Hello, why have you removed the templates that I put up to propose the merger of Frittole and Frittelle? – El Mono 🐒 (es.wiki account) 13:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@El Mono Español: Hello. Because the tags had been there for over a year, with no supporting statement from you or anyone else. If you want to try again, then please do, but in accordance with Wikipedia:Merging you should first create a discussion on either Talk page explaining why a merge is required. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for fixing my edit on ALCAPA. My eyes must have ben crossed! Leschnei (talk) 11:27, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Leschnei: You're welcome ;-) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect C-diff and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#C-diff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am alarmed that you are going round removing hatnotes that enable encyclopaedia users to go to a disambiguation page if the article they have found is not what they want. Why on earth do you think these are not needed? I have reverted you on Brest, France - and this gives a good example of why the hatnote is needed. Given that Wikipedia is full of links to the wrong article, it is important to point out to the reader that there is a disambiguation page. It is also helpful to the reader who chooses one option on the disambiguation page, but then thinks they have the wrong one, to navigate back (relevant on some mobile devices).

Cany you identify any actual harm done by the hatnotes you are removing? If there is none, why not leave them there? ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 13:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ThoughtIdRetired: Please read WP:NAMB – I referred to it in my edit summary – It is usually preferable not to have a hatnote when the name of the article is not ambiguous. "Brest, France" is not ambiguous (there's only one Brest in France), there are no ambiguous redirects that target it, and it is not a good example of why a hatnote is needed. No-one is going to navigate to Brest, France if they wanted Brest, Belarus, for example. If they didn't know what Brest they wanted they'd land at Brest, the disambiguation page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I had just modified my Twinkle preferences and mistakenly rollbacked your edits on Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 8. Sorry. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 14:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, if you're condensing hatnotes like you did here, there's a better way: please consider using ((hatnote group)) to condense hatnotes rather than manually specifying the hatnote with ((hatnote)) or other tricks. This method preserves the standard forms for hatnotes (including any integral error-checking) while still achieving less bloat at the top of the article. Hopefully this is helpful, ((Nihiltres |talk |edits)) 19:44, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nihiltres: That's very helpful: thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you feel the need to solve the 60 links to disambiguation pages in Template:Vajrayana created by the link Kriyayoga? You pushed on to change that link, so it is more then reasonable to ask you to solve the mess created. The Banner talk 11:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

With thanks to @TartarTorte: who got there before me ;-) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year!

Shhhnotsoloud,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 21:48, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 21:48, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vinkov and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § Vinkov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Shhhnotsoloud,

I hope you are doing well, this second week into 2023. I noticed that you didn't post a talk page notice to the page creator when you PROD'd this page for deletion. I'd like to encourage you, if you aren't already using it, to use Twinkle any time you tag a page for any kind of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/CFD/etc.). Once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post these talk page notices on your behalf and you don't need to worry about them. It has a lot of other great features that help with the administrative/reporting part of editing which you can explore.

If you are already familiar with Twinkle, well, I'm sorry for stating the obvious, just take this message as encouragement to always leave a talk page notice when you tag a page for deletion. Thank you and have a great year! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Shhhnotsoloud, hopes you are good!

Could you help with the correct process of Disambiguating links, on São Paulo (state)? I recently need to revert some edition on the article and looks like other user was working on disambiguating links in the meantime. I don't know how to fix this to him. It looks like you have the knowledge to help.

thank you so much! B777-300ER (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @B777-300ER: (and pinging @Rodw:). You are trying to revert edits by Kauã Haock but you have used Restore to also revert edits by Rodw. Rodw's edits were correct. You should revert your last edit and revert Kauã Haock's edits individually, or manually add back the work Rodw did. I'm going to try doing that for you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Some edits could not be undone. You'll have to do them manually. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 22:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much! B777-300ER (talk)

Hi Shhhnotsoloud, I have nominated the page Agbiz at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agbiz procedurally per the 2021 RfC on contested BLAR. My rationale for reverting the BLAR was that despite a lack of mention there seems to be a bit showing that Agbiz sees to be as shorthand for Agribusiness. Best! TartarTorte 20:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@TartarTorte: OK, thanks. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just received your message on proposed deletion of CPIM (disambiguation), which I think I have created. But by the time I noticed your message, the page was already deleted. I might not have any issues with the deletion but since history is not available for deleted pages, I won't be able to tell. Please allow for more time for the stakeholders to review your proposals before (unilaterally) making decisions. Aravind V R (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have removed the ((proposed deletion/dated)) tag from Nothing from Nothing (disambiguation), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add ((proposed deletion)) back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by R. S. Shaw (talk • contribs) 05:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you recently moved Dead air (disambiguation) to Dead Air. Would you mind explaining why? I think that since there's already a page at Dead air, moving the disambiguation page to something similar would cause confusion, especially to users who don't understand that capitalization matters in article titles. RteeeeKed💬📖 04:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello @RteeeeKed: this is actually a typical case of WP:DIFFCAPS. "Dead air" in sentence case or lower case is not ambiguous: there's only one article about it. "Dead Air" in title case is the ambiguous term. There's no primary topic so the disambiguation page is at the base name, Dead Air, and both Dead Air (disambiguation) and Dead air (disambiguation) redirect there. "Dead air" is listed at the top of that disambiguation page as a common use. This is quite common and WP:DIFFCAPS gives other examples. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see, carry on. RteeeeKed💬📖 17:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hylidae, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shubham Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shubham Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jax 0677 (talk) 20:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For the List of fictional intersex characters‎, List of horror television series with LGBT characters‎, List of dramatic television series with LGBT characters: 2020s‎, List of feature films with transgender characters‎, List of transgender characters in television‎, List of bisexual characters in anime‎, List of lesbian characters in anime‎, List of fictional asexual characters‎, List of fictional pansexual characters‎, List of lesbian characters in animation, List of bisexual characters in animation‎, List of dramatic television series with LGBT characters: 1960s–2000s‎, List of LGBT characters in radio and podcasts‎, List of made-for-television films with LGBT characters, List of comedy television series with LGBT characters‎, List of bisexual characters in television‎, List of gay characters in television‎, List of fictional lesbian characters‎, List of lesbian characters in television‎, History of LGBT characters in animation‎, and List of animated series with LGBT characters‎ pages, along with others.

I was under the impression that some of those hatnotes (I didn't create all of those on all of these pages, but a good deal of them) were ok, and no one ever said anything different. Perhaps I'll read WP:HN to clear up any misconceptions in the future. The only issue is that "see also" sections may be bulky and may need to be cut down. Historyday01 (talk) 16:13, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heelo @Historyday01: Hatnotes are intrusive: they impede the reader in getting to where they want to be. They should be short and are only required "to help readers locate a different article if the one they are at is not the one they're looking for". Happy editing! Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Yeah, many of those articles I only added hatnotes because I thought it "made sense", and realize what you do now, that hatnotes can be intrusive. So you are right that they should be short and only used sparingly. Historyday01 (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Shhhnotsoloud!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jerome, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sankar (writer & director), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankar (writer & director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Mountain people (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

((One other topic)) left unchecked for two months; even though I could add the book, currently it doesn't have an article, and I feel like hatnotes and WP:SMALLDETAILS would be enough to distinguish them. The Ik can be added as a hatnote as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 19:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mhm. Technically you are correct, but in the long we will have to restore it, the other books seems notable too. it:Il fumo di Birkenau. WP:BEFORE suggests sources exist. I might stub it, but I am busy. Who else... User:Buidhe? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I was confused on your decision to remove Subheading text and links to main articles on both of these pages. I was hoping you could explain your reasoning, I'd also like to mention I appreciate you moving Kristianstad School attack to "Kristianstad school attack".

Kind regards, Salutations25 (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)User:Salutations25Reply[reply]

@Salutations25:. You should read WP:HATNOTE on where and how to apply hatnotes, together with Template:Main. I don't think even a properly-formatted main hatnote is appropriate. You should also refer to Wikipedia:Manual of Style, specifically MOS:HEADINGS, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility has helpful tips: "Do not skip parts of the sequence, such as selecting levels for emphasis; this is not the purpose of headings". Prose generally reads better if it's not broken up in to single-sentence paragraphs.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I suppose I sort of understand, I am fairly new to making larger edits as in the past I mainly made minor edits using an IP. Thank you for these links, I'll need to read them.

Salutations25 (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The vast majority of incoming links are directed to the World War I blockade which was known by that name, and the article was the primary topic until moved in response to Talk:Blockade_of_Germany_(1914–1919)#Requested_move_8_September_2023 which had no support but moved anyway. I will initiate a RM but this avoids a metric tonne of disambigation links in WWI articles. Links to the WWII article were already correct. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• @GraemeLeggett: I know, but you can't just ignore an RM (which was properly constituted and received no opposition) because you don't like it. You're out of order: if your RM succeeds then revert me. Now please go back and undo your revert at Blockade of Germany because right now you're going to confuse readers who land there. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		Hello! I meant to send my appreciation earlier, but thank you for drafting the disambiguation page at Marsouin during the RfD discussion. It may not be much, but putting it together was a big help during the RfD. There was a lot of different possibilities to go with at that title, so thank you! Utopes (talk / cont) 01:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Shhhnotsoloud,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MicrobiologyMarcus, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Dunkard's Bottom, West Virginia for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|MicrobiologyMarcus)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 18:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]