User:Seabuckthorn/Archive Header
Hi Seabuckthorn. Just wanted to say thanks up-front for taking on 3 of my GANs. I was just wondering when someone might take the first one ... and you've grabbed the lot! Excellent! Best, JG66 (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
I also want to give my thanks. I'd give you a reviewer's barnstar, but it seems you've already got one. Thanks again! Erick (talk) 01:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
For your quick review of my GANs. Cheers! — Simon (talk) 10:32, 5 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hey Seabuckthorn. I hope you saw my reply on Talk:Don't Let Me Wait Too Long/GA1 – thanks again for your help with the article. As I mention in that message, I got to thinking about an alternative solution re the lead vs article-body issue, and what I've recently done is to remove some of the text from, say, Release – which I realise now makes much more sense than filling up the lead. Just wanted to explain that here, and be up-front about it all. It's not as if I've made major changes to the article, but I am conscious that the changes have occurred within a day of you passing it for GA. Please feel free to comment if you've got any new concerns, of course. Personally, I'm really happy with it, and I'm glad you brought up the issue, because it led me to make the discussion more focused.
I'll be addressing the other two GARs shortly. I just had to finish work on another song article first – to make sure my head was sufficiently clear to receive incoming information from you, rather than focusing on outputting details in the new article. (All done, so I can flick the switch now!) Thanks, Seabuckthorn – see you on the GAR page(s) … JG66 (talk) 04:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar | ||
For your excellent reviews on both Leave Home and "Temptations" (song), I am pleased to give you The Premium Reviewer Barnstar since you strictly follow the good article critiera. You've also been awarded The Reviewer Barnstar three times, meaning you definitely qualify for this barnstar. Cheers! CrowzRSA 19:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Seabuckthorn, thought you'd like to know that I've addressed your comments at Talk:Sesame Workshop/GA1. Thanks so much! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey thanks for the quick and comprehensive review of Rocket to Russia. I believe that I fixed the issue in the lead, so if there's anything else don't hesitate to ask :)!!! CrowzRSA 22:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Can you review an article for me? Kaleidoscopic God (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Seabuckthorn, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! AdmrBoltz 19:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your review at Talk:Bath Assembly Rooms/GA1 I've revised the lead, combined some short paras & expanded the PD-art licence. Do you think these are what is needed?— Rod talk 10:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey I really really appreciate you reviewing these past few Ramones albums, its really speeding up the process getting their studio albums to good topic. I responded to the comments on Talk:Road to Ruin (Ramones album)/GA1.
By the way, if you're interested, you could put a few comments/opinions on the Ramones featured article candidacy. Only if you feel like it though! If you ever want anything reviewed or something, I'll do it for free ;)
Again, thanks!!! CrowzRSA 19:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
The Reviewer's Barnstar | ||
For your most thorough and painstaking reviews of Charles Allen Thomas and Francis Birch (geophysicist). Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for your GA review of Language planning and policy in Singapore. I understand that the article is currently far from meeting the GA criteria, but would appreciate a more thorough review, so I know what specifically needs to be done to improve it. Looking forward to your review of Kelvin Tan, which, unlike the language articles, was actually written by me. --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 15:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
I want to praise you for your review style. Very well prepared. Thanks for looking into this. Keep it up. MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing those three GA noms for me. I'm going to be very busy at work over the next three or four weeks, but I'll have some time in the evenings to respond to comments. If you want to take them one-at-a-time, that might be easier. Your call, though. If you want to do them all at once, I'll try my best to keep up. Thanks again, --Coemgenus (talk) 14:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
My thanks as well for the reviews on Marcel Pronovost and Martin Gélinas. Much appreciated! Resolute 00:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the GA assessment on the Landing at Anzac Cove article. Drink up and Cheers! Jim Sweeney (talk) 01:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC) |
--Connormah (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
/span>]]
Dear Seabuckthorn,
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 11:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the articles, I look forward to the reviews.--WillC 00:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for quickly and diligently getting the GA reviews for Abbey Road, Mellotron and Rhodes Piano done, and for some good advice on how to improve prose. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I am really sorry for bothering you, but I was wondering if you could take my GAN BlackBerry Bold 9700. It's alright if you don't have the time or simply don't want to, I understand. :) Prism △ 19:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing Francisco Rafael Arellano Félix! Happy editing. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 05:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC) |
Thank you for your reviews of my GA nominations (Agapemonites and Stoke sub Hamdon Priory). I didn't expect them to be reviewed so quickly.— Rod talk 08:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey Seabuckthorn, thank you for taking time from your busy schedule to review several of my Good Article nominations! I look forward to working with you throughout the process of getting all these articles up to Good Article status! Thanks again! -- Caponer (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)