Welcome[edit]
Hello, Sammielh, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place ((Help me)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Image without license[edit]
Unspecified source/license for File:Cave, Bertha (Tatler) crop.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cave, Bertha (Tatler) crop.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like ((PD-self)) (to release all rights), ((self|cc-by-sa-4.0)) (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 00:45, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cook Islands Court of Appeal has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
KylieTastic (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Arima (parliamentary constituency) has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
bonadea contributions talk 13:50, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituencies of Dominica has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
bonadea contributions talk 14:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for August 13[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ethel Blondin-Andrew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Observer.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red[edit]
Hi there, Sammielh, and welcome to Women in Red. Thanks for creating two well-presented articles for our Latin-American contest. These reveal your competence in editing but you might nevertheless find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
_crop.jpg){kind=link}
--Ipigott (talk) 10:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
a barnstar for you![edit]
|
Women in Red Women in Latin America contest |
| Sammielh Thank you for your additions August 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Janine Brookner[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Janine Brookner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Janine Brookner[edit]
The article Janine Brookner you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Janine Brookner for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Janine Brookner[edit]
The article Janine Brookner you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Janine Brookner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 16,477 views (686.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
March editathons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Janine Brookner[edit]
On 8 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Janine Brookner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that three former top-ranking Central Intelligence Agency officials appeared on ABC News Nightline to condemn the agency's treatment of Janine Brookner? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Janine Brookner. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Janine Brookner), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your share in IWD! I show two who didn't make it, one from Russia and one from Ukraine. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Precious
women in Trinidad and Tobago politics
Thank you for quality articles about women such as Janine Brookner, Carolyn Seepersad-Bachan and Khadijah Ameen, for Constituencies of Dominica and your plans for members of parliament, for adding categories, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2711 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! It was my first DYK and my first GA. Sammielh (talk) 09:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 16,477 views (686.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Article for Wilma Scott Heide[edit]
This edit for the article for Wilma Scott Heide basically overwrote and replaced every word and every source that had existed in the article since it was created more than a dozen years ago. Was there anything in the earlier version that might have merited updating, rather than total replacement? Alansohn (talk) 02:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Alansohn. I used the existing article as the base when I updated the article and I didn't remove any of the information that was originally in it, although some was reworded as it was expanded. I kept three out of the five sources that were in the article at the time I expanded it and I am happy to add the other two back if you think they would improve the article. I apologise if you feel there was something from the article that was wrongly removed but I didn't intend for it to be completely replaced. I think when I copied it over from my sandbox that it may have made it appear that it was an entirely new article but I did update the existing article rather than starting from scratch. If there is anything in particular that you are concerned about, I'm happy to discuss that here or on the article's talk page. Sammielh (talk) 19:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Margaret Ramsay-Hale[edit]
On 29 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Margaret Ramsay-Hale, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Margaret Ramsay-Hale has worked as a judge in three countries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Ramsay-Hale. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Margaret Ramsay-Hale), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
a barnstar for you![edit]
|
Women in Red Translation Contest contest |
| Sammielh Thank you for your additions May 2022 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Wilma Scott Heide[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wilma Scott Heide you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 10:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wilma Scott Heide[edit]
The article Wilma Scott Heide you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wilma Scott Heide for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 12:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wilma Scott Heide[edit]
The article Wilma Scott Heide you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wilma Scott Heide for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 14:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
a barnstar for you![edit]
|
|
Women in Red Translation Contest |
| Sammielh Thank you for your additions June 2022 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC) |
Biographies of women[edit]
Just a quick word from me to let you know how much I appreciate your extensive work on the creation of women's biographies as well as your success in bringing Janine Brookner and more recently Wilma Scott Heide up to GA status. Your involvement in Women in Red is proving to be a real asset to the project. Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 07:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Jo Ann Evansgardner[edit]
On 25 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jo Ann Evansgardner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Jo Ann Evansgardner ran for a position on the Pittsburgh City Council, she asked voters to "put this woman in her place"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jo Ann Evansgardner. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jo Ann Evansgardner), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. Thank you for creating Mary-Scott Welch. User:Spicy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for this new article. You may want to add links to this article on relevant pages so that it is not orphaned.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Spicy)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Spicy (talk) 20:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Anita Bowser[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anita Bowser, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023[edit]
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Mary Jo Arndt[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mary Jo Arndt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jo Ann Evansgardner[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jo Ann Evansgardner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 21:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jo Ann Evansgardner[edit]
The article Jo Ann Evansgardner you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jo Ann Evansgardner and Talk:Jo Ann Evansgardner/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jo Ann Evansgardner[edit]
The article Jo Ann Evansgardner you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jo Ann Evansgardner for comments about the article, and Talk:Jo Ann Evansgardner/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 19:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:M. Adela Eads[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:M. Adela Eads, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Marjorie Lynch[edit]
On 26 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marjorie Lynch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Daughters of the American Revolution opposed Marjorie Lynch's nomination to a government post due to her birth in Britain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marjorie Lynch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marjorie Lynch), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Catherine Conroy[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Catherine Conroy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Cathey Weiss Steinberg[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cathey Weiss Steinberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Cindy Judd Hill[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cindy Judd Hill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Lillian Ciarrochi[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lillian Ciarrochi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Virginia Hartigan Cain[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Virginia Hartigan Cain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Alma Speed Fox[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alma Speed Fox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Evelyn Gotzion[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Evelyn Gotzion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Gene Boyer (activist)[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gene Boyer (activist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Joan Thomas (environmentalist)[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joan Thomas (environmentalist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Gene Boyer (activist)[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gene Boyer".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Arnhilda Gonzalez-Quevedo is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 01:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William A. Forward, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Charlie Cole Chaffin[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charlie Cole Chaffin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Joan Thomas (environmentalist)[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joan Thomas".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Charlie Cole Chaffin[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charlie Cole Chaffin".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
GA review[edit]
Hi! I have addressed all your points for the GA nom of BP Refinery. Please can you review. Thanks! MaxnaCarta (talk) 09:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marjorie Lynch[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marjorie Lynch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaxnaCarta -- MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Sammielh, now passed. The bot may not work properly due to an issue at my end, but I fixed it. Well done! — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:26, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- @MaxnaCarta: Thanks so much for taking on this review, I really appreciate it. Sammielh (talk) 16:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Sammielh an absolute pleasure. Happy to review again for you. Always up to swap reviews too. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 10:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- @MaxnaCarta: Thanks so much for taking on this review, I really appreciate it. Sammielh (talk) 16:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on International law[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page International law, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marjorie Lynch[edit]
The article Marjorie Lynch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marjorie Lynch for comments about the article, and Talk:Marjorie Lynch/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaxnaCarta -- MaxnaCarta (talk) 06:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - June 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
New message from Narutolovehinata5[edit]
Message added 01:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.
Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of John Goldmark[edit]
Hello! Your submission of John Goldmark at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 〜 Festucalex • talk 13:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Maggie Savoy[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maggie Savoy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Maggie Savoy[edit]
The article Maggie Savoy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Maggie Savoy and Talk:Maggie Savoy/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Maggie Savoy[edit]
The article Maggie Savoy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Maggie Savoy for comments about the article, and Talk:Maggie Savoy/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Lynn Germain Cutler[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lynn Germain Cutler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brenda Frazier (politician)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brenda Frazier (politician) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 10:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Nina Hyde[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nina Hyde, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brenda Frazier (politician)[edit]
The article Brenda Frazier (politician) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brenda Frazier (politician) for comments about the article, and Talk:Brenda Frazier (politician)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
DYK for John Goldmark[edit]
On 19 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Goldmark, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Goldmark brought a libel suit that did "to the Red Scare what the Scopes monkey trial had ... done to Creationism"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Goldmark. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Goldmark), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Evelyn Anthony bibliography[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Evelyn Anthony bibliography".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Polly Dyer[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polly Dyer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red 8th Anniversary[edit]
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WiG Editathon Barnstar[edit]
|
Women in Green Editathon June '23 | |
| Thank you for your excellent contributions to GA nomination Maggie Savoy and GA review for Mayme Schweble at the latest WiG Wildcard Edition editathon!
Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 23:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC) |
Women in Red August 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive[edit]
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
The August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive is at the halfway mark, and has seen incredible progress, dropping the backlog from 638 to 359 unreviewed articles -- a 43.7% reduction in only fifteen days! But we still have over two weeks to go, and there are plenty of articles left to review:
- We've gone from 14 nominations 270+ days old and 65 nominations 180+ days old to 2 and 0 respectively. No more articles will reach 270+ status during the drive, and only three more will reach 180+ if unreviewed, so this is your last chance to get the higher age bonuses!
- We still have plenty of articles in the 90+ range, but the list is shrinking fast.
- Some articles need new reviewers, either because they're officially on second opinion or because the original reviews were deleted or invalidated. You can help prevent these articles from waiting longer!
- While there are starting to be clear favourites for the Content Review Medal of Merit, the field is still very open. A late entrant can still pull an upset to get the most reviews in the drive!
And remember: if you've done reviews, you should log them at the backlog drive page for points, so they can be tracked towards your awards at the end.
Thanks for signing up for the drive, and I hope to see you reviewing! Vaticidalprophet 02:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
You have received this message as a participant in the August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive who has logged one or no reviews. This is a one-off massmessage. If you wish to opt out of all massmessages, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Your draft article, Draft:Cathey Weiss Steinberg[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cathey Weiss Steinberg".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women in Red[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive[edit]
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| We really appreciate your efforts to review GANs. During the drive, the backlog of unreviewed nominations reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Give Me Your Hand (novel)[edit]
On 11 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Give Me Your Hand (novel), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Megan Abbott was inspired by Donald Trump's comments about menstrual blood while writing Give Me Your Hand? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Give Me Your Hand (novel). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Give Me Your Hand (novel)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Sammielh. You've added references for "Edy 2012" to Inez Robb, but it's not defined in the article. Could you add it to the Sources section or let me know what work this refers to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ActivelyDisinterested: Thanks for flagging this, I’ve amended it. The year of the thesis was listed incorrectly in the references. Sammielh (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Sammielh. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 21:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Inez Robb you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Inez Robb you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Inez Robb and Talk:Inez Robb/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Evelyn Gotzion[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Evelyn Gotzion".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Inez Robb you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Inez Robb for comments about the article, and Talk:Inez Robb/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2023[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Anne Forer[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anne Forer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
WiG Editathon Barnstar – October 2023[edit]
|
Women in Green Editathon October '23 | |
| At last – here is your barnstar! Thank you for your excellent contributions to GA nomination Inez Robb during the WiG "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article editathon. Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. Thank you for your work on The Birthday Murder. ARandomName123, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for your work on this page!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|ARandomName123)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 01:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy Holidays![edit]
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Sammielh: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 01:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
Women in Red January 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Roberta Applegate[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roberta Applegate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. Thank you for your work on Rachel Monroe. Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for the article. I have marked it as reviewed
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Bruxton)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Bruxton (talk) 17:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Give Me Your Hand (novel)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Give Me Your Hand (novel) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhain -- Rhain (talk) 01:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Give Me Your Hand (novel)[edit]
The article Give Me Your Hand (novel) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Give Me Your Hand (novel) and Talk:Give Me Your Hand (novel)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhain -- Rhain (talk) 05:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Give Me Your Hand (novel)[edit]
The article Give Me Your Hand (novel) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Give Me Your Hand (novel) for comments about the article, and Talk:Give Me Your Hand (novel)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhain -- Rhain (talk) 01:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive[edit]
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary[edit]
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cindy Judd Hill[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cindy Judd Hill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 12:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cindy Judd Hill[edit]
The article Cindy Judd Hill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cindy Judd Hill for comments about the article, and Talk:Cindy Judd Hill/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 20:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Bonnie Wiley[edit]
Hello, Sammielh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bonnie Wiley".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Tolstoi Wallach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bantam.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Signups open for The Core Contest 2024[edit]
The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—returns again this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 02:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.
TCC 2023 Check in[edit]
Hi there Sammielh. It has come to our attention that most of the winners from last year's Core Contest didn't receive any money from WMUK? Is this your case as well?
There appears to have been some major communication errors, but WMUK is happy to uphold their funding promise. I was planning to send an email to the other winners this weekend with instructions on how to receive their award—I'm happy to send you this as well. Aza24 (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Aza24: Hi there, no I never received any money although I think it was largely my fault as I completely forgot to ever reply to their initial email. Sammielh (talk) 09:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging