Hi Rahammz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Rahammz,

Thank you for creating Abdol Hossein Noushin.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add references. They appear to exists in the Farsi version of the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Vexations)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vexations (talk) 15:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Morteza Keyvan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 13:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unfortunately its pointless submitting Draft:Vladimir Tolmachyov (politician) to Wikipedia:Articles for creation unless you are going to add sources as it just wastes eveyone's times as its going to get rejected. Also please read WP:MINOR about marking your contributions as minor. It really is important you study and understand Wikipedia:Verifiability. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 01:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't write the article I just saw it was well written and mostly based on the original Russian article. I see you added sources now so there isn't any reason to reject the article Rahammz (talk) 14:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sources. Not sure of how to assess lower-level apparatchiks against WP:NPOL. Obviously people like Brezhnev, Khrushchev, Kosygin, and Podgorny warrant inclusions as heads of state/government. Even Gromyko as Minister of Foreign Affairs. I guess Tolmachev had the rank of Interior Minister, which I guess passes NPOL, but I need more sources for verification.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vladimir Tolmachyov (politician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vladimir Tolmachyov (politician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 17:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Erika Eleniak, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vladimir Tolmachyov (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 00:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rahammz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Morteza Keyvan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The page has already been made. That draft should be deleted. Rahammz (talk) 01:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Flix11. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contribution on Bruno Fernandes have been undone because they did not appear constructive and violating WP:LIVESCORES. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 22:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok no need to warn me. You said I could get banned from editing because of my "edit on Edinson Cavani" even though I did not edit his page. It seems it was a mistake. Rahammz (talk) 22:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Rahammz! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Execution of the Romanov family that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Considering it is a long article I thought it would be considered a minor edit. I will be more careful next time. Rahammz (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Help copy edit. Thank you. Vnosm (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi I’ve just reviewed Karl Steinhardt. Thanks for creating a good quality article and happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 07:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Longjumeau Party School, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Longjumeau Party School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:46, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi thanks for creating Jean-Baptiste Clément. If you need any help with anything please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Rahammz: I was wondering why you removed the Jewish identity in the above two articles. The sources refer to them as Jewish. scope_creep^Talk 23:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC) @Scope creep: According to Wikipedia,the "Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities or the place of birth should not be mentioned in the lead unless relevant to the subject's notability." Anatoly Gurevich and Daniël Goulooze were Communists and Soviet intelligence spies. There ethnicity and religious background is not relevant to the subject's notability.Reply[reply]

Your wrong, because your using MOS to dictate content, instead of looking at the sources, which is shockingly bad. These sources, which comes from books, Jewish newspapers, Jewish web sites and academic sites, Russian and Polish sources, all state or indicate they were Jewish and that was one of their primary driver as a group entity. I will now need to do the work to update these articles. Not even doing the work to check the sources. Shocking. scope_creep^Talk 17:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The fact that these articles used Jewish sources and those sources started their article or book with their Jewish background is irrelevant. The article still needs to subscribe to Wikipedia's MOS. "Anatoly Gurevich was a Jewish professional Soviet intelligence officer" is an absurd way to star an article considering the person was a Soviet communist spy and functionary. The ethnicity of those people are already mentioned in the early life section, I don't understand your insisting that it should be stated in the lead section. If you look at the corresponding Russian Wikipedia of Gurevich it is written in the same manner. Rahammz (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stanisław Radkiewicz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish Communist Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi thanks for creating Vladimir Potemkin which I’ve just reviewed. Is it a translation of the ru.wiki article? If so I need to add a template to the article talk page. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 18:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Most of the information is from the ru.wiki but it's not a direct translation with some information being added from different sources and some removed. So I don't think the template is necessary. Thanks. Rahammz (talk) 19:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your note. Copying any amount of material between wikis requires attribution - it doesn’t need to be a complete or even substantial copy, any amount needs the template, so I’ll add it. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 11:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ion Vincze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kuprian Kirkizh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vladimir Ivanov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi thanks for creating Anti-Bolshevist League and for correctly attributing the translated material. Mccapra (talk) 06:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not insert overlinked wikilinks and birth/death years to the articles, --Egeymi (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Instead of giving orders please consider do not insert overlinked wls, --Egeymi (talk) 23:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All professionally written articles also do not contain overlinked wls, --Egeymi (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm pretty sure adding a link to the country of origin isn't overlinkinking but I won't link it them twice next time

Hi I noticed that you have created many Soviet biographies. If you have time, I think it would be good to have Yakov Rapoport from Russian ru:Рапопорт, Яков Давидович. He was an important person in the construction of the White Sea canal like Sergey Zhuk. Thanks. 91.159.81.129 (talk) 18:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Rahammz,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 04:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mitrofan Grekov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Realism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I really love that I'm not the only one editing the Central Committee articles. Sorry that I reverted you're edits but let me explain. This template {sortname|Nikolai|Kubiak|Nikolay Kubyak)) ensures that the list is ensured after last name. The [[ ]] ensures that the list is sorted by first name.. If you want to change something - I'm guessing you want to change the links - do the following {sortname|first name shown in text|last name shown in text|article name} . This will ensure that the link is correct and the table sorts properly.

I am sorry that I have reverted some of you're edits.

On another note very good that you removed the Osinsky image. But notice that all other individuals that lack pictures uses the template {center|—} in its place.

Regards--TheUzbek (talk) 07:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rahammz

Thank you for creating Mitrofan Grekov.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rahammz

Thank you for creating Léo Figuères.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rahammz

Thank you for creating Isidor Lyubimov.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Elly Winter, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 04:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent editing history at Spanish Civil War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BusterD (talk) 10:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The user Havsjö has already reverted my edits 4 times and he didn't get a warning by you. The disagreement is that they keep removing an important commander (which is even mentioned in other corresponding Wikipedia of the Spanish Civil War). Apart from warning him from the edit war you should warn them for constantly vandalizing the article. Rahammz (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Havsjö stopped editing the article when I warned all contributors in talk. You took the lull as an opportunity to push your position by reinserting contested material. I warned folks on talk I would warn individuals. I have done as promised and am not finished. BTW, the WP:ONUS is on the inserter to demonstrate why such a figure belongs in the infobox. You must accomplish that on talk, not in live pagespace. Since the figure does not appear and as far as I can see has not ever appeared in the body of the article, it's an uphill push to suggest they must appear in an infobox intended to summarize the article itself. Arguing your point here with an uninvolved administrator isn't improving your position. Make your case on the article's talk page. BusterD (talk) 15:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My last revert was only a half an hour after your warning on the talkpage, and I only saw the warning a few hours later so I didn't meant to revert it again after the first warning. And I doubt the user Havsjö saw the talk page warning either considering he reverted my edits for the 4th time after the warning. Anyways I made my case on the talkpage but haven't got an answer.

Sorry for the constant reverts on the live spagespace. Rahammz (talk) 15:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, a few notes before you continue to edit birthdates in the lede: All year ranges are unspaced per MOS:RANGE and date ranges are only spaced when one side of the range has spaces, i.e., they're full dates. The lede paragraph need not show the full birth/death dates if they're sourced in the text. If they're not sourced at all in the article, they should be removed as unverified. czar 10:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Fritz Erpenbeck, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:32, 17 September 2022 (UTC) The article has a short biography section and is mostly directly translated from the German counter-part. I added another source regardless. The number of sources are enough for an article with such length. User:Onel5969Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your work on Jaromír Dolanský

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 06:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, may I ask the reason for deletion of categories and other stuff in the page? It may be just a mistake, but please check the pages after your edits. Egeymi (talk) 09:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes it was a mistake, I removed the commons category because the subject has nothing on in it. But for some reason it deleted the categories with it Rahammz (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you insert unsourced information? The source does not cite this person as editor-in-chief. So I will revert your edit. Secondly, did you have to disorganize the infobox when you added something to it? Egeymi (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Was not it possible to insert the information without disturbing the ordered parameters of the infobox? Egeymi (talk) 15:53, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What order in the infobox? I just added another editor parameter. Because there was only one editor-in-chief and another 3 man editorial team. If the parameters were distributed or whatever you can change it. I don't see what's wrong with how it currently is

I have fixed the order. Did not you see the order of the items in the infobox. --Egeymi (talk) 16:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hope you will be much more careful about your future edits. Because it's time consuming to correct the things after your edits. --Egeymi (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just added a editor section, if the order was changed it was probably done automatically. Hopefully you check the sources before reverting my edits next time. It's time consuming finding new sources Rahammz (talk) 17:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Fritz Erpenbeck instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fritz Erpenbeck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 09:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georgi Kulishev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatherland Front.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rahammz. Thank you for your work on Ivan Kairov. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Thank you for creating the article. I encourage and hope you will write more article in the future. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Helena Malířová is a lovely page. Good job! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Friedrich Jodl, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rahammz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fritz Erpenbeck, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rahammz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fritz Erpenbeck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Rahammz, hope you are well. I saw you added the death date to Pyotr Rachkovsky [1]. Do you have a reference for that? Most sources about his death just say it was most likely in 1910 and even that may not be correct. Thank you kindly, Meanderingbartender (talk) 20:04, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. There are multiple Russian websites that claim his death date to be October 19, 1910 [N.S. November 1].

https://old.bigenc.ru/domestic_history/text/3500209

http://www.hrono.ru/biograf/bio_r/rachkov.php Rahammz (talk) 20:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I added the source to the article. Although if you think it's inaccurate for whatever reason you can remove it and replace it with more reliable sources. Rahammz (talk) 20:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you kindly for adding the referernce. All the best, Meanderingbartender (talk) 21:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Howard Selsam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Rosenthal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 03:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dialectical materialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viktor Afanasyev.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rahammz. Thank you for your work on Romuald Minkiewicz. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day and Merry Christmas!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:32, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rahammz,

Thank you for creating Lucien Sampaix.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The text needs to consistently in the past tense.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Mccapra)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 07:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

((Re|Mccapra)) . Hello, the issues have been corrected. Would be appreciated if you reviewed the page. Rahammz (talk) 04:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean-Richard Bloch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of the Republic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]