Hi Selmaflora294! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hello, Selmaflora294, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ((helpme))
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
You may wish to consider whether or not making claims about what other editors believe or are influenced by is accurate before you make public proclamations about it. The assertion of any impact on another editor is completely untrue.
In addition the removal of content, including "sourced" content, that is placed in a way that creates an impression that the sources make claims that they in fact do not expressly make is not allowed. I am willing to bet the of the 25 million who watched the game, 5 watched because of George being involved: His mother, his sister, his PR agent, his significant other and his father, although its probably closer to 4 because his father was going to watch the game anyway. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:49, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
There is no such thing going on, you prematurely have come to conclusions. Just like you did about the viewership of the game. You seem to be someone who jumps the gun on things. Relax, take things a little less seriously. Selmaflora294 (talk) 02:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
my reply here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:29, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ngoesseringer. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC) |