A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fezara, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No sourced sited, much content seems to be untruthful.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — Jake Wartenberg 19:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sarcelles, sorry I haven't responded in a while; I don't want you to think I have been ignoring your e-mail about the new edition of the Laogai Handbook. Anyway, I have been working (very slowly and intermittently) on updating the entire list, but I'm doing it in my sandbox (User:Politizer/Sandbox) rather than the main article, since I want to be able to post all the changes at once rather than have the article in limbo for a long time. Right now I'm down to Inner Mongolia (you can tell which sections I haven't updated yet because the Established columns are empty; I didn't include establishment dates in the original article, but I am adding them as I go now). Anyone is welcome to edit, but you're not required to (it just means it might take me a few more weeks to finish it on my own). Politizer ^talk/_contribs 20:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Sarcelles, just so you know, I finished this about a week ago and moved it all into the main article. Best, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs (formerly Politizer) 14:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mixing WP:AGF WP:BITE and a few other policies which prevent my skepticism full expression - and in good faith I might ask -

I am at a loss as to why Papua Conflict was created - have you checked all the other articles that exist regarding the location? There are articles in which the conflict is mentioned.

Please feel free to correct me if I have misunderstood your intentions with that new article.SatuSuro 23:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think that current conflicts, that have caused casualties should have an article about them.

Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 07:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About this - [1]. You wrote that it should be rewritten a bit and still have not answered that it was:) . I'm not native English speaker, so it's difficult for me to rewrite as necessary under the rules of the language.Regards,Sentinel R (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sarcelles. You have new messages at Rjanag's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Hi, Sarcelles! I removed the poverty statistic you added to the Cameroon page's introduction, and I wanted to let you know why. Earlier today, I cleaned up the article, and I moved that statistic to the body of the article rather than the introduction. The introduction already mentions that large numbers of Cameroonians live in poverty, and for the lead section of an article, that should be good enough. The body of the article is really the best place to go into hard numbers like the statistic you added. For more information, you can check out WP:LEAD and WP:SUMMARY. Thanks! — Dulcem (talk) 13:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your edits to numerous articles (including Guatemala and Yemen) are following this incorrect pattern of inserting new information regarding poverty rates into the lead. These articles have appropriate sections for economy. Additionally, your edit summaries are uninformative. Describing things as "enhanced" is meaningless, since the purpose of editing is enhancement. You might want to consider something closer to "added information on poverty rate". Your information and sources are useful additions. With appropriate placement and summaries, your edits will be far more useful.Novangelis (talk) 18:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Novangelis and Dulcem, thank you for your messages. I apologize for my uninformative edit summaries. Kind regards Sarcelles (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a discussion at Talk:List of Re-education Through Labor camps in China#In quest for "Judong" or Wikipedia Laowai Handbook?. Since you have been involved in editing this list, you may be interested. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 00:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your message.

Kind regards Sarcelles (talk) 11:40, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Jehovah's Witnesses in Nigeria, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jehovah's Witnesses in Nigeria. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jeffro77 (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, it seems like you are going around and including how many Christians now live in a large number of Chinese cities, and you are citing the same reference. As the reference is a book or other non-Internet publication I would like to see it verifiable by WP:V. A lot of the claims, like Zhejiang having a 10% Christian population, is quite dubious. Having been there lately I actually find this number to be extremely hard to believe. I would ask you to stop inserting these one-sentence snippets on Christianity until we can verify the information. Is that okay? Colipon+(T) 21:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It appears you might have created an article: 16:39, 23 July 2005 (hist) (diff) Holiness Tabernacles ‎ (Main source : World Christian Encyclopedia). I cannot make any sense of the content of this article. I have served as an official in holiness churches in America, and have a wide knowledge of the holiness movement. I know of no such denomination. Further, there are confusing and inaccurate statements. The article should be listed for deletion. Respectfully, R/T-รัก-ไทย (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I suggest to rename that article to the title, with which I have created it.

Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is there interested members to chose some subject about Christianity in Chine and to work on it together (sevveral of us) and to make it article to FA or GA status?--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 21:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note that List of Christian denominations does not list groups which lack Wikipedia articles. Tb (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sarcelles. You have new messages at Talk:India.
Message added 04:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Abecedare (talk) 04:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes I will start articles on Chinese prisons if you help expand as many as you can.Starzynka (talk) 16:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You will have to red link all the prisons from Fujian and all the others lists before I can start them. If there is little info I won't start...Starzynka (talk) 17:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Thank you for your messages.

Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 16:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Agreed to my redlinking. Sarcelles (talk) 16:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You created Pentecostal Church in Indonesia - parts of the article are almost out of standard WP MOS - you might want to look at it again - just in case - cheers SatuSuro 00:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sarcelles! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 35 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,793 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the ((unreferencedBLP)) tag. Here is the list:

1. Salah Ali Al-Ghali - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Mikhail Musatov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Ivan Musatov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Andrey Bronitsyn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Vladimir Kulakov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Vyacheslav Pozgalyov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Nikolay Vinogradov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Sergey Ivanovich Morozov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Sergey Sobyanin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Vyacheslav Dudka - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:44, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shashwat986 (talk) 19:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

HI Sarcelles. I had nominated your article for Speedy deletion because, according to me (and I may be wrong), I felt you were attacking the citizens of India, by calling them religious persecutors. Going through the Wikipedia Policy, I feel that I incorrectly nominated your article. I still feel that you are not citing any references to support your claim, but I apologize for incorrectly nominating your article for speedy deletion. Thank you for bringing this to my notice. Shashwat986 (talk) 21:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Seicho-no-le, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R'n'B (call me Russ) 17:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Many of the articles you started or the edits you made have been found to be in violation of Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines, especially those on Christianity in "u name a state in India". You have cited as sources in many of these articles from places that do not qualify as Wikipedia:Reliable Sources. A matter of note is that you have taken special care in including the sentence "There is Christian persecution in India" or so in the lead of many of the articles i pointed earlier; which is obviously Wikipedia:undue. Therefore i request and recommend that you take proper care to stick to Wikipedia policies and guidelines in the future. Thanks. (You may not respond to this. No response in expected). 117.204.82.163 (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"There is Christian persecution in India" or similar is not undue. Sarcelles (talk) 19:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Christianity in Chhattisgarh, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vipin Hari || talk 19:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Christianity in Goa, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianity in Goa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Vipin Hari || talk 19:23, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Christianity in West Bengal, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianity in West Bengal. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Vipin Hari || talk 19:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Christianity in Andhra Pradesh, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianity in Andhra Pradesh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Vipin Hari || talk 19:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sarcelles!
You mean to create an article new? Or to expand the existing(Christianity in Nigeria)?
Sentinel R (talk) 07:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sentinel R,

I meant writing articles such as Christianity in Plateau State. Sarcelles (talk) 08:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, I will create. You will help to expand it?Sentinel R (talk) 09:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much. I will help expanding it. Sarcelles (talk) 09:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've created an article - Religions in Plateau State.About Christianity in this region i have a minor information... Sentinel R (talk) 10:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much. To write an article Religions in Plateau State rather than Christianity in Plateau State is a good idea. Sarcelles (talk) 10:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok.If you find more information, please add to article.Thanks for your support!Sentinel R (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, thanks for all the new entries from India for List of Christian Denominations. Many editors add red-links, out of alphabetical order, etc. So extra thanks for not only the new (good!) entries, but also for carefully preserving the formatting. Tb (talk) 18:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, since you wrote most of the article Uerdingen line a long time ago: there are some ambiguous places in the description of the location of the line: Hermsdorf, Freidorf and Stoki. Do you know which places are meant (for instance close to which larger town)? Do you have a reference for this part of the article, and does this source mention more places, for instance between Bergneustadt and Halbe (that's quite a gap)? Markussep ^Talk 07:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Stoki is Sorb for Staakow. Hermsdorf and Freidorf should be in that area, too.Sarcelles (talk) 18:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Freidorf is apparently a part of Halbe. There are several possibilities for Hermsdorf, see de:Hermsdorf. Hermsdorf, Brandenburg seems too far south, then probably it's Hermsdorf near Münchehofe. That doesn't bring us to the Polish border yet, do you have more info about the course of the line there? Markussep ^Talk 16:01, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,Sarcelles.Recently administrator had deleted the article Nigerian sectarian violence (where was my mistake - I added two links to information from the news blocks). At the same time in German language wikipedia there is a article de:Scharia-Konflikt in Nigeria. I do not know German so good, I can't correctly translated into English. If I'm not mistaken, you speak German very well, if you is not difficult - could you translate from German into English version Nigerian sectarian violence?. In addition, writing to you because one of the conditions of my amnesty was now I can not create articles.But I can help in finalizing this article. Sincerely,Sentinel R (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sentinel R,

thank you for your message. Allright, I will write such an article. Later I would like to create articles such as Religion in Kaduna State. Or what title would be better? Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 18:58, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought about your question. Maybe you'll create the article Christianity in Northern Nigeria? In the Internet there are a lot of material for this article, and it will be comprehensive. There can be included such as Kaduna and Kano. Regards,Sentinel R (talk) 19:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Indian Evangelical Team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organisation with little coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. prashanthns (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anyone can create a category. So you could create one for countries after the by country articles are created. However I would advise caution since it is not clear to me that there is a need to create those extra categories since we do not have a large number of articles on slums. Right now, readers would be better served by keeping the slum articles in one category. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,Sarcelles. You may be interested in the article about the religious violence in Bangladesh. Regards,Sentinel R (talk) 12:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Heshan, Guangdong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jay-Sebastos (talk) 08:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gatwekera, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://umande.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:26, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The grammar and spelling in your JWs in Cuba article is appalling, in addition to the concerns about the article's lack of notability raised previously. If the result of the current AfD is to keep, I will clean up the article, however it is most likely the case that the result will be to redirect the article to Religion in Cuba. I will therefore postpone further edits to the article.--Jeffro77 (talk) 12:15, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I could add additonal content, as I only have consulted few websites on Spanish on the JWs in Cuba. Sarcelles (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sarcelles, Referring to persecution of Christians in these articles is irrelevant, defamatory at worst and undue weight at best. It is not important for these topics because, for example, there is no direct link established in an independent source between Oriental Orthodoxy in India and persecution of Christians. And even if it were, there is bound to be many other things that could be writing about Oriental Orthodoxy in India. If it's actually a significant enough topic to have a separate article on, then there will be significant enough information about it: the history, famous people; just generally more than a sentence or two saying what is actually worth saying about the topic. In fact it does seem a notable topic. You can't just have an article which just has 2 sentences, one going "this exists" and the second going "look at this questionably related article". I am sure you agree that it is unreasonable to make half the content of Islam in Germany talking about Islamophobia#Germany and this is pretty much the same thing. For a lot of countries, the only place I see they're mentioned in relation to persecution of Christians is Open Doors which is an obviously biased Christian missionary organisation which basically acts as if pretty much any country which isn't Christian is persecuting them which is just ridiculous. And it just gives numbered statistics for the most part even, not any actual incidents that can be referred to. As you can see, I actually did leave the link for Saudi Arabia and only that because that actually makes something of sense. Look at this non-affiliated site news articles [2] for example. Regards, Munci (talk) 22:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Islamophobia in Germany is not as important for Islam in Germany as persecution of Christians in say India is for the Christians there. And in the ten commandments it says that one should not lie, which means that Open Doors can be cited. Sarcelles (talk) 08:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What proof do you have of such an assertation? Also, where's the link to the specific denomination? Really, it's more like linking from Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs to Islamophobia#Germany.

No that's not the way a WP:Reliable Source works at all. Just because one of the Ten Commandments is Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour doesn't mean everything they say is true. It could easily mean they sinned. And they could always be unaware of the truth themselves. Then they wouldn't be lying but they would still be telling falsehoods. With such an argument, would you say that the Spanish inquisition never happened because there's "Thou shalt not kill"?Munci (talk) 13:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not saying the Spanish inquisition did not happen.

http://www.gfbv.de/inhaltsDok.php?id=309&highlight=Indien says there is persecution of Christians in India. Sarcelles (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not denying the existence of persecution of Christians in India. I am denying that it is important to talk about it - and pretty much only it - in every single article even vaguely connected. If you want to write about, go to articles like Anti-Christian violence in India and actually use proper neutral sources. Like that STP source for example. Munci (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Persecution creates fear. The countries in the first 25 entries of Open Doors' world persecution list can be expected to have widespread discrimination of Christians. Sarcelles (talk) 16:21, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not sure you intend me to react to the first statement. In any case, Open Doors is just not a reliable source. If you want to talk about persecution, you should look at other sources that support claims. Also, one thing I had thought of: even talking persecution of Christians on the religion in Saudi Arabia is undue weight for a different reason: it's not just Christians that are persecuted there but any non-Muslim. So you'd have to talk about persecution of minority religions in that country rather than specifically one particular minority religion. Munci (talk) 17:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the German wikipedia, a lot of Articles are missing, have a look at here: your Discussion, you could fill the red links

You are creating really good articles, that's the reason why we need you. In the past, you did so much, but now we can't find anyone who could make articles like you. Please continue and do so on!

THX--84.57.16.179 (talk) 10:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will create articles of that kind there soon. Sarcelles (talk) 17:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a lack of ARticles (you didn't do al lot of ARticles you promised in your talk page). You can do really good Articles, I can't do it alone.--84.57.16.179 (talk) 10:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.65.133.47 (talk) Reply[reply]

I will do two of them tomorrow. Sarcelles (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I've just come across List of slums in Venezuela, and it looks like you've created a bunch of lists of this type. Apart form sourcing issues, there's a fundamental terminological issue with calling a place a "slum", which is pretty negative. "List of barrios" (the Venezuelan term) would be fine, but than it would still be in the "list of slums" category. This problem must apply in other cases too. I don't know what to suggest. Rd232 ^talk 14:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey I have visited your talk page and found that ur interested in Christian related articles, even i likes that, you made many articles about Christianity in Indian states. i have tried to add some information in the articles, thanks for your articles about christinity. marshmir (talk) 16:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I see that you created Assembleias de Deus Africanas and was wondering if you knew the English translation of this denomination. I'm sure it's something like "Assemblies of God Africa", but I'm not sure. Also, do you know if this is the same body as the Mozambique Assemblies of God? Thanks for any help you can give. Ltwin (talk) 22:17, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I ask that you immediately remove any "Lists of prisons in _" and "Lists of Laojiaos in _" that have not been removed from the mainland Chinese provincial articles. They do not belong under the "See Also" section, or any other part of the main provincial article, for that matter: want to start adding lists of prisons to other provincial/state articles? The lists are fine in a more detailed law and crime article, though. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 16:23, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I consider them to be useful enough. Sarcelles (talk) 21:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

useful by themselves, yes, but not in articles on the provinces. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 21:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought you may be interested how the discussion you started here goes. I have suggested to have the "dispute" resolved at wp: 3. I am sure both of us would welcome your input on the subject of having the sitation resolved with the help of an unbiased third party. schyler (talk) 23:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are of course welcome to comment at the topic linked above. However, please note that any request for a third opinion must be from uninvolved parties. You should not offer your opinion at the request for a third opinion as you are not an uninvolved third party.--Jeffro77 (talk) 02:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Christianity in Fujian, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.findouter.com/China/Region/Fujian/Christianity.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry I'm not a member of WikiProject Christianity, so I don't feel entitled to tag them, except for really obvious ones. If you want WikiProject Christianity as a whole to tag things, I'm sure you can post to the project's talk or the talk page of a prominent user or two. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Sarcelles, I have noticed that you have spent some time helping with the article "2011 Chinese protests". Therefore I would like to inform you about two votes going on:

• "Vote for renaming article to "Chinese Jasmine Revolution"" at the bottom of the page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2011_Chinese_protests

• AfD for the article

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/China's_2011_crackdown_on_dissidents#China.27s_2011_crackdown_on_dissidents This second article contains information about Christians in China and a recent arrest of 200 Christians.

Thank you very much for your valued opinion! Best, Waikiki lwt (talk) 08:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Sarcelles! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

• From the Editor
• What are You doing For Lent?
• Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
• Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

---

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

The article List of slums in Indonesia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

POV potential, as well as a fly-by stub with no refs or effort to substantiate the subject - I am not saying there are not slums in Indonesia - but this current stub has no effort to back up with WP:RS or text or anything

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SatuSuro 10:39, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Africa's topical issues coverage in wikipedia is scant. An article on Child labour in Nigeria, or perhaps Child labour in Africa with Nigeria as a section, would indeed be interesting. With significant coverage inside Africa, and UNICEF, ILO etc as [WP:RS]] sources, it would meet WP:GNG guidelines. I will try to write it up. Perhaps you can begin contributing to it, and I will co-contribute when I can. Here are a few sources from my library of links: Child labor fact sheet for Nigeria United Nations Africa Recovery paper ILO paper on Child labor in Africa

ApostleVonColorado (talk) 17:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taiyuan City Reeducation through labor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taiyuan City Reeducation through labor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shrigley (talk) 02:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of prisons in Ningxia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of prisons in Ningxia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fourthborn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fourthborn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Andrey Golovatiuk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:Notability, unsourced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sarcelles. You have new messages at Talk:United Kingdom.
Message added 18:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

You made that exact edit yesterday evening, but without your references.  –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 18:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Orthodox Christianity in Azerbaijan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, redundant to Azerbaijan#Religion and Religion_in_Azerbaijan#Orthodox_Church

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 19:45, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Venezuela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

POV title, unreferenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 20:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of slums in Indonesia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of slums in Indonesia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —rybec 20:08, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Child labour in Nigeria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

redundant to Child_labour_in_Africa#Nigeria

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 20:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Algeria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced and POV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 21:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Angola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, POV and only one of these places has a Wikipedia article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 21:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Bolivia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, POV and only one of these places has a Wikipedia article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 21:40, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Burkina Faso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, POV and none of these places has a Wikipedia article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 21:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Colombia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, POV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 21:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Ivory Coast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, POV and none of these places has a Wikipedia article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 21:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Egypt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced and POV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 21:51, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Mali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

POV, unsourced, and none of these places have Wikipedia articles

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 23:07, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Zambia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced and none of these places have Wikipedia articles; even the bluelinks refer to other places not in Zambia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of slums in Swaziland , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. —rybec 00:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Sierra Leone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

has had no references since its creation more than three years ago; only one of these places, Kroo Bay, has a Wikipedia article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 00:47, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Senegal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This list has had no references since its creation in July 2010‎; only one of the places on the list, Pikine, has a Wikipedia article, and that article says that only part of Pikine is an "informal settlement" (slum).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —rybec 00:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Christ's Chosen Church of God International has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable church. Very little content; just lists of people. All of the sources are affiliated with the subject, and none are reliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persecution of Christians in Japan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Christians in Japan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wkharrisjr (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article New Apostolic Church in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too much dependence on related primary sources and nothing independent to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I see you are the one who created Mo (religion) article which is Zhuang's religion. But Moism is not only practiced by the Zhuang but all Tai peoples who are not influenced by Buddhism and Hinduism. I've just made some edits on the Nùng people article. They are one of Tai ethnics who practice Moism and Animism. But I find the article has no section for religion and I myself have not much knowledge about this aspect, therefore I think you could help out with it (if you know any). Regards Psychoneuroimmunology (talk) 15:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Psychoneuroimmunology,

thank you for your message. Unfortunately I hardly know anything about this subject. Regards Sarcelles (talk) 18:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

According to this map, there's no filthy/dirty Sharia in Osun State. Regard. ༆ (talk) 20:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BW Plantation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of slums in Tanzania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and WP:OR, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 18:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

Is that you there ?

Thanks for your answer, Esprit Fugace (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Reiyukai Kyodan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fork of Reiyūkai, contains virtually no info that is not already in the Reiyūkai article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JimRenge (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chongqing proper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jialing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Slavery in Pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 13:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Germain Sengelin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 16:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ethiopia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beating. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Socfin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 13:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maasai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for joining Wikipedia Asian Month. Here is some information about participating in the event:

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. Wikipedia Asian Month is also held in other language Wikipedia and count independently. Check for language editions.
6. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes,--AddisWang (talk) 04:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sarcelles. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sarcelles. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Indonesia. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Sarcelles, thanks for creating Turks and Caicos Creole!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Specifically, the list of words and phrases. Cheers!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 08:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that you created Conference of the Mennonite Brethren Churches in India. Today, I plan to create an article on Mennonite Brethren Centenary Bible College, Shamshabad and request your support wherever needed. Meher Mansion (talk) 05:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Alif Oil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. | Naypta^✉ opened his mouth at 08:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I added to the article the refs you mentioned in an edit summary. You can add the refs directly to the article next time. Thank you for your contribution! Saturnalia0 (talk) 03:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alif Oil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alif Oil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 11:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Rek people, Sarcelles!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I added two refs and renoved the citation needed tag.

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robert G. (talk) 06:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi I am working on de-orphaning articles and I've come across an orphan you create a while ago called Waldensia. The problem with this article is, there is literally no such place. There are towns in the Americas called Waldensia, but there is no place or region in Italy with this name. Where did you find a source for this article? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 20:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sarcelles,

Thank you for supporting the Sustainability Initiative, which aims at reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. There are currently over 350 supporters from all over the world – please encourage other community members to sign the page as well! You can also read an update from the Sustainability Initiative in the most recent edition of the Wikipedia Signpost.

Thank you, and kind regards, --Gnom (talk) 11:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

The article Chen Jingmao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. No inherent notability in being a political prisoner, there needs to be clear reliable source interest in the case, which I have not found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Jesus Is Lord Church Worldwide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is in practice completely unsourced. I have tried and failed to find any mention at all that is not from JIL themselves. Both the references are to JIL's own website (and are, incidentally, dead links). The article has had to be indefinitely semiprotected because of persistent abuse (=promotion). The name has been changed, so see [3] for the protection log.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | talk 11:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesus Is Lord Church Worldwide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Is Lord Church Worldwide until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bishonen | talk 21:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sarcelles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Scheduled castes in Rajasthan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rana and Kori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I recently found that you created the page of my hometown Tieling in 2005, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kychn (talk • contribs) 16:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hani people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I saw your updates in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elfstedentocht&oldid=795001520

Actually, West-Frisian is a dialect, spoken in Noord-Holland, while Frisian is the language of Friesland. I will therefore revert your changes. Hope you don't mind!

Best regards, Sietske (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for learning me something new. I did not realise that there was a bigger international context tovan be taken into account. In Dutch, when we say "Westfries", we mean West Frisian Dutch, while when we say "Fries", we mean West Frisian. That's why, for a Dutch person like me, it seemed incorrect to talk about West Frisian at first sight. I will revert my changes (when you did not do that already).

Best regards, Sietske (talk) 12:16, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sergey Sirotkin (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergey Sirotkin (politician) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Corvus tristis (talk) 15:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sarcelles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Valeriy Panasenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:POLITICIAN and WP:ANYBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 15:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Workers Autonomous Federation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 02:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Datong city re-education through labor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article consists of only two sentences, of which most content was from an original edit in 2006. The re-education through labor program ended in 2013 yet is still presented here as if it is extant. There is little notability to this former prison aside from a 1980s New York Times article relating to what one can assume may be this prison, but may not be. The only source is a dead link to an Italian laogai-related website. For these reasons, I advocate for this article's deletion, since it has little to offer in terms of actual information at all, and has barely been changed, let alone updated since its creation in 2006 or the end of the re-education through labor program in 2013.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Khu'hamgaba Kitap ^talk 00:18, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Protestantism in Qatar—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Lennart97 (talk) 13:15, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Bacondrum 10:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Big Circle Gang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Barely any sources, no significant coverage. Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bacondrum 20:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Langendreer-Alter Bahnhof has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks WP:Sources, last Edit 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dialekt des Weichselgebietes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barcice. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Sherifi people has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced solely to the Joshua Project, an unreliable evangelical Christian database of "unconverted peoples". No suitable reliable sources found on a search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Werdersch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jezioro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lusatian dialects, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lusatian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Werdersch

added links pointing to Enns, Penner, Fast and Wiens

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Kineenawi people has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient sources to verify the existence of any group under this name. Only ref is a Christian missionary organization.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings,

Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find your interest in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 17:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Werdersch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Catarina and Steinhagen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political parties in France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jean-Louis Masson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sarcelles, and thanks for your tireless work at List of political parties in France. I'm afraid I have some bad news for you: unfortunately, I had to remove several dozen edits of yours at the article, going back to mid-December, because these edits unfortunately either lacked a source, or they attempted to cite articles on French Wikipedia as the source, or cited Wikipedia mirror sites like EverbodyWiki. No self-published source, including Wikipedia or any Wikimedia sister project, such as French Wikipedia, may be used to support material added to articles at English Wikipedia; please see WP:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for details.

Just to be clear: it is perfectly okay to copy content from one English WP article to another, or to translate material from another language Wikipedia; but you need to include a citation to a reliable source, *even if the other Wikipedia does not*. French Wikipedia, and all foreign Wikipedias, have their own set of rules, and if they don't require verifiability or citations, then that's their business; however, at English Wikipedia, WP:Verifiability is policy, and if you import material from other articles, you need to include citations. In the case of rows in the table at List of political parties in France, you would generally need one citation per row (i.e., per political party), or possibly more, if one citation doesn't cover all the data in the table row. Please do not add any material to List of political parties in France (or any other article) without keeping WP:Verifiability in mind.

One other thing regarding copying/translating content: Wikipedia's licensing requirements requires that all copied or translated content be accompanied by an attribution statement in the edit summary. For translated content, you can find a model attribution statement here. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Church Assembly Hall and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 15#Church Assembly Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 21:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Shrine Shintoists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not an identity group, there are no sources indicating this is an identity group, if it is an identity group it is not notable. Shrine Shinto is a real division but the believers do not identify as distinct in the way Muslims and Christians and Protestants do

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 23:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Werdersch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bickenbach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Sara Gambai people has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sketchily sourced to the Joshua Project, which per our article " is a Christian organization...which seeks to coordinate the work of missionary organizations to track the ethnic groups of the world with the fewest followers of evangelical Christianity." I wasn't able to find reliable sourcing to back up the content of this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Tornasi people has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sketchily sourced to the Joshua Project, which per our article " is a Christian organization...which seeks to coordinate the work of missionary organizations to track the ethnic groups of the world with the fewest followers of evangelical Christianity." I wasn't able to find reliable sourcing to back up the content of this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Werdersch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gossen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article New Sect Shinto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems not notable. Need proof this is notable separately from Sect Shinto

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 18:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, Sarcelles. I know it has been 11 years since your creation of Christianity in Sichuan, but I believe you deserve a belated thank-you note. - Uriel1022 (talk) 11:39, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Oleg Skorlukov has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

This BLP was created 17 years ago and has never had any sources, other than the 404 link that I removed in the previous edit. A DuckDuckGo search using both the article title and the full name return nothing other than copies of this Wikipedia page

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 04:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Meena ethnic religion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is nothing but a hoax. None of the sources talk anything about a distinct "Meena ethnic religion".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Catholic Renewal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clear lack of notability and of source. This is clear WP:OR. No source was added in the article's 18 years of existence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Veverve (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nehrungisch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ens.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Southern Low German, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Vistulan dialect

added a link pointing to Harlingen

Werdersch

added a link pointing to Lubieszewo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]