Archives to date: User_talk:Schissel/Archive_10122004 and User_talk:Schissel/Archive05a, User_talk:Schissel/Archive05b (October 2004 to December 2004, January 2005 to mid-June 2005, mid-June 2005 to mid-January 2006, User talk:Schissel/Archive06 for late January '06 to December 27 '06 respectively. Inconsistent naming, I know. May move the barnstar to my main page, very proud to have received it but unsure of policy!) Schissel : bowl listen 16:57, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Barnstars and such are informal. Put yours whereever it makes you happy; most people put them on their front page or on a subpage. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 09:32, 28 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Further: User talk:Schissel/Archive07 and User talk:Schissel/Archive08 for January 3–December 12 07, and January 12–December 11 08.-note added 15 March 09.

A tag has been placed on Paul Rapoport (music critic) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. UKWikiGuy (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Page 371 of the Goetschius says of Hugo Kaun: "He has created three Symphonies, in D, C minor, and E minor (1915), several Symphonic-Poems, Suites, and other works, orchestral and choral." Since he repeats the word "minor" I thought he meant the one in D is in D major. But I haven't heard any of his music, and I don't know if it any of it has been played in concert or on the radio in the past 20 years. Willi Gers07 (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for the links. It certainly sounds like it's in a minor key to me. But, as you said, it could well switch to D major at the faster tempo (like Haydn's "London"). Oh, and btw, do you know anything about the Garritan Personal Orchestra? Willi Gers07 (talk) 22:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Say, Schissel, do you know of any way to deal with bullies on Wikipedia? What about a bully who knows Wikipedia's policies backwards and forwards and uses them against those who disagree with him? And what if he does this in a much more sophisticated way than what is described at WP:GAME? A lot of people are aware of this bully but they act as if they're completely powerless to do anything to take him down. Willi Gers07 (talk) 16:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article String Quartets (Smetana), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

all pertinent information is in main articles

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tomdobb (talk) 16:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cheers. Amazing what one finds when one goes digging. To think that the conductor of the Berlin premiere of Parsifal has only just died - astonishing! -- JackofOz (talk) 19:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I just saw your message. I read your article and the information of my Symphony-Articles are mostly from there and from the book of Gulinskaja (and, of course, own ideas). As yet I liked the late Symphonies more, but with the historical background the early works are interesting, too (my favourites are the 21st and the 24th). It's difficult to filter the non-indoctrinated information from Gulinskaja's book, and one thing I didn't understand is: What relationship did Mjaskowski really have to the Sowjet regime? Do you have any other sources? I also wrote an article about the piano sonatas, if you are interested. I'm glad, that my articles will be translated soon and I hope, more people will be interested in this wonderful and exciting music. --Daniel Musiklexikon (talk) 19:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC) (Discussion on my German page)Reply[reply]

Thank you for translating the articles. Maybe you can tell me, which articles you will translate next, so I can translate some, too. --Daniel Musiklexikon (talk) 15:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I translated the first symphony here. You can correct the text and use it for en.wikipedia. Thanks! --Daniel Musiklexikon (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, i just wrote this and this. I think I'm going to write about the 12th Symphony next. By the way, do you have any scores of the symphonies? I'm not sure about my examples, you can see here, here and here. If I have enough time, I will translate de:6. Sinfonie (Mjaskowki), but that will take a few days... --Daniel Musiklexikon (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm very busy at the moment (preparing for a music-contest), so I don't have enough time to translate more articles. By the way, on imslp.org the score of the 13th symphony is now available. --Daniel Musiklexikon (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here at en. we now have an article about Georg Wilhelm Rauchenecker. Don't know what sources de. or es. used, but if my humble little stub doesn't get deleted and it passes muster with you, perhaps you could possibly consider linking it at the IMSLP. I'm not going to get an account at IMSLP since I don't consider myself worthy of IMSLP, people who actually know what they're talking about. Actually, come to think of it, how come IMSLP doesn't link to a more reputable website than Wikipedia, a website actually run by experts and not morons? Or have their own bios of composers? James470 (talk) 06:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My favorite Catholic saint is St. Florian, if that tells you anything about the validity of your conclusion. (Look him up in a book, not here, if you care to). Lately I had been annoyed by a couple of morons who think that plagiarizing New Grove is the same as creating fine free content.

Anyway, and much more importantly, thank you for telling me about Rauchenecker's two other symphonies. It was difficult enough finding any information on the guy. I have a subscription to Oxford Music Online, and he's mentioned in the Winterthur article. I can't find that mention in either my copy of New Grove (the older edition) and the library is still missing, well, all volumes of the 2001 edition.

Still, I remain concerned as to what sources exactly the German Wikipedia used. Though my knowledge of German is only a tiny bit more advanced than Jimbo's. James470 (talk) 06:19, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for clarifying that.

I see Amazon has the Jecklin CD mentioned in one of the Wikipedia pages. Rauchenecker's Quartet in C minor and Goetz's Quartet in B-flat. Just $63 plus shipping and tax. James470 (talk) 00:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Who do I talk about copyright violations in Wikipedia? Does Wikipedia even have copyright reviewers like IMSLP does?

I am concerned that the composer James Lentini is under the serious misapprehension that he is the copyright owner of images of himself (such as File:JimL Guitar.jpg) taken by professional photographers. The particular photographer here probably would have charged him a lot more if he had known his work would wind up on Wikipedia without permission. Incarnatus (talk) 20:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The problem is I have no idea who the photographer is. All I know for sure is that he didn't take it himself. Incarnatus (talk) 18:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Schissel. I'm impressed with all you've been doing to improve Wikipedia's coverage of classical music. I was wondering if I could persuade you to look through the article on Carl Nielsen which I've been trying to expand. If you have any suggestions for further improvement, please let me know - unless of course you would like to contribute yourself. - Ipigott (talk) 17:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Schissel. I've recently started the article on Beethoven's 6th piano concerto. It would be great if you could give me some help. Thanks! Ocean Shores 15:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi-- I just made List of symphonies in C sharp minor into a table per your request. Appreciate the correction on List of symphonies in A flat minor as well. Please let me know if you need other assistance. Thanks! Jokestress (talk) 17:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Schissel! Nice to meet you in Wikiverse! I would like to ask you a question - where did you find a list of works? Thank you! Semimartingale (talk) 01:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Schissel,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Young June Sah --Yjune.sah (talk) 20:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will have a look- sorry about the delay. Will be gone Friday until Tuesday but will get back to you soon. Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Schissel,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.34.167 (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Six Flute Concertos, Op. 10 (Vivaldi), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Studied composition with Karl Marx in Berlin

during the last four years of his life, when Karl Marx was himself only 4 years old? No one checks these things. I am guessing the source of this statement had "Marx" and that composer Adolphe Marx or another was meant? Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for checking. You're right that it was Adolph Marx. I changed the link. Pkeets (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Schissel | Sound the Note! 22:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Schissel, I'm a wikipedia newbie who's trying to add to a page about the Missa Gaudeamus of Josquin. This is my first article, so I'm quite cautious both from a technical and historical point of view. I've just started compiling the "sources" section, here are my attempts as far as now

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:UneMusqueDeBiscaye#Sources

when documenting online I've found the imslp page at

http://imslp.org/wiki/Missa_Gaudeamus_%28Josquin_Desprez%29

in which you've indicated a Liepzig print (of 1836) which attributed the mass to Ockegem. I was wondering if you have additional information about it and if you deem my sources section correct and adequate for wikipedia. The interesting point is about the paternity of the edition abscribed to Friedrich Rochlitz...

any suggestion or hints?

thanks a lot for your magnificent work on imslp, hope you will appreciate my little effort to bring Missa Gaudeamus to a larger audience, since it is really a piece of fine art...

une musque de Biscaye (talk) 17:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Shissel, thanks a ton for your information, I've updated the page at Missa_Gaudeamus if you want to have a look.

une musque de Biscaye (talk) 23:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ervin Schiffer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Violinist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Berceuse (Chopin) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• August 2013))<br/> For the story of Elise Gavard, see the [[:de:Frédéric Chopin|German Wikipedia]].)</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Girolamo Diruta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• from Grove 6 as quoted by [[Répertoire International des Sources Musicales|RISM]] online.</ref>)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johann Pehel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conductor and Czech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Napoléon Henri Reber may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ''Bibliographie de la France'' (a weekly journal of copyright registrations), 2 October 1858 issue).</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:02, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Émile Pierre Ratez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Administrator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franz Syberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adagio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes. Adagio is not a disambiguation page - a disambiguation page would provide disambiguation and redirect links for all of its components, which Adagio does not - so Adagio is a target page; in particular, the link referred to Adagio as a composition, and no further redirection was suggested for that, so I linked directly to Adagio, which was the only page available. So I am making no change. Go away until you have something relevant to say. Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cello Sonata (Poulenc) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• worklist found in Schmidt, Carl (1995): ''The music of Francis Poulenc (1899-1963) : a catalogue'' (Oxford: Clarendon Press, and is a cataloguing system, not a composer and/or publisher-applied [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:00, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Francesco Santoliquido may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ]<ref>published 1931 - ((OCLC|844361868))</ref>, a [[symphony]]<ref>announced as forthcoming (''erscheint demnächst'' in the 16 February 1921 issue of [[Melos]] (http://www.archive.org/stream/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stéphan Elmas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *6 [[Etudes]] (dedicated to Franz Liszt) (published 1884 by Wetzler of Wien<ref>((cite web|url=http://anno.onb.ac.at/cgi-content/anno-buch?

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Conrad Beck may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• OCLC|730050049))), though the print was received by ''Hofmeisters Monatsberichte'' in January 1931.)</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for tagging this, so that I found it while prowling round CAT:HOAX. I have nominated it for deletion - formal notice below. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. I've been and remain interested in the music of composers similar to Eschenbach-as-described (similar at least in a general way) - who were notable enough to write about for Wikipedia, of course, and who, preferably, actually existed ;). (Given some of the people I have started articles about, that former boundary is not exactly unhoppable, or wasn't at the time.) All the more reason to make sure the hoaxes (attribution and entire) are known for what they are, then... Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gottfried Eschenbach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gottfried Eschenbach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Schissel, I noticed that you had typeset the bassoon part of the Theodor Sick Septet no. 1 (op 25). I'm in the process of typesetting a complete score and a set of parts, but I figured I'd check if you were working on the rest, so as not to duplicate efforts. ps. do you know anything about Sick? I found nothing on a quick internet search, but the septet looks pretty good. Thanks, Rgotlib Rgotlib (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was working on more but I've set it aside, other projects to do... go ahead! There's a Danish biography of Sick linked to from the DKB website, let me see... well, there's Wikipedia (Danish) (which uses the other bio I referred to as reference, I think.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ok, thanks. I'll put it up on imslp when it's done. Rgotlib (talk) 18:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Neat, looking forward to it. Another thing someone should consider, I keep thinking, is asking the DKB to scan at least one of the many other chamber works by Sick they hold - quite a few string quartets, violin sonatas, cello sonatas, etc., mostly also only in manuscript, listed in their catalog... (the use of "Th. B. Sick" on the manuscripts, together with duplicated opus numbers related to different works and some other stuff, that maybe we're not talking about one composer but maybe two with the same initials- brothers, maybe?... don't know... ... anyway...) Schissel | Sound the Note! 21:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm all for that. I play cello, and I'd be very interested in seeing those cello sonatas. Do you have any pull with the DKB? (I'm stuck on long island...) Rgotlib (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I gather anyone (it helps to know Danish- which I really don't) can sign up for an account there and request for a work to be digitized. I think... Schissel | Sound the Note! 00:39, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry to keep bothering you, but another question: I just realized that it was you who had scanned in the Fritz Kauffmann cello concerto. I've made a piano reduction, and played it a few times with pianists: it seems a worthy composition. I just completed typesetting the orchestral parts for the first movement (with a view toward playing it with an orchestra), and I wonder: do you know if orchestral parts were available wherever you acquired the score? 24.187.199.178 Rgotlib (talk) 18:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The source of my scan was Sibley Library (or as it shows up at IMSLP, "US-R" - US- Rochester.) The Fleisher Collection of the Free Library of Philadelphia does have the parts, though (see Free Library Link.) That section of the library only loans out to institutions, though... The solo cello part, and piano reduction, are at some other libraries (University of Southern California, for instance.) (Other works of Kauffmann's listed by, but not always at, e.g. the Library of Congress catalog include a symphony in A minor Op.18 (pub.1886), piano sonatas (opp.7, 11 pub. 1882, 1883), piano trios (trio no.1 op.9 pub.1881, 1trio no.2 op.20, pub.1887), a string quartet Op.14 (which IMSLP has...), three other concertos- for piano and violin I think (a concerto in D minor Op.27 for violin pub. in 1894, a 2nd violin concerto pub.1909, a piano concerto in C minor Op.25 pub. in 1893), a Dramatic Overture for orchestra Op.23, and an Abendmusik for string quartet (etc.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 05:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings and best wishes from Amsterdam. I just made Moerans Symphony in G minor (Moeran) on the dutch version with most of the details of this English article. However coming to Boults version, I disagree. Boult recorded the work with the New Philharmonia Orchestra for Lyrita, see Amazon LP. The London P as mentioned in the article was "used" for the other works on the Lyrita cd-release.If I am wrong please let me know.Ceescamel (talk) 21:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll look into it. At a guess: (1) you're very likely right (2) Amazon.com is not generally a source I'd rely on, however. I've found some outright temporally impossible statements at sites like Amazon, ImdB (and here, too, but, well, easier to fix them here, relatively, I think...

But getting back to topic, I'd use something more official for a source, if one can be found- either a book about Boult, perhaps, with a discography; or a library catalog card entry. Also fallible - library catalog entries have some interesting misattributions, though librarians are on-the-whole willing to discuss and fix them, if convinced, I find..., but on the whole, I think, better than some other sources anyway. (My only contribution to the Moeran symphony article here, I believe, was the date of publication of the score, by the way :) - but happy to discuss!... ) Ah! There it is. OCLC 10632467 . Schissel | Sound the Note! 22:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Normally Amazon is not a favorite source, but they had an original copy of the Lyrita-LP cover (as Ebay had). I tried to find the backcover of the Lyrita CD but couldnot find it. Discogs mentioned the NPO as well, but again no picture. I only have the Handley/Ulster cd of this strange work.Ceescamel (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Schissel, I know you are the main author of Allan Pettersson. I've rearranged and added some parts of the Article and References. Can you please take a look at that, as I'm not a native English speaker. Thanks 109.90.188.105 (talk) 14:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bohuslav Martinů may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• date=June 2013))<ref>Note: Simon, p.38 provides some of the information here but not quite all (the timeline pp.15-26 does not give such exact information about this work's composition beginning

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings, the result of reading some different pages....I was working on articles of some not well-known Norwegian composers for the Dutch Wiki. They were named in an ad for Ny Musik in the Aftenposten of 19.12.1917. In that ad was named Romance for violin eller cello og piano by Windingstad. Publisher Oluf By. In a later edition of the newspaper (probably evening) there was also an article about new works of December 1917 (by Hjalmar Borgstrom). Then going to IMLSP (I lost my password there) I found the sheet music without the full name of the composer and the year of publishing. Well, composer was Thorleif Windingstad, an organist (and for a year mayor) from (of) Sandefjord. He was the father of the more famous conductor Ole Windingstad. Here is the link to [Aftenposten]. I don't know if it works directly, otherwise type "Aftenposten 1917.12.19" in "Search", chose "Aviser". Ceescamel (talk) 12:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! - have started to incorporate it, will do so more later when my computer is happier with me. :) Schissel | Sound the Note! 13:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rondo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• as a form, in many a classical-era aria.)<ref>Thorpe Davie, ''Musical Structure and Design''.)</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't know what you mean by "maps from territories and pointers from things themselves". If you could specify which edit/edit summary you're talking about, it would help.

In general, publication date (when available), much like author, title, etc. is an integral piece of the publication information about a given work when that work is cited as a source. It makes no sense to leave it out, but to note when an editor accessed the source, any more than it makes sense to persistently omit the name of the author, both of which are practices that I've observed on the part of many editors. Nightscream (talk) 03:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there again. I was working on the the dutch version of Isle of the Dead (Rachmaninoff). It seemed the date of first performance was wrong there (1919). Both a biographer as Schott-Music mention 18th of april 1909 (link on the dutch). IMSLP however mentions first of may 1909. Maybe you can do something with that, I am not a member of IMSLP anymore.Ceescamel (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hopefully a scholarly biography of the composer, or a dissertation about the piece, can shed some light on the discrepancy and give a settled answer. I'll try to have a look. Schissel | Sound the Note! 11:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

April 18 1909 for the first version, according to "Sergei Rachmaninoff: A Lifetime in Music" p157. then revised the tonepoem and conducted it in December 1909 in Chicago (p163). Schissel | Sound the Note! 02:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh hold on a minute... 1909 Russia OS NS, Julian Grego... Oh no... we standardize on Gregorian here but which is the author above using? that may be why Schissel | Sound the Note! 02:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry to bother you again about IMSLP. I am writing an article about Aton Averkamp and saw his composition Elaine und Lancelot there (loaded by you). The first performance ("voor het eerst") took place in Utrecht on march 16th 1898 (woensdag). It was reviewed in a dutch newspaper of march 19th (zaterdag)].Ceescamel (talk) 11:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, very very helpful information- have updated the page! Please, apologies quite unnecessary, far from... Schissel | Sound the Note! 12:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello again, I am working through two Dutch music guides from 1911 and 1881. There I saw the name Appy (Appij). I worked through the entire family (a lot musicians there). Looking at IMSLP I saw you were looking for information about this composer. Well together with the man behind another composer site and a site of Rochester musicians I came to the article nl:Henri Appy. I read some dutch and american newspapers as well. The date of birth in the article was controlled by me in the Civil registration, because it differs from site to site.Ceescamel (talk) 09:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks much again! Have incorporated the changes @ IMSLP Schissel | Sound the Note! 02:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On the IMSLP there is some discussion about his name. His real name is Marinus Hendrik van 't Kruijs. His birth certificate is number 15 on this page. His calling name was Marius. Some data can be found on nl:Marius van 't Kruijs.Ceescamel (talk) 15:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted in the discussion area with credit and links. Much appreciated again! Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:30, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There I am again. On IMSLP his date of passing away is wrong. He died on the 12th November. On Familysearch, akte 171, line 7, "twaalfden", and in the newspapers "12den". If he died on the 16th it would be very morbide:-).Ceescamel (talk) 10:31, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll look into making that change soon, thanks again. In seriousness shouldn't you consider getting a new account on IMSLP? In fact, when I started on that site all I did, at first, was edit, fix, didn't try to upload anything until quite awhile later - if I remember. Schissel | Sound the Note! 12:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Schissel. Answer to the above. Writing about the dutch musicians hard enough. The way the program of IMSLP works, was too difficult for me, but who knows in the future. The work above Roussel is dedicated to Marix Loevensohn, a famous Belgium celloplayer. During a long period he was solocellist of the Concertgebouworchestra. He is described now on the dutch nl:Marix Loevensohn (sometimes spelled Loewensohn).Ceescamel (talk) 09:36, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Schissel. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hell again, I just made nl:Jules ten Brink for the dutch Wikipedia. On IMSLP there is some discussion about his date of passing away. In the dutch article there is a link to Le Menestrel, with an obituary (necrologie). Le Menestrel was coming out on sunday feb 10th; the obituary names mecredi (Wednesday). So he died the 6th. I changed somewhat on IMSLP the last months, but such a correction is (still) too difficult for me. Greetings,Ceescamel (talk) 12:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• And misplace the keys... well, I was warned about that. - Schissel (who can only log in from Chrome at home and that only temporarily, so...)

Hi Schissel.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Schissel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings. In 2007, you sent a newbie greeting with an admonition to this editor. As it turns out, this editor did just a handful of edits to classical music articles, including this one to Fritz Kreisler. Your comments to this 'brief encounter' editor indicate a knowledge of classical music. You'll notice that the edit reads like a copy and paste, plus it uses the non-descriptive term 'expansive tempi!' If you know where to find better descriptions of information of this sort, or know folks who specialize in cleaning up this sort of (imagine a polite term), please do Wikipedia a favor and fix Kreisler and, if possible, the other articles edited by this person. Regards, Tapered (talk) 11:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Apologies- will look into it soon :( !! Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

classical chamber cello music

Thank you for quality articles on classical music and its composers, such as Cello Sonata No. 1 (Brahms), Allan Pettersson and Ernst Pepping, for expamding cello sonata and Max Reger, for "I love this place and the atmosphere it creates", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1734 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Schissel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings from the Netherlands again. I made the Dutch version of Symphony No. 6 (Bax) and there are some differences in orchestration and premiere. Reading the printed score on IMSLP there are indeed 3 flutes, but flute 3 is also playing the piccolo (see page 2 of part 1; change to flute). The clarinet III is also playing the Es-clarinet (also mentioned in the early pages of part 1). Strange is that IMSLP takes the orchestration of the Wikipedia, while there have the printed score. For the premiere Foreman and Parlett mentioned the London Philharmonic Orchestra at the Royal Philharmonic Society. The Royal Philharmonic did not existed then (only from 1946). Please confirm my marks and change the article on Wiki and IMSLP if I am right. For me, Bax's 3 is the best.Ceescamel (talk) 11:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Edited @ IMSLP and noted on the talk page here @ Wikipedia. Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for correcting my mistakes. Especially with the grammar. Re fortune/misfortune thanks for that also. I have aphasia and it is crazy sometimes spending ten minutes on a sentence figuring out the best way to express what I want to say.Rybkovich (talk) 17:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings again. I made the Dutch version of Jacques Gregoir. It is strange that you and the Ca-version name him "Jacques". Also IMSLP names him that way. However, all the sheetmusic there carries the name Joseph/Jos. Gregoir. This name is mentioned on the Fr and in the Hofmeister-collection. I leave it to you, if you want to change it.Ceescamel (talk) 14:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Thanks. Raising the issue for discussion on the IMSLP page for starters, and will do so here on Wikipedia as well. (My time is somewhat limited at the moment by a move upcoming - in two days - but I will keep this in mind :) ) Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:39, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll just note that

• until and unless I figure out a way to turn off 2-factor authentication (... nope)
• then once my browsers (edit: Chrome on desktop; the others seem to have lost it already) lose my "saved-for-several-months" login info,
• I will no longer be able to connect to Wikipedia probably ever again (for a simple reason: Google authenticators seem to be broken on my phone, and ------ if I have been able to fix it. So no more logging into Wikipedia the next time my browsers all ask me for my password and my authentication keys, for I shall be unable to provide. So it goes. Bye in advance.)

Hee. I can't even disable 2-factor authentication from the one computer and browser on which I am logged in, because it demands a code from my authentication device which I can no longer supply. Well, I was warned about this- that if I lost my authentication keys I would lose my account unrecoverably (at least, once this login expires in x days.) So goes. Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Schissel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is the same person, different account, as I no longer have access to my old account, having accidentally locked myself out. Feel free to remove privileges. ELSchissel (talk) 08:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:00, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]