Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:55, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A heads-up that IP block exemption has been removed from your account, as it no longer appears necessary. Feel free to request it back if you find yourself hindered by IP hardblocks in future. WilliamH (talk) 16:14, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter We are halfway through our March backlog elimination drive. The mid-drive newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the March drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:29, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated M62 motorway for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Rschen7754 19:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our March backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the April blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:27, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of Russell T Davies know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 27, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or one of his delegates (Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 27, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Russell T Davies (born 1963) is a Welsh television producer and screenwriter notable for the 2005 revival of the classic British science fiction series Doctor Who. Born in Swansea, Davies joined the BBC's children's department on a part-time basis in 1985 and eventually wrote two series for the network, Dark Season and Century Falls. As a freelance writer in the mid-1990s, Davies' early scripts explored concepts of religion and sexuality among various backdrops: Springhill was a soap drama about a Catholic family in contemporary Liverpool; The Grand explored society's opinion of contemporary subjects during the interwar period; and Queer as Folk, his first prolific series, recreated his experiences in the Manchester gay scene. Works during the 2000s include Bob & Rose, which portrayed a gay man who fell in love with a woman, The Second Coming, which focused on the second coming and deicide of Jesus Christ, and Casanova, an adaptation of the Venetian lover's complete memoirs. Davies became the executive producer of the revived Doctor Who series in 2005 and oversaw a surge in popularity that led to the production of two spin-off series: Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An arbitration case regarding sexology has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all articles dealing with transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g., hebephilia).
2. User:Jokestress and User:James Cantor are banned from interacting with each other, commenting on and/or commenting about each other including their professional lives, works and on-wiki activities. This applies to all namespaces, but excludes dispute resolution that explicitly relates to both parties.
3. User:Jokestress is indefinitely banned from the topic of human sexuality, including biographical articles.

For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 13:00, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this

Guild of Copy Editors April 2013 events newsletter We finished the April blitz and are preparing to start our May backlog elimination drive. The April 2013 events newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the May drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:17, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 468th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors May 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our May backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the June blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IOS 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of iOS 7 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Crispulop (talk) 21:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered at 13:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

Hi, came across your name in doing some edits, wanted to point you to Kristin Beck which I recently created. Would welcome your help to expand it if you think it's worthwhile. I think it's an interesting story. cheers --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 04:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our June blitz and are about to commence our July backlog elimination drive. The June/July 2013 events newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the July drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 20:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You promised a response and a new hook for this DYK nomination within a week, and it's been almost three now with no action. Absent a new hook and some sort of response soon, we'll have to close the nomination. Please respond as soon as possible. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:31, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 July 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article IOS 7, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that iOS 7 will feature fewer skeuomorphic elements than previous versions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/IOS 7. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter Participation: Out of 30 people who have signed up for this drive so far, 18 have participated. If you have signed up for the drive but have not yet participated, it isn't too late. If you haven't signed up for the drive, sign up now! Progress report: Thus far we have reduced the number of May/June 2012 articles to just 124 articles, so we're on the right track. Unfortunately, for the first time in GOCE history, the number of articles in the backlog has actually gone up during this drive. While all participants are currently doing a fine job, we just don't have as many of them as we have had in the past. We have over 500 editors on our mailing list, but only 18 editors who have done a copy edit for the drive. If you're receiving this newsletter, it's because you have an interest in copy editing. Join the drive! Even if you only copy edit one article, it helps. Imagine how much progress we could make if everyone chipped in just one article. – Your drive coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor. >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our July backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the August blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:03, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Section 28, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grace Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mess this up or become tense over it. I just plowed through the archives for a few mentions that back your assertions and tried to help. Taking a hardline is not in your interest, and I believe the 7 sources I mentioned help prove that your actions were not without considerable thought. You'd do well to strike or remove your confronting posts because not all editors see the content dispute and behavior as separate matters. Your behavior matters more then the content issue at this point, even if they are wrong, you want to move forward and not stay in the past. I added sources for the content dispute side, maybe an effective counter even, but that should be enough for future eyes to make a decision provided you don't become confrontational over the old issue. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. As I mentioned, I'm still extremely bitter about the way I was treated during the topic ban discussion and the talk page discussions leading up to it. As a trans woman myself, who had not come out on Wikipedia at the time, I did find the level of discussion rather personally offensive; being called "a repulsive lying bigot" and having my intentions as an a LGBT person called into question still rather hurts, and I never received an apology for it. Sceptre ^(talk) 01:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is sad, personal attacks hurt regardless of the intention behind them. I've got my own long running dispute to worry about, but for what's it worth, try to move forward whenever possible. It's what everyone should do, ideally. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I have long held the philosophy on Wikipedia that the only things I will take personally are praise. All else is background noise. I did not see the discussion, nor will I look for it. I know how much things hurt even if one tries hard not to let them. Please laugh in the face of insults and rejoice in praise. Fiddle Faddle 09:55, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sceptre, I was hoping that I could just ask what your preferred gender pronouns are so I don't accidentally use the wrong ones. I assume it would be the she-series, but it's better safe to ask than accidentally use the wrong ones. Thanks, NW (Talk) 03:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be fine. :) The silent coming out is taking people by surprise, isn't it? Sceptre ^(talk) 03:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template ((gender|Sceptre)) parses to what a user has selected in the Wikipedia preferences, in this case: they NE Ent 09:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's also a script that will display an editor's gender on the heading of their user page and talk page, which is helpful since you don't have to go looking for it. - Aoidh (talk) (formerly User:SudoGhost) 09:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A friend of mine who is trans*/genderqueer prefers gender neutral pronouns. Since finding that out, I have figured it is probably easiest to ask when it is possible that I might be wrong. NW (Talk) 12:13, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. I have a cousin who is M2F and the polite thing was to ask both what she preferred to be called (the family knew her only be her male name prior to my asking) and what pronouns to use. A polite question never gets taken the wrong way, a bad assumption can spoil a relationship for ever. Fiddle Faddle 12:27, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for 12 hours per this edit that violated your topic ban. (Per our discussion on irc earlier) This is an Arbitration Enforcement block under this remedy and has to be specially appealed. --Guerillero | My Talk 03:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)ere[reply]

Though I understand why you were blocked, I am grateful that it is brief. The list of quotes you posted on Jimbo's talk page is telling, sad and offensive to all compassionate people, not just transgendered people. I have always favored addressing people by the names of their choice, without regard to legalities. So, Jimmy Carter and Chelsea Manning. It's easy. And gender self-identification is intensely personal, and I believe in accepting people as they self-identify.

I wish you well. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your post was well worth being blocked for. It raises the usual set of uncomfortable truths about bigotry that always require highlighting in the loudest forum one can find. Use your voice sparingly and only risk being blocked when it is worthwhile. This was worthwhile. I doubt it will go anywhere or make any difference, but it was worthwhile. The alleged wisdom of crowds always sees to it that bigotry remains as the overall consensus. Fiddle Faddle 08:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add my acknowledgment and appreciation. I hope your laudable post on the co-founder's page, where you cast much-needed light on some repellent commentary, will help guide enlightened editorial practice. Writegeist (talk) 17:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to send you an email and I noticed that you don't have email enabled. If you don't wish to receive email, that's fine; my message wasn't terribly important. But if you wish to, I just thought I would let you know that it isn't possible at this time. Best, NW (Talk) 13:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm just going to send you an email; I don't have Special:EmailUser active on my end due to harassment concerns. :) Sceptre ^(talk) 13:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

:) . Count Iblis (talk) 23:29, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have continued your breaches of the topic ban immediately after the last block [1], I have blocked you again, for the same reason. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The edit was clearly as directly related to the Manning discussion as the previous ones for which you were blocked the other day. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:34, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you reviewed JWales' post in which he asks that people not be blocked for violating their topic ban on his talk page especially if they are raisin concerns with Wikipedia's administration? NW (Talk) 12:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you mention it, he also said that it would be unwise to allow his page to be used as a "useless battleground for editors who have been excluded elsewhere" – which is exactly what was happening here. But in any case, I don't see it as particularly relevant. Jimbo Wales needs to respect community-imposed sanctions just like everybody else. He has no more right to unilaterally declare his user space exempt from them than you or I would. Comments by other administrators on the AN thread were unanimous in saying Sceptre's edits were unacceptable. Plus, she was violating the sanction not just on Jimbo's page but at the AN thread itself too. (–unsigned by Fut.Perf. (talk) 13:27, 24 August 2013‎)

The arbcom ruling specifically allows appeals on AN. NE Ent 14:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Making an appeal, yes. Using the appeal thread as a pretext for again grandstanding about the topic from which they are topic-banned, no. Different thing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any replies to copy

Sceptre, if you wish for us to copy your replies to other talk-pages, then please post them below, with where-to-post each, such as after a timed comment "13:42". I or others will repost each reply segment (but might omit parts about Manning!). I have noted block at User_talk:Jimbo, which can resume next week if you wish to take a break for weekend. -Wikid77 (talk) 14:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sceptre is being treated like the US treats or wants to treat Manning, Snowden, Assange etc. and I don't think that's acceptable. Count Iblis (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I have no idea how the attitude most editors are showing comports with the Foundation's Non discrimination policy. Sceptre ^(talk) 19:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you really just compare Sceptre to Manning et al?! GiantSnowman 20:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No comparison like that can be perfect. There does exist on Wikipedia a problem with dealing with controversial topics. E.g. in the Amanda Knox case Admins had been imposing a regime in which editors got unfairly blocked because of their POV. Jimbo intervened there when a banned editor posted on his talk page about this. It seems that this case may be similar, you have Jimbo again complaining that Sceptre should not have been blocked for bringing a real problem to his attention. By blocking Sceptre for that, the topic ban ends up being a de-facto cover to hide a real problem, similar to the US attempts to stop Snowden from leaking information to the media. Count Iblis (talk) 22:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And with Sceptre topic-banned, then discussions were limited about trans issues in Manning case, where many of us were eventually shocked when U.S. national news reported "Chelsea E. Manning" announced a name/gender change. Plus, who knew wp:MOSIDENTITY covered such cases, and now the enwiki admins who move-renamed the Manning page are being accused of improper admin conduct, some wanting those admins sanctioned, with wild calls for desysopping. Meanwhile, I have been learning some developers do not want to fix the trivial wp:edit_conflicts which can be auto-merged by a few simple changes to MediaWiki utility diff3.c, and no one told me what "cisgender" meant because Sceptre is too afraid to discuss wp:COMMONNAME, where I have been debating the unusual forcing of dashes into names which 95%-99% of the world spells with hyphens. Sceptre is instantly seen as coherent, well-reasoned, and restrained (i.e., not "site-banned"), and yet another questionable case of "indef topic ban". BTW: I am indef topic-banned (2.3 years now) about Amanda Knox re "Murder of Meredith Kercher" and "all related institutions" across Italy! More later.... -Wikid77 (talk) 19:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a brief comment on this edit you made to Jimbo's talk page:[2] (I replied there yesterday, but you may not have seen it.) You referred to the writer Julie Bindel making 'horrifically transphobic comments in The Observer' back in January; I believe you actually meant Julie Burchill. Strictly speaking, this edit was a BLP violation, but I'm conscious of the prohibition against editing other user's comments so haven't altered it. If you would like to me to edit your comment to correct your mistake, feel free to say so. Robofish (talk) 00:44, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please, it was a simple mistake that I would correct myself if I had the chance. Sceptre ^(talk) 01:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors August Blitz wrap-up Participation: Out of sixteen people who signed up for this blitz, nine copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 26 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the September drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the September drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sceptre, are you looking for another block? Seriously. I just undid that edit - feel free to reinstate it or whatev - but you're cruising for another topic-ban block. Just saying, and getting in here before someone else does ... - Alison ^❤ 19:40, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as Jimbo has actually said in respect to this discussion that blocking me should be disfavoured, and that I'm not directly referencing Manning, I feel okay about making the comment. Sceptre ^(talk) 19:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sceptre.

This is just a quick courtesy notice. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by September 19, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Seddon ^talk 23:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sceptre, the clarification request you submitted regarding Sexology discretionary sanctions has been closed and archived. The Committee clarified that discretionary sanctions were authorised for articles dealing with transgender issues and for articles dealing with paraphilia classification. The original discussion can be viewed here. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:25, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my apologies for contacting you directly. Can you tell me how I can get an article re-assessed by the WikiProject UK Roads please? I have been working on Wade's Causewway the last couple of weeks and the project still classifies it as a stub, which I do not think is appropriate any more. Can you tell me how I can get it re-assessed please? I didn't see anywhere to register it for re-assessment on the project page. Many thanks -PocklingtonDan (talk) 20:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure why you reverted my addition of a comment to the Doctor Who talk page. Could you advise me why you felt this was necessary? I have re-instated it pending any evidence that it contravenes anything, as no evidence as such was supplied. Thanks.  drewmunn  talk  16:26, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I was on my iPad at the time looking at my watchlist. Sceptre ^(talk) 18:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors September 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter The September 2013 drive wrap-up is now ready for review. Sign up for the October blitz! – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:14, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've done as User:Bencherlite suggested.

I removed Lisa the Skeptic from 23 November in the pending queue.

I nominated it for 24 November at TFAR.

Hopefully my nomination will not be futile.

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 21:09, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my nom date to 4 November. Hopefully this will be an acceptable compromise to accommodate all involved. :) — Cirt (talk) 21:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you don't mind but I nominated The Stolen Earth for TFA on November 23. Please check Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests#November 23, I'm sure you would have a better blurb. Edgepedia (talk) 11:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I commented Support over there, with a note that I think it'd be awesome in an ideal universe for Wikipedia to have an article on Meta-Crisis Tenth Doctor... — Cirt (talk) 16:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed you recolored the 7f7f7f grey on the map to a different shade. The different shade was not very distinguishable from the grey we used for New Mexico and the US territories, thus it was not optimal. Both I and one other use mistook the two colors. I have reverted the color back to 7f7f7f. In the future please discuss color changes before you make them. Thanks! Thegreyanomaly (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, it was simply a change to be consistent with File:Recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States.svg. I don't mind that revert. :) Sceptre ^(talk) 00:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors October Blitz wrap-up Participation: Out of eleven people who signed up for this blitz, eight copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we copy edited 42 articles from WikiProject Film's backlog, reducing it by a net of 34 articles. Hope to see you at the November drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the November drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dual mandate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Hancock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dual mandate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Hancock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:36, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of The Stolen Earth know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on November 23, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 23, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

"The Stolen Earth" is the twelfth episode of the 2007–08 series and the 750th overall episode of the British science fiction television series Doctor Who, which marks its 50th anniversary on 23 November 2013. The episode was written by show runner and head writer Russell T Davies. It is the first of a two-part crossover story with spin-offs The Sarah Jane Adventures and Torchwood, concluding with "Journey's End", the finale of the fourth series, which brings closure to several prominent story arcs created under Davies. In the episode, contemporary Earth and 26 other planets are stolen by the Daleks. As the Doctor (David Tennant, pictured) and his companion Donna Noble (Catherine Tate) try to find Earth, his previous companions Jack Harkness (John Barrowman), Martha Jones (Freema Agyeman), Sarah Jane Smith (Elisabeth Sladen), and Rose Tyler (Billie Piper) convene to contact him and mount a defence against the Daleks. The episode was received positively by the audience and professional reviewers. It received one of the highest Audience Appreciation Index ratings for a television programme, and when first shown was the second most-watched programme of the week. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Ward (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Union of Students (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your work on The Stolen Earth, quite meticulously sourced, most impressive. Yes, bow ties are cool... but I still miss the Tenth Doctor! :) — Cirt (talk) 20:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sceptre,

Most of user page has gone white. This is because you used ((gradient)). It appears you use codings such as .css to make your user page. Please change it from ((gradient)) to ((linear-gradient)) so you get your color scheme again. Best, Sportsguy17 :) (click to talk • contributions) 21:24, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A request for comment has been started on an issue you have been discussing at Talk:Doctor_Who#Tables.Blethering Scot 21:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't speculate on anyone being mentally ill without sources saying so.Two kinds of pork (talk) 13:56, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Two kinds of pork: - please don't remove other people's comments.

@Sceptre:, I suggest you re-phrase your comment please. GiantSnowman 14:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 18:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors November 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter The November 2013 drive wrap-up is now ready for review. Sign up for the December blitz! – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:About me tengwar.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Articles tengwar.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Barnstars tengwar.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Badri (1999 film). Since you had some involvement with the Badri (1999 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). PamD 09:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December Notes from the Guild of Copy Editors The December blitz ran from December 8–14. The theme for this blitz was articles tied in some way to religion. Seven editors knocked out 20 articles over the course of the week. Our next blitz will be in February, with a theme to be determined. Feel free to make theme suggestions at the Guild talk page! The January 2014 Backlog elimination drive is a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on January 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on January 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to copy edit all articles tagged in October and November 2012 and complete all requests placed before the end of 2013. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits at least one article, and special awards will be given to the top five in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", "Number of articles of over 5,000 words", "Number of articles tagged in October and November 2012", and "Longest article". We hope to see you there! Coordinator election: Voting is open for candidates to serve as GOCE coordinators from 1 January through 30 June 2014. Voting will run until the end of December. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors 2013 Annual Report The GOCE has wrapped up another successful year of operations! Our 2013 Annual Report is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978 and Jonesey95 Sign up for the January drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2014 wrap-up Participation: Out of seven people who signed up for this blitz, all copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 16 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by

Notes from the Guild of Copy Editors The March 2014 backlog elimination drive is a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles in need of copyediting. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to copyedit all articles tagged in December 2012 and January 2013 and to complete all requests placed in January 2014. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copyedits at least one article, and special awards will be given to the top five in the following categories: number of articles, number of words, number of articles over 5,000 words, number of articles tagged in December 2012 and January 2013 and the longest article. We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sceptre! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of ((U|Technical 13)) ^{(t • e • c)} 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors March 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter The March 2014 drive wrap-up is now ready for review. Sign up for the April blitz! – Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by

Guild of Copy Editors March 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up Participation: Thanks to all who participated in the drive and helped out behind the scenes. 42 people signed up for this drive and 28 of these completed at least one article. Final results are available here. Progress report: Articles tagged during the target months of December 2012 and January 2013 were reduced from 177 to 33, and the overall backlog was reduced by 13 articles. The total backlog was 2,902 articles at the end of March. On the Requests page during March, 26 copy edit requests were completed, all requests from January 2014 were completed, and the length of the queue was reduced by 11 articles. Blitz!: The April blitz will run from April 13–19, with a focus on the Requests list. Sign up now! – Your drive coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors April 2014 Blitz wrap-up Participation: Out of 17 people who signed up for this blitz, eight copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 28 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the May drive! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sceptre. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:22, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Liberty GB, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Ivanvector (talk) 15:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make edits to Wikipedia that reflect personal opinions/vendettas, or because of non-reputable sources, like you did at 2014 Isla Vista massacre. This is an encyclopedia that presents facts from reputable sources and unbiased views, not a blog page for opinions. Please do not remove links from articles again without considering why you are doing so. Thanks! Lord Laitinen (talk) 05:28, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on [[:2014 Isla Vista killings]]. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:48, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Slenderdan (talk) 05:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I recommend that you reread WP:INVOLVED, particularly the definition. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:35, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  You've been editing the article heavily, and reverted me on a point of substance rather than a point of administration. Were you to revert to a pre-conflict version, it wouldn't be a violation of INVOLVED, but because you actually joined one side of the dispute, you became involved. Sceptre ^(talk) 06:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • You reverted the same thing three times before he got involved. That's why you've been blocked. --Slenderdan (talk) 06:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The edit-warring was about Category:Violence against men in North America, a category that with the removal of this page had only 2 entries and at the time had no definition of what articles should be in this category, and I can see BLP issues arising both with the category and its addition to this page. Apparently the perpetrator of this killing has written about his hatred of women, but not of men, which would justify the Category:Violence against women in the United States category (although I'd still like to see a definition for this one also). Adding the violence against men category appears to be stating that the perpetrator was acting because of his hatred of men (as well), and that doesn't seem to be justified - thus a BLP violation. I was about to close this as no violation when Crisco blocked. See also the discussion I've had with another Admin at User talk:Dominic#the editor he blocked. Dougweller (talk) 07:25, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Crisco 1492, do you really think you are not involved? You have edited the article heavily, and you reverted Sceptre. I'm not excusing the 3RR violation, but you probably should not have pushed the block button. There seems to be more going on(adding a Cat that had no other articles) than simple content disagreement. I'm going to assume that you have some kind of interpretation of WP:INVOLVED that differs from standard practice, but the appearance is not good. Dave Dial (talk) 07:39, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dave Dial, I will copy my reply to Dougweller from my talk page: "I do not consider reverting violations of policy being involved. If I were to do so, then I would have to ask another admin to block somebody who, say, spends an hour vandalizing articles and refuses to stop (not that Spectre was vandalizing, but 3RR violation was out of policy). Had this been an issue which I had feelings regarding, there could have been WP:INVOLVED issues, or if this had been a content dispute with neither party violating policy. I warned her, reverted her violation of 3RR, and blocked her when she reverted that and went to 5RR." As I've said elsewhere, I have no strong feelings regarding this issue. I was reverting a violation of policy. Nothing more, nothing less. After reverting Sceptre I opened a discussion to head off further disruption caused by edit warring over the category (which appears to have been successful, based on a quick scan of the history). If the community wants to crucify me for preventing conflict on a high traffic, high profile article, so be it. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And while we're at it, could we please limit discussion of my block to one page (perhaps here, so that Sceptre can participate?) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Sceptre, I have unblocked you per consensus here and elsewhere that my block was inappropriate. My apologies. You are welcome to participate at the discussion regarding the category at Talk:2014_Isla_Vista_killings#Violence_against_men_category to build a consensus whether or not the disputed category should be included, but please do not edit war any further. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors May 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up Participation: Thanks to all who participated! Out of 51 people who signed up this drive, 33 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We reduced our article backlog from 2,987 articles to 2,236 articles in May, the lowest backlog total since we began keeping records in 2009! Since at least 300 new articles were tagged during May, that means we copy edited over 1,000 articles in a single month. Amazing work, everyone! Blitz: The June blitz will run from June 15–21. This blitz's theme is Politics. Sign up here. Election: You can nominate yourself or others for the role of Coordinator for the second half of 2014 here. Nominations will be accepted until June 14. Voting will begin on June 15 and will conclude on June 28. Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2014 Isla Vista killings. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I don't know if you're aware but there is a wikimedia meet up in Leeds this Saturday (14 June) if you're interested. Hopefully you can make it. Regards IJA (talk) 18:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors July 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights: Sign up for the July 2014 Backlog elimination drive Review the Coordinators election results – Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corazon, I love you..gif	You are fantastic!
	I love you!!!!!!!!!!!! I like your contributions at wikipedia. I want that you be my friend. LZNQBD (talk) 21:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop - this is a ridiculously petty edit war. You are letting your personal biases get in the way of objective editing. Regardless of what Brown uses, "equal marriage" is a term used in British political discourse exclusively by proponents of same-sex marriage, and is thus NPOV. And quite apart from anything, it's not at all obvious what it means to someone not familiar with British politics. To repeat myself yet again: if you think it's notable that she uses this term in preference to the more neutral "gay marriage", add a sentence or two to the article saying so. Otherwise, leave it as it is - you do not own the article. Wereon (talk) 12:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Both of you are seasoned editors, yet both of you are on the edge of WP:3RR. Please take this to the talk page for a wider audience. Next person to blindly revert gets blocked - Alison ^❤ 17:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Brown (politician)#Gay versus Equal marriage. Thanks. ~Excesses~ (talk) 18:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors July 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up Participation: Thanks to everyone who participated in the July drive. Of the 40 people who signed up this drive, 22 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We reduced our article backlog from 2400 articles to 2199 articles in July. This is a new month-end record low for the backlog. Nice work, everyone! Blitz: The August blitz will run from August 24–30. The blitz will focus on articles from the GOCE's Requests page. Awards will be given out to everyone who copy edits at least one of the target articles. The blitz will run from August 24–30. Sign up here! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Under-occupancy penalty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew George. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Gender Gap Task Force Issues -- thought you should be aware. Two kinds of pork (talk) 21:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender Gap Task Force. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender Gap Task Force/Evidence. Please add your evidence by October 17, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender Gap Task Force/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 14:38, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors October 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights: Results of the August Blitz and September Drive A few changes around the Guild's pages Sign up for the October Blitz Review the Coordinators election results – Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A case (Sexology) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 20:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Candidate nominations for Guild coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015, are currently underway. The nomination period will close at 23:59 on December 15 (UTC), after which voting will commence until 23:59 on December 31, 2014. Self-nominations are welcomed. Please consider getting involved; it's your Guild and it won't coordinate itself, so if you'd like to help coordinate Guild activities we'd love to hear from you. Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis. Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. μηδείς (talk) 03:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2014 Newsletter Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in November's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 43 people who signed up for this drive, 26 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: The November Drive removed 26 requests from the Requests page and 509 articles from the ((copy edit)) backlog. We copy edited 83 articles tagged in the target months; July, August, and September 2013. Together with tag removals from articles unsuitable for copy editing, we eliminated July 2013 from the backlog and reduced August and September's tags to 61 and 70 respectively. As of 01:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC), the backlog stood at 1,974 articles, dipping below 2,000 for the first time in the Guild's history (see graph at right). Well done everyone! Blitz: The December Blitz will run from December 14–20 and will focus on articles related to Religion, in recognition of this month's religious holidays in much of the English-speaking world. Awards will be given out to everyone who copy edits at least one of the target articles. Sign up here! Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from 1 January to 30 June 2015 is now underway. Candidates can nominate themselves or others from December 01, 00:01 (UTC), until December 15, 23:59. The voting period will run from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. You can read about coordinators' duties here. Please consider getting involved and remember to cast you vote—it's your Guild and it doesn't organize itself! Thank you all once again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve anything without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Ward and Mike Hancock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors Late December 2014 Newsletter Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the December Blitz. Of the 14 editors who signed up for the blitz, 11 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. January drive: The January backlog-reduction drive is just around the corner; sign up here! Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015 is now underway. The voting period runs from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. Please cast your vote—it's your Guild, and it doesn't run itself! Happy holidays from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors 2014 Annual Report Our 2014 Annual Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page; Review the election results; Membership news; Changes around the Guild's pages; Plans for 2015. – Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! czar ⨹ 04:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sceptre, it's been nearly two weeks. You need to address the issues raised in the review soon, if you wish to pursue this nomination. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—Given that the remedy has just been enacted, I am providing this notice to everybody who has participated in the discussion on Jimbo Wales' talk page for their information. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cucumber (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Con O'Neill and Freddie Fox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Banana (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canal Street. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a Parliament Square protest against a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos featured slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Russell T Davies page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors February 2015 Newsletter Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in January's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 38 people who signed up for this drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We were able to remove August 2013 from the general copyediting backlog and November 2014 from the request-page backlog. Many thanks, everyone! Blitz: The February Blitz will run from February 15–21 and again focuses on the requests page. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one request article. Sign up here! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Superfish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lenovo Yoga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors March 2015 Newsletter Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 21 people who signed up, eight copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: The blitz removed 16 articles from the requests list, and we're almost done with December 2014. Many thanks, everyone! Drive: The month-long March drive begins in about a week. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]