This is the Qazin talk (discussion) page Qazin (talk) 02:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Qazin, Although it might be careless of me to describe this publicly, it occurred to me that you might appreciate knowing some of my motivation, which is essentially that I have the same relationship to the absolute pitch article as you do to Sight reading. I have a website of my own dedicated to the understanding and, I hope, development of absolute pitch-- so I've put in a lot of effort to enhance the accuracy and quality of the absolute pitch Wikipedia article, and I'd love to have a direct link to my home page, but if you read the discussion page for that article you'll see the tussle over promotional links that happened there. I'm pretty sure that Wikipedia policy is generally meant to keep the door closed to that kind of blatant promotion, and we're tarred with the same brush; but whether or not that's so, my interest in vigilant perpetuation of the discussion is mainly that, since off-line I'm in an academic environment, it helps me stay sharp in recognizing how to distinguish between sources percieved to be "reliable" or "unreliable", which was a big problem for me in the last two terms. aruffo (talk) 04:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Bachcell, thank you for your contribution to Sight_reading#Assessment_and_standards way back on 12 December 2007. I've recently been checking all the references on the article. I can't find any of the article content on the page your reference links to. I also followed the Zoo Music link on the page the reference links to and couldn't find the referenced content. Has the referenced site changed, or is there another deeper link that we should use instead? Also, there are no references for some of the material following the note 1 link in the content. If you have a minute, I'd greatly appreciate any guidance you can offer on this to help me clean up the references. Thanks, Qazin (talk) 04:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)