Hi QiuLiming1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 23:29, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Current events in china indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Current events in china has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CN Current has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai March 2022 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai March 2022 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Elli (talk | contribs) 20:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QiuLiming1,

You are too inexperienced to be closing a deletion discussion and you are considered "involved" as you are the article creator. This is highly improper. Do not ever do this again or you will lose your editing privileges. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I thought I could keep it because the nominator have withdrawn the nomination. QiuLiming1 (talk) 05:14, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that is not correct. But you are a new editor and it takes a long time to become familiar with Wikipedia policies. I don't want you to quit editing Wikipedia over this, I just don't want you to close deletion discussion until you have much more experience and are not involved. Please stick around. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I noticed that in this edit to 2022 Shanghai COVID-19 outbreak, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 23:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kirbanzo First of all, I added this content by myself, and I think it is unnesseacery because it does not relate specificly to Shanghai pandemic. QiuLiming1 (talk) 23:48, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. Please provide that kind of information in the edit summary next time, since it helps avoid misunderstandings like this. I won't revert if you remove said content again. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 23:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Internet speed test is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet speed test (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Inappropriate illustrations of Chinese textbook, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 01:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think all of those sources listed are reliable. at least they have been rated semi reliable in zhwiki QiuLiming1 (talk) 03:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Most Comfortable Chair was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inappropriate illustrations of Chinese textbook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Inappropriate illustrations of Chinese textbook, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— The Most Comfortable Chair 14:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QiuLiming1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — The Most Comfortable Chair 14:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QiuLiming1

Thank you for creating Noteflight.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. You really need independent sources to build the article and put it in firmer ground for surviving as a separate article. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000:I forgot to request speed delete this article, I created same article on Chinese wiki, and it got delete during an afd I requested, I can't found any reliable source describing this, and I highly suspect the number on the official website were fake. QiuLiming1 (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When I reviewed I did check that there was coverage in independent sources which means that it's probably OK for mere existence as an article. But as you point out, that does not resolve issues regarding verifiability of material in the article. North8000 (talk) 15:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Chu Wanghua, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. interviews are not independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:07, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		I have noticed that you are learning English, which is a very hard subject, and I want to say that you are doing a great job at it! You deserve this. Sportsfangnome (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a subpage for dead people, here it is:User:Sportsfangnome/Rest in Peace, I would like for you to also add people that meet my rules. Sportsfangnome (talk) 12:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportsfangnome Just a note: we already have Category:Dead people. QiuLiming1 (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Sportsfangnome (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I will analyse my sources but saying she is too young for a Wikipedia article doesn't seem correct. Karissa 247 (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QiuLiming1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:QiuLiming1/Inappropriate illustrations of Chinese textbook, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QiuLiming1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Inappropriate illustrations of Chinese textbook".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]