Hello, SatDis! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding ((Ping|I dream of horses)) to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 03:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thanks for filling out the Hi-5 (Australian band) article with sources and history. It's looking a lot better.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! I love Hi-5 so it was fairly easy!

SatDis (talk) 23:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hi-5 (Australian band) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shaidar cuebiyar -- Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I have finally finished the review of your article. You now have seven days to address the remaining issues raised. I hope you enjoy fixing up these points.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaidar cuebiyar: Thankyou for all the hard work! I'll be in contact on the page. SatDis (talk) 08:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Congratulations on the article's GA pass: you did a mountain of work to achieve that! You'll notice that a great way to learn about the criteria is to do a review yourself.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaidar cuebiyar: Thankyou so much! I'm surprised! I certainly did get a feel for the whole process and become interested. Thankyou for all your hard work and contribution also. You're welcome to keep checking in on the page! SatDis (talk) 21:46, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hi-5 (Australian band) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hi-5 (Australian band) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shaidar cuebiyar -- Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A balanced GA reception section does require both negative and positive views: where they are representative of reliable sources. As long as you provide a summary style presentation of Le Marquand's position I have no problem with her discussion being added. Make sure that a typical reader can tell that this is her view not yours nor wp's.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaidar cuebiyar: Excellent, as I thought. Thanks! SatDis (talk) 07:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SatDis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SatDis, congrats on getting Hi-5 discography promoted to featured list status! Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 12:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hi-5 (Australian TV series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 23:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review completed. Let me know if you have any questions/concerns. AIRcorn (talk) 10:11, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work getting The Wiggles discography to FL!! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AngusWOOF Thanks, it was a challenge! SatDis (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hi-5 (Australian TV series) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hi-5 (Australian TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 10:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SatDis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SatDis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grace Beside Me you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 03:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heya! Sorry for the late-ish reply, I actually just came back from holiday XD. Just leaving a message to say I read what you said and will action it and follow up when I have free time. Derick1259 (talk) 21:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Derick1259: No worries at all! Thanks, hope you enjoyed your holiday! SatDis (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did enjoy it indeed :). I assessed the article, all my comments on the Bluey talk page. One normally requests a review by asking folks through the relevant WikiProject; I'm on WikiProject Animation, so I did it. Derick1259 (talk) 12:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grace Beside Me you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grace Beside Me for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 17:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please do not put it note to Kathleen de Leon Jones because it's correct is series 1-8 and 3 guest appearances in series 9 because not need to note! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.9.103.243 (talk) 01:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@61.9.103.243: I have placed this on the talk page. The "Cast" section specifies which series the presenters were part of the main cast. de Leon Jones had three guest appearances in Series 9, and this is listed as a note. This is due to the ease of reading; for casual readers to see that she was only part of the main cast for Series 1 to 8. This was approved during the article's Good Article review. The note relays the same information while appearing neater and more accurate. Without the note it looks messy. Please continue discussing on talk page. SatDis (talk) 03:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please listen to me do not put it note again because Kathleen de Leon Jones (Series 1-8 and 3 guest appearances in Series 9) is not messy even without note but i am the lawyer! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseatienza (talk • contribs) 04:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please continue discussing at Talk:Hi-5 (Australian TV series). SatDis (talk) 05:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not undo on Hi-5 (Australian TV series) because without note is not messy but i will edited at Talk:Hi-5 (Australian TV series) for you read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseatienza (talk • contribs) 05:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:High School Musical, The Musical, The Series - Soundtrack Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bluey (2018 TV series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Allied45 -- Allied45 (talk) 11:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bluey (2018 TV series) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bluey (2018 TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Allied45 -- Allied45 (talk) 09:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While editing the article on the list of "Bluey" episodes (the viewer count on the list), do we count the viewers in both the morning and the evening (do we add the numbers together) ? ( look for "BLUEY-EV" in the tv tonight articles. e.g rank 2 in this tv tonight post. https://tvtonight.com.au/2020/04/saturday-11-april-2020.html ) I didn't know how to contact you in any way so I put this message in the talk page. Please tell me the correct way to contact a wikipedia user. I am a beginner at wikipedia (I don't edit much) and I don't really know what to do in situations like these. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScratchyGamer314 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ScratchyGamer314:, no worries, here is perfect - welcome! I noticed you added the last few ratings I needed to do. The protocol is to only include the ratings for the "premiere screening" and for the case of Bluey, that's the morning episode. To be fair, its morning episodes are more watched than the evening episodes, and it has rivalled some of the biggest prime time shows this series. It would be inaccurate to combine the numbers together, as most other shows on TV don't get two screenings in a day. Hope that helps. And signing off a talk page comment can be done with four of the [~] symbols. Thanks, SatDis (talk) 05:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SatDis, are you reverting the section on Hi-5 (Australian band) again? Animal Control Abuse (talk) 22:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Animal Control Abuse: There are two options there; "between 2013 and 2015" or "from 2013 to 2015". SatDis (talk) 22:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Between 2013 and 2015, got it. Animal Control Abuse (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you say my addition to Bluey was "Not really an essential character detail."? 172.250.44.165 (talk) 22:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote Bandit is "often the brunt of Bluey and Bingo's jokes". This doesn't refer to a characteristic of Bandit, it specifies how he reacts to the girls' actions. I believe Bandit's relationship with his children is outlined in detail in the production section - his role as an active father and nature of the humour in the series. I think the statement you wrote is subjective and the character details should be tight, essential details which can be backed up by a reference. That statement is too ambiguous and the wording is too coloquial. SatDis (talk) 00:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm saying is the girls frequently like to play jokes on Bandit. 172.250.44.165 (talk) 00:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already in the writing section: "The conflict and humour in the episodes stems from Bandit's relationship with his daughters". In the themes section: "Bandit seen regularly doing housework and engaging in imaginative play with his children". These add more value then "playing jokes". SatDis (talk) 00:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you re-edit back about CBeebies on Singapore? Because only Singapore make the article about Bluey coming to CBeebies. I'm Malaysian and CBeebies is really share the same live stream with almost all Southeast Asia countries. Another proof is on reddit: cbeebies southeast asia tv schedule bluey. So if you don't mind can you add back the information? Arsyad1105 (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Arsyad1105: Thank you for your message. I do understand and would like to help you make this edit possible, however, the references need to be of the highest quality to support any details added. I have had to remove the Reddit source and Kutu Buku Kartun source as they are not reliable enough for a Featured Article. I do also have concerns for ByKido being a blog source, and Malay Mail being a tabloid source, but have kept those two for now. See this page Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources for more details. It would be great if higher quality references could be found, or the information may have to be removed. I have also expanded "SEA countries" to list what the references support. Another consideration is that the Broadcast section does not have to list every country the series airs on. Thanks. SatDis (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I am sorry for my message on your FAC. It was not appropriate for me to do that, and I wish you luck with the FAC. I always appreciate seeing an article on a television show in the FAC space, and I can tell that you have put a lot of great work into this article. I hope that I did not offend you in anyway, and apologies again for my behavior. Have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 (talk) 19:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Thank you for your message, I appreciate it. I wasn't offended in any way! I figured it was my mistake for nominating a new article so soon and I'm glad you brought it to my attention. Thanks for noting my work on the article, I am really hoping it will get some attention during the review... it can be disheartening when no one leaves a review during the nomination. Thanks again! SatDis (talk) 22:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the response, and I agree with you. It is frustrating to not get feedback for a FAC. It may be helpful to review other editors' FAC as part of a quid pro quo. Apologies if this has already been mentioned to you before, but you could also try the FAC mentoring system. If I have time in the future, I will try to review the FAC, but I unfortunately cannot guarantee it right now. Aoba47 (talk) 22:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Aoba47: and great suggestion - I will look at reviewing another article. SatDis (talk) 23:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to help. I have two questions about the Bluey article. Is the "Characters" section mostly cited through the show itself? That is a valid method, but I was curious about it since a majority of the section does not have citations. I also noticed the article does not have a plot section. Is there any particular reason for this? Apologies for the random response and questions. Just wanted to get your feedback on this. Aoba47 (talk) 05:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great questions @Aoba47:. Yes, the character information is cited throughout the show. There are no citations because this information isn't available online, except for the official website (and I don't know if it's appropriate to cite that website for every character). However, I have citations for voice actors where possible in that section. As for plot, I'm not sure if you're familiar with Bluey, but it doesn't have a substantial "plot" heavy element. In the lead I describe what the show is about, and I go on to talk about the characters in that section, and more of plot in the "Themes" section especially. So basically I opted for "Themes" instead of "Plot" because I feel like that is more valuable. Basically the show is about a family who play games, so the "Plot/Premise" section would be short! SatDis (talk) 05:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response! Good luck with the FAC. Aoba47 (talk) 06:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Just wondering if you would like to leave a review on the Bluey article at all? I'd be happy to leave a review on any of your articles in exchange? Thanks. SatDis (talk) 13:12, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. I am currently doing a GAN, but after I am through with that review, I will look at the Bluey article. I have two comments about it. Is there a reason why some of the characters include the voice actor and other characters are listed with the voice actor? Also, in the "Broadcast", there is a one-sentence paragraph, and that should be avoid as it makes the prose choppy. If there are one-sentence paragraphs elsewhere in the article, I'd find a way to better represent the information as it is discouraged to have them. Aoba47 (talk) 20:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And if you have time, I would greatly appreciate any feedback for my FAC. Do not feel pressured to do so though as I should comment on your FAC to make up for the mess I started right after its nomination. Aoba47 (talk) 20:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much @Aoba47:!! Please don't feel that you started a mess, it has caused no problems at all! I would be happy to leave a review on your article and I will get to it this week. I have fixed that one sentence paragraph. Some characters are listed without the voice actor because they are voiced by child actors who are uncredited on the series - the first sentence of the Characters section actually explains this with a reference. Hope that helps. Thanks again. SatDis (talk) 21:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I am glad that the child actors are uncredited hopefully as a way to protect them. I am looking forward to reading the article when I have the chance as I always enjoy animated television shows. Aoba47 (talk) 23:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delay in my review. I will put up my comments on either Thursday or Friday as I'd like to devote my Wikipedia time tomorrow to wrapping up a GAN review and take a short break for Wednesday. I have noticed the oppose. Do not feel discouraged about it since you have engaged a lot of editors with this nomination. If the FAC does get archived, I'd recommend opening a peer review and notifying everyone who has commented. If the FAC gets archived before I can post comments, I will definitely respond in a peer review and at the next FAC. I do not want to say that it will be archived for sure, but just wanted to let you know that it would not be the end of the world. Aoba47 (talk) 06:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Aoba47:, your support has been great throughout this process. No need to hurry, whenever you're ready is fine! And thanks for mentioning that oppose - I have had some other support, so I am eager to keep working on the article. I am hopeful I can fix those suggestions and change the oppose. I would definitely refine and re-nominate if it was archived. Thanks again for your help. SatDis (talk) 08:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I told you this before, but apologies in advance if I had not. Please do not collapse other editors' comment as you have done here. An editor may collapse his or her comments, but it is strongly encouraged to not adjust other editors' comments in such a manner. Just wanted to let you know. Aoba47 (talk) 01:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Oh, okay, thank you. I was unaware. SatDis (talk) 03:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Just wanted to let you know. Aoba47 (talk) 03:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bluey Storyboard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I hope you're doing well with the Bluey FAC. If you don't mind, would you leave some comments on my current 1989 FAC? Thank you so much in advance, HĐ (talk) 08:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HĐ: Absolutely. I love my Taylor Swift so I will definitely get stuck into the article in the next couple of days. SatDis (talk) 09:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears, and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 11:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gog the Mild: Thanks so much for the promotion! SatDis (talk) 12:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! You did all of the work, together with the reviewers. All I did was acknowledge it. Thank you for the high quality article. I look forward to the next one. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Hi-5 (Australian band) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Nothing strikes me as missing from the article. Though I know nothing of the subject, it seems well balanced and complete to me.

Best of luck with FA process.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the thorough copyedit @Twofingered Typist:. I believe your work will be a great contribution to the FA process. Thanks again. SatDis (talk) 22:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will apologize for this edit summary, which came across as harsh. I've seen you around before, but this time I got you mixed up with another user I've had problems with, hence the summary. And with your first edit there today, I oversaw that you added another source. Keep up the good work! Amaury • 03:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Amaury: I appreciate the apology. I have no issues with the sentence and citation now - the only reason I pushed for the archive URL is because I've been undergoing Featured Article nominations and it is encouraged there that every source needs to have an archive. I'm happy to work with anyone who has a passion for Disney Channel.

I'm not sure if you're part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Disney, but would you be interested in having a go at my GA review for Hannah Montana? OR, would you potentially do a B-class assessment of the article? If not, is there anyone who you think would suit the job? I will not be offended if you say no. Thanks. SatDis (talk) 03:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you could technically say yes—likewise for Nickelodeon—but I have no experience with FA or GA pages. However, I can invite Geraldo Perez and IJBall, two editors I work collaboratively with on television related articles, particularly those for Nickelodeon and Disney Channel. They can comment if they wish, as they have much more experience with FAs and GAs than I do. Amaury • 03:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Amaury: That is greatly appreciated, thanks. I would love for someone familiar with Nick / Disney to do the GA review. SatDis (talk) 03:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, and apologies for the random message. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any help with my current FAC. I completely understand if you do not have the time or energy to do a FAC review, but I just wanted to reach out and ask. Either way, have a happy holidays! Aoba47 (talk) 04:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course @Aoba47: I love working with you, however, I will get to it after Christmas. Also, seeing as you've done The Emperor's New School, I was wondering if you'd like to take a look at what I've done with Hannah Montana? If you feel comfortable doing the Good Article review, I'd be so grateful! But if not, I'd appreciate some casual feedback - even participating in a peer review? Thanks. SatDis (talk) 06:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. That makes perfect sense to me. I honestly forgot that Christmas was so close until a few days ago. I will pick up Hannah Montana for a GAN review. Since it is a rather long article (understandably so given how popular that show was and continues to be), my review will likely take some time and I will post my comments in sections so you can address them as I go (or you could wait until I post everything; that part is up to you). Have a happy holidays! Aoba47 (talk) 13:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much @Aoba47: I will work through the review as you go and I'll check out your FA candidate ASAP! Merry Christmas! SatDis (talk) 14:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas to you too and take as much time as you need. Aoba47 (talk) 14:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much @Aoba47: for your work on the Good Article nomination of Hannah Montana, I appreciate it. I look forward to working with you on the next project (I am eyeing off Wizards of Waverly Place, haha! And I will contact you again when I put Hannah up for peer review/FA. Enjoy the rest of your year. SatDis (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! I'm looking forward to your improvements to the Wizards of Waverly Place article if you decide to pursue that as a project. I am actually thinking of retiring in the near future so unfortunately, I do not think I will be much help with the Hannah Montana peer review or the FAC. Apologies for that. Enjoy the rest of your year as well! Aoba47 (talk) 00:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Oh, wow, that's a shame to hear! Will it be a full retirement or will you still make edits? What has led to that decision? (I hope you don't mind me asking). SatDis (talk) 00:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It will be a full retirement. I find that Wikipedia takes a considerable amount of time that I would prefer to spend elsewhere. Lately, I have been revisiting my past GAs to rewrite them for possible FACs, and I think the process of going back to my old work has made me too critical on myself and made editing more stressful in a very odd way. For instance, after I spent a decent amount of time finding and formatting new sources for a song article, I asked myself why I'm spend this time and energy on a song that I do not particularly enjoy lol. Maybe one day I'll come back to Wikipedia, but I just do not find Wikipedia editing to be as fun or rewarding as it used to be. Apologies for rambling lol. Aoba47 (talk) 01:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: No, I completely understand! I frequently feel as if I am spending too much time on GAs and FACs - it's a bit like an addiction! However, I try to only work on projects I feel passionate about. And for 2021, I'll try and find a better balance. All the best for when you do retire if I don't get to talk to you before then. :) SatDis (talk) 01:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad that I am not the only one that feels that way lol. I agree that it is far better to do work on projects that you are passionate about. I am sure you will find a balance between it all. All the best to you as well. I am going to wait to retire until things wrap with my FAC and that will still take some time so I'll be around for a little while longer. Aoba47 (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Aoba47: Things have been progressing well with Wizards of Waverly Place and due to some spare time, I believe I'll finish it this month. I've structured the page almost identically to Hannah Montana and have found scholarly articles for themes and reception. I was wondering, if you haven't retired by the time I finish, would you be interested in doing the Good Article review? I'm only suggesting it seeing as you're familiar with the structure and writing style. If you don't think you will have any opportunity to do so, I won't be offended, and I'll simply wait for someone else to pick up the GA. Thanks and Happy New Year! SatDis (talk) 05:55, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you are having a wonderful new year so far! Great work with the article so far and best of luck with the rest of it. Unfortunately, I will not be able to review it whenever you put it up for a GAN because I am honestly not doing any more reviews. I am just waiting for things to wrap up with my FAC and will retire when things are settled there (regardless if it is promoted or archived for any reason). I am sorry for not being any help with this. I just think a clean break from Wikipedia is the healthiest thing for me right now, and I am actually planning on not logging in at all after everything is cleared up with the FAC and my retirement. Aoba47 (talk) 06:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: No worries at all, I completely understand! Best of luck with your FAC, and regardless, I do hope you check out the article once it's finished. SatDis (talk) 06:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words, and I will definitely pay attention to the article to see all of the great work you will be putting into it. Aoba47 (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I just wanted to say good luck with the Wizards of Waverly Place GAN. I was actually about to pick it up for a review after returning from my very short time away from Wikipedia. I hope everything is going well with you! Aoba47 (talk) 01:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Aoba47: good to hear from you! Does that mean the retirement was temporary? Thanks for the well wishes. In the future I do hope to look at getting both Hannah Montana and Wizards of Waverly Place to Featured Article, but I myself am having a little bit of a rest from taking on larger nominations at the moment. In other news, my biggest project Hi-5 (Australian group) will be Today's featured article on March 26 so I'm pretty happy about that! All the best! SatDis (talk) 02:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I have decided to return to Wikipedia so my retirement was a temporary thing after all. It is always important to take breaks so I think that is for the best. Congrats on getting the article on the front page. I am sure that will make a lot of people very happy when they see it! Aoba47 (talk) 02:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hannah Montana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 14:00, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hannah Montana you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hannah Montana for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 07:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hannah Montana you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hannah Montana for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 16:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SatDis. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Hannah Montana at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 07:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Baffle gab1978: Thank you for your work, it is much appreciated! SatDis (talk) 07:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries; good luck with your planned nomination. :) Cheers, Baffle☿gab 10:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, SatDis! The article you nominated, Hi-5 (Australian band), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I also wanted to say congratulations on this promotion. I know that you have worked a lot on this article and have attempted several FACs on it before and for that, I admire your dedication to getting it to FA status. I think that deserves respect. Stay safe and have a great weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 01:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Gog the Mild: @Aoba47: Thank you both so much! I appreciate all the support and I'm so pleased to finally have the article at FA status. SatDis (talk) 03:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• SatDis, two down. Good going. What's next? Gog the Mild (talk) 10:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Gog the Mild I have Hannah Montana at GA so that will be next! I think I need a break from the FA process though! SatDis (talk) 11:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SatDis, I know you're trying to help, but there's really no need to make edits only to change ARIA URLs to their PDF links. There's nothing to say those are going to stay longer in ARIA's database than a URL that already points to a date-archived version of the chart page now that ARIA has introduced these. Ss112 06:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: Understood, thanks. SatDis (talk) 07:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for March 26, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 26, 2021. Congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 20:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wehwalt: Wow, thank you! So exciting! SatDis (talk) 21:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SatDis, did you have an image in mind to use on the main page along with the TFA appearance? --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffeeandcrumbs: Yes, I was just planning on using the image from the article's infobox. Should this be added to the TFA write-up? Thanks. SatDis (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can take care of it. That image is not going to appear as well on the main page. Would you object to using this one. Not all the original members but 3 out of 5 is not bad. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:28, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The main article image is a little dark and won't look as nice when shrunk down to main page size. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added the image you chose. Let me know if you want me to replace it with the one I picked. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffeeandcrumbs: I think you are right, the other image may look better, I would not mind seeing it appear instead. Thanks for the assistance. SatDis (talk) 23:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article "about the Australian children's musical group Hi-5 - they once rivalled the Wiggles in popularity, but as of this year, the band is inactive, ending a 20 year run."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

"I love Hi-5 so it was fairly easy!"

Thank you for quality articles about music and television from Australia such as Hi-5 (Australian group) and Bluey (2018 TV series), backed up by Hi-5 discography and List of Bluey (2018 TV series) episodes, for "I love Hi-5 so it was fairly easy!" - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2564 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SatDis, Good Job! -- Panini^🥪 15:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Bluey (2018 TV series), "about the 2018 Australian children's series Bluey which has quickly experienced success as the highest rating children's programme in Australia. Its deal with Disney has seen it made popular in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. The series is unique for being a high quality show for preschoolers that many adults also enjoy"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wizards of Waverly Place you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LM150 -- LM150 (talk) 16:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wizards of Waverly Place you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wizards of Waverly Place for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LM150 -- LM150 (talk) 19:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I recently some Hannah Montana-related things, and I wanted to share them with you. Miley posted a letter to Hannah on her instagram and the response on Montana's Twitter is just everything lol. There was also an article in Billboard where the people related to the show looked back on the music's impact. I just thought that you would find these things interesting. All of this coverage makes sense since it is the show's 15th anniversary after all lol. Aoba47 (talk) 21:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Aoba47: for sharing the article! I'll see if anything in the article is worth citing. It'll be interesting to see if this coverage is just for the 15th anniversary or if Miley is planning some future "Hannah"-related projects! SatDis (talk) 21:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I think the coverage is just for the 15th anniversary for the time being, but if I am sure that Disney is paying close attention to how many people are looking at this stuff to see if any further Hannah Montana content would be worth pursuing. I still think the best idea would be bring back Cyrus as Montana and have her be a mentor to a young girl was has the same dual identities. This type of concept was successful for Raven's Home so I could see it also working here. That would be pretty ironic considering that Hannah Montana was definitely inspired by the popularity of That's So Raven. I think Billy Ray's prequel idea is cute, but I think fans would rather see Cyrus return and a prequel would have to be set in the past, which I think would be a mistake. Anyway, apologies for the long message. I guess I had a lot of thoughts about this. Aoba47 (talk) 23:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aoba47: Very interesting. Yep, the only way it would work would be to bring back Miley Cyrus, but I'm unsure if she would ever want to return to a full-time show. Looking at how the Lizzie McGuire revival was cancelled due to adult themes, I think it would require some serious planning. Raven's Home has been a great series, but I feel like the fans would not respond well to a similar concept for Hannah Montana. I hope one day we get something, even if Disney just poach Cyrus to do a "Hannah Montana" one-off concert for Disney+! SatDis (talk) 02:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I see your point. Cyrus could be willing to do a full-time show, especially since touring is not possible for the foreseeable future, but she may want to commit her time to other projects (like Ariana Grande with The Voice). As much as I would want the show to only focus on Cyrus, I do not think that is Disney's goal as they seem more interested in focusing on children characters. The Lizzie McGuire revival was a mess. I feel bad for Hilary Duff as I think she has unfairly gotten a lot of criticism for sticking up for the show's more mature themes. A one-off Disney+ concert would be the ideal solution, but I'd even take that one step forward. It would be cool if they had a movie about the events leading up to the concerts so we could see all of the other characters and get a story which would lead to the concert film. With all that being said, I do not think anything major will happen with the Hannah Montana franchise in the near future, but it would certainly be another way to attract viewers to Disney+. Aoba47 (talk) 05:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aoba47: All great ideas - either way, it's fun to discuss and theorise! SatDis (talk) 13:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed. That is always fun to do. We will just have to wait and see what happens lol. Aoba47 (talk) 22:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article High School Musical: The Musical: The Series you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Wizards of Waverly Place has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist: Thank you for the copy edit, it is appreciated. SatDis (talk) 23:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article High School Musical: The Musical: The Series you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:High School Musical: The Musical: The Series for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article High School Musical: The Musical: The Series you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:High School Musical: The Musical: The Series for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert this edit? I just moved the 1 after "October", so it's not really a problem. 🍓⋆JennilyW♡🍧 (talk) 22:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JennilyW:. Thanks for the message. It may seem like a small edit but it actually signals a much larger problem. The series is an Australian series and in Australia, the date format is Date Month Year (i.e. we say 1 October 2018). According to Wikipedia, the article's use of date must follow rules from the show's country of origin. This was approved in the article's Featured Article nomination. Hope that helps. Thanks. SatDis (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SatDis. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Bluey (2018 TV series) episodes – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 28. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:42, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Giants2008: Thank you for the honour! SatDis (talk) 23:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SatDis, I hope you're doing well. I have currently renominated The Masked Singer (American TV series) for FA. In the previous nomination, you supported promotion. If you're able to, I would greatly appreciate any comments you might have about in the article in its current state, or if your opinion still holds. Thanks so much, Heartfox (talk) 09:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Heartfox: Absolutely. I hope to get around to it soon! All the best SatDis (talk) 11:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I hope you are doing well and staying safe. I was wondering if you could possibly provide a review for my current FAC on the television show Veronica Clare? I understand if you do not have the time or interest, but I just wanted to reach out since you have experience with television articles. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 03:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Aoba47:, of course, I'd love to help. I will try and get around to it soon, but I'm afraid the comments might not be as in depth as usual! SatDis (talk) 09:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you and I will appreciate any of your comments. Aoba47 (talk) 18:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi @Aoba47: - apologies for not making it to the review in time. Congratulations on having your article promoted! SatDis (talk) 06:06, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• No worries. I hope you are doing well and thank you for the congratulations! Aoba47 (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SatDis, I have opened a peer review for Red prior to taking it to FAC. I am reaching out as you commented on Blank Space's FAC. If you have the time and are willing, I would greatly appreciate any comment or advice that you could give at the review. If you are unable, that is totally fine as well. Thank you! --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi @TheSandDoctor: yes, I will definitely try and leave some comments on your review. I will have a look at the article soon, but I'm afraid the comments might not be as in depth as usual! Thanks. SatDis (talk) 01:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Peer review/Red (Taylor Swift album)/archive1 § Comments from SatDis. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 13:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: Apologies, my real world work hasn't allowed me any time to check back in. I will continue my comments today. SatDis (talk) 21:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As far as i can tell, you are the only one who updates The Wiggles Wiki Page. I would like you to confirm this statement, in order to confirm that I am addressing the correct individual? WebrunnerOne (talk) 18:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @WebrunnerOne:. By no means am I the one who has put in all the hard work on the article over the years, there have been other editors who wrote the article. However, recently I have been making some minor edits, yes. SatDis (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SatDis, I'm reaching out as you commented on 1989's review. Red (Taylor Swift album) is now up for FA. If you have the time and are willing, I would love to get your feedback on this article. Best, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SatDis! I am very sorry to disturb you but I noticed these edits. You appear to be asking for supports in an FAC, which I believes violates WP:CANVASSING, specifically campaigning. Instead of asking for "comments and support", I would recommend just asking for "comments". I might be wrong so if I am just alert me. I'm doing this right, right? Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 11:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pamzeis: Oops, I definitely shouldn't have said the word "support". My mistake! Should I go back and fix those messages? Thanks. SatDis (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the word. Thanks for alerting. SatDis (talk) 12:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luckily, I wouldn't fret; you've only reached out to a limited amount of people, and since you simply reached out to people who contributed to your last FAC (who rarely work in such field and gave good neutral comments), you clearly aren't cherry picking for supports. I would suggest shakinig up who you do ping however; maybe search for users you interact with often, or users who actively contribute in a subject or genre you're working on. You also don't have to worry about going out of your way to reach out to SandyGeorgia, ImagineTigers, and Casliber because they're always active in featured article creation and have that stuff watchlisted. Panini!^🥪 18:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 3 February 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to comment on the draft blurb at TFA. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:50, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I just wanted to congratulate you on all the work you have done on the That's So Raven article. The show was a little after my time so I am not super familiar with it, but I do like its premise and I find it interesting that it has a big impact on Disney Channel shows. Aoba47 (talk) 04:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aoba47: Thanks so much for your continued support. I really appreciate your feedback on That's So Raven, and I have nominated it for GA. Funnily enough, the show was actually before my time but I am rediscovering it now. It's part of my sporadic mission to eventually tackle as many Disney Channel shows as possible - I have already done Hannah Montana (fingers crossed for FA) and Wizards of Waverly Place... and I was initially inspired by your work on The Emperor's New School. I hope I can get some of them to Featured Article; for now I'm just happy if I can use the articles to help people like yourself understand what made the shows so special! SatDis (talk) 04:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Best of luck with the Hannah Montana FAC. You now know that I am older than you lol. I had a lot of fun working on the article for The Emperor's New School, and I learned so much from that FAC. While I have issues with the show's main premise, I still found myself really enjoying it and having a lot of very fond memories attached to it. I think that one of the best parts of Wikipedia is how I can continually learn and grow as an editor.
• I am honestly very flattered that the FAC for The Emperor's New School had inspired you so much, and that is one of the kindest things I have read on here. You have a lot of my respect for taking on these articles as they are about such popular shows so it is a lot of work and time. Aside from the three Disney shows you've already mentioned, do you have any others in mind? I should go back and do some more work on Disney show articles myself. Aoba47 (talk) 04:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aoba47: Before I saw your article, I looked at the Disney shows and didn't realise they could be transformed into such well-written pieces! I've noticed a couple of others are already Good Articles - The Buzz on Maggie and Kim Possible come to mind. I wonder if they could all be grouped into a Good Topic, as there are a few now in addition to Hannah, Wizards and New School. Phineas and Ferb used to be a Good Article but was de-listed. But I wouldn't be sure exactly how to tackle that.
• In terms of my own projects, I think I have to find the right show which has a good amount of sources available. A lot of the recent shows simply don't have enough coverage. I briefly touched up Lizzie McGuire previously but I don't know if what I did would be enough to become a GA. I currently have my eyes on The Suite Life of Zack & Cody and maybe Sonny with a Chance or Good Luck Charlie. I'll have a go and see which one gains momentum. I also hold my breath as I consider High School Musical as well! If you were to tackle a show yourself, which would you choose? SatDis (talk) 06:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm uncertain if all the Disney Channel shows could become a topic as there are so many of them. However, I'd ask someone with more experience in that area. I could see shows like Lizzie McGuire becoming their own topic as there are multiple articles related to it. I would love to work on the So Weird article as that was one of my favorite shows when I was younger (at least the first two seasons before it changed for the third and last season). I also love the Aladdin and The Little Mermaid televisions shows so I'd also enjoy working on those articles. Maybe one day, I will get around to them. Aoba47 (talk) 16:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aoba47: For what it's worth, I'd love to read about Aladdin and The Little Mermaid... they're "retro" to me! But I haven't seen So Weird before. Yes, maybe one day! SatDis (talk) 02:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• It makes me feel so old to realize that those shows are super "retro" at this point. I keep meaning to get back into art, and I would love to draw characters from both the Aladdin and The Little Mermaid shows. Mozenrath is my personal favorite. I've heard people describe So Weird as a younger version of The X-Files. When compared to Lizzie McGuire, Hannah Montana, and That's So Raven, So Weird is very different in tone and style, and it is interesting to see how Disney Channel shows evolved over time. So Weird is very much steeped in the 90s, and nostalgia is very likely one of the reasons why I still love it so much lol. I will let you know if/when I decide to work on those articles. I'm planning on taking a break from music articles anyway as I've done quite a bit of them lately lol. Aoba47 (talk) 03:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I actually have a quick comment about the That's So Raven article. I would encourage you to incorporate scholarly articles and analysis about the series into the article. I use Google Scholar as my primary search engine for this kind of research and I find it to be very useful. I have only done a quick search and I found sources like Racializing Raven: Race and Gender in That's So Raven and Never, Sometimes, Always: The Multiple Temporalities of “Post-Race” Discourse in Convergence Television Narrative. There does not appear to be a lot of academic coverage, but I still think it would be worthwhile to investigate this further (although I'd discourage you from using student theses and dissertations as those are not encouraged to use on Wikipedia). Sorry for the randomness of this message. It was just on my mind. Aoba47 (talk) 04:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aoba47: No need to apologise and thank you for the links. I have used scholarly sources before, for Hannah and other articles, so I will definitely add these into the Raven article in when I get the chance! Thanks again. SatDis (talk) 06:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Sorry for adding yet another message to this thread. Although Hannah Montana has been promoted to FA status, I would still look through Heartfox's comments about the ratings. I have a lot of respect for them as a reviewer (and an editor in general) and I think it would be beneficial to further explore what they have brought up in their edit summary. I am sure you are already aware of this, but I still wanted to bring this up regardless. Aoba47 (talk) 05:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you fix this edit. (t · c) buidhe 22:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: Oh thank you! I think I was working from an old revision. Oops! SatDis (talk) 23:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, SatDis! The article you nominated, Hannah Montana, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Buidhe (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article That's So Raven you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of I'ma editor2022 -- I'ma editor2022 (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article That's So Raven you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:That's So Raven for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of I'ma editor2022 -- I'ma editor2022 (talk) 23:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article That's So Raven you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:That's So Raven for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of I'ma editor2022 -- I'ma editor2022 (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article That's So Raven, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Raven-Symoné, who played the lead role in the series That's So Raven, became a producer for its fourth season at the age of 19? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/That's So Raven. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, That's So Raven), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Hannah Montana, "about the American teen sitcom Hannah Montana, which aired on Disney Channel and starred Miley Cyrus. This was a massively successful TV series and franchise which launched the career of Cyrus."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Hannah Montana article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 5, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 5, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SatDis! We've worked together before on some StonesTaylor Swift related articles and I was wondering if you would be able to take a look at The Rolling Stones and perhaps provide some feedback at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Rolling Stones/archive2? I hope to take the article through the gauntlet (FAC) following another GOCE peer review and am definitely looking for any feedback to help ease the process. Thank you, regardless! TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SatDis! I debated about merging this with the above section, but figured it would probably be best to separate it. Mick Jagger is currently standing at FAC. I was wondering if you might be able to take a look at the article and provide your thoughts/review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mick Jagger/archive1? They would be very greatly appreciated, but I would understand if you don't have the time/enough room on your plate. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: I'll try to take a look at both over the next week and provide a few comments. Thanks! SatDis (talk) 05:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! TheSandDoctor ^Talk 23:38, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't restore sources don't meet our WP:RS policies, as "newonnetflix.com" certainly does not. It's a personal project, which violates WP:RSSELF. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Ohnoitsjamie: Apologies, the revert came from the fact the source showed the April date. I see you have now added an Instagram source for the March date, however, during the FA review for Hi-5 (Australian group), I was instructed not to use Instagram, as it is a social media source like Facebook and Twitter, listed here. SatDis (talk) 02:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An announcement from the official Instagram account of the show is better than a personal site. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Ohnoitsjamie: Understood. Thanks for the clarification! SatDis (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SatDis. I'm just posting to let you know that The Wiggles discography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 25. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, SatDis! The article you nominated, Wizards of Waverly Place, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Congratulations on your recent promotion! Aoba47 (talk) 00:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aoba47: Thank you! And thanks for your continued assistance. SatDis (talk) 00:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Anytime. I am always glad to help when and where I can. Best of luck with all of your future projects. Do you have any future FAC plans on the horizon? Unfortunately, I will be taking a break from Wikipedia for some time so I will be unable to help with anything in the immediate future. I have just been rather burnt out with Wikipedia so I think a step back would be the best option for me. Aoba47 (talk) 01:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aoba47: I'll also be having a FAC break, and just work on some various projects for a while. Then I'll probably look at High School Musical: The Musical: The Series for FA. I definitely agree that breaks are necessary! All the best. SatDis (talk) 01:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for the response. I am honestly not the best at taking breaks, but it is something that I am actively trying to improve on for the future. All the best to you as well! Aoba47 (talk) 01:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sonny with a Chance you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 01:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I hope you are doing well and having a great weekend so far. I was wondering if you could help with my current peer review? I completely understand if you do not have the time or interest. I am trying to be patient with peer reviews and I am already being super impatient with it lol. Aoba47 (talk) 02:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Btw I know I announced a WikiBreak earlier in the month, but I want to complete my work on this particular article >< Aoba47 (talk) 02:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Sure, I'd be happy to help - interested to read about this sitcom. Is there anything in particular I can review (e.g. sources to text, source formatting?). I'll review it here and restate my position when it goes up for FA. SatDis (talk) 13:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I do not have anything specific in mind. Just anything that you notice while reading the article. I greatly appreciate your help. Aoba47 (talk) 19:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sonny with a Chance you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sonny with a Chance for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sonny with a Chance you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sonny with a Chance for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SatDis,

Thank you for creating List of High School Musical: The Musical: The Series episodes.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hello, I reviewed the list article. I believe that there is close paraphrasing in the article and I have tagged the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Bruxton)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 23:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bruxton: I believe the source you have specified here [1] has merely copied word for word what was already written on Wikipedia. All of this:

"High School Musical: The Musical: The Series is an American mockumentary musical drama streaming television series created for Disney+ by Tim Federle, inspired by the High School Musical film series. The series is produced by Chorus Boy and Salty Pictures in association with Disney Channel, with Oliver Goldstick serving as showrunner for the first four episodes. He was succeeded by Federle as showrunner for the remainder of the first season and thereafter." 

has been directly taken from High School Musical: The Musical: The Series which was then transferred to the episode list page. SatDis (talk) 02:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruxton: If you have no problems with this, I will remove the tag. SatDis (talk) 01:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SatDis. I've gotten your requested chapter "Family, Hard Work and Magic". Please send me a wikimail using this link so I can give it to you, and feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Best, —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: Thanks! I'm not exactly sure how to use wikimail. I had previously accessed the chapter through the upload [2], but now that has been removed. If the chapter is sent directly to me, also, I'm not sure how I would reference that on a Wiki article? Thanks again. SatDis (talk) 02:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, if you already got the chapter and don't need it anymore, that's fine. If you do need it, here's how to send a wikimail:

• Go to Special:EmailUser/Mdaniels5757
• Type literally anything (I'm just doing this to get your email address privately)
• Press send
• Keep an eye on your email and I'll send the chapter to you.

If the chapter is sent directly to you, you can still cite the chapter the normal way (i.e. as if you had a copy of the book).

Best, —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 12 November 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 12, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article "about the American teen sitcom Wizards of Waverly Place, which aired on Disney Channel and starred Selena Gomez. This TV series was a hit for Disney and launched the career of Gomez. This article became a Good Article just over a year ago in March 2021 and has since been copy-edited. The article is classed as "High-importance" in the Disney WikiProject. I had a great time researching and writing this, so am keen to revisit with any feedback welcomed."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sonny with a Chance, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the proposed third season of teen sitcom Sonny with a Chance was reworked into the sketch comedy series So Random! after the departure of its lead actor Demi Lovato? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sonny with a Chance. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sonny with a Chance), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SatDis. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for High School Musical: The Musical: The Series at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Sarrail (talk) 16:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Just wanted to let you know that the first episode of The Random Years is now available on YouTube. I was very surprised to find it and of course, it came out after I did the FAC lol. Aoba47 (talk) 22:43, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aoba47: Thank you for letting me know! I will definitely check it out. SatDis (talk) 06:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SatDis. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for That's So Raven at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, SatDis! The article you nominated, High School Musical: The Musical: The Series, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please ping me when you open that. It's important that WP:TV's WP:GA's actually follow MOS:TV, and actually do a better job with table readability in terms of 'rowspan'. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lizzie McGuire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pamzeis -- Pamzeis (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lizzie McGuire you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lizzie McGuire and Talk:Lizzie McGuire/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pamzeis -- Pamzeis (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lizzie McGuire you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lizzie McGuire for comments about the article, and Talk:Lizzie McGuire/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pamzeis -- Pamzeis (talk) 02:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For this edit [3], I am just going by what this user has been saying, [4]. he has said it before but forget where. In addition tried to get him to join discussion and refused, [5]. Asked this user here [6]. I have done it to several other shows after getting JBall approval since no one reverted decided to clean up more. I also opened an ANI on :Amaury here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1119#trying_to_engage_in_civil_discussion but it went no where. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Magical Golden Whip: Thanks for the response and examples. I did try and support this change over at High School Musical: The Musical: The Series, but the edits were reverted and all awards were restored. I am partial to all awards staying, because the actors are credited for their work on that specific show. I feel as if the awards should remain until an official decision is made to be consistent across all articles. Let me know what you think. SatDis (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As of now, I just plan to take them down as I agree they shouldn't be there, but if it gets reverted I am not going to do anything about it. I have done several Nick shows already and no one else has said anything including a few Disney ones. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 19:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the High School Musical: The Musical: The Series article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 29, 2023. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page blurb, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 29, 2023, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. If you wish to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article, you can do so at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 2023.

I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:07, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for High School Musical: The Musical: The Series, "about the Disney+ series High School Musical: The Musical: The Series, which was inspired by the hit 2000s movie High School Musical, and stars the popular singer Olivia Rodrigo."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lizzie McGuire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a revival of the comedy series Lizzie McGuire was ordered in 2019, but canceled mid-production after Disney deemed it not family-friendly enough? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lizzie McGuire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lizzie McGuire), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's an FA? (I'm relatively new to this wiki.) —theMainLogan (t•c) 16:26, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @TheMainLogan: FA refers to Featured article process. Also, I think I was too quick to revert your edit, as I think your wording sounds better. I have reinstated your edit. Thank you for your help with the page. SatDis (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  You're welcome. And thank you for clearing things up. —theMainLogan (t•c) 18:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nickelodeon (Australian and New Zealand TV channel), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:57, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @SatDis, I noticed you moved pages without the move menu on Wikipedia, examples being Nickelodeon (Australian TV channel) (formerly 10 Shake), and Nickelodeon (Australian and New Zealand TV channel) (formerly Nickelodeon (Australia and New Zealand)). In my opinion, you should've just asked someone to page swap the articles for you, via a Round-robin page move. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 11:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @TechGeek105: I am unaware of the "Round-robin page move". I did this purely because the new pages already had redirects on them so I was unable to use the "move" option. Thanks again for the information. SatDis (talk) 11:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @SatDis. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 11:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pinging @Liz and @Happily888, who have both produced round-robin page moves before. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 11:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SatDis. Please follow the instructions at WP:Moving a page. Don't move pages by cut & paste. I repaired your move of Nickelodeon (Australia and New Zealand) by doing a history-merge (which only WP:Administrators can do). Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Courtney Monsma. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Bluey (2018 TV series) (estimated annual readership: 1,500,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! QuicoleJR (talk) 17:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I hope you are doing good. Thank you for supporting and reviewing my first FAC Frozen II three years ago. Can you also review Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Frozen (2013 film)/archive1 because it is once again in dire need of attention. Thanks. Wingwatchers (talk) 03:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

I saw that you reverted my edit categorizing the characters of Bluey. Could you explain why on that show's talk page? Specialsam110 (talk) 14:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SatDis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Courtney Monsma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]