Hello, Rickyurs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Knightrises10 (talk) 07:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks (Rickyurs (talk) 04:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Hi Based on your recent edits I think these links will be helpful to you. Please read them carefully.

• MOS:TV - Manual of Style for Television
• Template:Infobox television - Information about the parameters to be used in the television article infobox
• WP:NOTTVGUIDE - Wikipedia is not TV guide so we don't add information like Time slots and other airing history
• WP:CRYSTAL- Wikipedia is Not Crystal ball so we don't add scheduled or expected future events like adding end date of the series before the actual date and updating episodes in advance.

Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 04:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 06:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Reviewer's Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for reviewing articles under pending changes protection. Thank you PATH SLOPU 17:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Path slopu:Thank you for consideration. I am appreciative of your contribution. Rickyurs (talk) 19:35, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not sure what the role of this user Sid95Q is or how much of knowledge or training he has - to moderate but it’s very poor. At first for all the edits I did were ignored and was reverted back even though I provided necessary source links. My latest changes on ‘Super30’ page after doing 2 hour research (since I liked the plot of the movie) I updated content based on facts. But everything was reverted back. This has now discouraged me from making any changes in future but I thought I should let you know so others still keep updating and not feel like waste of time. Chintan Kamani 06:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckamani (talk • contribs)

@Ckamani: In your edit at Super 30 you have changed reliable source to unreliable. Please check WP:RS for WP policy on citing sources. Rickyurs (talk) 07:17, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ckamani: Please check this edit In this edit you have changed source from British Board of Film Classification to IMDb. The board which has certified the film is reliable source for running time then IMDb. Please avoid poor or unreliable sources. Rickyurs (talk) 07:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions to Hostages (web series). Bishal Shrestha (talk) 04:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Rickyurs. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2019-12-09. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 08:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Kevin Thanks Rickyurs (talk) 08:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	For your kind support and tireless effort. DreamSparrow Chat 15:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For your amazing support..... DreamSparrow Chat 15:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Rickyurs, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Go Phightins! 02:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Go Phightins!: Thanks Rickyurs (talk) 07:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings,

Requesting you to visit Draft:Love in Pakistan & Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai and please help expand the same if feel topics are of you would be interested in to write more about.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 12:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rickyurs: Hi, would like to enquiry you on how you differentiate between the parts of each of episode when checking the ratings on AGB Nielsen? Take Penthouse: War in Life (Season 1) episode 1 for example as listed on Wikipedia, part 1 is 6.7%, part 2 is 9.2%, and part 3 is 9.1%. However, on AGB Nielsen, it[1] didn't mention which part is 1 or 2 or 3 hence how do I know which is correct? — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Paper9oll: Hello! In such cases I usually refer to associated news items for reference. For example Racket Boys, which is aired in 3 parts, ratings on AGB Nielsen for June 1, are as: these. As you have rightly observed there is no mention of part with the ratings. So if we refer to news item which gives ratings as: 4.0% in Part 1, 5.4% in Part 2, and 4.7% in Part 3 clarifies the situation. This way an editor can know which ratings belong to which part. Thanks and regards. Rickyurs (talk) 04:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rickyurs: Understood. In case where the episode didn't enter Top 20 and the news didn't report on it, what should be included instead. As I saw, some drama episodes, the ratings is likely too low to enter the Top 20 ratings chart however somehow the editors manage to get the numbers even though the news media didn't reported it. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:20, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Paper9oll: I also have observed the same. I wonder where do they get the numbers and why don't they put the source. Some people may have subscribed to AGB Nielsen or TNmS by paying subscription and have access to complete chart by logging in. As for me, in such cases I usually put NA template. Rickyurs (talk) 04:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rickyurs: Ok understood. Thanks you for the information and guidance. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thanks for your work to improve Wikipedia. Regards, -- Titodutta (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Titodutta: Thank you Rickyurs (talk) 16:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Rickyurs. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 23:51, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Swarm: Thanks. Rickyurs (talk) 03:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I have posted Talk:Temu (company)#Request for more clean up and removing flag to ask for fixes to the page about Temu (company), the most downloaded app in the United States the last few months. [2] These tiny fixes address the last issues needed to remove the flag. . I have a conflict of interest as an employee of Temu and I would very much appreciate it if you might have time to take a look. Since you are a member of the WikiProject for Internet Culture, I thought you might possibly be interested in this internet cultural moment. [3], [4]. This page is in need of careful expansion in compliance with Wikipedia policy (and there is plenty of press coverage) but getting rid of the last tiny policy violations is a good place to start.

Thanks in advance for your consideration! Snowy2000 (talk) 02:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I nominated the article at Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#February_25. BorgQueen (talk) 05:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BorgQueen: Thanks. Please advise me in respect of improving the content or quality of the article. Rickyurs (talk) 05:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BorgQueen: Added some prose to the festival article. With some prose to go on, other editors may also add/edit to improve the content. Rickyurs (talk) 05:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've withdrawn the nom. I'll nominate the festival article for DYK instead. BorgQueen (talk) 06:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done: Template:Did you know nominations/73rd Berlin International Film Festival... now just wait for a review. May take several days. BorgQueen (talk) 07:11, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BorgQueen: Thanks for nominating and copy editing the prose sections. I like the 'hook', its ingenious as it's really a hook. Rickyurs (talk) 08:40, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 2 March 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 73rd Berlin International Film Festival, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 19:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Being on ITN automatically disqualifies it from DYK. Congratulations anyway! BorgQueen (talk) 00:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hello @Rickyursrickyurs I'm created Draft:Sangramsingh Thakur so can you help me about how to improve it. Rajmama (talk) 08:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rajmama: hi, the article doesn't comply with WP:NACTOR, so you need to wait till he lands up significant role in notable film. Rickyurs (talk) 10:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hello @Rickyurs, I have been writing on the article Ghar Banduk Biryani for a long time. I have done a lot of research and improved the article but I think you should check Ghar Banduk Biryani once and make sure it meets Wikipedia standards article. Morekar (talk)

Hello, Rickyurs. I've been trying to find where you achieved a consensus to add image boxes to the Incubments section of gov't leaders in the 2024 in sovereign state pages. Example - 2024 in Mexico. Anyways, I've mentioned this topic, over at WP:YEARS, fwfw. GoodDay (talk) 03:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I see you are a member of WikiProject Awards. I’m seeking feedback on some suggested updates to the Academy of Achievement page. I have a conflict of interest, would you be able to do a review? Jarc12030 (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]