Hello Silverije, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

P.S. You might also want to join WikiProject Croatia. :-) Admiral Norton ^(talk) 19:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Dear Admiral Norton,

Thank you for Your message. I appreciate that very much.

Best Regards,

Admiral H. Nelson

(Sorry, I'm just kidding!) Silverije

No problem, if you need anything, just ask! :-) Admiral Norton ^(talk) 16:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Silverije. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 16:08, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See here; I think the person you are trying to contact is unlikely to see your message. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 17:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try contacting User:Joy, User:Marek69, or User:GregorB. I don't really know any of those people very well, but they are all members of the Croatia wikiproject who seem to be highly active users right now. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 20:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea what you were talking about, or how you thought that I could help you communicate to a completely different user. I see now just above that someone explicitly suggested that. Well, what can I say, I live in a city of a million people, even if Admiral Norton also lives here, that simply doesn't imply that I know how to contact him. :) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed you've done a fair amount of castles-related work so you're certainly qualified and might be interested in improving the List of castles in Croatia to featured-list status. You may want to take a look at User_talk:Kebeta#Re:_Congratulations for more details and perhaps also leave a message there... GregorB (talk) 07:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very good! Did you see my discussion with Kebeta (linked above)? Is that plan thus far generally fine with you? GregorB (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, these are not more than random ideas anyway - we'll see how it will all work out. Well, great then - I'll notify Kebeta, and further discussion will take place in the article's talk page. GregorB (talk) 17:59, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please insert a proper reference to Belaj's work after the paragraph you added to Chiprovtsi#Antiquity and Middle Ages? I saw there was a reference mentioned in the paragraph, but that's not quite how it works, and I was unable to determine what kind of reference it is exactly. Also, please use ((cite book)), ((cite journal)) and the like. Thanks! :) Todor→Bozhinov 12:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Toдor Boжinov — 13:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, nice work and a very good addition to the article, I must say! There's no need to be quick, like we say in Bulgaria, "the hasty bitch gives birth to blind puppies" :) You and me have some work to do on merging House of Pejačević and Pejacsevich, but I can't say when I can devote time to this, unfortunately... Best, — Toдor Boжinov — 18:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just to let you know that I removed Template:List of castles in Europe from all the Croatian castle articles. It's a list-listing template intended for use on lists such as List of castles in Croatia, not on inidividual castle articles, and wasn't being used on articles on castles in any other country. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Silverije. You have new messages at Cordless Larry's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pejačević Castle in Virovitica, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.casopis-gradjevinar.hr/eng/index.asp?s=200105.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

your article have lots of informations (thank you), but, where you taked these informations. If you don't add references, you work will be considered as unreliable work and may be deleted soon. References allows to others for verify your work and it's very important.

Sincerely, Eofren (parler/diskuti/talk) 20:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You lie, I did not found references in the text. So, please, add references. Eofren (parler/diskuti/talk) 20:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Bernardin Frankopan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aristocrat and Ribnik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Battle of Krbava field, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tržac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Zrmanja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Obrovac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Silverije, could you please explain this? Thank you, KœrteFa {ταλκ} 08:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Međimurje County Museum, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Artifact and Heritage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Oršić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Drava River (925), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Braslav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see at least ten fairly long paragraphs there with no references (and no more than that with some). The bottom section doesn't seem to list any secondary sources, only two unsigned maps and two links to another encyclopedia. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Palmotić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maritime (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Horvat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pecs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you restored this article, but then also noticed that the old history (redirect) had been protected, which was the probably reason why you didn't restore it in the original location. In the future, when you come across such a situation, that you can't edit something that looks like it should be edited, please see Help:Protection and in particular use any admin or WP:RUP to request unprotection. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Norman conquest of southern Italy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ostrovica Fortress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Silverije, I'm contacting you because we need some Croatian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Croatian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 23:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Silverije, much appreciated. I have emailed the message to you. Regards, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I came across this template, which was created and I suppose - is supervised by you. It's a great work and it looks like a flawless summary of all battles related to Croatia I thought I'll share my observations about the Austro-Hungarian – Bosnia-Herzegovinian War, which is indeed an important part of the table and of history. There are four battles listed, and I saw you added tow of them after creation: Battle of Jajce (1878) Battle of Vitez (1878) Battle of Sarajevo (1878) Battle of Livno (1878) Now my problem with that is that it is really a partial list, which is fine if it focuses on the major battles for now but it isn't quite the case. According to A magyar nemzet hadtörténelme by József Bánlaky There were at leat a dozen battles at the time (mostly in 1878). Battle of Jajce is fine but e.g. Battle of Vitez was just a march through without any armed conflict. There were also battles at Banja Luka, Gračanica, Han Pirkovac, Dolnja Tuzla, Čitluk, Ravnice (before Sarajevo) just no name a few. How about making a revamp of that section? I will gladly start it and if you have any comments along the way just drop me a message. Also if you feel like please give a respond to me on my talk page about the idea in general. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 12:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. I further searched for the battles of this conflict and found this map showing the military actions of the whole campaign. Crossed swords mark a battleplace. Vitez has none of that, the nearest places are Kakanj, Kolotič, Bjelalovac where battles were fought. So I'll update the template according to that map. I am also considering removing the date 1878 from the red links' article names as I doubt any other battle occured in most of those places and thus no disambiguation is needed. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 18:10, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also this list seems quite valid. I will sort it out somehow to concentrate on bigger battles. Both sources are based on Austrian accounts, though I doubt that any pro-insurgent source survived. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 18:26, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Međimurje horse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northern Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Križevci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the portrait to the Mathias Rukavina von Boynograd article. It's great! Djmaschek (talk) 03:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For Wars and battles involving Croatia please see Dalmatian Campaign (1809). Djmaschek (talk) 03:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ostrovica Castle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Foundation and Una (river). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ostrovica Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ostrovica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ostrovica Fortress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ostrovica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dubrava Hydroelectric Power Plant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donja Dubrava. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stridon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pazin Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French Empire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Palmotta a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Palmotić. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Zoupan 03:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been warned, why are you continuing to cut-and-paste? Next time I'll have to report you.--Zoupan 21:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Zadar (998), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rebel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dragutin Lerman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Požega. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Borna (duke) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Borna of Croatia. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Zoupan 20:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marco Antonio de Dominis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make dubious moves, such as the one you did at Borna (duke). You have already been warned for cut-and-past moves.--Zoupan 22:51, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Silverije. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's up, Silverije? -- Director (talk) 22:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vlaho Kabužić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any information on this person that lived 1698–1750. Creator used a Croatian encyclopaedia entry which only says "Vlaho ... tax collector". The image is unsourced, and is most likely another, more notable Biagio Caboga who was a commander and lived later.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoupan 02:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I now saw that you altered the commons description of the image. The notable "Vlaho Kabužić/Kaboga" is Biagio Caboga (who is portraited), btw.--Zoupan 02:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you appear to have done at the Bleiburg repatriations article, you may be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 17:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be so kind and specify where you see vandalism in the Bleiburg repatriations article. Otherwise, your threat to block me could seem to be vandalism. --Silverije (talk) 19:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not threaten to block you. I can't block you. I am not an admin. However, anytime someone, say, adds and subtracts 67,000+ or so characters in two consecutive edits (-67,124/+67,180), my Spidey sense tingles and I issue a boilerplate warning. Sorry if I inadvertently issued what you consider an inappropriate warning but under no circumstances would that be or could that reasonably be construed as an act of vandalism. Again, apologies for the warning if you have an innocent explanation for the two consecutive edits (see [1]) mentioned above. Quis separabit? 01:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. My edits (-67,124/+67,180) were just a consequence of a simple mistake, which can happen to everyone. I usually try to avoid such things, but.... Anyway, best regards, --Silverije (talk) 19:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of castles in Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Klenovnik. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I haven't been paying much attention to my talk page. In general, if any individual admin is not responding to such requests, please use a noticeboard, in this case Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. In this case, I see things have calmed down on their own, only two unexplained anonymous reverts since you first asked. If it flares up again, please explain the situation on the talk page and just ask any admin on that noticeboard. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So please dont bring your personal bias to this encyclopedia, and much less edit-war about it. What you say it is "worldwide knolledge" seems you referng to your village only. FkpCascais (talk) 20:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to [[:Republic of Venice]. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 72.201.104.140 (talk) 02:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article.

Hello, Silverije. You have new messages at Talk:History of Istria.
Message added 00:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

72.201.104.140 (talk) 00:02, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Republic of Venice. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article.

--Rosso Veneziano (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SECOND WARNING

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Republic of Venice. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article.

--Rosso Veneziano (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are UNDISCUSSED. You can not restore them, without a proper discussion in the talk page. This is against basic wikipedia rules.--Rosso Veneziano (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Silverije. You have new messages at Doug Weller's talk page.
Message added 17:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

Doug Weller talk 17:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ljudevit. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.--Zoupan 06:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Silverije. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugen Kvaternik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rakovica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because it doesn't have sources (i.e. a section titled Sources, References, or something like that). That put aside, I believe Start class would be OK.

The article lists a lot of numerical data, that's why it would be really good if it used inline refs right from the start. Tagged accordingly now. GregorB (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your move was irregular, there was a valid successful move request in May 2017. To avoid the destruction of the page history, I reverted your edit (which was, technically, not a moving a page). --Norden1990 (talk) 22:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Silverije, what is your concern? The present title for the article (Újlaki family) was decided by a valid move discussion which you can still see on the talk page at Talk:Újlaki family. That discussion was closed in May 2017. If you disagree with this outcome you would have to start a new move discussion and give arguments that the others would find convincing. Administrators would tend to think that this issue falls under the heading of ethnic disputes. (A family has interests in different areas of Europe and is referred to by different names in different countries). Wikipedia has to pick out one of the many possible names. When deciding this, editors would tend to defer to WP:COMMONNAME whatever that turns out to be. Whatever your personal opinion, this is a matter to be decided by consensus. Some of the items in your move log cause concern. I'm leaving you a notice below of the ARBEE discretionary sanctions, just so you are aware that Wikipedia has concerns about any editing that may appear nationalistic. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 18:08, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest to stop with your edits. I've reported your behaviour. Best regards.Rosso Veneziano (talk) 19:41, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. These type of categories should not be used on individual biographies. For example, a sport in New York category would not be used on every single sportsperson from that city. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Silverije. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ignác Martinovics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikola Tesla Memorial Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikola Tesla Memorial Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Savino Bobali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vedran Pavlek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slalom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sport in Gospić requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Međimurje Horse Stud, Žabnik, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Ivan Gundulić (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You have recently edited the article. Whether Gundulic should be identified as Croatian, Serbian or something else is a question that's been heavily discussed. See the majority of all the talk on Talk:Ivan Gundulić. If you want to modify the lead about his nationality, it is best to use the talk page and get consensus. At present he is identified as "the most prominent Baroque poet from the Republic of Ragusa", which is a safe statement and is technically correct. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EdJohnston (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take an eye onto this discussion; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Peacemaker67#Turkish_Croatia --Čeha (razgovor) 15:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you do continue do canvass, that is break the basic rules of Wikipedia, as you did here [2] or a number of times on HR Wiki (I am keeping an eye on it) - you will be reported.

Thank you, Sadko (talk) 16:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time you have reverted my edit of Template:Dubrovnik nobility sidebar without an explanation.

The version of the names of Ragusan noble houses that I used is the official version used both during the Republic as well as by their remaining members today (e.g. Dubrovnik's contemporary scenographer Marin Gozze [3]). The Slavic version was used as a sort of nickname or pseudonym, not officially. For this I gave a source in the edit description, an article discussing this by the noteworthy Croatian historian Nenad Vekarić: http://www.lzmk.hr/images/radovi6/nenad%20vekaric%20prijedlog%20za%20normiranje%20dubrovackih%20imena%20i%20prezimena%20iz%20povijesnih%20vrela.pdf

From which I quote: "No, kroatizirane oblike vlasteoskih prezimena treba pravilno razumjeti. Kad ih rabi puk, rabi ih kao nadimke. Kad sama vlastela koriste kroatizirani oblik, rabe ga kao pseudonim, a ne kao svoje službeno prezime. Medu Pozzi, koji je sam na više načina kroatizirao vlastito prezime (Počić, Pucić, Pučić, Bunarić), i kad se rodio i kad je umro zabilježeno mu je prezime Pozza. Mi, dakako, trebamo poštivati i pseudonim, ali nemamo pravo taj pseudonim širiti i na one koji ga nisu rabili."

I can understand that you consider the Slavic version closer, I also used it regularly and without a second thought, following the example of others, before I found out that it was merely a sort of nickname, and that the Romance version was always official. We should respect their real last names and not change them based on what appeals to us.

If you simply continue reverting, I will have to report it.

Berto456 (talk) 02:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not true that I reverted previous edits without an explanation. As anyone can check in the history of the article, I gave an explanation for my edit in the description and I linked to the article by Historian Vekarić.

It is of course true that several Ragusan authors used the Slavic versions of their last names in their literary works. That, however, is not official usage (which is why Vekarić uses the term "pseudonym"). It is also true that the Ragusan nobility in Medieval times used a Slavic version of their last names in several contracts signed with their Slavic neighbors in their particular language and Cyrillic script. This was an adaptation to their customs, it is indeed official but limited to those circumstances. Only the Romance versions of their last names were official in the Republic and in every other circumstance.

But since you do have a point that the Slavic version was used in an official capacity in the circumstances mentioned above, I will agree to a compromise and rewrite the template to include both versions, with preference given to the version which was official in the Republic and was used the most (a few examples with the Slavic version do not trump the rest of the State Archives). This is also more practical and easier to navigate for non speakers, since most of the articles linked to in the template use the Romance version anyway.

P.S. I originally left Vodopić and Zlatarić in their Slavic form because that was the official form they used in all documents (it was actually "Vodopich" and "Slatarich" in Ragusan orthography). BTW, it is a mistake to simply equate the Romance version with Italian because those Romance names which originated in the City before the late 15th century were in the Romance Old Ragusan language spoken by the population of the City until that time.

Berto456 (talk) 02:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User%3ACeha_reported_by_User%3ASantasa99_%28Result%3A_%29 User santasa is vandalasing that page again and again... --Čeha (razgovor) 21:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Udbina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Croatia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian history

Thank you for quality articles about historic people, families and events from Croatia, such as Karl Paul von Quosdanovich, Pejačević family, Siege of Zadar (1345–46), House of Orehovečki and Lipik Stud, for creating categories and applying them, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2365 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Prelog, Croatia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

THe edit summary you just made for reverting the Trpimirović tree is completely nonsensical. I did not "eliminate this family tree". I made three changes: 1) I switched templates. The merger discussion said "great care should be taken when implementing the merger" and I took great care in doing it - every change I made was intentional and none involved "merging or deleting any of the involved wrapper templates", as you inexplicably complained about in your edit summary. This is really not negotiable - the familytree template is being eliminated, so deal with it. 2) I intentionally modified the tree to make clear the relationship of Demetrius Zvonimir to Stjepan Svetoslavić, which in the prior version had a dotted line but no indication what that dotted line represented, so I spelled it out as described on the respective pages to improve the chart. If you have a better way of demonstrating what is meant by this part of the chart, we can talk about it, but some clarification is necessary. 3) Finally, to address your question, "Why did you delete boxes?" I removed the boxes because I think the boxes are ugly and unnecessary. You apparently think differently. So be it, but how about we talk about the actual issues you have with the modified version rather than just blanket reverting and thereby restoring the deprecated template? Agricolae (talk) 18:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Republic of Ragusa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 01:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Serb lands in the 9th century (en).png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CptViraj (talk) 15:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make nationalist edits as you did here. They have been reverted. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 18:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Silverije, Would you write / translate the article of Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the HR Wikipedia? That would be appreciated. Boss-well63 (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:17th century military history of Croatia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Silverije. The talk was on another page it was to be merged into.OyMosby (talk) 18:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got your message. Could you explain what you explained on my talk page on the talk page of the other article I linked? That way multiple people can join. I appreciate you explaining to me but want others who were prt of this merger topic to join in. There is a merger discussion in the link above. Please take a look and hive input about your take. I am not the best educated on this specific matter. Hence I respect yours and other’s opinions there. OyMosby (talk) 19:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your response. I see your point. For now you can undo it and we can see how it plays out on the talk page I mentioned. And you are right, the talk should have been on the article’s talk page itself or at least duplicated so people can follow what’s going on. I will have to spend time too look further into this. Cheers OyMosby (talk) 22:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladislav (Duke of Croatia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pannonian Croatia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ladislaus of Ilok, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here they want to put Bosnia and Herzegovina and other things that have never been Serbian countries, please pay attention to this page and further possible edits [[4]]. Thank you.89.172.66.209 (talk) 06:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Silverije,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Bijela (Rijeka) for deletion, because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|John B123)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 07:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Silverije. I see that you edited on Nikola IV Zrinski's page. I have a question why the page changed from Nikola Šubić Zrinski to Nikola IV Zrinski and he is a Croat. And a Hungarian name Miklós Zrínyi [[5]] did not change to Nikola VII Zrinski and he is half Croat, half Hungarian. Someone should make a request to change that to Nikola VII Zrinski. That would be right and fair. I don't know how to change the name, so someone who knows should do it. Maybe some of you experienced editors know that, so someone should submit a name change request.93.138.118.21 (talk) 13:29, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:8th century in Croatia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:10th-century establishments in Croatia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:12, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:9th-century Croatian people has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:10th-century establishments in Croatia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Croatian principalities has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Milan Tepić. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 20:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pozdrav Silverije! Vidim da si uredio ovu stranicu. Pa imam pitanje. Eugen Kvaternik [[6]] koji je živio do 1871 godine nikad nije imao potomke pa ni ne može biti djed Slavku Kvaterniku i njegovom sinu iz ww2 kao što je stavio korisnik Amanuensis Balkanicus. Korisnik Amanuensis Balkanicus je stavio tri izvora od kojih samo jedan nešto kaže o tome , ostala dva ništa ne kažu i to je lažno stavljeno, jer u njima ništa ne piše o tome. Na stranicama iz Hrvatske isto ne piše nigdje da je Eugen Kvaternik koji je živio do 1871 imao potomke .Prema mom istraživanju od Slavka Kvaternika se je djed zvao Antun ,ne Eugen. Ovo je Eugen Kvaternik iz 19 stoljeća https://www.geni.com/people/Eugen-Kvaternik/6000000069655991081 i nema potomke. A ovo je Slavko Kvaternik https://www.geni.com/people/Slavko-Kvaternik/6000000038200151011 i njegov otac je Ljudevit Kvaternik https://www.geni.com/people/Ljudevit-Kvaternik/6000000039352585170 , a od Ljudevita Kvaternika otac je Antun https://www.geni.com/people/Antun-Kvaternik/6000000083018819002 . Znači oni nemaju veze , osim samo što imaju isto prezime.89.172.104.100 (talk) 02:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pozdrav Silverije vidim da uređuješ Hrvatsku povijest ,da li možeš malo urediti ovu stranicu[[7]] i provjeriti izvore da bude kako treba, mislim da ovdje ima dosta netoćnih navoda koje nisu iz izvora, pa ako bi ih mogao provjeriti i urediti,ako je sve u redu onda si staviš ovu stranicu pod prismotru, jer je znaju mijenjati. Hvala 93.136.187.121 (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Milan Tepić you may be blocked from editing. Theonewithreason (talk) 16.January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Milan Tepić. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amanuensis Balkanicus what kind of vandalism did he do, that he put the source in, did that vandalism? Stop lying? I could report you for lying and POV pushing in lead. You only delete what doesn't fit in the lead, and you leave what suits you. Read how you edit, leave your POV, and delete the rest. I hope other editors and administrators notice what you are doing. 93.139.190.234 (talk) 21:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support. I just warned him for his disruptive editing and threatening. Let's see if he will continue to repeat his unacceptable behaviour. --Silverije 18:37, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rakovica revolt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rakovica.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 17:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Silverije, your signature has unmatched bold wiki markup which breaks syntax highlighting on every page it appears on, for the entire rest of the page. Your signature as of very recently (example here) is or was coded like this:

[[User:Silverije|'''<span style="color:#705">Silve</span>''']][[User talk:Silverije|'''<span style="color:ForestGreen;">rije</span>]]

Please fix it. If you don't see the issue, please ping me, or ask for help. If you've already fixed it, thanks, Mathglot (talk) 17:31, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is one way to fix it, assuming my mind-reading skills are working properly :

[[User:Silverije|'''<span style="color:#705">Silve</span>''']][[User talk:Silverije|'''<span style="color:ForestGreen;">rije</span>''']]

Do you see the difference? I hope this helps!

By the way, this message is in response to your comment at my Talk page, but did you know that you can reply to a comment right here on your Talk page? Just use the ((Reply)) template, adding the following token to your message: ((Reply|Mathglot)) (replacing my userid, with whoever you want to notify). Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Postscript: Redrose64 responded almost simultaneously at my talk page, and their version is better (because shorter). You can see how they did it, here. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)]][reply]

Silverije, if you've made a tentative change to your sig, and you're not sure if it's working properly or not, just send me a quick message ("Testing...", or "How about this?" or whatever you want) followed by the four tildes (~~~~) right below this one, and I'll let you know. Remember to use the ((Reply)) template with your message, if you're replying to me. Mathglot (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As of this edit of yours, your signature is now valid syntax. Mathglot (talk) 02:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your information. This time I used the shorter signature proposed by Redrose. That means both signatures are OK. I'm glad that you take care of my signature. Thanks a lot, --Silverije 18:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just confirming that your newer signature appearing just above (@18:19) is also valid syntax. Mathglot (talk) 04:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Stephen Thomas of Bosnia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are allowed to make edits, and the fact they do not have an account is not a valid reason to undo their edits. Slatersteven (talk) 09:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Silverije

Thank you for creating Franko Talovac.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:19, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

((Re|North8000)) Hello, North8000! Thank you very much. I appreciate it a lot. I always try to do my best. Sometimes it takes a lot of work and a lot of time, because of lack of sources, unreliable sources or so. That's why i'm glad to hear nice comments. --Silverije 18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Međimurska trikotaža Čakovec, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poštovani,zanima me korištenje nekih vaših fotografija vezano uz obitelj Zrinski i Frankopane. Rado se o knjizi koja se piše u nekomercijalne svrhe,te će biti digitalizirana i dostupna javnosti. Srdačan pozdrav 94.253.193.61 (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ako se radi o fotografijama na Wikipediji i Wikimediji Commons, one se, što se mene tiče, mogu slobodno koristiti, osim ako kod pojedine slike piše da podliježe autorskim pravima.

[[User:Silverije|<b style="display:inline; color:orange; background:purple; padding:2px 3px 2px 5px;">Silve</b>]][[User talk:Silverije|<b style="display:inline; color:orange; background:blue; padding:2px 3px 2px 3px;">rije</b>]] (talk) 16:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. --Silverije 22:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1662 establishments in Croatia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 12:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Međimurska trikotaža Čakovec. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Međimurska trikotaža Čakovec, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 02:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Silverije. Can you look at this edit, [[8]] as far as I know the Kingdom of Slavonia was part of Croatia history in the Habsburg monarchy and part of Habsburg monarchy history , not part history of Serbia as they want to insert here. What does the Kingdom of Slavonia have to do with Serbia and their history? 83.131.64.247 (talk) 18:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Siverije.There are a lot of changes in these two pages and if you could edit them a little better and check the source, Thank you.This [[9]] and this [[10]] 83.131.65.132 (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polymaths by nationality has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Croatian polymaths has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:German polymaths has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Italian polymaths has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. I just noticed that Croatian–Bulgarian battle of 854 was not necessarily dated correctly, with these edits: [11] [12] where there are seemingly arbitrary citations that don't correspond to the source material. Please double-check this and fix it properly. Joy (talk) 21:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 3 § Category:Libraries by year of establishment on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to Bilina because disambiguation pages should not be over-written with an article without prior discussion. If you wish to add an article on the village in Jablanica, perhaps you could title it Bilina, Jablanica? Leschnei (talk) 12:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. It was just a typing error I missed to correct. --Silverije 23:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]