This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Try three! As always, any input you might have would be greatly appreciated. Hopefully third time is a charm! Harrias ^talk 15:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Could I pester you to look over Andjar Asmara and give a copyedit/review? Mark Arsten said you're a really good reviewer. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:49, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

• I'm hoping to bring the article to FAC soon-ish. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

• Could you check to see if I addressed your comments to your satisfaction (yeah, sources are sadly rather light; Njoo Cheong Seng has even less readily accessible on him, and he was much more prolific). No need to copyedit again, I'll ask Mark. Also, do you have any articles that need review? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

I do not believe it is a GA. I am requesting (is this even allowed?) a re-review of the Paul Brown article that gave a GA status based on my criticisms on the talk page. Best of luck, i think it's a pretty darn good article, though i wish the editor would strip footnotes from the intro ;) Have fun. 66.234.33.13 (talk) 02:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on Ruth Norman, it is now a featured article! Mark Arsten (talk) 21:24, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Sarastro1. You have new messages at Talk:Alimuddin (cricketer)/GA1.
Message added Zia Khan 20:31, 18 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

I been rather busy lately, let me see if I could find the time to review the article tonight or tomorrow afternoon. Sorry about that. Secret ^account 00:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm still around and about, but life has gotten awfully busy. I'm keeping an eye on my watchlist, and managing to do mindless bits and pieces, but having the time to put into a "project" such as an FAC or another article is a luxury I unfortunately do not have at the moment. I am loathe to withdraw the FAC, but I'm starting to think I'm going to run out of time to get it done. You never know what the next week will bring though. I'll look that Botham book up; most of the stuff I've got is a fair bit older. Cheers for the nudge. Harrias ^talk 16:45, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I've responded to most of your issues at the FAC. Those I've ignored I'm either considering in more depth, or looking for more information. Harrias ^talk 11:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Sarastro1. You have new messages at Talk:Alimuddin (cricketer)/GA1.
Message added Zia Khan 07:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

There is a discussion going at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Dennis Lillee/archive1. Would you mind weighing in your opinion there. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 05:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

I've already done that. Yet to see any response. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi -- I think you misplaced your "Leaning support" on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Somerset County Cricket Club in 2009/archive3; it's below your signature. I hate to move other people's posts around, especially when it's a support issue, so I haven't touched it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm doing to be done with the peer review comments on this article tonight or tomorrow. It needs a really good copyedit before we list it at FAC. You were recommended to me and I was wondering if you'd be so kind as to do this pre-FAC copyedit. PumpkinSky talk 09:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm working that issue today/tomorrow. I'll let you knowPumpkinSky talk 21:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

See Talk:Franz_Kafka#eBookEden, it was a non-RS copying wiki, not vice versa, so you should be clear to start copyedit. I'm still working on some refs. PumpkinSky talk 23:08, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

On Talk:FK, Gerda put the three German quotes for you. If you need translation help, let us know. PumpkinSky talk 12:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Literal translations done, I asked Gerda to smooth them. PumpkinSky talk 17:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

I think I'm caught up again. I like how you're moving the hanging chad to the new section. It's hard to follow the older stuff now. You are doing great, good writing and thorough, thanks.PumpkinSky talk 17:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

	cricketers
	Thank you for quality articles on cricketers, such as the first black West Indian George Headley (suggested as TFA), and for thorough copy-editing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

coming soon, surprise ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I've worked the lead. Please give the article a look over and advise of further remaining issues in a section on the talk page of the article. Many thanks for a great review!PumpkinSky talk 23:04, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Went through the final comments, input requested on 2-3 I asked for clarification on.PumpkinSky talk 23:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

See this related helper: User talk:Lou Kash PumpkinSky talk 20:17, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your look at the Lillard article. I noticed you added a bunch more comments to the review. Unfortunately, things have become busy in real life, and I'm not sure how many of the comments I'll be able to address over the weekend. Rest assured that I will get to them, though. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:25, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Franz Kafka/archive1. I thought you'd like to know. Comments and improvements welcome. Thanks again for the help. PumpkinSky talk 22:31, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, any chance you could take a quick look at Talk:2005 Women's Cricket World Cup Final/GA1 and 2005 Women's Cricket World Cup Final. I'm not keen on the use of bullet points, and wondered what you thought? Harrias ^talk 12:27, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

As I am held up waiting for sources for my next project, and feel like a change anyway, I am going to take the plunge and do Larwood, as I indicated a year or so back that I might. I have plenty of sources and will have no trouble writing the text. Images, however, might be a problem and I may need some help. The present (substandard) article has three images but two of these look problematic. The Larwood statue may be protected by regulations relating to the production of images of three-dimensional art works, while the "Larwood bowling" image, published in 1950, will not be PD in the US. You seem to have obtained free images for use on articles such as Douglas Jardine and Percy Chapman, so maybe you can suggest some for use on Larwood. I'd obviously like to use File:4th Test Woodfull.jpg; this is in the Jardine article that reached FA, but amazingly, that FAC went through without an images check, so I can't be sure how that stands with regard to PD in the US. Brianboulton (talk) 17:53, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Larwood lead image: The cigarette card image used in the lead is much larger than normal images, and this is accentuated by the elongated shape. I have cropped the image here, to create a less overwhelming version. What's your view (I've not loaded it into the article yet)? Brianboulton (talk) 10:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, I hope you don't mind but I took the liberty in fixing a few formatting inconsistencies with the above refs. Nothing major. I figured it was so minor, that it wasn't worth listing at FAC as it would probably have a proper spot check anyway, so I fixed them myself. I have to say, Cricket is not a strong point of mine, but the lead was so interesting, that I plan to read the rest over the next few days. I will post my findings (if any) on the review page. All the best! -- Cassianto^Talk 03:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sarastro1, again, great work on the Percy Chapman article. It must have taken quite some time to research a historic topic as thoroughly as that (although I imagine it was fun poring over the old newspapers and magazines!), and you've put together a very consistent piece of work on cricket. I knew nothing about cricket, but reading this showed me how much there is to learn as it's clearly a very rich topic.
I'd like to ask you a favor as well. I've seen others comment that you are a strong reviewer. Would you be willing to do a review of my Eusèbe Jaojoby biography, which is at FAC as well? He's the most popular musician in Madagascar (also a very rich topic!) and if this passes it will be the first Malagasy musician article to reach FA. Cheers, Lemurbaby (talk) 07:45, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Could you expand the information about the tabletop game, if it wasn't Table Cricket? I hit that clause in the article and came to a dead stop because I didn't understand what the sentence was telling me. Alternatively, remove it as incomplete information or so, maybe? --MarkTraceur (talk) 09:06, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I see it now. Thanks for the great article! --MarkTraceur (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Curtly Ambrose, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dean Jones and Ian Bishop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations on having the article on the main page as Featured Article of the day. :) JH (talk page) 17:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Two points from the Larwood coalface:

• Whysall was, of course, one of Larwood's team mates in the Nottinghamshire side, and they played in at least one Test together. The WP article on him is entitled Dodger Whysall. In every book I have, he is referred to as "Dodge", not "Dodger", which seems to be an internet concoction. Have you ever seen him called "Dodger", outside the internet?
• As a principle, should an encyclopedia article use a nickname of a person as its title (let alone an inaccurate one)? Brianboulton (talk) 22:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) Fairly common in sports and entertainment articles. Madonna (entertainer), for one. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

I think all your points are addressed. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review Sarastro, much appreciated. Malleus Fatuorum 16:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

My thanks indeed for the slightly hypnotic star! It was actually the image of.. (opens another tab to find out who..) Larwood that you and User:Brianboulton discussed further up here that motivated me to have a look through and see what I could find. There are plenty of other more notable players with cards that we can use, but they already had images, and I thought it more important to put up images of those without any at all. Hopefully it will give people incentive to improve some of the articles around them. I know there are a couple I have my eye on, but I'm already trying to do too many article at once! Harrias ^talk 20:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

One thought: shouldn't the article mention his being turned down by Essex before being signed by Surrey? JH (talk page) 08:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

My memory is rubbish these days, and I'd forgotten all about the sub-articles. I don't think that I'm going to have time to go through them at present, unfortunately. JH (talk page) 19:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

I was wondering if you'd have a chance to take a look at NFLPA over at FAC. I would appreciate your input. Thank you. -- The Writer 2.0 ^Talk 19:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review on the article. :) --LauraHale (talk) 20:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations on the Chapman promotion which I've just noticed. I intend to use a couple of the images (this and this) from the Jardine & Chapman articles in my Larwood project, though I'm not absolutely convinced of their okayness. As to File:4th Test Woodfull.jpg from the Jardine article, I'm sure the licence tag is wrong, and without clear source information I'm not going to use it. I thought it might be in Jardine's In Quest... book, but it isn't. The book does have a similar shot from the Fourth Test, which I think I could use as a non-free image under a fair use rationale. If you are watching the Larwood page, you should see some of the fruits of my Larwood labours this weekend, although there's a long way to go yet. Brianboulton (talk) 14:09, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

By the way, do you have a copy of a very early ghosted autobiography of Denis Compton, circa 1947, called I think Playing for England? It's a terrible book, as most cricket books of that era were (all written by the same bloke, I reckon), but I vaguely remember that Compton makes some reference to playing against Larwood in 1936 or 37, Denis's first season. If you have access to the book, I'd quite like to know what Compton says about the experience—I think he found it scary. Perhaps worth a line in the Larwood article. Brianboulton (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

I've responded to your comments at the GAN page. Thanks again for the review! Resolute 01:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sarastro, I believe I've responded to all your comments on your helpful FAC review of the article on Jaojoby. Would you kindly have a look to see whether my edits and responses adequately address the points you raised? Cheers, Lemurbaby (talk) 06:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your review. I had a feeling it was going to fail, but I tried. I am still active on Wikipedia, but of course I barely get the time to go on it anymore. One day when I'm not busy, I'll build up the John Major article and renominate it for GA again, taking in all your advice! It would be great to see it as a Good Article. But I got to admit, he has got to be the most boring man on this planet! Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the "heads up". I'm a bit short of time at present, but will try to take a look at it before long. JH (talk page) 08:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Excellent. I'll take a look when time permits. Good luck with finding photos. JH (talk page) 09:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Well done! JH (talk page) 09:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

BTW, in the main article, where you cover the various Wisden awards that he won you might want to mention his inclusion as one of "Six Giants of the Wisden Century" by Neville Cardus in the 1963 edition. (I may have the title slightly wrong - it might not be "Giants".) JH (talk page) 09:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello there. I just wanted to drop and let you know I've addressed all your remarks and implemented changes to the article per your review. I also decided to just get rid of the artwork image to avoid any possible issues. (I thought I might drop by and mention this while the article is still fresh in your mind.) Zepppep (talk) 01:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

I have addressed your remaining concerns. Let me know if there's anything else. I'm hesitant to go into too much detail in the lead regarding his seasons. (Comparing this article to say, FA Sandy Koufax, I'll let you determine which lead you believe is stronger). Zepppep (talk) 20:31, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, your article, Jack Hobbs, has been reviewed. Waiting for your response at Talk:Jack Hobbs/GA1. Zia Khan 06:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

That could be a good idea indeed to translate the article. I will consider if it passes GA status on fr (the procedure is not the same as here, there's a sort of 2-weeks poll, and I intend to start it later this week). Obviously reviews from other contributors would be needed (and fixing the errors I could make in English would be needed as well...). OrangeKnight (talk) 21:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Back to basics! You're absolutely right about the laws, I thought about doing something on fr: (with a rule as simple to understand as possible) when I saw your own Leg before wicket, which is amazing stuff. I'd like to translate it the other way, but before that I will need to expand/create some articles (we don't have yet any article on the methods of dismissal, "pitch" is pretty poor, and so on...). Well, maybe "timed out" is easier to understand for French-speaking people :) OrangeKnight (talk) 22:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Sarastro1. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Terms of Endearment (The X-Files)/archive2.
Message added 23:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

I leave a comment there about your comment. TBrandley 23:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Your main concern with the Terms of Endearment FAC article was the prose, something the kind Ian Rose looked at and did some copy-editing. Would your support still only be provisional? I could ping someone else to go even further into it, but either way thank you for the current degree of support and for offering the comments in the first place. Bruce Campbell (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

I have just about finished drafting Harold Larwood. I haven't sent it for formal review yet (I'll wait until Gilligan is dealt with), but I'd appreciate it if you could give me a very quick indication of any obvious defects or omissions which strike your expert eye. Brianboulton (talk) 19:58, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

I have taken on board the comments you left on my talkpage and have adopted most of them, within my overall strategy of keeping the text tight. I am seeking a couple of general reviews, one from a non-cricket person (Wehwalt has agreed to do this), and one from an expert. I hope you'll be able to oblige here; please let me know if it's a problem. I am not sending the article for formal PR, but am asking reviewers to use the article's talk page for their comments. Brianboulton (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Willing to improve this article? —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 05:54, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

See my talkpage for further info. Brianboulton (talk) 15:42, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Is Herr Gilligan going to FAC shortly? I am keeping Larwood for at least a week for final tweaks and polishings, but I think it would be wise for there to be a few days between the two nominations. Brianboulton (talk) 20:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

		The Expert Barnstar
		I hereby award you the Expert Barnstar for your outstanding contributions to cricket-related topics. This award is given to a few people who are regarded experts in one or several particular fields. Congrats and keep up your excellent work :)!--Tomcat (7) 19:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Sarastro1. You have new messages at User talk:Hahc21/Requests for comment/Future of GAN Backlog Elimination Drives.
Message added 20:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

— ΛΧΣ21™ 20:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

You raised a real important issue with the article - verbosity. Real life has cut down on my time editing the 'pedia, and I have lived too long with the article to maintain an unbiased view. Can you lend a hand in pruning the article by editing the copy somewhat? If I am not grossly wrong, some sections, including the leader, would need that help more than others. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 03:56, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I need your comments/suggestionc here for grammar's improvement. Regards, Zia Khan 21:29, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

No problem with the review: it's amazing how many things can still remain after a review at both GA and PR. I'm likely to be sending Claire Taylor your way soon for a peer review: I'm not at all happy with how it's written at the moment, the balance and the language both seem off. But it has a GA to get through yet, and then I should really get around to adding the "Style and technique" section: I'd thought I would get it done before the GA review given how long the list is, but it got reviewed pretty quickly. With regards to WP:CRIC; User:AssociateAffiliate was still very active creating new articles through October, and though he has retired again, and says "this permanent retirement" I wouldn't be surprised to see him back. User:Northmetpit has been quite active in creating new articles and adding photos from "Famous Cricketers", but I agree that there definitely seem to be less people about, and certainly less creating articles for GA and FA. I think it might be worth trying to bring WP:IPL into WP:CRIC as a task-force, which might help to unify efforts and lessen the stagnation, but I don't know how popular the merge would be. Harrias ^talk 16:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

That said about WP:CRIC, in the second half of this year, we've had 19 featured lists promoted. I know you're not really into the lists, but it shows there are people about. Might see if I can get some interest in improving some of the older FLs. Some of the ones from 2007 and earlier are in a terrible state. Then, some of the old FAs aren't great: West Indian cricket team in England in 1988, Kevin Pietersen (since 2009). Probably Paul Collingwood and Marcus Trescothick too. I should probably work on the latter myself, but I tire of having to update articles like that so frequently, so I'll probably let it lapse until he retires (if I'm still about then!) Harrias ^talk 00:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Archie MacLaren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Lockwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

I hate bothering people repeatedly, especially when they've been so helpful already. But your comments were really useful in getting my last FAC promoted and they were very specific and really scrutinized the article, and they were exactly what it needed. I've been working on a very similar article for my next FAC, the episode Home of the same series. The references, formatting, research and comprehensiveness isn't that hard to get done, the wikipoject sees to that, but prose is my biggest weakness. Would you mind assisting, at your own convenience, by going through a similar process as with my prior article? Rather than putting the article up for FAC and having the dogs go at it, I would prefer the prose be scrutinized beforehand. If not, I understand, especially since you've already helped me so much already. Bruce Campbell (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm fine with whatever you want to go with, whichever is easiest for you. It's in no rush. And thank you, of course. Bruce Campbell (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		"Awarded" for your amusing edit summaries, which never cease to give me a giggle: "Captaincy kerfuffle; probably too much detail, and will probably be cut", "Oh, but he really, really wasn't" and "Er... It is referenced. A lot. With 146 references." are among the more recent examples. Harrias talk 16:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

I don't know if you've come across it, but this article on cricketer's hats, caps and lack thereof is perhaps the best cricket article I have ever read! Harrias ^talk 15:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

It continues here. Harrias ^talk 15:49, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Well: you tend towards the big names with lots of information: I trawl Google. A lot. Harrias ^talk 21:07, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

I managed to find the Compton quote I was enquiring about a week or so back, courtesy of a local second-hand bookshop, and have incorporated it into the article., which has now gone to FAC, link here. I shall be interested to see how it fares. Brianboulton (talk) 21:30, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wally Hammond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alistair Cook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)