This user may have left Wikipedia. Seb26 has not edited Wikipedia since 22 September 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives — 2007: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12

2008: 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · last revision

2009: —

2010: —

2011: —

Start new topic · E-mail · Other methods of contact

Hi Spebi,

Glad to see you're back, though I also see you're very busy. I remember a while back feeling very alone in the world of Wikipedia, as I thought we'd lost you for good. I'm happy to see I was wrong about that.

This is mainly a heads-up for you regarding the Wikipedia article on 'Economic democracy'. I might need help with that in the future. For several years, I've actually been the primary editor of that article. But recently, some others have apparently taken an interest. Good for them. I have no objection to that. In fact, I welcome their assistance.

But like most people, they seem to have an axe to grind, and they tend to dump all of their opinions in the Lead Section of the article. Am I mistaken in assuming this is inappropriate, according to Wikipedia guidelines? When you have time, perhaps you could check the revision history and the discussion page for the article, and let me know what you think of my responses to their approach.

On the discussion page, I've also noticed that "this article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives and WikiProject Business, collaborative efforts to improve the coverage of Cooperatives and Business on Wikipedia" -- but "this article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale and as Low-importance on the project's importance scale".

What that mean? Is the article really that bad? What needs to be done to improve it? Criticism is all fine and good, but it doesn't help much without specific guidelines for correcting the problem.

Can you help? I'm an amateur, not an expert, and like you I have a 'real life' outside of Wikipedia that demands a great deal of my time. So very respectfully, what do I need to do to bring this article up to Wikipedia standards?

Many thanks for any help you can provide. You might still have my email address. If so, please use it. Thank you.

David Kendall (talk) 01:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, last time you were renamed, several double redirects were created:

Since these pages are protected, they have not yet been fixed. You may wish to unprotect them and/or fix the double redirects yourself. Thanks Gurch (talk) 01:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done. Seb26 (talk) 01:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! We're having a Canberra Wikimeetup on 20 November 2011 at Siren Bar in Gunghalin from 2pm to 4pm. It's most just a chance to chat with other local Wikipedians, get a chance to go a different sort of bar (which is reasonably kid friendly, serves real food, and has non-alcholic options), and, if you're interested, learning more about what Wikimedia Australia and local GLAM projects are happening. We'd love to see you and any Wikipedia/Wikimedia/wiki loving friends you have there. --LauraHale (talk) 07:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, don't misunderstand me, I think that page Bangla (band) was not so unimportant. That band reflects a time of rebirth or reconstruction of old Baul songs in current century. It was an inspiration to the other indie bands to redo baul songs and their influence on the culture of Bengal. Also it was important as they reflects the social situations of Bangladesh at that time. I think more care should be taken before a complete remove. You may compact if there was other pages related to it. Subhendu.luv (talk) 18:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WikiPlate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Newtalkpost has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 05:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WilliamH (talk) 17:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Hope everything's well. I was searching for the article titled Bangla (band) and found that it was deleted by you on 20 December 2007 because of lack of significance of the band. I want to rewrite the article with providing proper reliable sources claiming the band's notability. It would be helpful for me if you can userfy the deleted article in the draft space User:Kmzayeem/Bangla (band). Thanks --Zayeem^talk 12:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Primarysourcesleft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Canberra Meetup Next: 9 January 2013 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.

Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Category:Brand New, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Powderfinger for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. YuMaNuMa ^Contrib 10:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Canberra Meetup Next: 24 February 2013 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.

Details and attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:14, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to ((infobox road)). Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Notitle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Quiddity (talk) 02:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Donelink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Codename Lisa (talk) 18:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T:RFPP. Since you had some involvement with the T:RFPP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 17:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Chaser's War on Everything, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. CR4ZE (t • c) 12:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Annastacia Palaszczuk qld mp.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Jimbo Wales/Facebook/feed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 103.6.156.167 (talk) 16:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Jimbo Wales/Facebook/section+ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 103.6.156.167 (talk) 16:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Jimbo Wales/Facebook/topinfo and 8 other pages that you created, have been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales/Facebook/Wdefcon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jimbo Wales/Facebook/topinfo during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 103.6.156.167 (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Canberra Meetup Next: 17 February 2016 This box: view talk edit

Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee (talk) 02:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee (talk) 11:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Seb26. I'm just posting to let you know that Powderfinger discography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 20:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Australian rock music

Thank you for quality articles on rock bands and their music such as Powderfinger, for authors' templates, for maintaining portals New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory, for welcoming new users and fighting vandalism, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

Miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 1610 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry I was trying to create a link with my name and copying and pasting I dubbed some names and so after I noticed I deleted them,I thought I had canceled duplicates. I'm very sorry for the fact. Miloo.amila — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miloo.amila (talk • contribs) 17:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Responded on Meta seb26 (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will there a chance to go back with the changes made? Or compare new editions with old version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miloo.amila (talk • contribs) 06:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Whole day of 19/05/2017 has been deleted? Because I don't see any signature made during that day. Not only mine but also others

In response to Seb26 last response:Tell me if you want a help because I have somehow remedied my mistakes

My I use your post here as a boilerplate while working OTRS backlogs ? - FlightTime (open channel) 16:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sounds ok, seb26 (talk) 18:52, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've undeleted all four files. If any one of them turns out not to have a valid permission, just let me know and I'll undelete it immediately. Nyttend (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyttend, thanks, I marked 3 as pending while I wait for a follow up, and File:NewYorkIntellectuals 1987.png as speedy delete because permission simply wasn't going to happen. If you don't get to it, that is fine, I'm sure another admin will could also eventually handle it. Cheers. seb26 (talk) 02:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Got it; thanks! Nyttend (talk) 02:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry for the new images, I thought they looked better, I forgot to ask other people if this was fine to change. Also, my edit summary was actually meant to "If you don't like it, then reverse the edit and it's fine." JoaoPedro10029 (talk) 16:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)JoaoPedro10029Reply[reply]

Responded on your talk page. seb26 (talk) 17:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't think that's worth a revdel yet but if these edits keep reoccuring we might want to semi-protect the article. Would you like to watch the page or should I do that? De728631 (talk) 19:59, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

De728631, you are welcome to keep an eye on it as I think you are in a better position to look after it being admin/potentially more active than me. Thank you though. Although I suspect it was a random hit-and-run IP edit who isn't coming back, given that IP's very sporadic contributions (once this year, vandalism in 2008). Cheers, seb26 (talk) 20:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alright. I've added it to my list. De728631 (talk) 20:07, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Seb26. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo political party FARC Colombia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quote: "(Ahr was not Swedish; he simply had Swedish heritage. He was born and lived his entire life in the U.S., so he is an American (moreover, source claiming "American-Swedish" makes no mention of his citizenship or ancestry))" -Drown Soda

AKA, common sense, and something that shouldn't of been there in the first place, so you can piss right off, you bloody troll. Hell Hawk (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hell Hawk, hi, that was the kind of researched response that was required in the first place -- so good on Drown Soda for doing that. Removing information without explanation like on your part, however, was not helpful in the slightest, even if you were right. Neither was your language. Don't swear at me on my talk page. Thanks. seb26 (talk) 07:29, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Removing information without explanation like on your part, however, was not helpful in the slightest, even if you were right." No, sorry but being right is the whole, and ONLY point. Don't go undoing correct edits.Hell Hawk (talk) 07:33, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't think you're really in a position to be telling me what is right at the moment. You should have never made the above comments targeting me and it's astonishing you haven't even acted to retract them or apologise for it. That would be the right thing to do. With regards to the actual topic, if you read my talk page message, you would see that I invited you to comment and explain your original removal of content in a discussion on the talk page. That is usually what is expected when people make deletions without explanations. Another user happened to intervene and explain on your behalf. So that's good. Thanks, seb26 (talk) 07:39, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I explained it, you reverted it for no reason. There was no info in the first place to suggest he was Swedish (beyond partial ancestry which is not relevant). Again, DO NOT UNDO CORRECT EDITS. That is helpful to ABSOLUTELY NO ONE. If you're not sure someone's wrong, DON'T CHANGE IT. Hell Hawk (talk) 07:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hell Hawk: Please kindly stop replying in this section. This is my last reply as well. I don't want to participate in a project where people can freely attack and insult others (in reference to your above comments: "so you can piss right off, you bloody troll" [1]). Thanks, seb26 (talk) 07:49, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. We (the Research Team at Wikimedia Foundation) are building an algorithm that will align Wikipedia article sections across languages. For improving this algorithm we need the help of multilingual Wikipedia editors to provide true statements to the algorithm. You are contacted because based on your Babel template and/or content translation tool usage you know at least two of the following languages: ar (Arabic), fr (French), ja (Japanese), en (English), es (Spanish), ru (Russian).

(Note: by clicking the links in the following paragraph, you will be taken to Google spreadsheet.) If you'd like to help us with translating a subset of the section titles on or before 2018-05-01, please read and follow the instructions. If you see instructions in another language, please scroll down to find your preferred language. If you have questions about this message, you can contact us via Diego. Thank you! :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.55% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for April: April+Further with Art+Feminism Archaeology Military history (contest) Geofocus: Indian subcontinent Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 12:23, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Matangi/Maya/M.I.A., Seb26!

Wikipedia editor VerifiedCactus just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Summary could use a bit of work, bullet points don't seem sufficient.

To reply, leave a comment on VerifiedCactus's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

The Verified Cactus 100% 23:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matangi/Maya/M.I.A., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melbourne Film Festival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Seb26. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Portal:Australia portals, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Australia portals and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Australia portals during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Portal:Australia portals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 02:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Portal:Powderfinger, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Powderfinger (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Powderfinger during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 03:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Portal:Australia portals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal which would be subject to speedy deletion if it were an article.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Portal:Knitting, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Knitting and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Knitting during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:51, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:AndySymonds (crop).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Button ·wrap.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Northern Territory portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Monty Hall Diagram.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:New RFCU request has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 04:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]