Hello, Seen a Mike, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((Help me)) before the question. Again, welcome! -RFD (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Seen a Mike! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wisconsin Assembly District 58, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please explain why you created this account rather than continue using your original account User:Seen a Tina. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the explanation at WP:REFUND. I have blocked the old account as abandoned, and redirected the user and talk pages to your new account. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It doesn't appear that you provided an edit summary explaining your recent edits to Walker's BLP. Please explain the specific reason(s) for your edits in the article Talk, so we can discuss. Thanks.CFredkin (talk) 23:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... David A. Clarke, Jr. The article uses the person's campaign website (http://www.thepeoplessheriff.com/) and a YouTube video of a commercial as sources for quotes. Is this OK? It seems like since they are quotes about the person, said by the person, and are not being used to mislead, they should be alright. To me, it makes more sense to take quotations from the primary source directly, rather than use a secondary source (if one is available). Anybody able to offer some guidance on if primary sources are acceptable or preferred for quotations such as those that appear within this article? Thanks!

*Seen a Mike* 20:30, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This should best be discussed on the article talk page. Personally I'm highly skeptical about the use of such sources in the biography of a living person. If secondary sources discuss those aspects of his biography, those should be used to provide necessary context. If no secondary sources discuss those aspects, they probably are not important enough to be mentioned in the Wikipedia article in the first place. The relevant policy is WP:BLPPRIMARY, which also urges caution. Regarding the YouTube videos the situation is unambiguous, however: YouTube is not a reliable source, the videos are not uploaded by Clarke himself or some reliable source (such as, say, the official channel of a news organization). There is no way of telling what happened to those videos. They should be removed immediately. In fact, I'll do so. Huon (talk) 20:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the feedback Huon, and for taking care of the YouTube video on your own. I may research and try to find a different source for the quotes, as they were widely discussed in the local area. I'll do some research on all the quotes. I have opened a discussion on the article talk page, as you suggested. *Seen a Mike* 21:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:2A02:8109:1700:1C49:57A:620D:5184:4593, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 23:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yep, just forgot. Thanks, User:Wtwilson3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seen a Mike (talk • contribs) 21:16, 24 August 2014‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem. If I bump into you again I'll follow WP:DTTR  ;-) —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 22:05, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:2A02:8109:1700:1C49:57A:620D:5184:4593 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Thank you.
> Please read IPv6. -- 32.218.41.52 (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, User:Wtwilson3 had already pointed out that I was mistaken. I don't need to be warned about it for making a simple mistake. And it wasn't a mistake made through not using the sandbox. I think you could be more constructive and Assume good faith. *Seen a Mike* 21:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ask User talk:2A02:8109:1700:1C49:57A:620D:5184:4593 whether your warning was constructive or whether it assumed good faith. Just a note to be more cautious and less eager to jump to conclusions in your interactions with other editors. 32.218.33.58 (talk) 00:36, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was following the instructions as detailed WP:Username_policy#Talk_to_the_user. I did not realize that "uw" indicated a warning. It was the template suggest for drawing attention to a username, while not assuming bad faith. *Seen a Mike* 19:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Seen a Mike, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Draft:American Health Care Reform Act of 2013 has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. The problematic material was most of a paragraph taken verbatim from a Huffington Post article. Thank you. Revent^talk 02:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In a recent edit to the page Harry Potter, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 05:21, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My mistake. I hadn't seen the word "instalment" before and just thought it was a typo. Thanks for correcting! *Seen a Mike* 21:30, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eisenbahn State Trail, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

American Health Care Reform Act of 2013, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 12:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, Bot-face! I corrected it to point to the Caucasian race page. *Seen a Mike* 18:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phosacetim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compound. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Got me again, Bot-face! I corrected it to point to the chemical compound page. *Seen a Mike* 21:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Just to let you know, I reverted one of your edits at this article. Please see the discussion at WP:FILMOGRAPHY regarding why rowspans can malfunction in sortable tables. Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 22:27, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Field Report, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marigold. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

'Edited by Wikipedia editors' doesn't qualify. Tutelary (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Human echolocation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Curious George: A Very Monkey Christmas

added a link pointing to B.J. Ward

Do Something

added a link pointing to Life of the Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Tungsten ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:54, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi- I was asked by an IP editor to change the titles; the IP editor was able to do it because of the West Bend, Wisconsin article is protected and only editors who logged in can make the changes. Okay-I am wondering why you made the changes? The early Wisconsin Blue Books and obituaries of Wisconsin Legislators have used either assemblyman or assemblywomen. Would you please let myself know why you may the changes? Thank you-RFD (talk) 22:39, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello RFD. I made changes to the titles because they were inconsistent. Most were listed as "Wisconsin State Assemblyman", except for one which was listed simply as "State Assemblyperson". I prefer to keep information concerning in which house the person served. It seems relevant. Perhaps "Assembly Member" would be a better title, as the WI Constitution refers to them as members? *Seen a Mike* 16:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Many thanks-I have no problems with the changes. However, I hope the IP editor who requested the changes will contact you. The West Bend, Wisconsin article is protected and the IP editor can not edit unless he/she is a register user. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cuisine of the Midwestern United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Booyah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Seen a Mike. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Seen a Mike. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]