son. Though nothing has been proven so far, it is worth mentioning as such, especially since Michael Jackson's own father confirms it. The Wiki ghost (talk) 07:59, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (album). TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. :) Pyrrhus16 20:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I see you successfully nominated this for FA (congratulations!) and obviously did a lot of work on the article. Would it be possible for you to address the two questions I raised on the article's Talk page and edit as appropriate? Regards, DocKino (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Coming soon, did you know? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	collaboration of singers
	Thank you for quality articles related to Michael Jackson, such as Say Say Say, and your work "beginning to end" on E.T., - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (6 September 2010)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A year ago, you were the 262nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of unreleased Michael Jackson material is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unreleased Michael Jackson material until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 13:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of unreleased Michael Jackson material is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unreleased Michael Jackson material (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 07:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Pyrrhus16! A discussion is currently going on the Talk:2012 Grammy Awards. SilkTork, a Wikipedian, moved the article titles of the Grammy award ceremonies from "nth" form to the year form. Please come and support us to bring it back to its old titles. Thank you! Janbryan (talk) 06:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Big Brother 10 housemates (UK) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother 10 housemates (UK) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  00:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hello michael jackson what are you doing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.65.98.158 (talk) 19:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi (I thought I would notify you of this),

A Place with No Name, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 10:47, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aplacewithnonameog.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

collaboration of singers
Thank you for quality articles related to Michael Jackson, such as Say Say Say, and your work "beginning to end" on E.T., - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (6 September 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 262nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seven years ago, you were recipient no. 262 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:We Are the World alternative cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. Was there anything I left out of the summary that you'd like to see put back in? I'd appreciate it if you could check the article one more time before its day on the Main Page. - Dank (push to talk) 21:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, Pyrrhus,in case you look back here, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MichaelJacksonDebbieRowe1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:We Are the World alternative cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Speechless.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dorian Holley, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chubbles (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:WikiProject The X Factor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 23:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:17, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you today for E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (album)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Pyrrhus16. In 14 years I'd never before seen a sub-titled audio clip. Very cool. Is it easy? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:People v. Jackson has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated List of unreleased songs recorded by Michael Jackson for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 11:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Michael Jackson - Beat It music video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]