Welcome!!! Pull up a chair, let's have a nice chat. I'm glad you called. I'll put the kettle on. SilkTork
I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. Barack Obama
Our text should arise as a summary of the reliable sources, rather than editors first deciding what they want to say and then looking for sources. Agricolae
I am open to recall, using Whpq's wording from their RfA: "if editors I trust and respect are telling me I should not be an admin, then I would voluntarily resign as an administrator."
I do not feel ECP on the page is necessary due to the relative infrequency of edits. I don't know how low it should be, but I propose no protection with pending changes. You can make it semi or no protection at all if you want but ECP is no longer necessary. If vandalism returns it could go higher. CharlieEdited (talk) 20:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a little hesitant to reduce protection on a highly visible article (over 110,000 pageviews a month) which has been subjected to high levels of vandalism (1,690 reverted edits), and even with current protection gets vandalised: [1]. The article has continued to grow since protection ([2]), so the protection in itself has not stopped editing - despite a comment on the talkpage saying that is the case. What has happened is the number of edits has declined - the bulk of which were reverted: [3], but the quality of the edits has proportionally increased. The Extended-confirmed-protected edit requests on the talkpage are working as intended - with speedy responses. Because, before the semi-protection, there were over 200 IP edits a year, it would inappropriate to apply PC, as that is too many edits to monitor (PC is intended for "infrequently edited articles"). However, let us try semi-protection without ECP to see how it goes. ECP has now been removed. SilkTork (talk) 09:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Wondering why you moved Bed-ins for peace to Bed-in. The "ins" indicates more than one, and 'for peace' summarizes the reasoning behind the performance artwork, so the full name seemed adequate and descriptive. Shouldn't this have been an RM (unless it was and I missed it)? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I came upon the article and noted that the name apparently didn't meet WP:CRITERIA, so I did some research on the use of the name, and after looking into it, I changed it to fit the criteria. Recognizability - the most common use is "bed-in". Naturalness - the most natural use is "bed-in". Precision - "bed-in" is precise and exact. Concision - there is no need for superfluous words such "for peace", as "bed-in" is all that is needed. Consistency - it matches Sit-in, Human Be-In, etc. It is singular as that is what we prefer per WP:SINGULAR. I followed common usage in reliable sources such as [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], etc. "Bed-In For Peace" is also used, and may be regarded as the "official" title for the two main events, though even when the official name is used, journalists prefer to then use the simpler form of "bed-in". We prefer WP:Common names over WP:OFFICIALNAMES, so go by most common usage. I did a Google search for "bed-ins for peace" (10,300 results), "bed-in for peace" ( 122,000 results), and "bed-in" (90,300,000 results), and found that pretty significant. I also noted that while bed-in was a well established redirect, and the incoming links (mostly from templates) used "bed-ins for peace", there were still an average of 15 daily visits to the page ([9]), which would mainly be coming from those typing in "bed-in". As per Wikipedia:Moving a page, I didn't think that moving the name would be controversial given the reasons given above, so made the move. SilkTork (talk) 13:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the full answer. Since this was a performance artwork as well as an anti-war protest the only question seems to be 'what did John and Yoko call it'. 'Bed-in' seems to be the overall descriptor of the type of event (Sit-in, not Nashville sit-in, Be-in, etc.) but was it the name of the event? If not then Bed-in would be fine as a redirect but not as the article's title, which should be the name that Lennon and Oko used at the time (was it "Bed-In for Peace"?). Randy Kryn (talk) 14:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yoko calls it a "bed-in": [10]. And I do recall at the time that Lennon called it a "bed-in" as he introduced it - something like "It's a bed-in folks". I recall seeing that on the news. Hang on - I'll see if I can find that. Yes: [11]. SilkTork (talk) 19:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Today's story is about education, 10 years OTD after lecturing our founder). Music for today's feast is Monteverdi's, the best concert we ever did (so pictured again on my talk), but it wasn't recorded, substituted with a "Pacific" one that comes with subtitles line by line in Latin and English: I learned something! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am largely retired on Wikipedia. I've done little of significance for a while. I interfere in minor things randomly as I consult the encyclopedia - adjust some phrasing or spelling, or fix a name. That's all. I do have vague intentions of taking some article to GA or FA, such as Brewing, which I have tinkered with for some years now. And if I am to invest some time on Wikipedia, I guess it would be to finish off stuff like Brewing. Good luck with getting what you are after Gerda. SilkTork (talk) 17:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let's see. For the violinist, I achieved three supports, - now I need an admin to move her to the template In the news, but I was out all day and just returned from choir rehearsal. When I don't go out, I usually do things myself. The Goehr article, however, is more than I can handle alone in the remaining five days until his death will be no longer regarded as recent. I'm more hopeful that we can be successful than when I called for help because I found that large portions are simply copied from his publisher's biography, and can simply be rephrased or quoted. I remembered him on his birthday, and noticed then already that the article was in bad shape, and wished him a long life that we won't get into the situation we now face ;) - Did you notice that my DYK for his opera in 2019 was on 26 August, - his day of death? - I hope you keep reading. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]