Hello, Sanglahi86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sablan, Benguet page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Trinidad, Benguet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aspiras–Palispis Highway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santo Tomas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tuba, Benguet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ''Note: [[Pugo]] was part of the municipal district of Benguet Province until February 4, 1920)''))</ref> of the [[township]] of Baguio in the early 1900s under the [[History of the Philippines (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:40, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of barangays in Benguet may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• align="left" | Tinongdan || 4,216 || 3,923 || 3,756 || 3,380 || 2,661 || [Itogon, Benguet|Itogon]]
• | align="left" | Tuding || 7,703 || 6,535 || 6,936 || 5,986 || 5,294 || [Itogon, Benguet|Itogon]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bued River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dike. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cordillera Regional Science High School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Department of Science and Technology and DECS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eddie Garcia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Best Actor and Best Director. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kinatay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sack, Bus terminal and Balut. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luzon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isabela. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Sanglahi86, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Happy editing, --L235-Talk Ping when replying 03:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply] Spread the love by adding ((subst:Seasonal Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cordillera Administrative Region, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabuk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cordillera Administrative Region

added a link pointing to Chico River

San Gabriel, La Union

added a link pointing to Saint Gabriel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amburayan River

added a link pointing to Creek

Benguet

added a link pointing to Creek

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isabela (province), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pandan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cagayan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalupiri Island. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fiesta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiligaynon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much for the barnstar, it's good to know that my work is appreciated. Likewise, your efforts are noted and you are certainly due for recognition:

		The Philippine Barnstar of National Merit
		Thank you for diligent work on Philippines geography articles to make them consistent and up to date, along with clean up and formatting work. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
		this WikiAward was given to Sanglahi86 by P 1 9 9  ✉ on 18:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lanao del Sur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Masbate may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• as 1906, Masbate lawmakers made proposal to the [[United States Congress]] to grant the Philippines] Independence.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	P199 already gave you the Philippine barnstar so I'm giving you a different barnstar to show my appreciation for your edits to numerous Philippine-related articles. Keep it up! (And I'll try to back you up on Bohol.) seav (talk) 16:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pampanga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balintawak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ilocos Sur may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Before the [[History of the Philippines (1521–1898)]]|arrival of the Spaniards]], the coastal plains in northwestern Luzón, stretching from [[Bangui, Ilocos Norte|Bangui]] (Ilocos

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cagayan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pangasinense. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Albay Gulf

added a link pointing to Gulf

Davao Gulf

added a link pointing to Gulf

Davao del Sur

added a link pointing to Kalagan

Lagonoy Gulf

added a link pointing to Gulf

Lingayen Gulf

added a link pointing to Large

Ragay Gulf

added a link pointing to Gulf

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you have edited a number of articles on Catholicism. A discussion is taking place as to whether the website Catholic-Hierarchy.org is a reliable source that can be utilized on Wikipedia or whether all references and information derived from it should be deleted. This topic is currently being discussed at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard [1]. As the website's removal as a reference will affect several thousand Wikipedia articles, I believe that the broadest range of opinions should be obtained before action is taken. Please contribute if interested.Patapsco913 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Baguio

added a link pointing to Burnham Park

List of mountains in the Philippines

added a link pointing to Location

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baguio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burnham Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Binuluangan page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cagayan Valley

added a link pointing to Department of Trade and Industry

Mount Makiling

added a link pointing to Calamba

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Be careful of using wikidata, you might replace a historical seal over a current one as you did in the Ilocos Norte article. Wikidata does not allow images under fair use where most seals and some flags are uploaded under this clause in the English Wikipedia.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much for the reminder and info. I will keep that in mind. Sanglahi86 (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Hariboneagle927:, technically, Wikidata doesn't host images. It merely links to Wikimedia Commons, which does have a policy of no-fair-use images. But the rest of your statement stands. —seav (talk) 00:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86, thanks for pointing out the error with the 'As of' template script. I'm looking now to try and locate the articles. Would you mind pointing out the articles (or the date, so I can look in edit history) where this has occurred so that I can fix it. Kind regards -- Marek.69 ^talk 20:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I am having trouble connecting to the internet, so I cannot check all for now. But I have noticed Masbate and Romblon provinces were some of those that had the error.

Thank you Sanglahi86, I've fixed those two. Please let me know if you spot any more. I will also try to do a search for any other occurrences.

Kind regards Marek.69 ^talk 21:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86, I've done a search of over 2,500 towns, cities & provinces in the Philippines, but have been unable to find any further occurrences of this error.

That is not to say that there are no more. If you do encounter any, please let me know, I would be very keen to know.

Best regards -- Marek.69 ^talk 16:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your diligent efforts. I was only worried assuming it might have been done in all 81 provinces, which would be a very tedious task to do manually (since I do not know how to use AWB). Sorry to have bothered you when I should have just fixed it instead. Sanglahi86 (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Batangas

added a link pointing to Treaty of Paris

Manila Bay

added a link pointing to Balanga

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lanao del Sur may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• are [[Sunni Islam|Sunnites]], with a minority of [[Christianity in the Philippines|Christians]] (mostly [[Roman Catholicism in the Philippines|Roman Catholics]] and most of them are Cebuanos and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Apayao may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ((Main|Kalinga-Apayao]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Romblon

added a link pointing to Banton

Samar (province)

added a link pointing to Partitioned

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Apayao

added a link pointing to Santol

Surigao del Sur

added a link pointing to Cebuano

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sanglahi86 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Most Played Songs". The reason given for Most Played Songs's block is: " There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text ((unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here)) at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must: Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here)) at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ".

• Blocking administrator: Jimfbleak (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Appears that this was handled below. Just a note - while it may be unrelated, it isn't entirely unjustified. The software placed this block because for whatever reason you've used the same IP recently as the blocked user (lot of legit circumstances this can happen). You were not "hacked" most likely, however. SQL^{Query me!} 05:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was surprised to see I was autoblocked and could not make any further edits. Upon seeing the stated reason for the autoblock, I do not know how my IP address was used by User "Most Played Songs". And I don't know how his/her user contributions show up as the same as what I had done. Please unblock my account as it may have been hacked in some way by the said user. I was just intending on editing some provinces of the Philippines as I had been doing in the past. Sanglahi86 (talk) 20:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know quite how this has happened, but I've now removed the auto block, so you should be OK, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sanglahi86 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text ((unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here)) at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must: Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here)) at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

• Blocking administrator: Jimfbleak (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: I've added "IP block exempt" to your account settings; hopefully that will prevent this from happening again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is the 2nd time I was autoblocked because of my IP address. I am not familiar with the technicalities on on how my IP address appears as the same as another user/s who use it for abusive purposes. Please unblock my account, and if possible, please prevent the system from autoblocking it again in the future. Sanglahi86 (talk) 10:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know why this is happening, ISP's are supposed to be unique. I've unblocked the original account for now to see if that helps Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am able to edit articles again. Thank you for the prompt response. Sanglahi86 (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much User:Ohnoitsjamie and User:Jimfbleak for fixing this problem. Sanglahi86 (talk) 14:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Sanglahi86 for updating Philippine articles with the 2015 census data. Please use Wikidata if you can to update the info, see Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive39#PSA has finally released the 2015 census report. An examples of linking to Wikidata and adding the 2015 census reference is this edit for Vigan.

And when you update the province articles, can you also update the population rankings? You can find the new rankings at List of primary local government units of the Philippines (still being edited, I still have to update the density rankings). If you have any questions, let me know by leaving a message on my talk page. Thanks again. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Regarding the use of Wikidata, I had noticed on several province articles that both ((PH wikidata|population_as_of)) and ((PH wikidata|population_as_of)) shows the old 2010 population figures, so I merely replaced the template with the actual 2015 population.

Also, it appears the population figures in some provinces infoboxes are hidden when using the above-mentioned templates (I preview-tested it in Capiz and the population info was not displayed).

I also tested in the Capiz infobox using ((PH census|current)) under the | population_footnotes parameter but the source template was not displayed at all. When replacing it with ((PH census|2015)) though, the source was correctly displayed, so this is what I used.

Yes, I had left the ranks untouched since the province/primary LGU table/s were not yet updated at that time. Thanks for updating the primary LGU table, I will use it in updating the population ranks.

Also, I will try checking if both ((PH wikidata|population_as_of)) and ((PH wikidata|population_as_of)) templates work correctly in some provinces. Otherwise, I would (temporarily) use the data figure itself instead of the templates, until you might find a better solution since I am not very familiar with the intricacies of Wikidata. Sanglahi86 (talk) 17:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86. The issue is the same: there is no data yet at Wikidata. Obviously if the population data is not yet at Wikidata, or the "point in time" and "determination method" qualifiers are not set, then it creates blanks or takes the old 2010 value (if it is there). I updated the Wikidata entry for Capiz, and restored the links. It works now. The advantage of linking to Wikidata is that we don't need to touch the WP article next census, only update Wikidata. Thanks. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for explaining. I had forgotten a lot on how to edit at Wikidata after having been away for several days. I will then not delete the templates from the articles, and I might update their Wikidata item if I have enough time. Sanglahi86 (talk) 19:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. If you need help for Wikidata, let me know. The density rankings have now also been updated at List of primary local government units of the Philippines. Regards, -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Camarines Sur may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ! scope="col" style="border-style:hidden solid solid hidden;" | ((small|(2010)))<((PH census|2010|05))
• Sur]] is said to be the "purest" form of Bikol according to Jesuit anthropologist Frank Lynch, S.J.), though most linguists just consider it as the standard form of Coastal Bikol language since

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have to say you are doing a great job updating all the tables of various provinces. It's just too full of data, if I may suggest to retain only the

• 2015 population census
• land area and density per sq km.

I think previous data like the 2010 population, population growth rate, and area and density in sqm can just be used in the respective article infoboxes of those political divisions. -- Namayan (talk) 09:35, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I am still in the process of updating the tables. I agree the tables are full of data, but I think they (previous population and growth rate) are useful enough to be included so that they can be displayed in a single sortable table (for comparative purposes). Besides, the growth rate needs the previous population figure, and the growth rate shows how a city or town is increasing in population. Number of barangays don't take too much space, and coordinates point to the city/town center (sorted from north to south and vice versa). Plus, the coordinates are even more useful through the GeoGroup template in the external links section. Clicking on "Map all coordinates using OSM (OpenStreetMap) displays the town centers of all LGUs in the province using OpenStreetMap (a feature more advanced than WikiMiniAtlas); useful if you want to see an uncluttered map (unlike WikiMiniAtlas). If the tables are too large, we may add the collapsible collapsed option so that they are collapsed by default. Sanglahi86 (talk) 09:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree the number of barangays should be retained. Population growth info are LGU specific and could be used well in converting their infoboxes into templated in Wikidata, so it updates across all WP projects. My suggestion mainly is to help new editors be comfortable in updating the tables too when the time comes. -- Namayan (talk) 02:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, it is extremely tedious manually updating these tables. It would make future updating easier if a table similar to these was made into a template (a "table template") to reduce excessive text in the Edit window. But, I am not familiar with the complexities of creating templates (even more if it involves several data such as those in tables). For now, I can only update and standardize the province tables manually to have their code consistent with the others. Sanglahi86 (talk) 20:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aurora (province)

added a link pointing to Dumagat

Kalinga (province)

added a link pointing to Chico River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Apayao image map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sanglahi86. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sanglahi86. You have new messages at Talk:List of festivals in the Philippines.
Message added 11:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

You were involved in a substantial expansion of the article, so I just thought I'd let you know. Quasar G ^{t - c} 11:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:PH town table alt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86, since you made the file, please update the map. The Negros Island Region is now defunct.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I have added a temporary note in the image map template while the map image is still outdated. Unfortunately, I could not find the file I used to create the map, and it appears I will have to start from scratch, but I am quite busy right now and I do not have the time. The good thing is that I directly used the image uploaded by Scorpion prinz at its original resolution of 1,000 × 1,560 pixels, in anticipation that future changes in the image will not affect the image map's coordinates. Since Scorpion prinz' image contains the correct colors for both Negros Occidental and Oriental, the problem lies only in the map labels. If you have the time, could you please add the map labels yourself as I really do not have the time to do it now. Thanks. — Sanglahi86 (talk) 08:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sanglahi86. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sanglahi86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you made [this edit to ((Philippine cabinet)) some time ago. I created that template in hopes of making a start at getting the tables used in articles about the Philippines to move towards a standard format more in line with my reading of MOS:Tables, though I have not moved forward very far in that. I see that your edit seems to disagree with MOS:Tables#Appearance, where that says, "In general, styles for tables and other block-level elements should be set using CSS classes, not with inline style attributes." Even though I've found in the past that the selection of existing CSS classes is pretty sparse and seems not well supported (as an indication of that, I note "Please put a list of existing classes here." at Help:Cascading Style Sheets#MediaWiki existing styles), I'd prefer to either stick with what is there or to work towards extending what is there. Your edit summary on that template edit says, "Formatting fixes." That fix, as done, would be applied over whatever skin is being used (probably the current default of WP:Vector). Do you think that the table formatting in the Vector skin is so badly broken that it needs repair? If not, what would you think about a revert of your format changes to this template? Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 18:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, please feel free to revert my old edits on that template as I have not been away from Wikipedia for quite some time and am unable to regularly edit due to real life situations. The only portions I hope would be preserved are the col and row scopes for accessibility. Thank you. — Sanglahi86 (talk) 02:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Philippine Drug War. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sanglahi86: if you are going to accuse other editors of edit warring then you should make sure that your own behaviour is exemplary — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:43, 7 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antonio Luna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guagua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Annotated image/Cagayan Valley has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86! I see that you are the creator of this file on the article Provinces of the Philippines. I would like to request if you can update it by changing Compostela Valley to Davao de Oro. Thanks! — Emperork (talk) 12:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry for the late response. I regret to say I misplaced the original SVG file I used back then so we are stuck with the PNG image. As I do not have enough time to fix the label, maybe you could try contacting Hariboneagle927 as he was successfully able to replace ARMM with Bangsamoro and remove NIR and change the colors of its provinces. Thank you. Sanglahi86 (talk) 20:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86. Thanks for your efforts to Philippine-related articles. But for LGU's, MOS:PHIL requires just one pushpin map (that of the entire Philippines). That is because the regional Luzon/Visayas/Mindanao maps show nothing extra over the national map, nor have any added detail. In other words, they are not really helpful.

And BTW, you have also been adding links to PhilAtlas. Is that actually a reliable source? There is nothing on the website about who publishes it and their credentials...

Regards, -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Sorry, I only added those additional pushpin maps to add more detail, and also as both Indian and Indonesian cities also have their own regional maps. Malaysian cities even took it needlessly further by Asia and Earth maps. Luzon and Mindanao may not be of much help due to the effect being a little zooming in, but I had thought that Metro Manila, Visayas, and Palawan regional maps were quite useful due to more zooming in and added map detail.

As for PhilAtlas as a reference, I agree that it may not be a very reliable source. However, the elevation was mass-uploaded by User:Exec8 in Wikidata, which included the site as a reference URL. The template ((PhilAtlas detail|reference)) I recently created checks Wikidata if the reference URL of the elevation is from PhilAtlas, then only adds the citation if true. As the elevation data is currently displayed in all infoboxes, I think the citation should be added, unless the elevation itself is removed from all Wikipedia infoboxes.–Sanglahi86 (talk) 01:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, some editors really go overkill with the pushpin maps. Just because we can add them, doesn't mean we should...

I think it may be better to have a centralized discussion at Tambayan whether or not we should use PhilAtlas. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree that it should be discussed further with other users. Kind regards. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 19:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@P199:: Hello. In the meantime while a discussion has not yet been initiated and a consensus not yet reached, I will continue adding the elevation citations. I have integrated the template ((PhilAtlas detail|reference)) into ((PH wikidata|elevation_footnotes)), which I will be using in order to make future changes easier. Regards. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 01:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry. I'll start the discussion today. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 12:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ferdinand Marcos, you may be blocked from editing. You have been engaging in disruptive cite-tagging of valid RS, and deleting well-cited content as "superfluous content"

Your deletion edits may have also broken a number of citation links.

Please see Wikipedia:Disruptive editing

Unfortunately, before accusing me of disruptive editing, the page Ferdinand Marcos contains a lot of serious issues; issues which were not even tagged so as to appear like nothing was wrong, and I wanted those issues to be resolved. Those "reliable sources" you claim are made by mostly one-sided advocacy/partisan groups, academic papers, opinion and editorials, and books published by a relatively unknown publishers. One publisher of a book you claim as reliable even did not have its own website, and merely used a Facebook page, which had users posting mostly anti-government sentiments.

Your arbitrary mass deletion of those tags and restoring those "superfluous information", most of which is undue weight and sourced by questionable sources, is very disturbing.–Sanglahi86 (talk) 04:35, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What of it if a book does not have a website? So what if publishers are relatively unknown? Are those against Wikipedia rules? Also please cite specific instances of Undue Weight in the article. As per WP:UNDUE -> "Giving due weight and avoiding giving undue weight means articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views or widely supported aspects." -Object404 (talk) 10:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also what do you mean by one-sided? Is something "one-sided" and "partisan" if it's on the side of historical truth? -Object404 (talk) 10:17, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"merely used a Facebook page, which had users posting mostly anti-government sentiments" -> are you referring to this -> https://www.facebook.com/MarcosMartialLawNeverAgain/ ? If so, I looked at the last 20 posts which span over a year and "mostly anti-government sentiments" is a clear falsehood. -Object404 (talk) 11:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kindly check my response at the article talk page. Regards.–Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kindly see the comment I just left at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines. When disagreements arise, we are to seek consensus, not edit disruptively, as Object404 has already warned you. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 07:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. The problem is the existence of PhilAtlas elevation at Wikidata, not my addition of ((PH wikidata|elevation_footnotes)). Right now, while elevation data are still existing at Wikidata and currently displayed at infoboxes, it is just proper to add citations where the data came from. Kindly remember that ((PH wikidata|elevation_footnotes)) code is usable in the future, and can be edited later on to remove PhilAtlas links once PhilAtlas elevation data are deleted from corresponding Wikidata items.–Sanglahi86 (talk) 07:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sanglahi86, no, simply no. The problem is the use of unreliable data on WikiData that we re-use. The correct mode of action is to find the correct elevation data from a reliable source and use that, likely overriding the WikiData information. If you do not find a reliable source you either tag it with ((citation needed)), or even, remove the data. What you are currently doing is intentionally ignoring a consensus, and basically evading the blacklist. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 08:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your insight. I shall initiate then the deletion of such elevation at Wikidata to end this issue.–Sanglahi86 (talk) 08:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sanglahi86, no. That is equally disruptive. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 08:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Administrative divisions of the Philippines list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Administrative divisions of the Philippines sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi, really appreciate your finding of sources. Could I ask that when you add them in the place of cn tags, or within uncited text, that you maintain tags in a way that separates the uncited information from the cited? For example, in this edit, you added sources to support "Aquino's administration also saw the pullout of the U.S. bases in Subic Bay and Clark." However, the preceding "high inflation and unemployment, and natural calamities, but introduced land reform and market liberalization." is not covered by these sources. (I assume, I can't actually access the Washington Post source, can you check the url?) Similarly, you added sources for the death penalty, but not the APEC summit. In these cases, if you duplicate/move the relevant cn tag, that would be quite helpful in keeping a record of what items in the article still need checking. Best, CMD (talk) 14:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Yes, I will be more prudent in replacing those citation needed tags. Regards.–Sanglahi86 (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Appreciated. The politics article is very close to being fully sourced! CMD (talk) 07:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Party rights (Philippines). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 17#Party rights (Philippines) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Parity Amendment. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 17#Parity Amendment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You made this edit. Could you clarify that, please? I couldn't find any update of RA8353 with some quick googling. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I could have added the tag on the section Occurrences, which contains several outdated info, but many of the non-book sources are likewise very outdated, dating more than a decade ago (2000s). For instance, a Bulatlat source there has three citations but is dated April 30 – May 6, 2006.–Sanglahi86 (talk) 09:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user helped promote Political history of the Philippines to good article status.

Particularly for work on the more recent history. CMD (talk) 17:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Benguet labelled map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Bulacan labelled map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Pangasinan labelled map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good day, I would have asked for help because someone proposed a deletion in the article I created, he said no because he is the mayor's son, this is not a basis to say that he is an actor and he doesn't have any significant roles on television. I also have a list of shows and series that he voted for me not to be deleted and someone also helped, I hope you can help me thank you. --7starunited (talk) 13:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user helped promote Politics of the Philippines to good article status.

CMD (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Buguias weatherbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:La Trinidad, Benguet weatherbox has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:World's largest islands location map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:PhilAtlas detail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 17:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86! Thank you for your edits to Rodrigo Duterte. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Presidency of Rodrigo Duterte into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 05:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for the very useful information. Will keep that in mind in future edits. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 11:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20190327151454/http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1062333#, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I would like to know why you reversed my edits on the Quezon Service Cross page where I included President Manuel Roxas as one of the recipients of the Quezon Service Cross, despite the fact that I cited my source: Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines Vol. 52 No. 7 (July 3, 1956). Did you not check that issue of the Official Gazette before calling the content "unverifiable/dubious"? Justinadriel (talk) 06:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Justinadriel:, kindly see my comment on Talk:Quezon Service Cross. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 12:10, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Precolonial states in the Philippines location map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your massive contributions to the Presidency of Rodrigo Duterte article. Itsquietuptown ✉️📜 10:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sanglahi86

Thank you for creating List of major acts and legislation during the presidency of Rodrigo Duterte.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sanglahi86

Thank you for creating List of administration members in the presidency of Rodrigo Duterte.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Just wanted to get your thoughts on making the project page and its subpages more mobile-friendly, based on the edit where you removed the float style for the statistics table at the Assessment subpage.

I too would like to make the page much more mobile-friendly but it does seem tricky to make sure that it would actually be responsive for wide screen users (desktops, laptops, tablets) as well. Like when you removed the float style for the table, it did leave a huge space when viewed on a wide screen, even though it did improve viewability on narrow screens.

So ideally, the best course of action would be to make it so it would resize and rearrange the contents accordingly. But based on experience, it's a lot easier doing that on an actual web app than Wikipedia with the full functionality of CSS.

It's also likely that the number of mobile users might be too few to justify putting in the effort, which would suggest that we just design the layout for wide screen users. What do you think? Ganmatthew (talk) 17:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I think floating the table to the right would "lock" the table in place. I viewed the page yesterday using my mobile phone and could not horizontally scroll through the table. I personally think the wide space left in desktop view is better than the table appearing to be "locked" in mobile view. Maybe you could also consider returning the Table of contents since it is useful in mobile view? I am not sure if less users use mobile view than desktop. Perhaps you can ask other Tambayan members for their opinions regarding the matter. Regards. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 18:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sanglahi86 I realized the table itself isn't responsive to narrow screen widths but nevertheless I've figured out a way to make the Assessment page (mostly) responsive. Ganmatthew (talk) 19:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The table looks OK now in mobile view. However, maybe we should remove the background color and frame of the page as it obscures part of the table. The page would also look much better and legible in a white background, like in WikiProject United States/Assessment. Sanglahi86 (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ganmatthew:, I edited the page and fixed the table of contents display issue but it appears the default TOC, including the TOC limit and horizontal TOC templates, are all disabled in mobile view. I presumed they would display normally like main articles. The TOC might still be useful in desktop view though. Kindly make adjustments as you see fit. Regards. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alright, will do if there are any! Ganmatthew (talk) 11:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For spearheading all-around layout and content improvements at Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines. Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 11:54, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sanglahi86. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Presidency of Rodrigo Duterte at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 21:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86, I've finished the copy-edit of this article but I haven't done any content work, though I have copied over three sections that had been transcluded over from Rodrigo Duterte for copy-edit, so the prose is now significantly longer. I think there's some scope to split the article and/or move content to other articles, but not something I'm going to attempt. Good luck with the article and cheers, Baffle☿gab 21:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Baffle gab1978: Thank you for your efforts with Paradoxasauruser in thoroughly copyediting the article. The prose is now much better. I would want to try summarizing and moving some content to other articles (although as I had focused on expanding the article, I don't have any idea right now on which content needs to be moved); perhaps you could offer some suggestions or insights? –Sanglahi86 (talk) 22:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

happy to have helped, @Sanglahi86. likewise, thanks for your significant contributions to the article!

I would suggest reviewing an article like Administration of Barack Obama to get an idea of how to broadly cover the administration, vs Timeline of the Barack Obama presidency which is more exhaustive - perhaps this is the way to include granular policies, international visits, etc, without resulting in an article with a lot of "on this date, Duterte did abc.... on this date, Duterte did xyz..."

The sections in the Duterte admin article make sense, but contain content that could still be pared down. I think particularly as it pertains to laws passed, some stuff may not be significant enough to warrant inclusion in the overview article and could be safely moved to either a separate policy page which ideally already exists (eg DuterteNomics, Build! Build! Build!), or to a timeline page which looks like it'd require building from the ground up. I also recall (haven't checked recently) leaving in some back-and-forths between Duterte and his critics which could probably be safely removed without resulting in a less clear or comprehensive summary of Duterte's presidency. hope that makes sense. Paradoxasauruser (talk) 15:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Paradoxasauruser:, thank you for your very helpful suggestions and insights. I will review the Obama article and see what I can do to broadly cover the Duterte admin article. A timeline for a six-year presidency is too daunting and time-consuming, but I'll consider it if I have enough drive and time. Regards. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I saw this edit, updating details re poverty in the Philippines article. Could you please make corresponding updates to the Poverty in the Philippines article? The info in those two article is now out of sync. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 21:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I'll see what I can do about the Poverty article. Thank you for informing. Regards. —Sanglahi86 (talk) 09:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I noticed that you are one of the active editors on government related Philippines articles so I wanted to ask for advice on an article I drafted. Draft:Human Rights Violations Victims' Memorial Commission. I mostly followed the structure of Commission on Human Rights (Philippines) as well as some United Nations Human Rights organization articles. I also referenced other Philippine government articles and foreign government articles too. According to the comment it recommended i use independent sources, but I think I used sufficiently independent sources at least to build a sort of background for the agency. Should I add sections relating to topic like this? [2]COA flags memorial commission's lack of progress Thank you! Firekiino (talk) 06:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Firekiino:, I think the sections "Mission and Vision" and "Logo" should be removed as they are unencyclopedic. I see no problem in adding content mentioned in the CNN Philippines article you cited since it appears notable. Regards. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 22:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh i see i see. Thanks! Firekiino (talk) 07:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sanglahi86. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Manila at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:47, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86, I've added several ((cn)) templates where refs are lacking, and at least one ((when)), both of which you may wish to address. I've also removed almost 3,000 bytes from the article, I hope you like the result. Good luck with the article and cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:47, 30 December 2022 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Thank you. I will check those cn tags in my free time. Regards.—Sanglahi86 (talk) 07:15, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year!

Sanglahi86,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sanglahi86. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Arts in the Philippines at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 20:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sanglahi86. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Isko Moreno at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86, this is a large article and will take me at least a few days to process. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Your efforts are very much appreciated. Regards. —Sanglahi86 (talk) 23:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No probs; well I wasn't planning to but I've moved around a lot of the text so similar stuff goes together, and I've also removed a lot of off-topic text. On the plus side, it's now down to 174 kb in size. Feel free to replace anything I removed if you think it's important for the article. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I haven't really read the entire article because it appears to have lots of off-topic text/excessive detail and appears to have a slight promotional tone. The copyedit is going great; there are only a few misspellings ("Monero"). Thanks again. Sanglahi86 (talk) 11:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks; I've fixed the typos... that's what happens when you edit tired! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 10:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(←) I'm done now; I've inline-tagged a few problems I came across: an uncited paragraph at the end of "Political career" --> "Vice mayor of Manila"; excessive citations in the last paragraph of "Political career" --> "Mayor of Manila" --> "City services and infrastructure" and in "COVID-19 pandemic response". Also I think the "Awards, honors and recognition" section could be consolidated; perhaps some of the awards could be placed in a table or a structured list, and there may some repetition in the subsections considering I moved the top subsection from an earlier position in the article. Anyway, it's all yours; good luck with the article. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your thorough work. I will see what I can do with the rest of the article. Best regards. Sanglahi86 (talk) 05:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Philippine executive orders indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I commend you for your extraordinary diligence in rationalizing and refining the many references in the Wiki article for the Philippines. Its' very tedious work, yet you did it! Here's a barnstar as a token for you efforts and sacrifice! Thanks! Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sanglahi86. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Philippines at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Miniapolis 18:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much for your thorough and high quality prose copyedits which significantly improved the article. Best regards. Sanglahi86 (talk) 18:59, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi, saw this request. I've recently been toying with creating an article on Fisheries management areas in the Philippines, but am not sure if that would better fit into a larger Fishing in the Philippines article or be standalone. Have you been looking into this sort of topic? CMD (talk) 03:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello CMD. I have not looked into those topics. I added those article requests primarily so that they could be linked in Philippines (I am not really keen on creating articles since I prefer editing existing ones). I would prefer a high level Fishing industry in the Philippines or Aquaculture in the Philippines, but both require more work and content to be comprehensive enough. Sanglahi86 (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sanglahi86. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Manuel L. Quezon at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 13:50, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Sanglahi86. Thanks for your message. I appreciate what you said and your confidence in proposing this project. Although I have contributed a few decades ago, I am fairly new with this advanced version of Wikipedia. It took me awhile to figure out what the "Template" was, or how to respond to you. Haha. I'm thinking about how to organize it also since many dishes overlap. But thanks for reaching out, I'll see what I can do.Chedlund808 (talk) 08:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, a reminder about Template:No plot, as per template instructions and long-standing practice it should not be added at the top of the page but in the plot section (which should be created if non-existing). Bye, Cavarrone 12:51, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sanglahi86. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Eddie Garcia at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86, I've noted some text isn't supported by citations so I've added several citation needed tags. These are in the sections "Career" --> "Later years", "Personal life" (already there), "Filmography" (completely unreffed) and "Awards and legacy". Good luck with the article and cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Barasoain Church, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sanglahi86, I think there's a Wiki bug with assessing article as NA. This diff registered as unassessed even if you already asessed it. I think for now assess NA articles as "Low" since it seems that it works around the bug. Thanks for helping in assessing WP:PINOY articles. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Thanks for informing me of the bug. I have been explicitly assessing some non-articles' importance as "NA" before, but now I just leave them blank when rating since the non-article is automatically categorized as either redirect, category, or template. Kind regards. Sanglahi86 (talk) 09:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sanglahi86, I noticed your January 2023 tag regarding the Rice Tariffication Law. To keep you informed, I've updated the article to reflect this development. HerBauhaus (talk) 09:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for updating the article. I will remove the old maintenance tag. Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]