Welcome to my talk page! Please click here to add a new message!

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Map of the Soul: 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Map of the Soul: 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Map of the Soul: 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you add the Music Rank Extra Awards to the voices of the awards and recognitions of K-pop artists? Ghostintears (talk) 08:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ghostintears: Hi. Does the awards show have significant coverage and is it notable enough per WP:N? It could be added once there are reliable secondary sources that are independent. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 14:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ashleyyoursmile: here are the sources: https://musicrank.wixsite.com/vote Ghostintears (talk) 22:19, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ghostintears: This might not work, its better to try looking for newspaper or magazine sources. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 09:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ashleyyoursmile: I put it on the YouTube channel of the Award. More relevant like this :) Ghostintears (talk) 09:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ghostintears: Would you mind helping me with a file? I didn't know who else to ask. I want to know how I might be able to use an existing image file from the Black Swan (film) page on the music video section of the "Black Swan (song)" page but I don't know how to. Thanks. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DNA (BTS song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cool (Jonas Brothers song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Idolator

Only Human (Jonas Brothers song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Hanes

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black Swan (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Renamed user 7z42t3k8qj. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Black Swan (song) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! -- puddleglum2.0 21:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Black Swan (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Black Swan (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Black Swan (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Black Swan (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited More & More (Twice song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Running Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Cool (Jonas Brothers song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Adore You (Harry Styles song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LOVI33 -- LOVI33 (talk) 20:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Adore You (Harry Styles song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Adore You (Harry Styles song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LOVI33 -- LOVI33 (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Adore You (Harry Styles song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Adore You (Harry Styles song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LOVI33 -- LOVI33 (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dye (EP), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the title of Got7's 2020 EP Dye is a pun referring to both colour and death as they relate to "eternal love"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dye (EP). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lights (BTS song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Variety and Chiba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cool (Jonas Brothers song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Jonas Brothers' song "Cool" has several popular culture references in its lyrics, including Post Malone, Game of Thrones, and 1950s actor James Dean? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cool (Jonas Brothers song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Crazy (EP) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 11:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black Swan (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that BTS transform into black swans in their music video for "Black Swan"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black Swan (song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of More & More (Twice song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Catallena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gangnam and After School

Crazy (EP) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lights (BTS song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lights (BTS song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lights (BTS song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 15:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Only Human (Jonas Brothers song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Jonas Brothers wrote and recorded the song "Only Human" mostly via FaceTime? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Only Human (Jonas Brothers song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Guerillero | Parlez Moi 12:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Ashleyyoursmile|<font color="DARKTURQUOISE">Ashley</font>]][[User talk:Ashleyyoursmile|<font color="DEEPPINK">yoursmile!</font>]] : Ashleyyoursmile!

to

[[User:Ashleyyoursmile|<span style="color:DARKTURQUOISE">Ashley</span>]][[User talk:Ashleyyoursmile|<span style="color:DEEPPINK">yoursmile!</span>]] : Ashleyyoursmile!

—Anomalocaris (talk) 01:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anomalocaris, Thank you for notifying me. I shall use the new code. --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lights (BTS song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lights (BTS song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Any Song, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Zico's "Any Song" dance challenge went viral on TikTok after several South Korean celebrities including Hwasa, Chungha, and Lee Hyori participated in the trend? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Any Song. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des​ 21:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 12:02, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mic Drop (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Adore You (Harry Styles song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the video for Harry Styles's single "Adore You" was praised for "elevating a good pop song to something closer to absurdist art"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Adore You (Harry Styles song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Reload (EP) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 00:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article More & More (Twice song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the music video for Twice's song "More & More" was inspired by the Garden of Eden (depicted)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/More & More (Twice song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Catallena you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Catallena you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Catallena for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Catallena you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Catallena for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 17:41, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lights (BTS song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that BTS's Japanese single "Lights" surpassed one million pre-orders in Japan and broke the 24-year-old record of Celine Dion's 1995 single "To Love You More"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lights (BTS song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Catallena at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Morgan695 (talk) 21:33, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reload (EP), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that NCT Dream performed songs from their album Reload on the world's first paid online concert Beyond LIVE? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reload (EP). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Reload (EP)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mic Drop (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LOVI33 -- LOVI33 (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mic Drop (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mic Drop (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LOVI33 -- LOVI33 (talk) 02:41, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your GA review of the song and I would have replied on the review page but you have archived it, but it is great to see you used the article history template on the talk page that I have consistently been employing and it's awesome to know that you are glad to see my work on Wiki! --K. Peake 10:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, you're welcome. I might not have been able to provide the "perfect" review for the article, since it only my second review. However, I think I have learnt a lot from your reviews of my articles and hope to improve on that by reviewing more articles in future. Its thanks to editors like you that new users are can learn more about the site and make this a better place. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 11:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mic Drop (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mic Drop (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LOVI33 -- LOVI33 (talk) 16:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Candy (Baekhyun song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Baekhyun compares his charms to various flavors of candy in his song "Candy"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Candy (Baekhyun song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Candy (Baekhyun song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fake Love (BTS song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Electronic and Acoustic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crazy (EP), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while the title track of Crazy features the signature sound of South Korean girl group 4Minute—a hip hop– and trap-infused dance number—its lead single was a ballad? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crazy (EP). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Crazy (EP)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Catallena, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the song "Catallena" by South Korean girl group Orange Caramel interpolates a sample of the Punjabi folk song "Jutti Meri"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Catallena. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Catallena), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des​ 01:20, 8 August 2020 (UTC) 00:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article DNA (BTS song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lirim.Z -- Lirim.Z (talk) 00:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've begun my first pass at copyediting the article Any Song. Please expect a ping on the article's talk page as I will most likely have questions. My process can be found here. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article DNA (BTS song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:DNA (BTS song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lirim.Z -- Lirim.Z (talk) 12:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mic Drop (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that BTS's song "Mic Drop" was inspired by former US president Barack Obama's mic drop at his last White House Correspondents' Dinner in 2016? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mic Drop (song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mic Drop (song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The format parameter in infoboxes was deemed unnecessary by consensus and removed from the template earlier this week hence Mal Arken's removal of it, and then subsequent undoing of your restoration earlier today. Just in case you didn't know. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 20:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carlobunnie, thanks for showing me this. This could prevent further edit warring. --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carlobunnie, an editor recently added an audio sample of "Dynamite" to the article's page. The song has been out for like 3 days. Don't you think it is a bit early to add the snippet now? I don't know if samples could be added immediately after a single release. Plus the sample is of 30-seconds, which exceeds 10% of the original length. --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:23, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ashleyyoursmile: I just saw it and yeah I'm thinking it's really early to add it so quickly. Can't recall seeing any documentation on how long before an audio clip can be added but if it were me I wouldn't include it so soon. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 05:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carlobunnie, should we just revert the edit and leave an appropriate edit summary? --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why not. It's possible he was pre-empting you asking him to do it later on when you eventually aim for GA like you did with Black Swan+Lights. I think the revert + clear explanation would be fine. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carlobunnie, I see. Maybe that's actually the case. I'm reverting the edit then. --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article DNA (BTS song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lyrics of BTS's song "DNA" compares love to a mathematical formula and divine providence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/DNA (BTS song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, DNA (BTS song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Not Today (BTS song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 13:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Not Today (BTS song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Not Today (BTS song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 07:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am once again honoured to be reviewing one of your articles, though a user said that I seem to use too much verbiage during reviews. From your experience, do you agree or feel as if I give feedback where it is fully needed? Don't feel afraid to be honest, since I am open to constructive criticism. --K. Peake 07:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, hi! Thank you for taking up this review. Apologies for getting back late. Honestly you were the first user to do a GA review for me and I haven't felt that the changes suggested by you so far have been superfluous. Please continue with your good work around Wikipedia. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is fine since we all take our time off; thanks for telling me how you feel and I will get round to starting the review tonight! --K. Peake 16:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have made my initial comments now and will do some more tomorrow and maybe afterwards, depending on what's in my schedule. Have a great day and it's always a pleasure to collaborate! --K. Peake 18:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, thank you! I shall address them now. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 07:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spring Day (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Not Today (BTS song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Not Today (BTS song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 10:41, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Music Barnstar
		For improving a lot of BTS related articles to GA-status and your work on music related topics. — The Most Comfortable Chair 11:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Most Comfortable Chair, thank you so much for this. I saw that you have passed the GAN. Many thanks even though a concern pointed out by you about the timeline thing hadn't been actually addressed. I shall try to fix it in the meantime. Apologies if I've kept you waiting. Do keep up with more GA reviews. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. I felt it was unfair to hold promoting a well-written article such as that over one minor point. Keep up the good work! — The Most Comfortable Chair 14:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Spring Day (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spring Day (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Spring Day (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spring Day (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blood Sweat & Tears (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 05:41, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blood Sweat & Tears (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Blood Sweat & Tears (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blood Sweat & Tears (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Blood Sweat & Tears (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ashleyyoursmile. I'm sure you know that the bot is broken and is not notifying nominators on a GA status. I thought that I would let you know that I have reviewed your GA nomination of Fake Love (BTS song). Hope to see your responses soon! LOVI33 01:49, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LOVI33 hi! :) I wasn't around here much since I reviewed the GAN for you so I had no idea that the bot was broken. Thank you for taking up the review and notifying me. I shall address the concerns now. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Japanese? The singer is not japanese and songwriters is not japanese. Why did you change the original album cover to Japanese cover? I think the explanation of the song you changed is not about the artist and the song, but about Japan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuraja01 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Samuraja01, first of all when you visit an editor's talk page, you should leave your message at the bottom of the page and not the top. Regarding your question, it shouldn't concern you in the least if I'm Japanese or not for that matter. What matters here is that the song (I presume you are talking about "DNA" here) was released in two separate languages- Korean and Japanese. While the Korean version serves as the "lead single" of Love Yourself: Her (assuming you know what lead single refers to), it was released simultaneously with it's parent album and hence doesn't have a separate "cover"; which is precisely why we have used the cover of the Japanese single album for "DNA" that also happens to includes the singles, "Mic Drop" and "Crystal Snow". No one is going to change that, because that's correct and will remain so. From your edit history, I can gather that you are new here, and you need time to go through other similar articles instead of going ahead and making changes which you think are correct. Also, the singers might not be Japanese, or the songwriters for that matter- however they have recorded the song in that language is what is important here. That too, it's a single. If you have further questions, feel free to visit the Wikipedia:Teahouse. They'd probably best know how to help you around here. Last advice, next time make sure to sign off your posts using four tildes like I've done. Cheers! --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Map of the Soul: 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fred Gibson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Any Song you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Any Song you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Any Song for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Any Song you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Any Song for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Crazy (4Minute song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Crazy (4Minute song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Crazy (4Minute song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 22:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Crazy (4Minute song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Crazy (4Minute song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Semicolon (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. First of all I wanted to apologize for mixing up the nominations for Any Song. It was actually nominated for Song of the Year and Best HipHop & Urban Music and not Best Collaboration. Thank you for correcting my mistake. I will be more careful in the future. :) EN-Jungwon (talk) 08:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon, its okay, I just corrected and added the Hip-hop nomination to it, but we really don't need a table here, as its just two noms from the same awarding body which could well be written out in prose. Since its a GA, we have to be extra careful of the MOS. Cheers, --Ashleyyoursmile! 08:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Need some help. An editor is saying that this website [1] is just like wikipedia and that it is reliable and I am not sure about it. EN-Jungwon (talk) 10:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon, its a fandom/blog. Hence unreliable. --Ashleyyoursmile! 10:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for expanding and contributing to so many k-pop related articles, especially those on BTS songs! I believe your work does a great job helping readers learn more about k-pop. Take care and keep up the awesome work! Blue Adventure (talk) 04:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Adventure, thank you so much! This means a lot. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up. The archive is from July. That's why I removed it. EN-Jungwon^Talk 11:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon, I'm sorry for not noticing that, I thought maybe you reverted it by mistake. Please go ahead and undo it. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 11:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you had nominated Blue & Grey for GA and was wondering why you didn't nominate Dynamite. Dynamite is already in good shape to be nominated. I am asking you cause you are the main contributor of that article. I am fine with you waiting until Blue & Grey gets listed. Best regards. EN-Jungwon 17:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon, its not ready yet. I will nominate when it becomes ready. --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sour Candy's Wowie Awards win was added to the BP awards+noms page but the majority of adds of this award across WP are supported only by a primary ref taken directly from the wowie website. I googled and haven't found any kind of coverage of it from secondary sources either. There's 1 BB article abt 2018 and 1 Access Online gallery photo of trixie mattel at the 2019 awards which doesn't even load for me. I want to remove it but I don't want to get attacked again for taking out another award because of lack of coverage. Jihkilan didn't take kindly to my explanation abt the QQ Boom Boom awards and it's honestly starting to drain me everytime I work on the page. Do you think it should be included? Because I don't. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 21:40, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carlobunnie, I found just one source by Gay Times — which is about the performers of the show, and nothing else after a thorough google search. So I think its safe to assume that it isn't notable and can be removed from the table. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About the order of producers on "Blue & Gray". The reference BE booklet (Screenshot) https://imgur.com/Rkb7wMe Why did you change it again, when you know already this order is wrong? You must have seen the screenshot from the booklet, I pasted the link to it before. The right order is Park Ji-soo, Levi, V, Hiss Noise. Other order is MISLEADING info. V isn't the main producer on this track.GG HSk (talk) 03:00, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashleyyoursmile! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:10, Tuesday, December 15, 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ashleyyoursmile! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:47, Tuesday, December 15, 2020 (UTC)

i am looking for friends and u seem nice :)

heyy you hru

Sebey2007 (talk). 18:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete referenced edist due to your POLITICAL views! See the term in Urbandictionary. Link: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Mangina Thank you!--Manfrottos (talk) 17:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manfrottos good day. Content of the Wikipedia needs to be supported by reliable and independent sources for verification. Pls note that Urban Dictionary is an not a reliable source as it is user-generated definitions and not vetted by expert. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 00:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not seen you on the music good article nominations page for a while, do you think you could review one of my articles potentially like you did once in the past and I've done for you on numerous occasions? --K. Peake 11:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

K. Peake, Hi, good to hear from you after a while. I'm actually busy with CVUA training these days, which takes up nearly all of my time on Wikipedia. But I'm really thankful to you for doing a bunch of GA reviews for me, so I'll review "Fire (Kids See Ghosts song)", if that's okay? --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is ideal for you to review to be honest since it's been in the queue for weeks by now, while I find your reduced amount of Wikitime fully understandable. --K. Peake 16:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-edited Gold Rush and have tried to make sure that it good reliability as per WP:NSONG. I have added charts and background, along with reviews by media critics. Please reply and ping me, so that I am notified.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 13:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantis77177, I appreciate the work that you did in expanding the article [2], however it still fails WP:NSONGS - since all sources used excepting [3], are from the album reviews of Evermore and there is no coverage outside these album reviews or any separate interview done for the song. The charts fails under WP:SINGLEVENDOR, so must be removed. So overall, it is not notable enough to warrant a stand-alone article yet. --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ashley, as much as I would like to cite a source for my information on the Amino App there isn't really much I can do on that front as Amino's nature as a social media app mean there aren't very many websites detailing all of it's features. I have run communities on it before and can assure you 'agent' status is real but obviously I can't prove it to you unless you go out of your way to use ACM to start one.

Is there anything I may be able to do to get the info to stay up?

Jz1207 (talk) 16:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jz1207, unfortunately no. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, independent sources that demonstrate its verifiability. --Ashleyyoursmile! 17:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hello ashleyyoursmile, pratikokane here, here is the source of seasoning general meaning please refer that then also you think this is not a reliable information then leave a message on my talk page so will remove this addition https://opentextbc.ca/ingredients/chapter/seasoning-and-flavouring/#:~:text=Many%20ingredients%20are%20used%20to,the%20food%20without%20changing%20it.&text=Flavouring%20refers%20to%20something%20that,original%20flavour%20of%20the%20food. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pratikokane (talk • contribs) 05:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How did i vandalize? I just redirected to main article... Tablet Human (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashleyyoursmile! Since you nominated Navid Shams (table tennis player) for speedy deletion, you may also want to look at Hamid Shams (if you haven't done so already). Enjoy the holidays! GoingBatty (talk) 18:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GoingBatty, thank you for bringing it to my notice, I see that the page already has a CSD template. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Ashleyyoursmile, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, D🎅ggy54321 (ho-ho-ho) 14:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding ((subst:Seasonal Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

D🎅ggy54321 ^(ho-ho-ho) 14:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doggy54321, thank you for your greetings. I like your new signature. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I thought I would start changing my signature for holidays and celebrations! Thanks for noticing! D🎅ggy54321 ^(ho-ho-ho) 14:19, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doggy54321, it's tailor-made for the season! :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:36, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly! D🎅ggy54321 ^(ho-ho-ho) 14:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Ashleyyoursmile, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, beetricks ~ talk · email 14:33, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding ((subst:Seasonal Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

Beetricks, thank you so much for the greetings! Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you as well. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:37, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashleyyoursmile! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes, and I happened to notice that you don't have the rollback or pending changes reviewer user rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling, and that you consistently view and undo vandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that these user rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of both tools. Instead of having you formally request these user rights at WP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave them to you. These user rights allow you to review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under pending changes protection, as well as to quickly revert the edits of other users in cases of blatant vandalism.

Rollback permissions

Please keep these things in mind at all times when using rollback to revert edits:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. It just adds a "[Rollback]" button next to a page's latest edits - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only, and never used to revert good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose, the rights will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask.

For more information on how to use rollback, see this tutorial page.

Pending changes reviewer permissions

Please keep these things in mind regarding the tools or when you're reviewing any pending changes:

• A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges, and a list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
• Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
• You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
• Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear vandalism, blatant neutral point of view issues, copyright violations, or BLP violations.

You may find the following pages useful to review:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, a summary of pending changes protection, the pending changes user right, and how it applies.
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy section on pending changes protection and its appropriate application and use by administrators.

I'm sure you'll do fine with these user rights - they're pretty straight-forward and they don't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, run into any issues or problems, or if you're not sure if the use of either tool is appropriate or not and need my input or advice - I'll be more than happy to help you any time you need it. If you no longer want one or both of these user rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove them for you. Thank you for helping to locate, revert, and remove vandalism, as well as review and keep disruptive edits off of Wikipedia - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:55, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oshwah, thank you so much for granting these extended rights. It's really kind of you. I promise to never misuse the tool and use it only to revert obvious vandalism. Thank you again. --Ashleyyoursmile! 09:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You'll do fine with them. They're easy to use. ;-) The best thing about having rollback is that it allows you to use anti-vandalism tools that require the user right (such as Huggle, a tool that I use). Just be cautious at first if you choose to use one - they're powerful and you'll want to make sure that you're comfortable with them. Thanks again for your hard work here. You're definitely appreciated, whether others tell you that or not! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oshwah, I will make sure to read about it thoroughly before using. Thank you for your kind words. --Ashleyyoursmile! 09:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Like I said, there's not much to it. Rollback just adds a [Rollback] link to the latest edit on each page. Clicking it will instantly undo the edit made by that user. If the user made more than one edit at the same time that's current, it'll undo all of their latest edits and the page will restore the latest edit by the previous editor. Pending changes will only show up if you're on a page that's pending changes protected and where there are edits that are pending review. You'll review the changes, and either press "accept" or "revert". Just go through the tutorials; you'll find that they're pretty simple. Of course, if you have any questions, let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oshwah, I will certainly go through the tutorials and approach you if I encounter any problems. Thank you for helping me out, Merry Christmas and have a wonderful, Happy New Year. --Ashleyyoursmile! 10:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations Ashley 🥳 EN-Jungwon 09:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon, thank you so much! --Ashleyyoursmile! 10:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recently added this page I reverted the edit. The reason that it's not supported is that the majority of the support for my edit comes from the band's official Facebook page. Wiki leaks does not accept Facebook as a source, even when it's an official page.

This edit that I made as you can see in the history was previously a reverted by a bought because there was a Facebook link supporting

I also linked to a GoFundMe page which is presently active, and has a lot of the back story but Wikipedia does not accept that as a source either.

Do you have some advice on this? The idea that this page is going to sit here claiming that this person has disappeared and nobody knows where he has when there's plenty of public discussion that proves otherwise is problematic.

I mean if you're gonna edit it why don't you take that out to? The person did not disappear, the band is clearly in touch with them come up people clearly know where he has. So why is that unsupported piece of drivel allowed to sit there? Elikelp (talk) 15:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashleyyoursmile - I do not understand why you removed my change to Eleni Kounalakis' page. I put on my edit that the photo is from her official lt. governor website. What other reason do you need? I appreciate your prompt response. Althea1000 (talk) 17:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Althea1000, unless the copyright holder of the image releases it under a licence that allows anyone (not just Wikipedia) to use it or it meets all of the fair use criteria, the image can't be used for the article. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 🎄Happy Holidays!⛄ 18:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand. Where is the copyright usage for the photo that is there currently. It is old. The photo I am using is the same photo that was on the page before. Please explain. Thank youAlthea1000 (talk) 18:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Althea1000, See your talk page. --Ashleyyoursmile! 03:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your all your work combating vandalism. Scorpions13256 (talk) 07:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to wait until tomorrow to give this to you, but now I have no choice. Thank you so much for the barnstar. It is an honor. Scorpions13256 (talk) 07:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scorpions13256, the gratitude likewise! Thank you so much. --Ashleyyoursmile! 07:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed user 7z42t3k8qj,
Thanks for your contributions to improving and organizing all articles relating to Korean pop culture. Have a Happy New Year! ~~~~

---

• File:Bg.gif
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year)) to user talk pages.

Nkon21, thanks so much! Happy New Year to you. Congratulations on getting "I Am the Best" to GA. Keep up the good work. I'm going to steal this template. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleyyoursmile,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! – Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 07:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year)) to user talk pages.

Paper9oll, thanks so much! Happy editing! :) Ashleyyoursmile! 07:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year O.F. Stephen (talk) 09:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do I create a wikipage like this;

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiji.ng

Kindly check please. Thanks. O.F. Stephen (talk) 09:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

O.F. Stephen, see the message I left on your talk page and read WP:FIRST. The topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources. --Ashleyyoursmile! 09:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Happy new year! 🤩 O.F. Stephen (talk) 09:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your brilliant and consistent work in reverting vandalism - well done! Pahunkat (talk) 10:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pahunkat, just left a message on your talk-page, apologies for messing it up after I accidently refreshed that page before the message had been sent. Thank you so much for the barnstar, it means a lot. Cheers! :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 10:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have already answered to Oshwah. --85.76.108.189 (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey 85.76.108.189 I couldn't find your "explanation" in your past edit summaries? --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made a small alteration to the Hiten Tejwani page because the subsection referred to the actor's work in television, whereas Nobel Peace is described as a feature film. Thanks so much for your eagle eyed edits. 192.182.151.219 (talk) 08:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your hard work reverting vandalism, for example at Seventeen (South Korean band). I keep seeing your name in the page histories of many pages I edit! Thanks! ⇒ Lucie Person (talk|contribs) 21:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lucie Person, thank you so much for this. It really means a lot! :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What was that? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk, apologies for my mistake, I've replied on your talk page. --Ashleyyoursmile! 07:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Ashleyyoursmile,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Fylindfotberserk, thanks again for your wishes. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 07:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleyyoursmile,

Your removal of my content changes to the Bayshore Christian School page citing a lack of a source was incorrect.

1. The opening paragraph changes left the citation, because the one used was originally misquoted. Bayshore Christian is NOT cited in the article as starting as a segregation academy and the first Principal is quoted as rejecting it. Therefore, the citation I left in place confirms my edit, not the incorrect language that is originally there.

2. The academic references are biographical and do not need a citation beyond the school's website - I lifted the language directly from the website and the website is already listed on the Wikipedia page.

3. I do agree I changed the student population without a cite. I will try to figure out how to "cite" that from somewhere.

4. The number of sports is also listed on the school website, which was already cited on the page.

5. The Boys Basketball team success is found on the FHSAA website - also already cited on the page.

I will go back in and try to link the citations but would at a minimum ask that the opening paragraph changes that I made be reinstated, since the citation remains in place and confirms my changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FWRanger (talk • contribs) 15:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FWRanger, please use inline citations wherever possible and also make sure to sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes, like how I've done. --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Want to understand more about the concerns regarding the added text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepshikha bansal (talk • contribs) 06:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deepshikha bansal, it appears that you've been trying to promote this website by adding it to the page. Please read the guidelines prescribed under WP:EL. Also remember to sign your post on talk pages using four tildes, like how I've done. --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to check, are you related to Ashleyyoursmile2? Pahunkat (talk) 16:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pahunkat, absolutely no. This started with Siege of Olomouc where two accounts (socks of each other) were adding the same content, albeit getting reverted by editor GELongstreet and me. Three days later, the user was back with two new accounts, one of them impersonating me and another User GELongstreet. GELongstreet filed a SPI. The SPI is open, just a CU check has been endorsed by the clerk-in charge and is left to be completed. --Ashleyyoursmile! 17:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the kerala mathematics section . Kerala mathematicians were the first to discover the binomial series. Not ibn al haytham. In the book of 'the historical development of calculus ' there is no mention of alhazen discovering the binomial series. Jino john1996 (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jino john1996, its fine as long as you have explained your changes accurately with an edit summary. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. EN-Jungwon 16:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon, thank you so much. This means a lot. The gratitude is likewise. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry. I was trying to update the page. It hasn’t been updated in eight years. I’ll do better next time. Gary Stluciesheriff (talk) 12:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stluciesheriff, thank you for reaching out to me. There's no need to apologize. Just make sure to explain your changes accurately in the edit summary next time. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Today,Christopher Maboulou, a Congolese footballer died in Montfermeil,Paris during a football match with his friends. I wrote this information but I don't know how to convert articles for living people to dead people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihkek (talk • contribs) 19:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mihkek, someone has already taken care of it on the article. I went ahead and updated the talk page project banner. --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:21, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ashley, hope you're doing well?

Please i need an assistance with my article that was flagged for speedy deletion. I have contested the deletion, but it hasn't been reversed yet neither have i received any feed.

Please Asheley i need your assistance in helping me review the article for possible errors that could lead to violation of the community rule.

This is me first article, i'm trying to do the right thing, but it's a bit complex. I'll be glad if you can assist me.

Thank you Seuntechnaire (talk) 19:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seuntechnaire, looks like the draft got declined due to it reading more like an advertisement and having written from a non-neutral point of view. If you any questions regarding how to write an article that meets Wikipedia's guidelines, please feel free to ask at WP:WPAFC/HD or at WP:TEA forum. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have made some changes to the article by making it look less like an advert or promotion article. I included a controversy story and a reference link to it.

I have submitted it again for review and publishing. Seuntechnaire (talk) 07:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ashleyyoursmile! Thank you for letting me know, I will fix that. It just had the same links below so I didn't know if it needed a citation or not. Will do so in the future! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tryingtobehelpful21 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tryingtobehelpful21, no problem! Always remember to include a citation to support your added content. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Willow (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the music video for Taylor Swift's single "Willow" avoids showing some dancers' faces because they were wearing masks as a COVID-19 precaution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Willow (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Willow (song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yellowtropic has added ranking from this website to articles but I am not sure whether it should be added since the website is considered as a blog. Thanks. EN-Jungwon 07:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon, you are right. Medium is unreliable per discussions: [4], [5], and [6]. It falls under the category of WP:SPS. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 07:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Homura (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You mentioned me not giving a reliable source. I am the reliable source. I went to school in that shithole. The town is incredibly bigoted to anything that doesn't fit into their tiny bubble of acceptance. The bullying was so intense that I dropped out halfway into my junior year. There is nothing even remotely good about the town. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitbull Queen (talk • contribs) 14:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you didn't notice that i was fixing grammar and not removing content Rotrex2000 (talk) 17:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rotrex2000, why do you need to remove references to fix grammar? I'm curious. --Ashleyyoursmile! 17:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the middle of making multiple edits, I thought it would be easier as if anything happened I could quickly revert any edits made and I was going to add the references back to their correct places when I was finished Rotrex2000 (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rotrex2000, then next time explain in the edit summary that you'll add back the references after making the grammar changes. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 17:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashley, you restored content on Islamic feminism which I had removed. Since I don't want to just revert your edit and create any controversy, I decided to come here to express my concerns about that page and explain why I made those edits.

The edits in question were pertaining to the section on dress codes. My issue with the current page (after your reversion and before my edits), specifically the section on dress codes, is that it seems to devote an outsized portion of the discussion to relatively fringe actors and views. It cites a handful of Muslim feminists from a single country and a singular fringe subset of feminism, and highlights them as the most important actors in the Islamic feminist debate on hijab and other forms of veiling. It then proceeds to a brief discussion of the more favorable views that most Muslim feminists have of hijab as a voluntary decision.

Based on the information available my impression is that the French Muslim feminists mentioned (Fadela Amera, Hedi Mhenni) are fringe actors in this debate, certainly outside of France. That's why I didn't think that they merited mention in a generic article on Islamic feminism which is ostensibly a general overview of the subject as an international phenomenon.

Most Muslim feminists do not oppose hijab itself as a social phenomenon, only objecting to enforced wearing of hijab, much less support state-imposed restrictions on the practice. My view is that Wikipedia pages ought to reflect the reality of the subjects they cover, and that includes how you frame information. If I read the page today and didn't have any background information, I'd assume Muslim feminists shared the worldview and politics of Nicolas Sarkozy.

For these reasons, I would suggest the following:

- Removal of the content on hijab restrictions in France and support by fringe actors in the Muslim community for said restrictions, due to the aforementioned framing issues. I believe that this particular content is wholly unnecessary in a generic overview article like this one. Even though it technically may be properly sourced, it's not really useful for this article.

- Brief discussion of the minority of Muslim feminists who view hijab as oppressive, including perhaps a name-drop of some of the people previously mentioned or someone like Asra Nomani

- Discussion of arguments FOR hijab which are made my many/most Muslim feminists, like Linda Sarsour, Ilhan Omar, Dalia Mogahed, etc.

I can certainly start this process myself.

Aronanki (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:27, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aronanki, thanks for the explanation. You are welcome to start the process yourself, however you should discuss these changes first with other editors who also edit the article so that there is no content dispute. You can start a discussion on the article talk page and describe the things that you wrote here. Happy editing! Ashleyyoursmile! 05:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashley, this is regarding paragraph removal in this article Valley of Peace initiative [[7]] the paragraph removed is an exact duplicate of the paragraph above "Project origins, 2005–2008", hence i removed it thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkoosa (talk • contribs) 00:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arkoosa, thank you for reaching out to me. I have undid the edit and restored it to your version. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently, you have reverted my edit on Sofiya Rotaru's name at birth - flagging it as possible vandalism and have suggested me playing with the sandbox (not nice). FYI, she was born Sofya Rotar (https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0744719/bio) and changed her name in her 20s. During the Sovietisation of Moldovans the last -"u" were forced to be dropped from the family names, so did her father, and it was a very bold move from her side (expression of nationalism) to restore it back into its original dynastic form RotarU. Now it is your turn to update her page with this information. Good luck!

Thank you for reaching out. You can go ahead and update it yourself and back it up with this citation. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blue & Grey (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Recently I made an edit on the Ian Cobain wikipedia page. I am his editor at literary publishing house, Granta and Ian has asked me to forward the below message in response to the current bio that is in place:

Hello, can I make an observation concerning your edits of the wiki page of Ian Cobain? I am Ian Cobain, and the suggestion that I am best known for my undercover work is incorrect. I have been a journalist for 39 years, and went undercover just once, in 2006, when I joined the British National Party under a false name. I feel that insofar as I am known for anything, it may be that I am best known for my investigations into post 9/11 human rights abuses, British state secrecy, and the legacy of Northern Ireland's Troubles.

I do understand how important it is that wikipedia pages remain open for users to edit, but you seem to be rolling back changes that are intended to amend inaccuracies.

Regards,

Ian Cobain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.164.25 (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everything on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable and should state exactly what reliable independent sources state. We don't do original research. Since you have conflict of interest with the subject of the article, you are not allowed to edit the page. You can propose the changes on the article talk page. Thank you. Ashleyyoursmile! 16:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Just going to pop in here and point out that per policy, editors with a conflict of interest are not prohibited from directly editing the page, but are strongly discouraged to do so. IP editor, you may be interested in getting acquainted with edit requests, which will allow interested and uninvolved editors to add/change information for you, provided a reliable source is given. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 17:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

precise explanation, thank you Tenryuu. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 17:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blue & Grey (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Blue & Grey (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ashleyyoursmile, I think you made a mistake as I do not need a source for my edit. All I did was edit a page on my football team's season and provide a large review of what happened. From TobyWanKeonobi799 TobyWanKenobi799 (talk) 19:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TobyWanKenobi799, thank you for reaching out to me. I appreciate the changes you wish to make to the article, but you need to provide reliable sources to support the added material. All content on Wikipedia should be verifiable. Please go through the tutorial on adding sources. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 19:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blue & Grey (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Blue & Grey (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source-https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/news/its-official-mammootty-starrer-shylock-enters-the-50-crore-club/articleshow/74000483.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:3919:8B79:0:0:0:1 (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your work in getting Blue & Grey (song) to good article status. Good job. Hope to see more of your work. EN-Jungwon 14:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon, thank you very much. This means a lot. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ashley. AfD discussions for Candy SHop (Madonna song) and Mmm Papi and other songs have started. Please feel free to comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, HĐ (talk) 02:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HĐ, thanks for the notification. I'll try to drop by sometime later. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 08:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lights Up, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lights Up you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 11:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lights Up you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lights Up for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 05:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lights Up you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lights Up for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of H? -- H? (talk) 12:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ashleyyoursmile

Recently I made an edit on the coffee and cigarettes Wikipedia page and also creating a page to help develop users ideas on coffee taking. I was not trying to advertise any product just a recommendation to make good coffee and ideas, you can check the website attached to it to see how useful it is (mycoffeetools.com). which I have been a journalist for 20 years. You can get back to me with the requirements or confirmation you'll need to verify my edit.

I do understand how important it is that Wikipedia pages remain open for users to edit, but you seem to be rolling back changes that are intended to amend inaccuracies.

Thank you  

Charles Besong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charles besong (talk • contribs) 11:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charles besong, thank you for reaching out to me. This edit has been reverted because it appears that you have been trying to advertise and promote a website. Please read the guidelines prescribed under WP:EL. Also regarding the speedy deletion of your userpage, I was not the one who tagged it under CSD. User Serols made the right call and tagged it to be speedy deleted since it is promotional in nature. Such pages are not allowed on Wikipedia. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 11:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Homura (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that with "Homura" and Leo-Nine, LiSA became the first female artist in 16 years to debut a song and an album simultaneously at number one in Japan since Utada Hikaru? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Homura (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Homura (song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leo-Nine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that with "Homura" and Leo-Nine, LiSA became the first female artist in 16 years to debut a song and an album simultaneously at number one in Japan since Utada Hikaru? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Leo-Nine), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am simply using oobe to describe e the slogan used for the current logo, please refer to https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WP20_EnWiki20_SimplifiedLogo_BillionEdits.svg#mw-jump-to-license

IP, how is it encyclopedic? --Ashleyyoursmile! 07:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashleyyoursmile. An AFD discussion has started for The Love Club (song). Please comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, HĐ (talk) 07:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello, Ashleyyoursmile do you know what contributer wrote on my page my content as humourous is it good to call a peice of content humourous. wha is this. He should have done research over the topic and provided the facts not simply readig and calling humourous.Thaeon (talk) 10:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thaeon, I didn't find anything inappropriate on your talk page. The reason why your draft was rejected has been properly explained by User @SL93:. Please remember to be civil while interacting and communicating, and do not make personal attack at any editors, like you did here. Always remember to assume good faith. --Ashleyyoursmile! 10:50, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The word humourous for a great man is still anything not accepted. Please ask hi to review the page wisely — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thaeon (talk • contribs) 10:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Thaeon: The reason that it was tagged as "humorous" is because the editor declining the page believed that it was a hoax. The statement "It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax." is an automatic one that pops up when the hoax option is selected.

As for why they believed it a hoax, they stated that the supplied evidence did not back up the claims. For example, when I read this link it names the challenger as Paramdev Mishra rather than Brahmdev Mishra. Now this source does (when I run it through Google Translate) mention a Brahmdev Mishra in regards to the fight so this may be confusion over a name. I know that sometimes English spellings can differ when it comes to languages that use different language writing styles (ie, letter alphabet vs a symbol language like Japanese), as I've seen this happen with names from countries like Japan, Russia, and India. This is why it's very important to assume good faith - this seems to just be a case of names being written differently.

Since you are interested in India related matters, I recommend checking out WP:INDIA, a WikiProject devoted to India related matters. I'm not sure if this is a prowrestler or not, as wrestling and prowrestling are very different areas of sports, but I would also recommend checking out WP:PW, which covers topics related to prowrestling. Either group could be invaluable when it comes to sourcing - both finding and providing sourcing that Wikipedia would see as usable. (I say this because one of the sources you used is Facebook.) Hope this helps! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one of the pages. Lots of the contest websites are no longer up. Please revert it to the hold article with the contest results and bio https://www.asaentertainment.com/athletes/thumper-nagasako/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordantnagasako (talk • contribs) 04:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jordantnagasako, you need to provide reliable, independent sources to support the content added, which you haven't. --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Great job! Vandals don't stand a chance. DanCherek (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DanCherek, thank you very much. This means a lot. The gratitude is likewise.:) --Ashleyyoursmile! 08:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for all your hard work in counter vandalism! Asartea Talk | Contribs 16:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asartea, thank you very much for stopping by and taking time to leave this. It means a lot. The gratitude is likewise. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (Shirin Nabati is a professional make-up artist in Asia who is in great demand in different countries. They are very well known. Please remove the quick delete tag) -- Mirtalebi.2021 (talk) 18:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mirtalebi.2021, thank you for reaching out to me. Please contest the speedy deletion here, not on my talk page. An admin would view and consider your request. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 18:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CVU Academy Graduate

Hi, Ashleyyoursmile, On behalf of the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy, congratulations! You have successfully completed all assignments and have now graduated from the Academy. You completed your final exam with a score of 96% – well done! It's been a pleasure to work with you over the past few months. I hope you gained something from this CVUA program and do always note that the motto of the Counter Vandalism Unit is Civility – Maturity – Responsibility. Do drop by my talk page you have any questions as I am here to help. Thank you so much for your willingness to help Wikipedia in this CVUA role. Best. Cassiopeia(talk) 07:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Blue & Grey (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that BTS's song "Blue & Grey" was originally intended to be included on band member V's solo mixtape? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blue & Grey (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Blue & Grey (song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ashley

I think you posted your warning to the wrong person, and you meant to post it to ProcrastinatingReader. As they were reverting my work. They have now accepted they were in the wrong and stopped, but it was really rather frustrating and your message adds to the impression of general unfriendliness and gatekeeping of wikipedia's existing user I've experienced. An apology would be appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.39.51 (talk) 14:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP, my apologies for the 3RR warning, I've removed the warning message. Please see your talk page. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind of you. I appreciate it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.39.51 (talk) 14:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the hard work. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ashleyyoursmile You did a mistake deleting my update on the Visa Requirement Page as UK citizens do need a visa now for all reasons and Ukranie abolished Visa Waiver with the UK, as the UK Left the EU. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Limanowa6767 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Limanowa6767, please provide reliable, independent source to support your change. The previous content was sourced, so you need to provide a source to your change. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've seen you have changed my edit to remove the word 'openly' from the phrase 'openly gay' in Jonathan Bailey's page, and called the edit 'unneeded'.

Please can you explain why the word 'openly' is needed?

As far as I'm concerned the word is redundant. Bailey is gay. It's a simple fact. If he were gay and not open about it, you wouldn't be able to mention it on his page at all, because it would be hearsay.

'Openly gay' also implies some kind of stigma around being gay. You wouldn't say someone was 'openly disabled' or 'openly mixed race'.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitsims (talk • contribs) 14:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kitsims, since you mentioned "If he were gay and not open about it, you wouldn't be able to mention it on his page at all, because it would be hearsay"- well precisely, this gives it all the more reason to state 'openly gay', and there's no need to change it. Ashleyyoursmile! 15:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to congratulate you on your graduation from CVUA. Well done! Pahunkat (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pahunkat, thank you very much! You are doing an excellent job with the trainees. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, do you have any advice for engaging with John Maynard Friedman and Cambrial I took JMF at his word and suggested a new longer lead as a compromise and Cambrial just instantly came back with nothing constructive, just a bunch of policies I'd breached with the proposal? 80.42.39.51 (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP, good to see you working hard on the article, unfortunately, I cannot help much since I'm not very familiar with the subject. However, just a general advice, make sure to add reliable and independent sources like newspapers, magazines, to support your content. And I noticed a few edits where you tried to remove content from the lead along with the references. Per WP:LEAD, the lead should summarize the main points of the articles. Be careful not to remove something which is substantially sourced without discussing it with other editors. Good luck and happy editing! :) Ashleyyoursmile! 14:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I generally put that content in the lead into the body as it felt a bit like a dialogue of competing opinions and that seemed better in the body of the text rather than the intro. I didn't delete anyone's work though. Thanks again80.42.39.51 (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Keep up with good work. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 17:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I hope you are doing well with the PR for Lights Up. I think you can contact some editors including Ceoil (talk) (who helped out with an FAC of mine, and seems to be willing to help out on request) and Aoba47 (talk) (a very kind and supportive editor who offers very insightful comments regarding the prose--though they are on retirement, I think they could help out a bit if it does not bother them...) Best of luck, HĐ (talk) 16:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HĐ, that's really kind of you. I'd requested two other editors to review, which they have and I've made the changes accordingly. I'll make sure to contact the editors per your suggestion. Thank you very much and hope you're keeping well. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the ping. I will look through the peer review and post some comments today as it would be nice to try and help since I have some experience with music articles, particularly in the FAC space. As I have never heard any of Harry Styles's songs, I should be able to provide a different perspective (at least ideally). Aoba47 (talk) 17:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47, thank you very much. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 18:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashleyyoursmile, i noticed that you have undo my changes added for sidhhant sharma( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siddhant_Sharma) May i know your organization ? We have no issues on displaying siddhant sharma's information public as we have all the proof of the info added provided by BCCI.

Source is louisedean.com. Please allow publishing of changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.16.161.133 (talk) 08:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is not considered a reliable or independent source. --Ashleyyoursmile! 08:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You have removed my update informing that I have not added a reliable source but I added the website address? It doesn't help that this is my first time, or that I am severely sight impaired. When you say I need to add it again, insert all the wording back in - and see if I can insert the website in a different way? Thank you. GMPC21 (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't You let me Win — Preceding unsigned comment added by NorthShoreNuggets (talk • contribs) 17:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You put up with a lot of grief and abuse in order to keep this crazy place running smoothly. Sorry for that; your work is very much appreciated.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo, thank you for the kind words. I appreciate it very much. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 21:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Someone added a bunch of junk to the Nancy Ward page which needs to be removed and the page reverted to its' previous state. Kathieforbes (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kathieforbes, thanks for reaching out. Please remove it if you think its not supported by reliable sources. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You get bad-faith editors before I even can. Shinyeditbonjour. 18:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shinyedit, thank you very much for this. It means a lot! :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 18:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested semi-protection. Shinyedit^bonjour. 20:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shinyedit, thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 20:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ashleyyoursmile, thanks for helping out on Marco Rubio. I've seen that vandal before at several pages, Ted Turner and Jay Leno amongst others. They always insert the same phrases to the BLPs, often vandalizing the infobox as well. Often articles that they target have to be semi-protected since they normally have multiple IPs they can use. Once again, thanks for helping :-) Pahunkat (talk) 20:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pahunkat, hey thank you for helping out as well. I was about to head over to your talk page and give you a small surprise, which I will. But you reached me early. Yes, Shinyedit requested a semi-protection in case they decide to evade the block. --Ashleyyoursmile! 20:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	One for you, for your work at Marco Rubio! Pahunkat (talk) 20:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pahunkat, thank you for this! :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 20:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

My source for the information that I added for Chip Vaughn is Chip Vaughn directly texting me to add the information that I added. How do I Cite that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atr0218 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Atr0218, Wikipedia content should be fundamentally verifiable. Please provide reliable independent sources to support the change you want to make. Refer to the tutorial on citing sources on your talk page. Also, you seem to have conflict of interest with the subject. If that's the case, you are highly discouraged to edit the page. --Ashleyyoursmile! 21:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi Ashleyyoursmile we have a problem with the page of Isabelle Adriani, since contributors keep on erasing references and true informations about the person writing she is not an author or a writer, please check yourself, omn amazon and these foloowing informations: she published many books since 1999 plesae check on Amazon and on internet also under her real name federica federici please help us to give her the right credits don/t hesitate to contact us if you need more infos or sources

thank you so much for your help Anna Marzi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.238.39.185 (talk) 21:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP, I suggest you open a discussion on the article's talk page and propose the changes so that other editors who work on the page can discuss and a consensus can be reached. Also, provide reliable independent sources to support the changes, such as newspaper articles or reputed magazines, otherwise its very likely that someone will eventually revert your changes. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please see my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Www.bismatrimony.com try to improve it if possible. if see others article in this category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Indian_matrimonial_websites i think my article is little good if you found any adversities content please remove it try to improve.. thank you sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Setmroger (talk • contribs) 06:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ashleyyoursmile_ I've just begun updating the Todd Cochran Wikipedia page which is and has been sorely incomplete for a good amount of time. Apparently, as you've indicated, I omitted including citations as I inputted and before I published which I now understand. Everything I've listed is absolutely verifiable. Bringing the page current is going to require a good amount of well intended time and care. Should you have a suggestion of a best way to proceed going forward please advise. Thank you! _Truuthmadas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truuthmadas (talk • contribs) 08:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Truuthmadas, thank you for reaching out to me. Please look for reliable independent sources such as newspaper articles or reputed magazine sources to support the contents that you want to add to the page. You can take a look at the tutorial for citing sources on your talk page. Happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lights Up, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the music video for Harry Styles's song "Lights Up" was interpreted as a "bisexual anthem" by critics and viewers due to it being released on National Coming Out Day? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lights Up. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lights Up), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ashleyyoursmile. An FFD discussion has started for File:Katy Perry - Smile LP and Vinyl cover.png. Please feel free to join the discussion to help reach a consensus. Thank you very much, HĐ (talk) 02:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HĐ, thanks for the notification but I'm not very familiar with FFDs, so I'll pass. --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok. Thanks for notifying me, HĐ (talk) 04:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FSO3cXFsX0O1uD86ERBFu9gAJ7jHAwEX/view?usp=drivesdk

Okay as a reference? 213.205.198.68 (talk) 12:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley, I just corrected a false statement on the San Carlos Apache page, and you reverted it.

The statement that the reservation was established for the Chiricahua Apache Tribe isn't true. The Chiricahua Apache Tribe was separate and distinct from the Western Apache.

As a Chiricahua Apache, and former tribal leader, I find it very troubling when our history is conflated with other tribes. Chiricahua people did live there, but they were forced to move there 5 years after the reservation had been established. It was established after San Carlos Apache Chief Eskiminzin met with General O.O. Howard seeking a reservation for his people.

The edit saying that it was established for the Chiricahua Apache is unsubstantiated because it is untrue, and it should not have been placed there.

I was wondering if you would want to participate in the AFD for Drive the Boat? The Ultimate Boss (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Boss, I will try to drop by sometime later. Ashleyyoursmile! 04:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It's Hockeycatcat! I've got a question that I'm hoping you could answer: Do you know how to add "If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices." to user warnings without having to type it out every time? I think there's a template for it but I can't seem to find it... I hope you can help! Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hockeycatcat, do you substitute the warning template manually or use Twinkle/Red Warn for that? Ashleyyoursmile! 09:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do it manually. Should I try Twinkle? I've never used it before... Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hockeycatcat, I think that's the reason why the notice on shared address doesn't show up. You could try out WP:TWINKLE, just go to your preferences, select Gadgets and enable Twinkle. You need to bypass your cache after that, and then you're all set. You would be able to warn/welcome and notify users and IPs with custom warnings, or make reports to various noticeboards. Hope that helps. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 09:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll use Twinkle from now on! This is going to make fighting vandalism much easier! Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Let's go! This is so much easier! Thank you again! :) 2001:8003:F10F:FD00:DD46:795E:5735:A39B (talk) 10:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain how my statement published on the twiki page itself, about Paul the octopus was not Neutral ? You quote a statistician who discusses the outcome based on random chance, whereas I point out that the predictions were all for Germany. My *comment* as to suggest that this might have been intentional on the part of the Paul's German handlers, was only specutation, and so I was careful *not* to mention this in the actual text on the wiki page. So for example, for Paul to get 4 out of 6 predictions correct is *more* likely than getting all 6 correct. But similarly, for Paul to select, at random, Germany for *all* 6 would be 1/64 - the same as the probability to get all predictions correct, as stated by the statistician. But the chance to get 4 out of 6, would be 15/64, so the chance would be 15 times smaller to select Germany 6 times at random, than it would be to predict 4 out of the 6 outcomes.

So on this basis alone, that Paul selected Germany all 6 times, is statistically more interesting than the prediction of the outcome.

The fact that Paul selected *Germany* each time is then of interest, and a statistician would then want to determine additional variables, before determining whether the outcome were random or not, so in this case the question of Paul being in a German institute, selection Germany to win, would need to be explored and eliminated. In fact, for choosing at random, then half his predictions should have been been for Germany, ie 3 prediction, as Germany were playing in each match. Therefore, his selection of Germany for all matches, is at once both statistically more significant, and more interesting that the number of prediction that he got right. This is true statement irrespective of any perceived bias.

As this was all that was published in the page, then perhaps that should be allowed to remain. I do agree however, than my *comment* might be construed as being impartial, although it was not really, it was merely suggesting a suspicion that would need to be explored, before any claim on randomness could be supported, and before any claim to actually predictive accuracy could be considered.

Many thanks, Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamspandex (talk • contribs) 07:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mark, you did not provide a reliable source to support the claim, you are welcome to add information to pages provided it is verifiable. Hope that helps. Happy editing! Ashleyyoursmile! 07:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

undoes reversions of spam so that they can do it themselves 49.183.53.79 (talk) 10:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See your talk page. Ashleyyoursmile! 10:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Solar radio emission, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that solar radio emission was first observed in 1942 during World War II by British radar operators? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Solar radio emission. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i wrongly duplicated them, on the really next edit i removed em though--62.18.232.170 (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks for letting me know. Happy editing! Ashleyyoursmile! 08:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please help meee :( This person is constantly attacking pages and I honestly don't know what to do at this point. They've already been reported, but I'm just sitting here reverting everything. Hockeycatcat (talk) 11:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Update: Things seem to have settled down... Hockeycatcat (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Sorry, I was panicking! Hockeycatcat (talk) 11:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hockeycatcat, I missed your messages. Looks like Widr has blocked them indef. --Ashleyyoursmile! 12:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ashleyyoursmile,

I am just trying to find the inventor J.F. Pickering not the professor named J.F. Pickering. Can you help me find him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.198.35 (talk) 14:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP, that doesn't explain this edit of yours. Ashleyyoursmile! 14:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay i will stop doing everthing. I just need help the inventor J.F. Pickering. It seems like there is no biography about him.

You can read WP:FIRST, if you wish to start a new article. --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Overall Nice :) OmegySock (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OmegySock, thank you very much. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You declined our bands wikipedia page because we didn't have a source. We are the source, we have all the information of the website. Plus, we are a very small band, there aren't any sources about us for us to cite. From, From The MeadowsFrom the meadows 18 (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From the meadows 18, Wikipedia articles should be verifiable, the articles state exactly what multiple reliable independent sources state. Also, if what you are saying is true then you have a conflict of interest and hence discouraged to create such an article. Thank you. Ashleyyoursmile! 18:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		All-Around Amazing Barnstar
		:) OmegySock (talk) 17:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	for making Wikipedia free from Vandalism. Peerzada Mohammad Iflaq (talk) 11:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peerzada Mohammad Iflaq, thank you very much. This means a lot. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 11:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Last Exit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that London-based dream-pop duo Still Corners' album The Last Exit paints a picture of open-road Americana? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Last Exit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Last Exit), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ashleyyoursmile. Two AFDs discussion have started for The Real Thing (Gwen Stefani song) and I've Just Begun (Having My Fun). Please comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, HĐ (talk) 04:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HĐ, thanks for the notification. I will drop by later today. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 09:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashleyyoursmile I was just wondering if I could borrow your talk page "add a message" code? Thanks, Skingo12 (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skingo12, nice to meet you. Please feel free to borrow it, its not mine btw. This is the actual code, I just customised it a bit. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 04:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashleyyoursmile thanks for the link and sorry for missing the obvious! Nice to meet you too and thanks, Skingo12 (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Skingo12, no problem! Ashleyyoursmile! 04:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed emotionally-charged, slanted words from the article. To label something that remains in dispute as "false" is misleading and disingenuous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:CF00:2260:2839:2DC2:CAE3:D480 (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP, I see that the content is sourced. If you think the content should be removed I think its better to start a discussion on the talk page of the article, so that other editors who are working on the article can participate and a consensus can be reached. Happy editing! Ashleyyoursmile! 18:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Ashleyyoursmile, It seems you un-tag the CSD tag of the article Rectified_Spirit_(band) . As a reviewer, you may be correct!. So is this a good article and it eligible for Wikipedia policy? I am new here need to learn something from a senior like you please suggest to me. My clarification: I visit the article creator's talk page and found there are many speedy deletion notices and the article doesn't have any/enough notable citation, also the inter wikilinks article has been selected for CSD A7. I thought all things are creating again and again to promote some brands and self or a group. That's why I tag a vandalism label otherwise I can tag it as normal CSD. For your kind information, there is no news about the article's subject in India. If the article deserves Wikipedia space then, okay for me, I am an Indian and an Indian brand should be published. I am not against of music. especially I dedicated for Indian and Indian projects, So thanks for your review of the article and save me from a mistake. ;). Auramstate (talk) 12:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Auramstate, thank you for reaching out to me. I'm neither an expert nor experienced in CSDs, but from what I know if an article has a credible claim of importance that doesn't need to be verifiable with sources, it is not eligible for A7. Here, the article is supported by Rolling Stone India ref which discusses the subject in-depth. Also, you tagged the article under G3, which is incorrect. G3 is for blatant vandalism and should only be used to tag pages which constitutes as such. Since you are new here, I would suggest you to familiarise yourself with WP:CSD before tagging pages. Ashleyyoursmile! 12:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Ashleyyoursmile to the New Page Patrol team. Congratulations on receiving the New Page Patrol user permission and on becoming a part of the patroller community. Our mission is to accurately, rather than quickly, handle the new articles which are created. As you begin to patrol it's natural to have lots of questions. Feel free to ask on my talk page or ask for thoughts in the New Page Patroller IRC channel #wikimedia-npp connect or on our Discord server (invite link). We also regularly discuss issues and topics surrounding New Page Patrolling at the NPP discussion page and I would invite you to join us there. If you have any questions please feel free to ask me. I hope you find NPP as rewarding as I do and, again, welcome to the community. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barkeep49 (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the file. Congratulations!! Atsme 💬 📧 22:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article I've Seen All I Need to See, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American band the Body's album I've Seen All I Need to See opens with a reading of the poem "The Kaleidoscope" by Scottish poet Douglas Dunn? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/I've Seen All I Need to See. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, I've Seen All I Need to See), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've done the alterations. Thanks for pointing this out - It's a very useful tool. I have got the percentage down to 33.8%. I hope thats ok. I cant change the rest because they are direct quotes. All the best. Fieryninja (talk) 11:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fieryninja, amazing work on the article. Since the article is new and in good shape, I nominated it at Wikipedia:Did you know. You can find the nomination entry here. Hope you don't mind. Ashleyyoursmile! 11:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I really appreciate this. It means a lot to me. Fieryninja (talk) 11:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fieryninja, no problem. I looked at some of your other articles on paintings and they are some really interesting articles. Please keep up the amazing work. Ashleyyoursmile! 11:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks that incredibly kind of you. Fieryninja (talk) 11:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He is a photographer and videographer in Canada. He has 5.3 million subscribers on YouTube. He is one of the famous personality. Google has also created a knowledge panel of him. Kashyapvelani06 (talk) 13:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kashyapvelani06, please check your talk page message. The article has not been deleted, but moved to draft, since it is not ready to be published yet. You are welcome to develop the article there and submit it for review once it is ready. Thank you. Ashleyyoursmile! 13:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redbridge is a small locality within the London Borough of Redbridge. There is a Redbridge tube station

The writer of the former page is confusing the two. This is perhaps not surprising as "Rebdridge" is used as a name for both, often without explanation or clarification.

Many institutions in LB Redbridge take the borough name. The notable example is Redbridge Town Hall, which is in Ilford.

The writer claims that the Redbridge Institute is in Redbridge, but it has 4 locations, none of which are in Redbridge (In fact in Ilford, Gants Hill, Chigwell and Wanstead). They are in LB Redbridge, but not Redbridge.

The writer also says that Redbridge FC is in Redbridge, whereas it is is in Barkingside as your own article confirms. It is in LB Redbridge, but not Redbridge.

The list of notable people is of people born in LB Redbridge, not Redbridge.

There are several London Boroughs named in a similarly confusing way:

Barnet Bexley Brent Bromley Camden City Croydon Ealing Enfield Greenwich Hackney Harrow Havering Hillingdon Hounslow Islington Kingston upon Thames Lambeth Lewisham Merton Redbridge Richmond upon Thames Southwark Sutton Wandsworth Westminster — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.135.239 (talk) 18:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Source (album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British jazz saxophonist Nubya Garcia's debut album Source, which incorporates reggae, cumbia, calypso, hip-hop, and soul, is an ode to her musical history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Source (album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Source (album)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

lights up

Thank you for quality articles about pop songs international, such as Lights Up, Adore You (Harry Styles song) and Spring Day (song), for Source (album), all written with love for the subjects, for fighting vandalism, for new page patrol with a smile, such as Jakob Grün, - Ashley, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2542 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gerda Arendt, what a pleasant surprise! Thank you very much for this. I appreciate it a lot. Nice to meet you. Ashleyyoursmile! 09:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome, and I hope you don't mind that the award comes from the cabal of the outcast ;) - I noticed you acccepting Grün - which will go to DYK some day - and made a note in my mind that you deserved this, finding a treasure when I looked closer. I like music, different style, but the idea is the same. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gerda Arendt, I'm truly honoured and happy for this recognition. I enjoy being a part of this wonderful community. It's great to learn that both of us have a liking for music. Again, thank you for this. Ashleyyoursmile! 10:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding your titlecaps change in Three Sisters with Maiden Hearts – should the same be done then with Fireworks Over the Sea? If yes, I can do this myself, just let me know. Thanks Robert Kerber (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Kerber, thank you reaching out to me. MOS:TITLECAPS states: "For title case, the words that are not capitalized on Wikipedia (unless they are the first or last word of a title) are: Prepositions containing four letters or fewer (as, in, of, on, to, for, from, into, like, over, with, upon, etc.)", so I think "Over" should be changed to "over" like you pointed out correctly. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 11:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, will do so, then. Thanks Robert Kerber (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Kerber, no problem! --Ashleyyoursmile! 11:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vitafon#February_2021%7CYou told me that my change was promotional]] Could you please explain why you considered it promotional. I have inserted facts using international journal articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitafon (talk • contribs)

Welcome for Thanking me here 😆😆😆 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ExclusiveEditor (talk • contribs) 15:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ExclusiveEditor, 😄. Ashleyyoursmile! 16:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for the barnstar but you deserve one yourself for doing the hard bit! Keep lining them up so I can knock them down. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HJ Mitchell, thank you very much! --Ashleyyoursmile! 17:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have never sent a Barnstar before so this might go wrong

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For being kind and warming when reverting a revert I accidentally made on the Evan Taylor page 146.90.19.218 (talk) 18:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP, thank you very much! :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 18:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article back to the article space. She's got an IMDB page, and has appeared in numerous major films and tv shows. If you don't feel that there are enough citations, add more. If you want to delete the article, put it up for deletion so there's a consensus. Please do not just remove the article without discussion on your own. Thanks. NoahB (talk) 07:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021-02-26 In updating the Additional References segment earlier today included are 2 reviews of Todd Cochran that appeared in the reviewer/writer's blog page. Have noted that blogs are red flags. Notwithstanding, the two listings SEE BELOW are legitimate critical review. Following your perusal should there be an issue, please advise. The material contained within is pertinent to Todd Cochran at specific juncture of his professional career. Thank you.

CD Review: Jazz Greats Jaco Pastorius And Bayeté Revisit Their Best AlbumsJP'S Music Blog Record-Journal  http://www.jpsmusicblog.com/2014/04/cd-review-jazz-greats-jaco-pastorius.html April 1, 2014

Bayeté's WorldAN EARFUL ABOUT MUSIC, POP CULTURE AND WHATEVER ELSE IS ON MY MIND http://anearful.blogspot.com/2014/04/bayetes-world.html#.U1BRXV6nnne Wednesday, April 16, 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truuthmadas (talk • contribs) 04:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Truuthmadas, I'm unsure about the reliability of these sources so I'll leave it to you. Ashleyyoursmile! 04:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For being a very nice person! Thank you very much for reviewing Dulcie Mary Pillers and for your kind words - it is really appreciated. Have a great day. Gricharduk (talk) 04:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gricharduk, thank you for this. I do hope you nominate the article for GA soon. :) --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ashleyyoursmile, by the looks of things there's the chance of you becoming a target of Evlekis for the long-term. Is it possible for you to enable email? I can't see your email adress when using the in-built wikipedia function, and you can immediately remove it in your settings after I get across one to you. I can't post the information here per WP:BEANS. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 17:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could also use a throwaway email account if needed. Pahunkat (talk) 17:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your talk page becomes a target, let me know if you would like limited semi-protection of it. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, thank you for reaching out to me. I'll let you know if that happens. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 09:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've just sent you an email, which is tangentially related to Liz's. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333, received and replied. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 18:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 215.1 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a ((help me)) notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 19:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ginny & Georgia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for issuing a warning that you did here. I'm not sure if this was automatic/generic, but I'd like to quickly ask for your advice on something, if that's alright. The edit blocked by the filter in question was pretty disturbing, and while its obviously a provocation of frustration, its one of the more serious WP:IUC comments I've received. I've been considering approaching an admin about their behavior, but I'm hesitant bc it's a. not in the mainspace and b. not a part of a repeated act of vandalism, which lessens the probability of further aggression. Do you think it warrants this in your opinion? Thanks again and have a wonderful week, sorry to trouble you.--Bettydaisies (talk) 07:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bettydaisies, no problem! I admit that the attempt made by the user was indeed disturbing and should not be tolerated. Its sometimes difficult to know whether they actually attempted to write this or something else since filters do report false-positives. But if this concerns you, you could try asking any admin to look into it. They'll tell you what should be done in this regard. Hope you have a great week as well. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 07:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, thank you so much for your feedback :)--Bettydaisies (talk) 07:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bettydaisies, you're welcome. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 07:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article For the First Time (Black Country, New Road album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British band Black Country, New Road, who are known for experimenting with post-punk sound, showcased a clear preference for atmospherics on their album For the First Time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/For the First Time (Black Country, New Road album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, For the First Time (Black Country, New Road album)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Renamed user 7z42t3k8qj. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.NASCARfan0548 ↗ 18:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I sent you more messages. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 20:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NASCARfan0548, I saw just now. :/ Ashleyyoursmile! 05:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]