This case held that the parodic nature of a case is only one element in determining fair use.

It looks like you're getting some good information gathered for a possible article. If you want to work on an article draft, you should do so in your sandbox, at User:Radeonhead/sandbox. Your talk page is meant for other users to send you messages. Let me know if you need help with anything. --Geniac (talk) 04:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Fisher V Dees page looks like a great idea. Definitely start looking for a couple more references and look at other Wiki pages on court cases to get a better idea of what important components are involved in court case pages. Check out the contribs of some of the users in this class who all wrote or contributed to legal cases on Wikipedia and might be a good place to start. Atavel (talk) 06:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Radeonhead! As a student editor on Wikipedia, you have a lot of valuable experience about what it's like to edit as a part of a classroom assignment. In order to help other students like you enjoy editing while contributing positively to Wikipedia, it's extremely helpful to hear from real student editors about their challenges, successes, and support needs. Please take a few minutes to answer these questions by clicking below. (Note that the responses are posted to a public wiki page.) Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Sage Ross (WMF), 16:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fisher v Dees, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker^talk 18:11, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS: The article really needed a "lead section", which provides a 1-4 sentence summary of what is to come. I took a stab at it, but I don't speak lawyer, so you'll want to review, extend and perhaps revise what I've done there. Let me know if I can be of any help! Thanks! --j⚛e decker^talk 18:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may also be able to find law-on-wikipedia related assistance at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases --j⚛e decker^talk 18:17, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]