Die Fliege




——————————————— Welcome! Need help? Click on [show] to the right ———————————————
This page was last edited or modified by Wugapodes (talk) on 2019-07-01.



Talmadge Memorial Bridge

Thank you for taking out the copyright violation on Talmadge Memorial Bridge. I'm the one that originally reverted it. I'm wondering - how did you find out about it? Is there a bot that looks for "copyright" in edit summaries or talk pages? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:06, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bubba73, CopyPatrol listed it. Best, Sam Sailor 04:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That page is on my watch list, and when I saw the addition that had "... at Tuesday's meeting." I knew it must be copied from something (and it was the newspaper). Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 23:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INTDABLINK violation

Please note that WP:INTDABLINK trumps WP:NAVNOREDIRECT, because failure to follow WP:INTDABLINK creates the appearance of errors needing to be fixed. This is even more of an issue in templates, which can create the appearance of thousands of errors. bd2412 T 04:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for reminding me about that. Best, Sam Sailor 04:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:51, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

World heritage sites

Hi Sam, since you moved the series of UNESCO articles, is there a centralized discussion on that or what rule did you follow? As the standard keeps changing a couple of times per year, I'd just like to know what we are following at the moment :) Cheers! Tone 16:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tone. To my knowledge, there has not been a WP:CD about this. As I said in the move edit summaries "...per the several discussions on Talk:World Heritage Site and consistent with the set." The October 2018 MR closed as Move to World Heritage Site. A lot of the associated list files had at that point already been moved to List of World Heritage sites in Foo. The Requested move 8 December 2018 was quickly withdrawn per snow. I do not think we have heard the last word about this, so to remain diplomatic, I categorized the redirects from List of World Heritage sites in Foo to List of World Heritage Sites in Foo as ((R from other capitalisation)) rather than ((R from miscapitalisation)). Does this answer your question? Best, Sam Sailor 17:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'm fine with any of the two, as long as we are consistent :) --Tone 17:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
​Looking at Category:Lists of World Heritage Sites, I think we are all good for the moment. Except for List of National Monuments of Bosnia and Herzegovina where we already have the FL List of World Heritage Sites in Bosnia and Herzegovina in the cat. So I repeated Special:Diff/787377079/820080769, created a redirect on Commons from c:File:Gazi Husrev-Bey's Bezistan (marketplace) (6086716410).jpg to c:File:Gazi Husrev-Bey’s Bezistan (marketplace) (6086716410).jpg so we avoid the article ending up in CAT:MISSFILE in the future should anybody run a MOS script, and corrected a number of minor things in Special:Diff/881908227/900141034. Best, Sam Sailor 18:17, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need feedback

Hey Sam! I sent a mail about my article, I hope that you would give me a feedback about it, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by YBAhmed (talk • contribs) 13:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi YBAhmed! Thank you for your mail. I still do not see the sourcing provided in Draft:Center for Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship as sufficient for a pass of our natability guideline, and the draft very much reads as an About page for the centre. You have already added more or less the same material to the parent article Católica Lisbon School of Business & Economics, and I created a redirect from Center for Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship to the relevant section in the article. Your intentions quote "I am a student in the university ... offered to help them with their activities because I saw what they are doing and they deserve recognition and exposure" are noble, and such intentions are often what drives people to Wikipedia in the first place. It is, however, a misunderstanding: Wikipedia is not a platform for exposure, Wikipedia is where we try to write about subjects that have already been exposed. I hope we can retain you for the project, we always need more editors; perhaps join Wikipedia:WikiProject Portugal? Best, Sam 14:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

re: Talk:Solar eclipse of September 27, 2182

It may not 'fit' because so far from now, but see my comments there. Move instead of delete? Shenme (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Shenme: Now deleted, but you may ask Fastily if a WP:REFUND applies here. If my memory serves me well, the text consisted of two or three lines of text more or less identical to the intro in other solar eclipse articles, and a table with values for the eclipse. Best, Sam 05:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia entry for David Zabecki

Hi, Sam -

I'm a new contributor, having become one in part to help MGen Zabecki, an erstwhile colleague of mine. He surveyed the his Wikipedia entry and was aghast at the factually incorrect information it contained. The alterations come directly from him, including the biographical passage, which he earlier composed for another purpose.

What is required to make the necessary changes permanent? Any suggestions you could offer would be welcome.

Marcus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geschichtlich4848 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Abend, Marcus, und herzlich wilkommen bei Englischen Wikipedia. If the article contains factually incorrect information, it needs to be addressed. You are welcome to edit the article yourself, but you should realize that you have a conflict of interest that can make neutral editing difficult. The more technical aspects of referencing what one writes to reliable sources can be a bit of a challenge in the beginning as well. A likely better way forward is to start a new section on Talk:David T. Zabecki, then I and, I am sure, K.e.coffman, the editor who started the article, will have a look at your suggestions. MfG, Sam Sailor 19:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shamsheer Vayalil article and the help desk

Oh no not this again! :P This IP hopping editor has been pestering the HD for about a week now; making such a nuisance of himself that he was blocked at one stage. (Don't know if you aware of the history here.) Every question we answer or demand we 'comply' with, he'll come up with something else. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagleash: Well, that IP (223.230.168.24 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)) could have been handled in a better way than just the mechanical series of uw-vand1-4 and a 31h block to begin with. Their remark in the infobox was well intended, and you deserve credit for being the one who fixed it. As for their requests to HD in re the same article, sure, there's a certain juvenile urgency to them, but they sound honest to me, so I would not call that pestering. Sam Sailor 21:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't seen that IP before as it goes. I would definitely call it pestering though (trouble or annoy with persistent requests etc.); see HD archives 2 June and previously. It was that IP that was blocked following multiple requests at the help desk. Eagleash (talk) 21:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

For keeping a watch on Helpdesk and helping a mate DBigXrayᗙ 13:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh, thanks friend ... makes me think or rødgrød. Best, Sam Sailor 13:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

You are most welcome sir

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Fylindfotberserk. Best, Sam Sailor 14:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RM/TR

I would like to ask you something as I am a New user about RM/TR. What should I do if I had made RM requests and there are no discussions taking place in the talk/discussion page? Can I make a bold move? Sai199610 (talk) 17:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to your notice that I have called for discussions but there has been replies by any User.Sai199610 (talk) 17:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sai199610: You are so welcome to ask questions. RMs run normally for seven days. Have patience and await other editors to join the discussions. Sometimes an RM will be relisted and run 14 days. I don't think it is good form to first open an RM, then close it and boldly move. But if you think a move is uncontroversial, most articles can be boldly moved in the first place without an RM. Do check out the article history and the talk page and its archive before moving. If there has been one or more prior RM discussions, consider if it is best to open a new discussion rather than boldly moving. Details at WP:RM. Naming convention docs are in Category:Wikipedia naming conventions. HTH, Sam Sailor 19:14, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ohk Thanks.Sai199610 (talk) 09:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sai199610: My pleasure. Never be afraid to ask questions. The Teahouse is the perfect place to ask, but you are certainly also welcome here. Sam Sailor 18:54, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The discussion for moving Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus railway station to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus is closed. Together with that we have also decided to move Lokmanya Tilak Terminus railway station to Lokmanya Tilak Terminus and also Bandra Terminus railway station to Bandra Terminus. I would like to bring to your notice that we have decided to move Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus railway station to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus and not Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus railway station as I had made requested. You can refer this at Talk: Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus railway station. It would be good if you help me out with the next step that I should go for. Whether again give a RM and wait for a mover to move or make a bold move. Thank You...Sai199610 (talk) 15:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

​No, the discussion at Talk:Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus railway station is not closed, it has only been open for three days. In four-five days from now, someone will close it. Unless it is relisted for a further seven days. Two rules of thumb in regards to RMs: if you are either the one who opened it or just have participated in the discussion, do not (in almost all cases) close the discussion or move the article. Leave it to an experienced, uninvolved editor. Sam Sailor 18:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I didn't know that it is according to the no. of days. Ok Thanks :) Sai199610 (talk) 04:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, Sai199610, I'm happy if I can help. Wikipedia is very complex, so it is fairly easy to make good-faith mistakes if one is unacquainted with the guidelines and common practices in a given area. So it is great that you ask questions in the beginning. Sam Sailor 06:57, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It has been more than 7 days, infact nearly 10 days after opening the discussion at Talk:Puratchi Thalaivar Dr. M.G. Ramachandran Central Railway Station. So, most of them have opposed and appealed to revert to Chennai Central railway station. Hence, I made a revert request.Sai199610 (talk) 12:32, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sai199610: The discussion has been relisted for a further seven days, just let the RM run. Sam Sailor 12:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sam Sailor: Oh I didn't know that. Sorry! Sai199610 (talk) 12:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sam Sailor: Hi! Sorry to trouble you multiple times. This time I would like to make a request! Please visit Talk:Mumbai Central railway station/STATION CODE. A user has been repeatedly making changes at Mumbai Central railway station station code. I have provided a primary source: apress release from the railway's website and also a secondary source: a newspaper article proving the same. But this user is arguing constantly and not ready to accept it. I had made a change in the code but due to his reluctant behaviour he is constantly changing it. The current code is "MMCT" which I tried to change from "BCT" which he just kept changing back (I would request you to refer the sources that I have provided for Mumbai Central and Mumbai CSMT on their talk pages i.e., the official ones as well as the newspaper article). The same behaviour was also observed in Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus railway station and Panvel railway station. Refer Talk:Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus railway station/STATION CODE. Here also you can see his disruptive behaviour and arguing nature. Another "Experienced user" accepted the source I provided in the same talk page. But this user is not ready to accept the change as well as his mistake. As per WP:RS a secondary source like a newspaper article is more reliable. But he has provided a station code table as reference which is an official primary source that too of the year 2015 which show no current changes. He is on the track stating he has provided 7 sources from the official website (a primary source) which are also older than that of the press release at Talk:Mumbai Central railway station/STATION CODE. I can go ahead with the changing but I fear it may lead to an edit warring and may ban the user. You can visit his talk page you will find multiple edit warring warnings to which also he had argued. I would like you to visit the above mentioned pages and make the relevant changes in the article and warn him (the user). I had requested as well as warned but it does not seem to work. If this behaviour persists I may need to request for a ban on the user. Thanking You, Regards, Sai199610 (talk) 15:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sai199610: The discussion on Talk:Mumbai Central railway station#STATION CODE (permalink) is a normal content dispute, and you have to resolve it between yourselves. I know nothing about Indian railway station codes, and I can not be of any good help there. You could politely and neutrally ask Fowler&fowler to have a look at it, but you should not go and ask people to "make the relevant changes in the article and warn him (the user)".
Two of the most important things on Wikipedia is that we maintain a high degree of politeness towards each other and that we work together even when we disagree. You are your own worst enemy when you start a talk page discussion with "Do not edit war with the station code." Please consider taking a day off now and then. And if you get any feelings of anger when you edit here, turn off the computer and meditate an hour or two. All the best, Sam Sailor 16:30, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sam Sailor: I am sorry. I will take care regarding what you have said. Thanks.Sai199610 (talk) 16:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sam Sailor: Hi! I would like to request you to please close the discussions at Talk:Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus and Talk:Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Terminus railway station since these RM have been "Withdrawn" by me. ThanksSai199610 (talk) 16:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
​Both have been closed. Best, Sam Sailor 20:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sam Sailor: Thank You! :)Sai199610 (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sam Sailor: I would request you to please move Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Terminus railway station to Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Terminus as it was discussed to remove "railway station" suffix at Talk:Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus. Regards,Sai199610 (talk) 05:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sai199610: I don't mind moving Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Terminus railway station to Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Terminus, if Matthew hk and User:Fowler&fowler can confirm the consensus here. The RM discussion on Talk:Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (permalink) is about 40k of text, and it would be really helpful for the closer if the opinions were clearly stated with * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' to whatever title you decide on. Best, Sam Sailor 05:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley Award

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Elipongo/SmileyAward

In the interest of promoting good cheer and bonhomie, you are hereby granted the coveted:
Random Smiley Award
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

WildChild300 (talk) 00:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, WildChild300, that's a very kind gesture, and we can all need a little smile. Best, Sam Sailor 00:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of references .

My page Kiran Dubey was not published citing lack of references according to Wikipedia standards . Could you please guide exactly what type of references are required. And any additional correction,if there . Thanks ! Eeshu167 (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eeshu167. I've worked a bit on Draft:Kiran Dubey, cleaned it up, and added more references. She does not meet the specific notability guideline for actors, and I doubt even the best writer could convincingly produce an article that would meet WP:BASIC. Best, Sam Sailor 06:46, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for sorting out the page move, and associated edits (although I see HBMS is still displayed in some pipe links where you have corrected the link bit).

Is there a reason you are not an admin? Have you considered WP:RFA? 213.205.240.17 (talk) 08:24, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, IP. You're welcome, and thanks for noticing. Double check me and see if the HBMS errors are all fixed now. As for RFA, no need to rush things, I've only been here for six years. ;) Take care, Sam Sailor 08:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another kitten for you!

Thread retitled from "A kitten for you!".

You are welcome

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Fylindfotberserk, it's just my way of saying "you're welcome and thank you too", so you don't have to post a kitten every time. Best, Sam Sailor 10:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and welcome sir. I suffer from mild OCD, so whenever someone thanks my edit, I've have an urge to say welcome and post a Kitty Wikilove. I feel like I'm not grateful enough if I don't do it. Have to restrain it though . I also have this urge to 'thank' vandalism reverts as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
​Kittens are indisputably lovely creatures and your gesture is noble. Take care, Sam Sailor 10:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Regards. -Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Draft: Shripad Vaidya

Respected Sir, Thanks for the guidance. I will try to improve the references. With regards. MA$HRVA User talk:MA$HRVA Write Right!! 17:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Denied

Hi Sam,

How are you?

Can you please help get my page published? Not sure why i got denied, i sited all my sources and even linked keys words back to wikepdia words.

Please help!KVDCom (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KVDCOM

Hi KVDCom, I'm great, how are you? Draft:Pau Guardans is in queue for review, it may take up to eight weeks. It does need some copy-editing, several lines sound like something I would expect in a promotional write-up. Are you being paid to write about him? Please do the TWA, I invited you on your talk page, and then join the normal editing of our encyclopedia. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me here, or you can ask your question at the Teahouse, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Happy editing, Sam Sailor 13:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

galaxyconsulting.net & copyvios

Hello. I noticed your Taxonomy (biology) revdel request and went digging out of curiosity. It looks as if Galaxy may be reusing Wikipedia content. See, for example, this comparison, which matches part of the Galaxy page with Taxonomy - but the revision of Taxonomy is from 15 September 2011, almost two months older than the Galaxy blog (assuming the date on their page is accurate). Another example: Galaxy's 'What is ontology?' blog entry matches Ontology (information science) from four months earlier. Of course it's still possible some of their copyrighted material was added to our articles (that recent bit you tagged on Taxonomy does look dodgy), but I thought you'd want to know. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 11:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are sure it is a backwards copy, parts of it seem to come from https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-goals-of-taxonomy which ofcourse may also be a backwards copy, feel free to remove the template. It would be lovely if people attributed their reuse of material published under CC and did not post it as copyrighted. A minor flaw in the universal fabric of order, though. Sam Sailor 11:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The woman on Quora's the owner of Galaxy. It's possible (perhaps likely, considering Ontology) that there's been some ebb and flow of text, and that it all originated on Wikipedia, but it would take more time than I care to spend to look through eight years of revisions. As I'm not certain the text in Taxonomy's a backwards copy, I won't remove the template. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 13:09, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
​I wouldn't care either, TBH, but thanks for posting anyways. All the best, Sam Sailor 13:12, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

The Bombay Baroda and Central India Railway Barnstar
For your work on Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, I award you this barnstar. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Fowler&fowler, happy to help where I can. All the best, Sam Sailor 05:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

Hello Sam Sailor,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 7

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (June 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 7th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Miscellaneous

  • After an MfD, DannyS712's MMS was deleted. It was originally created by Abelmoschus Esculentus. If you import either of these scripts, you may want to uninstall them, as they no longer exist.


Having published 6 issues of this newsletter, I decided it was time to move it out from my user space. It is now located at Wikipedia:Scripts++. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 11:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2019)

A soil profile depicting bedrock
Hello, Sam Sailor.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Bedrock

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Legislator • Bookworm (insect)

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Patrolling with Sagittarius

Hi Sam. I've been using your Sagittarius+ script to tag redirects in the NPP, but noticed it didn't mark the pages as patrolled after I had done so. I've made some changes at User:Wugapodes/Capricorn.js that adds this functionality. If a user is in the "patroller" user group, it adds a checkbox near the save button which, if checked, marks the page as patrolled in addition to adding the templates on save. If the user is not in that group no such box appears and the script should function normally. You can see the difference between the two scripts here. Let me know if you have any feedback, and feel free to incorporate it into your code if you like it. Best, Wugapodes [thɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 07:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful, thanks Wugapodes. Wouldn't you like to take over the maintenance entirely? I know far too little about javascript to properly maintain it, let alone code what you just showed me. Best, Sam Sailor 07:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can't say I'm a whiz at javascript myself, but if you're really looking to offload it I can do my best. Wugapodes [thɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 07:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
​Sounds good. What's the best things to do here? Redirect User:Sam Sailor/Scripts/Sagittarius+ to User:Wugapodes/Capricorn and change User:Sam Sailor/Scripts/Sagittarius+.js to something like /* #REDIRECT */mw.loader.load("//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wugapodes/Capricorn.js\u0026action=raw\u0026ctype=text/javascript");? Best, Sam Sailor 08:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And the .css, would be logical that you had one at User:Wugapodes/Capricorn.css. With a redirect from "mine". Sam Sailor 08:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure a redirect is the best option, but may be wrong. The conservative answer would be to just add a note/message box at the top of your documentation page that points to mine. That way current users know where the code they import is coming from. But in the grand scheme of things, it's probably not a huge deal, and users would (hopefully) notice the symbol change and click to learn more. It's your call since it's your js page. I'll copy over the CSS. Wugapodes [thɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 08:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
More