Hi Quake1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2011 Sikkim earthquake have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2011 Sikkim earthquake was changed by Quake1234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903371 on 2021-06-20T23:23:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quake1234! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 23:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dawnseeker, I’m 14 and I love earthquakes too, I maybe young and sometimes the edits may be mistakes or Actually Vandalism, but the young is supposed to make mistakes, if the edit is false and is edited back, then I will not revert it back, Quake1234 (talk) 23:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for that. Enjoy! Dawnseeker2000 23:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You too!! Quake1234 (talk) 23:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2021 Loyalty Islands Earthquake, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 19:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2004, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Papua. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2009 Tonga earthquake, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck u Quake1234 (talk) 16:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2009 Vanuatu earthquakes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:49, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I said that I hate my life all because of YOU Quake1234 (talk) 16:49, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2004, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ambon and Jumla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one thing that is cuter than a kitten and that is you. Keep up the great work!

V. E. (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank u Quake1234 (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks your so cool bro Quake1234 (talk) 11:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 1983, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gizo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, thank you for your edit in the Lists of earthquakes article in attempting to improve the section Largest earthquakes by year. Your edits however have introduced new issues; the claims are not cited and the beginning of each word is in caps. Please have them fixed. Thanks. CactusTaron (Nopen't) 15:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright and thx Quake1234 (talk) 16:43, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with March 2021 Miyagi earthquake. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Quake1234 (talk) 09:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from 2009 Vanuatu earthquakes. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. CactusTaron (Nopen't) 16:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 1998, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ishigaki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, please check the "impact" section of the USGS link in articles. A lot of the times it's in the infobox labeled "Comcat". In the impact section, you will find a seismologist's interpretation of the felt effects and they will give a few intensity values for several different locations. The difference between using the figures in the impact section versus the shakemap is that it's preferable to use the words of a scientists over those of a computer simulation. Dawnseeker2000 01:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please go back through your edits where you may have done the same to other articles? I was monitoring your changes for a while, but stopped a month or two ago. Dawnseeker2000 02:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but what are the pages I need to change exactly? Quake1234 (talk) 05:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's why I'm asking you to do it instead of searching for other possible instances myself. The hope is that you may remember some that you had done that way. Dawnseeker2000 22:10, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Quake1234 (talk) 22:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahau.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HurricaneEdgar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. i have rv your edit, this is unsourced and unrelated the haiti earthquake. HurricaneEdgar 08:21, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 August 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Haiti earthquake, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. HurricaneEdgar 08:44, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mw7.5 Quake in Hidalgo, Mexico gReAT

Mr. Dimentio (talk) 06:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! May I ask, why dud you replace the old relief maps of both the 2012 Negros earthquake and the 2013 Bohol earthquake? Just asking, and no worries I already turned both of them back to relief maps again. Not much of a big deal, really! :) Moctiwiki (talk) 02:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of Tremors in 1991. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 1#List of Tremors in 1991 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MoonlightVector 17:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Earthquakes in 1991, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lists of earthquakes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 1996, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bougainville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2021 Crete earthquake. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Any addition of information must be cited, and the contents must be reflected in the cited materials. Extrapolating sources is not the correct way to do it. Also do not remove any magnitude values from other seismic agencies without starting a discussion and reaching a consensus. This is clearly not the first time I have seen this. Please always verify and cite your addition of contents. CactusTaron (Nopen't) 23:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2021 Davao Oriental earthquake

added a link pointing to Davao

List of earthquakes in 2021

added a link pointing to Nanao

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Quake1234 (talk) 20:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck You Quake1234 (talk) 20:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Haiti earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of earthquakes in 1998

added links pointing to Qayen, Sogod, Gualdo, Zhangbei, Mugan and Nendo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reverted the unexpected changes you've made to some earthquake articles in regards to their seismic intensities. The USGS knows what they're doing so we should follow their ShakeMap intensity rather than one or two stations reporting something else. You shouldn't be extrapolating seismic stations, and using that as evidence for the claimed intensity. Also those "circle" stations are DYFI reports, not actual stations. You can ping Dawnseeker and/or Mike for their insights. Dora the Axe-plorer (Nopen't) 23:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry about this just the Shakemap stations, that are little dots or triangles that tell you how intense the shaking was in a location. I am very sorry and I will always follow the Shakemap. Thank you for reading this. Quake1234 (talk) 09:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another issue with your contributions are the ShakeMaps in the recent revisions of 2021 Crete earthquake and 2021 Chignik earthquake; the are obviously too large. It appears you inserted File:2021 Chignik earthquake shakemap.jpg into the | image = parameter. To avoid the oversized image, just remove File:. It should be | image = 2021 Chignik earthquake shakemap.jpg. Please take note of this when inserting ShakeMaps into the infobox. Cheers. --Dora the Axe-plorer (Nopen't) 22:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2020 Kamchatka earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:ITEXISTS Yes it is a large earthquake (largest since ...), but without any lasting impacts whatsoever, it does not need an article. Also, this event was first published under 2020 Kuril Islands earthquake before being turned to a redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dora the Axe-plorer (Nopen't) 02:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quake1234: I think the page you created should stay in it's current state and have said so in the AfD. But I also think it could be improved by adding info from the detailed analysis of the quake from ScienceDirect[1]. I don't have the knowledge to do an appropriate job of that, but I think you might. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 06:10, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Kamchatka earthquake, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Kamchatka earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quake1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2009 Tonga earthquake, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quake1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2009 Vanuatu earthquakes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quake1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 Loyalty Islands Earthquake, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for revising the Palu earthquake MMI with reliable and credible sources. To comply with Wikipedia:Citing sources policy, provide additional information like publisher, journal, volume, issue, date, author, doi, etc when made available. Please make a habit to fill in as much as you can into the citation template rather than just the title and url. Here's an example of what should be done:

Ping me here or drop a message in my talk page if you need any help. Cheers. --Dora the Axe-plorer (explore the morgue) 23:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quake1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2009 Tonga earthquake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quake1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2009 Vanuatu earthquakes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quake1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 Loyalty Islands Earthquake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Timor Leste earthquake, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Timor Leste earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 Gansu earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Gansu earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reego41 09:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have inserted Creative Commons licensed text into Wikipedia, as you did at 2002 Manokwari earthquake. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Badghis earthquake, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please join this Discord server?

https://discord.gg/bkJf6KZr6K — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crannofonix (talk • contribs) 18:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No thank you Quake1234 (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quake1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Earthquakes in 1991, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barranca.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2002, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yumen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quake1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Earthquakes in 1991".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2002 Manokwari earthquake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201704.0081/v1/download. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fukushima.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. HurricaneEdgar 12:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the ((copyvio/core)) template from articles. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at a temporary subpage linked from the article. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators and/or removers of the copyright notice templates will be blocked from editing. HurricaneEdgar 12:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I have to rv your edit your clearly using Google translate copying into the article that is call WP:Close paraphrasing according to them

Limited close paraphrasing is appropriate within reason, as is quoting, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text HurricaneEdgar 13:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the best way to go? (List of earthquakes in Indonesia) Dawnseeker2000 03:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2012 East Azerbaijan earthquakes into 2019 East Azerbaijan earthquake. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2007, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santo and Yeniyapan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am just asking if you can help me to expand the List of earthquakes in 1994 which I just created. Also can you also add missed quakes in List of earthquakes in 1993? Thank you! Filipinohere (talk) 11:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will help you right now! Quake1234 (talk) 13:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 1994, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nord-Ouest.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quake1234

Thank you for creating 2022 Hormozgan earthquakes.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited October 2014 Nicaragua earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Miguel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Majene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mamuju.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dora the Axe-plorer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1960 Concepción earthquakes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 22:04, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Pakistan floods, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 20:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to September 2022 Afghanistan earthquake has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2022 Afghanistan floods

added a link pointing to Bloomberg

2022 South Asian floods

added a link pointing to Bloomberg

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2022 Afghanistan floods

added a link pointing to Bloomberg

2022 South Asian floods

added a link pointing to National Disaster Management Authority

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am a rather new editor who mainly edits Wikiproject:Earthquakes articles, and I have seen you pop in the edit history from time to time. I looked into your page creations, and all of them seem to be either a start or stub class, with the exception of 1987 Chiba earthquake which seems to have had significant contributions from other editors. I appreciate your work in creating new articles on wikipedia, however I feel that creating lots of low quality articles goes against what Wikipedia is for. Perhaps it would be better if some of your time was spent on upping all of your articles to C class for example? Anyway, just some thoughts I had, feel free to let me know what you think and if I can help with that. SamBroGaming (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Quake1234 Re-reading my message, I come off across as quite harsh, and this is not my intent. I appreciate your contributions to wiki, so keep it up. My only concern is that a lot of your articles are not rated higher than start class, and since you create lots of articles, my concern is that as WP:ARTASS says, creating many start class articles may discourage other editors from touching your articles, and thus overall lowering the quality of articles that you create. I feel that if you worked on improving some of the articles you created to C class or above, potentially some other editor down the line may be more likely to improve it further. Again, let me know if you would like my help with improving some of your articles as I would love to do some of that as well. Thanks, SamBroGaming (talk) 01:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text from 2003 Colima earthquake to 2022 Michoacán earthquake. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am Dickonlandia, I mentioned you from the Cyclone Idai. So, We are going to mention and replace this in the calculator. If you can edit your summary, the people loved a lot from the wiki, so, I am going to use the calculator, good luck Dickonlandia (talk) 09:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when you propose merging articles, please start a discussion, otherwise the discussion links will show nothing and the articles can’t be merged. 72.80.246.5 (talk) 22:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. While I appreciate your attempts to convert the list into a table, could you make a good habit to fill in the edit summary boxes? Those edits to the 2011 list were really huge changes, and without the edit summary filled, set off an alarm in me for potentially damaging/unhelpful edits. I had to review them one-by-one to understand that your intentions were good. It would really help other editors understand what's going on, especially with major changes to the article, although, an edit summary for even the smallest edits is recommended. Please visit here so you can understand why I (and a lot of other editors) strongly encourage you do so. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 15:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2022 European heat waves

added a link pointing to The Mirror

2022 United Kingdom heat waves

added a link pointing to The Mirror

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 2022 Qinghai earthquake a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text from 2016 Solomon Islands earthquakes to 2022 Solomon Islands earthquake. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 10:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Destructive yet moderate earthquakes has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 13:11, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2005 Northern Peru earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tumbes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quake1234, it will have to be in the list regardless as it's mag 6 or greater. If it was less than mag 6, it would not be included unless there was evidence of significant damage in reliable sources. That's how Wikipedia works, we have to be able to verify that an event meets the criteria set out before inclusion, we shouldn't be including an event just on the off chance it might turn out to be worthy of inclusion. Mikenorton (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please Yaniskisspussey (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quake1234 is on a roll! Quake1234 (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the first time the earthquake had a magnitude 6.1/6.6 Yaniskisspussey (talk) 00:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider adding archiving here, as your user talk is getting quite long and difficult to navigate. Valereee (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source you have cited reports 5,553 deaths and injuries, not only deaths. Ecrusized (talk) 14:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Template:Cite news template when citing news sources. Replace "|website=" with "|agency=" or "|publisher=" parameters. I've told you many times in my edit summaries yet you haven't followed accordingly. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I appreciate this is a rapidly developing subject area but please make sure you verify your facts before you edit. And given how many edits are being made to the article, it would be very helpful if you could use descriptive edit summaries, especially when you're changing statistics or making other important edits, so that other editors can trace developments through the history. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I revised intensity of 2023 Kahramanmarash earthquake yesterday, I showed an source for my revise. Why my revision was taken back? Deprem Bilimi (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pagewatcher responding, the USGS provide good rapid determinations of various earthquake parameters, but their MMI results (which rely on self-reporting using the DYFI feature) are often superseded by more thorough ground surveys, as is the case here. These numbers may yet be updated further. I've added a citation to the infobox. Mikenorton (talk) 10:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Misawa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A gentle reminder that your approach to the revised earthquake magnitudes is very wrong. You should be taking the source material's value (7.95±0.013 & 7.86±0.012) as mentioned in the paper without rounding off the numbers. Misrepresenting source is wrong and your editing ethics (and reputation) will be scrutinized, you may read Wikipedia:Don't lie for additional context. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 22:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect February 6 earthquake has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 8 § February 6 earthquake until a consensus is reached. The Night Watch (talk) 18:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Houma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anything about blanking talk pages for new categories - so I am not sure what to say.

Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Earthquakes_in_Java&action=history - it would be well advised to at least project tags of the country and earthquakes when you start them... thanks. JarrahTree 10:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:August 2023 events in China indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2022 European heat waves, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello was an earthquake 7.2 i don't know was reviewed but I know 7.2 from Geonet Yaniskisspussey (talk) 10:17, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use the USGS; they have the magnitude at 6.6. Quake1234 (talk) 10:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have already put in the section for earthquakes of 7+ already the earthquake which now I see that it would be between 6.9 and 6.6 Yaniskisspussey (talk) 10:45, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You think that the earthquake in Morocco will cause 100,000 deaths, don't you? Yaniskisspussey (talk) 22:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not, based on the area affected, the death toll will likely be between 50-2,000. If it was above Mw7.5, then, maybe around that 100,000 figure. Quake1234 (talk) 22:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Earthquakes Barnstar
		I wanted to thank you for numerous contributions in regards to earthquake and disaster articles.

Salutations25 (talk) 09:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Quake1234 (talk) 09:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Herat earthquakes, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 05:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Nepal earthquake, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes 2021–2030, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burias.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's the first time I'll ask help from you, Quake1234, but there is a citation on List of earthquakes in 2023 in which there appears to be "#invoke:citation/CS1" and "Template:Cite news" errors that I don't know how to fix. Thanks! Filipinohere (talk) 13:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I've been trying to fix it too. When it comes to advice, I guess you should contact an admin about the problem. The templates say #invoke:citation as well, so I had to remove them until the error's fixed. Quake1234 (talk) 13:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, one Wikipedian have told me that the Post-expand include size was so large so this problem exists. So what should we do? Filipinohere (talk) 13:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We could shorten the text of some longer earthquake descriptions, or maybe changing the source could work. I've added an earthquake in China when the error was already there, but it didn't worsen anything. Two templates at the bottom (earthquakes by year and earthquakes of 2023) also don't work (it shows up as "#invoke:navbox" instead), so I had to remove them (as a failed attempt to fix the errors). If we keep trying new ways to fix these errors, a miracle may happen, even if we might fail 95% of the time. We can do this! Quake1234 (talk) 13:27, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the citation errors! I was right, shortening of the text did work! Quake1234 (talk) 13:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Jishishan earthquake, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 04:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to reach out in a friendly and informative way; I noticed several of your edits to 2024 Noto earthquake where you added references did not follow the style guide laid out at Help:Citation Style 1#Titles and chapters for use in templates such as Template:Cite news or Template:Cite web. Crucially, a romanization of the non-Latin script title should be used in the |title= parameter. The way I personally choose to do this is by simply pasting the non-Latin script into Google translate and the romanization appears underneath it. The rest of this you already seem to know: for titles in non-Latin scripts, they should be added using |script-title=. For example, with Japanese, it would be |script-title=ja:. The English translation of the title is then used in |trans-title=, with |lang= or |language= being used to indicate the language of origin. I've already gone ahead and corrected the existing refs on the article to follow this style. I just wanted to let you know for future reference. Regards. Rowing007 (talk) 17:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi do you have instagram? Yaniskisspussey (talk) 12:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Quake1234 (talk) 12:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wanted to remind you the edit summary is to let editors know what changes you're making to the article. Not for personal commentary. It'll be helpful if you can briefly explain what changes you make, expecially for large additions/deletions/changes Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, saw your attempt at the latest article of figuring out MT solutions. You're not quite there yet but it's a good attempt. there are plenty of resources online that demonstrates how to read one of these beach balls. Here's one I personally found very helpful, page two identifies the different types of beach balls, but I recommend to read on because it also breaks down fault strike and dip direction. IRIS has a YT video for this, though very generic, but it's nice. Cheers Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 12:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]