Thanks for your support, glad to work with you again. Are you planning on bringing Ahalya to FAC again soon? I can try to take a look through the article again. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, prose is pretty tough to get to top quality, and good copyeditors are hard to find. I'll try to find time to read through the article and see if I can help at all. As far as other people who might be willing to help, I'd suggest Accedie, Despayre, Rothorpe, and Allens. They've each helped me on some of my articles recently and I've found them to be pretty skilled and eager to help. Hope it goes well, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and FYI, I pinged a few people today who said they would be willing to help out with copyediting. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hinduism is in need a volunteer coordinator. The volunteer coordinator would have the following responsibilities:

• Do whatever needs doing in the WikiProject Hinduism, or getting it done alongwith others.
• Do everything that needs doing in the WikiProject, or getting it done alongwith others.
• Look after the interests of the WikiProject community in general and the articles in specific.
• Represent the views of the WikiProject wherever representation/participation is sought; to get & put forward the community's viewpoint.
• Innovate and bring forth new initiatives, continue existing ones and retire defunct ones.
• Maintain the WikiProject infrastructure of pages.
• Community development - recruitment, motivation, empowerment.
• Join the mailing list for Wikipedians working on India related content on English Wikipedia (wikimedia-in-en [at] lists [dot] wikimedia [dot] org)

The Volunteer coordinator is a volunteer from the community and is answerable to the community. He enjoys the informal recognition and full support of the community. However, he is open to recall by the community, should the community so decide. I have been requested by User:Ashlin to recommend candidates and I have recommended you. Let me/Ashlin know if you are interested. Cheers, Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 07:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting. I was initially approached by Ashlin but Im pretty swamped myself, hence wouldnt like to commit though Im always there to support. Iv also pinged Ism schism, if your happy to work with him or Sriram or anyone else, thats great, we are then good to go. Cheers, Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 09:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...is located at User:Ucucha/HarvErrors. It is one of the more useful tools, especially since many pages that have harv formatting do contain errors. Somewhat random, but Ucucha has another handy tool tool you might be interested in, for finding duplicated links. Clay^Clay_Clay 10:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was just re-reading the lead of Ahalya, and I noticed that there is no article on the panchakanya. That might be a good idea for a new article. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Mark asked me to to work on this, so please don't edit the article for a few hours to avoid edit conflicts. Thanks, Alarbus (talk) 05:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 diff. Alarbus (talk) 08:12, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you like it. And you get it — the ease of narrowing page ranges is one of the key benefits of this approach to referencing. Named refs encourage citing to wide ranges, often a whole book, and they frequently are expediently re-used when the named ref is to some other page range.

This tweak is about getting those long urls out of the middle of your paragraphs and would allow you to reuse them if needed by simply adding a ((r|Wilson p650)) somewhere. With ((r)) I don't recommend using the inline page option. Alarbus (talk) 00:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again. edit should be undone. Two reasons: first it's simply complete information; the full citation should specify the full range of an article within a journal while the inline cites specify a page or range within an article (or omit it if referring to the whole article). Second, User:Citation bot will put them back into the full cites as it maintains articles (leaving the commented-out one, too). Alarbus (talk) 08:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We welcome you to post of volunteer coordinator for Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism. This volunteership is important because the WikiProject needs vision, guidance and direction and in the absence of anyone undertaking this responsibility in a holistic manner, the community felt that a volunteer coordinator was needed for WikiProject :Hinduism; in fact for each of the task forces/daughter projects/related projects to WikiProject India. We have asked for other volunteers to be co-coordinator alongwith you as you requested. Hopefully someone will respond soon.

Your appointment has been announced on the India Noticeboard and on the wikimedia-in-en mailing list. I strongly encourage you to join the wikimedia-in-en list. Feel free to approach the community for any cooperation you need. All the best for your new labour of love. Have fun & do great work. AshLin (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Joined the mailing list. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wish you all the very best. Please feel free to loop me in for temple related articles. Ssriram mt (talk) 17:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)ssriram_mt[reply]

Many Thanks for coordinating. All the very best. Needless to say, wanted to give a hand but I am swamped :-) -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 14:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since you are one of most brilliant contributors of Swami Vivekananda article, we want to inform you that we have nominated nominated Swami Vivekananda article in Wikipedia Good article category. Most probably you have already noticed it in your watchlist, still, we just want to make sure, you don't miss it!
Also note, the person who has nominated the article, this nomination is his first experience in this section. So, it'll be fine, if you recheck if everything has been done correctly.
Thanks once again for all your contributions! Even if the article fails to get GA status, we have really done an excellent team work! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 18:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Thirugnana Sambandar". Thank you. --George Ho (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a heavy case of sock-puppeteering. Hope you have instigated an SPI. Perhaps a revert to last good version would be appropriate after the SPI. AshLin (talk) 04:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sivamrutham123/Archive : Action taken. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Can you fix the reference errors you have posted in Vivekananda talk page? (At least few of them?) I'll not be able to do it correctly! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 19:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redtigerxyz, just wanted to bring to your notice that the Mantra-Rock Dance poster is nominated for FP, should you wish to take part in the discussion there. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Prāyaścitta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atonement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	Good work in Sita Mata article. Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 10:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar, Titodutta. A lot of work is needed to improve the article further. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 10:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	A plate of Modaks!
	Hope you have a sweet tooth because I am presenting you with a plate full of modaks. Keep up the great work! AshLin (talk) 19:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the sweetest award I have got. :) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redtigerxyz, just finished copyediting Ahalya. Hope you approve! Let me know if I can be of any more assistance – are you planning to take it to FAC? It's a fascinating article, and I'd be happy to pitch in where I can :) Accedie^{talk to me} 02:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redtigerxyz, and thanks for all your comments on the Rainilaiarivony review at FAC. Your suggestions were very helpful in improving the article. I think I've responded to all your points, so when you have a minute if you'd drop by again to have a look I'd be much obliged. Cheers, Lemurbaby (talk) 07:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tomorrow for sure. :) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's on my watchlist, so I won't forget. I want to have another read through anyway, to see if there's anything I missed in this long article, but it will be tomorrow before I do so Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:40, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Hinduism-related topics notice board#WikiProject Rambhadracharya. Thanks. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 09:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to figure out where I can complain about something. I'm kind of lost, don't understand Wikipedia's complex structure.

My complaint: The subject of Paranormal, Psychic, Metaphysical, New Age, etc. The articles in Wikipedia on these topics are heavily biased towards the skeptical. I mean to the extreme! There is a total lack of objectivity. I've heard this complaint many times from my peers. What is causing this, and how can it be rectified? Is there a cabal of skeptical editors controlling this?

Can you direct me to whom I would complain and how to resolve the problem? I'd rather not do it article by article, as it is a broad spectrum problem.

50.131.208.83 (talk) 22:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi anon. The best way to rectify a problem is to fix it yourself. Edit the pages or leave notes on the article talks.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Indian service award (bronze)
	For your efforts in Tag and Assess 2012 - many thanks and wish you achieve many more in the project. Ssriram mt (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey lal bagh! Thank you for your help during the FARC of Kolkata. The FARC has been closed, and the article remains an FA. Cheers!--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:02, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thatz great news. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 09:55, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Wiki Award You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! 66.87.2.193 (talk) 16:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, anon. Hope you will create an username and join Wikipedia to help improve articles soon... :) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This notice is to inform you that I have nominated the article Ra.One for a featured article promotion. The nomination can be viewed here. Any comments are welcome at the article's or my talk page. Thank you. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Redtigerxyz. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to ask you a question related to archiving of a url. Is it possible for editors to archive a reference url? If yes, can you tell me how its done? I need to archive the references from Box Office India, as they have a habit of disappearing a few months later. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Use [1] --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:32, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I used that, and most unfortunately, the Wayback Machine has very few Box Office India articles which are archived. Is there no way where we can archive them? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can use this service – [2]. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 17:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for showing me that :) ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll send it via email, if you don't mind. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• More of a copyright issue, actually. Direct translation and all Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Alright, sent Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Indonesian. If it were a local language I'd have been just as stumped as you Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:47, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, the titles are of Javanese origin through Sanskrit. I am not able to understand either language. The text itself though was Indonesian Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:20, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am really busy in real life, so I am afraid I do not have time to do spot checks on Ahalya now. Sorry, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.2.217 (talk) 20:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

• Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
  • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
  • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing ((User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox)) on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:58, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You put a ton of work into that article! I'm impressed that you stuck with it for so long. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the promotion of Ahalya to FA. You have made many significant contributions to Wikipedia over the years. Finetooth (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats to your hard work on making Ahalya a featured article. The credit goes to you. I wish I could have contributed more. Unable to do so. But you are doing excellent work.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 18:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulation! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 20:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats - I will line up some of the articles for your perusal. Ssriram mt (talk) 22:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! I believe this has been the toughest challenge for you so far in your wiki career and you never once gave up! Wonderful achievement. Thanks for the note, Im happy to contribute in a very small way to this :) Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 05:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My congratulations too - good to see your hard work recognized and the article getting the recognition it deserves. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 17:14, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks all. :) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, well done. --TheMandarin (talk) 04:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The India Barnstar of National Merit
		It takes a really tough editor to persevere and get a quality article to FA quality, especially where Hindu mythology is concerned. Well done, Tough Guy! :) AshLin (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of High Culture
		This barnstar is awarded to you for getting Ahalya to FA status. Kudos.... Dwaipayan (talk) 01:31, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 07:58, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Splendid job old chap!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have started two new articles:

• Karma Yoga by Swami Vivekananda
• Jnana Yoga by Swami Vivekananda

But, I am not sure of the article titles, we can not name Jnana Yoga & Karma Yoga, since there are articles on these (rel. Gita), and also we can not name Karma Yoga (book), since (I don't know any) but there might be other writers on this subject! So, what do you think about article titles? --Tito Dutta ^Message 18:45, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (books), Karma Yoga (book) would be a good title. If there is another book by the same name, then Karma Yoga (Swami Vivekananda book) is the best title. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sivananda Swami etc some more people have books on these names, there is not any Wikipedia article. Some people publish (ISCKON, Gita Press etc) Gita's chapter 3, 4 as separate Karma, Jnana Yoga!--Tito Dutta ^Message 13:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Karma Yoga (Swami Vivekananda book) and make Karma Yoga (book) a disambig.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:25, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Currntly your naming (of the articles) is excellent. Just now I found there is another article Raja Yoga (book), created in 2006, follows the same naming convention you have followed. We can make disambig page(s) when someone will create articles on other books of Karma Yoga etc.. What do you think? --Tito Dutta ^Message 14:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thatz good. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also can you tell me in File:Karma_Yoga_Swami_Vivekananda.jpg etc, in "date" section I have mentioned that, I have not got the front cover image of 1896 first edition book (which is in public domain), so I have used front cover of a recent edition of the book under fair use. But, the "date" section is not being displayed there. Is it expected to write only date or year in date? You can see the "date" information clicking on "edit" --Tito Dutta ^Message 14:59, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no date field in template. Corrected. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Tito Dutta ^Message 15:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Socratic Barnstar
		Thanks for help and suggestions! --Tito Dutta Message 15:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pradyumna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dwaraka

Tara (Ramayana) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kamban

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you review the usage of non-free images in the article? There seems to be quite a few, and I doubt if they pass WP:NFCC. Hence, I thought of asking you. Thanks. Secret of success (talk) 13:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The number of non-free images goes upto 9, consisting of one poster in the infobox, two copyrighted ones in the post-production section, four images in the visual effects and two in the costumes section. Secret of success (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redtigerxyz. You have new messages at Iramuthusamy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Two articles edited by me (moved to main space) are submitted for your kind perusal and review.

Muruga Nayanar and Perumizhalai Kurumba Nayanar Kindly review and instruct the needful. I have at the least one hour time to spare. What way I can be helpful in serving WP:Hinduism Project? Kindly suggest. Thank you once again for your guidance and support. Regards. Iramuthusamy (talk) 17:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest some step by step improving of articles bottoms up, what do you think Redtigerxyz?इति इतिUAनेति नेति Humour Thisthat2011 13:16, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three articles edited by me (moved to main space) are submitted for your kind perusal and review.

Muruga Nayanar and Perumizhalai Kurumba Nayanar Kanampulla Nayanar Kindly review and instruct the needful. Recent review about my two articles Jeera water and Dandi Adigal Nayanar are critical about the neutrality, reliability of the citations and other issues. I am consulted the sources that are reliable for the specific subject being covered. Kindly help me. I have at the least one hour time to spare. What way I can be helpful in serving WP:Hinduism Project? Kindly suggest. Thank you once again for your guidance and support. Regards. Iramuthusamy (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Dandi Adigal Nayanar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nayanar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had contacted the original copyright owner of the files, which was the cinematographer of Ra.One himself - Nicola Pecorini. We conversed on copyrights (he is an avid Wikipedia watcher, it seems) and he was surprised about the copyright discussion since he had always aimed it to be free files. I requested him to explicitly confirm the free nature, and all the mails regarding the copyright have been forwarded to OTRS. If you wish, I can forward the mails to you as well. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:54, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for improving the quality of content in a unique way to meet out challenges raised about the article Dandi Adigal Nayanar on neutrality grounds. I am much benefited by this unique demonstration and learned some more skills. Iramuthusamy (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Four articles edited by me (moved to main space) are submitted for your kind perusal and review.

Muruga Nayanar and Perumizhalai Kurumba Nayanar Kanampulla NayanarRudra Pasupathi Nayanar Iramuthusamy (talk) 17:14, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two points :-

• Are the producer details required? Even in the main article the producers are mentioned only fleetingly.
  • IMO, Yes. Very important persons :)--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• There is only one section that requires summarization (Economics) and I shall do that hopefully by today/tomorrow. I shall place the construction template under that section.

Cheers. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a note on the FAC. I will take a look. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cuts have been made in the article. For the FAC, could you look up the resolved comments you placed? If you are satisfied, please move the resolved comments to the FAC's respective talk page to avoid cluttering the nomination. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 07:39, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really impossible to finish it within this review itself? I mean, I am at a stage in real life where I will most probably not be able to push further for the article's FAC if this one gets failed. That's perhaps the only reason I am working on it so much. Please give me a small window of time. I assure you, stability will return in a day or maximum two. I am working on adding summaries for the post-production and a final two paragraphs for the Economics section; and also, I shall work rapidly on the other concerns you have brought. I hope you understand. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 09:41, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a summary for the post-production section. Just for the time being, ignore the reference bit (I will surely add that now), could you tell me if it is alright? I will be working significantly to correcting any problems pointed out. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 10:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done References added. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 10:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redtigerxyz. You have new messages at Talk:Ra.One#Post-production_summary_comments.
Message added 10:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Hi. I found an error in the article (see photo). Copernicus was not a German, he was from Poland. --Top811 my talk —Preceding undated comment added 16:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Please edit the article and correct it. I don't know much about the subject. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have proposed to merge Yajna and Homa (ritual) without giving any reasons on the talk page. While Homa is a type of Yajna in Hinduism, the Homa article also has content related to Japanese Esoteric Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism and Jainism. Such being the case, a merger of the two is not workable. If you have reasons to suggest a merger we can discuss them here or at Talk:Yajna. CorrectKnowledge (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged the above article for Hinduism based on its being included in the Synoptic Outline of Hinduism from the Jones Encyclopedia of Religion, as can be seen at User:John Carter/Religion articles#Hinduism. It is also included in the outlines of several other major faiths as well, apparently because there are also in that book several subarticles relating to the topic of "orgy" in various religions or areas. I know at least Buddhism is included as well. Having not actually looked at the articles, I don't know all the relevant material, but I assume that the editors had a reason to include it. Anyway, just giving my reasons for tagging the article. John Carter (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Ahalya Barnstar
		For your sincere and tireless efforts in getting Ahalya to FA status. Keep up the good work! —Vensatry (Ping me) 07:41, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you re-assess the Yajna article for both WP India and WP Hinduism? I have expanded the content and added references to most of the content in the article. I have also improved the wording of the article and removed POV and sections needing citations for more than a year. I will also be grateful for any comments on how to improve the article further. Thanks. CorrectKnowledge (talk) 11:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of Ahalya know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on May 22, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 22, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Ahalya is the wife of the sage Gautama Maharishi in Hindu mythology. Many Hindu scriptures describe that she was seduced by Indra, cursed by her husband for infidelity, and liberated from the curse by Rama (an avatar of the god Vishnu). Created by the god Brahma as the most beautiful woman, Ahalya was married to the much older Gautama. In the earliest full narrative, when Indra comes disguised as her husband, Ahalya sees through his disguise but nevertheless accepts his advances. Ahalya and her lover (or rapist) Indra are cursed by Gautama. Although early texts describe how Ahalya must atone by undergoing severe penance while remaining invisible to the world and how she is purified by offering Rama hospitality, in the popular retelling developed over time, Ahalya is cursed to become a stone and regains her human form after she is brushed by Rama's foot. Medieval story-tellers often focus on Ahalya's deliverance by Rama, which is seen as proof of the saving grace of God. Her story has been retold numerous times in the scriptures and lives on in modern-age poetry and short stories, as well as in dance and drama. Ahalya is extolled as the first of the panchakanya ("five virgins"), archetypes of female chastity whose names are believed to dispel sin when recited. While some praise her loyalty to her husband and her undaunted acceptance of the curse and gender norms, others condemn her adultery. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats ;) Br'er Rabbit (talk) 00:17, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, glad to see you've got TFA! Mark Arsten (talk) 00:54, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:01, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well done and congratulations on Ahalya being Today's Featured Article! Thank you for all the hard work you've put into improving Hinduism articles on Wikipedia. I hope you'll keep it up and that we'll see many more like Ahalya on the main page. Best wishes, Lemurbaby (talk) 04:00, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 06:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just went through the history of the article and saw the fantastic efforts you put in. Warmest congratulations! Hisham (talk) 07:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gajasurasamhara, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Slayer of the elephant, depicted dancing vigorously inside a flayed elephant hide, is popular in Pallava and Chola art? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gajasurasamhara.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	beauty of Hindu mythology
	Thank you for revealing the beauty, powerful life and sensuality of Hindu mythology, present in figures such as Ahalya, - a blue jewel should go well with her and a red tiger, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Matches well with us :) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In celebration of Ahalya appearing on the main page today! :D Accedietalk to me 17:01, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-nominated Works of Rambhadracharya for FL status here. Since you commented on the previous nomination, I though that you might like to comment on this one too. Regards, :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 07:51, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. First up, thanks for you detailed review at the FAC; I took heed of your point re comprehensiveness and with the help of a few others found a few strong sources that filled in a lot of the gaps you had mentioned. There has also been a significant re-org and rewriting, so I was hoping, if you get a chance, you might be able to revisit at some stage. You helped drive the article on a fair bit and I'd appreciate input again. Best and thanks. Ceoil (talk) 00:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Thank You
	With the help of contributors like you, the Tag and Assess 2012 project has achieved the planned objectives. Close to 65,000 articles have been assessed and 19,000 articles have been added to the scope of the project. Please do watch out for the post tag and assess activities. Thanks a lot. Ssriram mt (talk) 00:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for taking part in the second FAC of Ra.One. I'm taking some concerted efforts to ensure that the article passes the third attempt. Hence I have started a peer review for it here. I would be really relieved if you could comment here, in a detailed FAC-level review that will hopefully clear out all problems before becoming an FA. i hope you aren't too busy :). Thanks.

P.S - Congrats on Ahalya; saw it on the Main Page, but it slipped my mind to congratulate you then :P. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:35, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redtigerxyz, Thank you for your reply.Based on your feedback we had edited the information on our page and subsequently adding the necessary resources from the dailies The Hindu and New Straits Times, Malaysia (http://conf2010.agastiarpeedam.org/english/images/nst_fwcsp_190507.jpg) of national newspapers, videos from popular Indian Television networks (SUN TV,Jaya TV), which are later published in www.youtube.com. From 2004 to 2009, Our Guru composed, recorded and even sang several songs of Thiruvarutpa for Thiruarutpa Deiva Isai Amutham project of www.vallalar.org (http://www.vallalarspace.com/ThiruArutpaAudio). Is these information enough to support to retain our page ? Thanks Arulraja (talk) 12:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Arulraja[reply]

Hi added the source for our Guru's life broadcast by a television channel.Arulraja (talk) 14:46, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Arulraja[reply]

....over here. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Centenary_year. But nothing urgent. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

O wow! It will be fascinating to collaborate with you and Dr Blofeld. As told in Blofeld's talk page, I have already ordered copies of those two books. Once they arrive, I would start updating the article. And yes, I have access to JSTOR. So, if you find some reference available through JSTOR, please add them in the talk page. I will also do the same. The CNN-IBN documentary that you added (I have not seen it yet) would be valuable, I hope.

Do you think we should convert the reference styling to sfn and efn (as in India or Ahalya)? I have not worked in that style yet, but you know the technique well. Regards, --Dwaipayan (talk) 13:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I later found out that Mrinalimi Sinha's book does not really have any connection with the film. Anyway, I have began collecting the PDF of appropriate articles available through JSTOR. I will share those articles with you by email, so that you can also use those articles. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:54, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's an interesting book! Dialogue with commentary. I do not have access though. It is available in Yale library, but they won't probably allow me to borrow that!--Dwaipayan (talk) 23:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redtigerxyz. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

Hello, Redtigerxyz. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

Please read the following before making unilateral changes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ConsensusVegeYoga (talk) 20:16, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind weighing in your opinion here. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 04:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redtigerxyz, thanks for your suggestions for this FLC. While incorporating your suggestion of de-linking many terms i got stuck here:- List of The Doon School alumni#Armed forces. I'll be grateful for your help here. What should I de-link here? Lt. Gen., Air Marshal,etc? I look forward to your opinion. Thanks!--Merlaysamuel :  Speechify  11:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OVERLINK. Link only once and that which is relevant. I would have retained 1 link for army titles and removed the rest. Also removed all links to common words like writer, actor, musician, artist, singer etc. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks. I have done a lot of de-linking now. If you still see anything left, please do let me know. Thanks for your time.--Merlaysamuel :  Speechify  18:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, "Avoid linking plain English words" like writer, actor, musician, artist, singer. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have de-linked those words already...--Merlaysamuel :  Speechify  18:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Writer in "Literature", actor in "films" is linked, "headmaster" lead. Remove all instances of common words. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for my ignorance. But how does sorting help, as you commented on the FLC nomination? --Merlaysamuel :  Speechify  18:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting: See Wikipedia:Featured list criteria Structure. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently added this script User:Ucucha/duplinks.js --Tito Dutta ✉ 22:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explore my User:Titodutta/vector.js page. There are two dablink related scripts– one is Uchua's script another is User:Lilac Soul/dabsolve.js. I am not totally confident right now which script I am using! But, it is very helpful. I feel, you'll able find out easily. You can ignore those Mosnum Engvar etc scripts, those only quickly correct American British English mix up, DMY MDY mix up etc.

You can see this screenshot (click to enlarge), I am using this dabsolve option! --Tito Dutta ✉ 05:52, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No thank please! Though I have made comparatively many more edits using dabsolver etc script, but I am more excited with another tool I have found recently–ignore it if you already know– this is Google book citation tool – http://reftag.appspot.com/ It has made my Google book citation upto 200% easier. --Tito Dutta ✉ 06:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also curious, do you use any old newspaper archive? I do not have JSTOR access, so, sometimes rely on tools like Google's old newspapers etc! For example see here you'll get some good old documents on Gandhi's arrests. See coverages of Independence of India in some newspapers. I found these very interesting. You can change date range in tools at right side. If you knew it just ignore! --Tito Dutta ✉ 09:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please reassess the following, i have widely expanded - Marundeeswarar Temple, Thyagaraja Temple, Tiruvottiyur, Parthasarathy Temple, Triplicane, Rameswaram and Hanuman Chalisa. I am also planning to push Rameswaram to GA - can you please help with peer review at Rameswaram peer review. Ssriram mt (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for reassessing. I will rework on the comments for Rameswaram. Ssriram mt (talk) 21:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rameswaram - latest updates in here. All review comments have been incorporated and lot of cleanup has also been carried out - please let me know if it can go up to GA. Ssriram mt (talk) 00:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!
With experience of so many FA-GAs it would be good if you could find some time and take up the peer review of 59th National Film Awards. I and User:Vivvt have no much experience with this. Also based on this article we would then start working on 58th National Film Awards. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think this can be a GA after some tweaking?

Tomorrow. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am Miha. I wrote and nominated article Alapainui for a good article, but this never happened. I made corrections at Alapai. Can I now nominate it again?--Miha (talk) 17:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your hard work and clearing the disambiguations. Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you re-assess the Cārvāka article for both WP India and WP Hinduism? I have expanded the content and added references to most of the content in the article. I will also be grateful for any comments on how to improve the article further. Thanks. CorrectKnowledge (talk) 22:44, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can you please review Madurai - I am trying to promote it to GA. I have created the peer review here. Ssriram mt (talk) 15:43, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weekend. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:30, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot - i will start working on this early next week to closure. Ssriram mt (talk) 07:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ra.One has been placed for FAC (again), and I request you to give your comments on it there (again). Something other than a "Comment" would be useful. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look, if you are not interested in doing it, fine. I am not forcing you. However, inform me about your unwillingness. I've been waiting a while for a response, and if you don't want to respond, then delete this section. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There have been lots of changes; please respond. If you are satisfied with the changes, and feel that the article can be rectified in this FAC, I suggest that you make your vote a comment, since even one Oppose will archive this nomination prematurely. I'm desperate to pass this time, but I am not canvassing and it is strictly on your judgement. But please consider the option. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:41, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still reviewing the article? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 12:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. The article Sangeet Sharada is nominated for DYK. Looking at your user page, I believe you would be able to help us as DYK needs second review and some of the sources mentioned in the article are in Marathi. I would appreciate if you can take some time from your busy schedule and a look at it. - Vivvt^Talk 19:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't need my review now, got a green tick before I could read it. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:00, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That correct. Another reviewer reviewed it. I was under the impression that sources in Marathi is an issue but then thanks for your attention and reply. - Vivvt^Talk 17:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Redtigerxyz/Archive 16!, we are looking for editors to join WikiProject Indian cinema task force, a joint task force run between WikiProject Films and WikiProject India to ensure that Indian cinema-related articles on Wikipedia are written in an encyclopedic style, in a neutral manner using verifiable and reliable sources. We thought you might be interested, hoping that you will join us. Thanks!! Click here to add your name.

. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

• Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:30, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Red Tiger XYZ, How are you? Do you know any site similar to Bollyhood Hungama where I can get image files of Bengali actors/people? --Tito Dutta ✉ 06:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No idea. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:01, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redtigerxyz I don't think you remember, but a few months back you reviewed Uttarakhand here.Since then the article has made considerable progress and is again ready for peer review.It would be helpful if you could give your inputs.Thank You.Ayanosh (talk) 09:08, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redtigerxyz, your expertise is required at Talk:Bhagavad_Gita#Sources. When you find the time, please have a look at the discussion. Thanks. CorrectKnowledge (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but since i am busy I would not be able to participate in this long discussion. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:04, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem, in short– we are trying to rewrite the Gita dating section, some sources have been gathered, can you please give your opinion after we'll finish creating our final list of sources and comment on the sources (reliable, non-reliable, important, not-important etc)! If you can, it'll be helpful, and I (or someone else)'ll let you know when your opinion will be needed! --Tito Dutta ✉ 15:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Can weight in on reliability of a final list. But you will have bear with a delay in response. :) I now-a-days only edit excessively on weekends.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That'll be excellent! --Tito Dutta ✉ 15:30, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you get some time, comments in the peer review will be greatly appreciated. After this article is done, will work on Mother India. Meanwhile, if you manage some time (no hurry), would you consider converting references in Mother India to sfn style? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:09, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]