You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Draft:S4 League (videogame). Robert McClenon (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Simonmana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked because an admin bloc claims that their POV determines notability.They underminded the delete discussion with the person nominating the article not even commenting as to why or willing to argue his point later on i had been called an it as a personal attack against me.And also certian users have sticked around to continue blocking and harrasing me.
Decline reason:
No means no. MER-C 06:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Simonmana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked because an admin bloc claims that their POV determines notability.They underminded the delete discussion with the person nominating the article not even commenting as to why or willing to argue his point later on i had been called an it as a personal attack against me.And also certian users have sticked around to continue blocking and harrasing me.
Decline reason:
You've already had that exact unblock request declined. While you are welcome to make a new unblock request, addressing the concerns that lead to your prior unblock request being declined, an exact copy-and-paste is abusive and may result in your talk page access being revoked. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Simonmana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked because an admin bloc claims that their POV determines notability.They underminded the delete discussion with the person nominating the article not even commenting as to why or willing to argue his point later on i had been called an it as a personal attack against me.And also certian users have sticked around to continue blocking and harrasing me.Also the blocker has said he will discuss it with me which after my response he did not.Implying that i am to sockpupet if id want to as he says move on to apperently wonderland where those users who keep harrasing and blocking everything i do dont exist.They have relentlessly refused to comment and therefore break policies in order to censor anything related with a comepletly notable(its a subjective term and means nothing but sure ill address it since they havent got the memo) and reliably sourced(to the extent of what wikipedia considers reliable which in 2016 is basicly nothing since all relevant topics regarding the Video Games category has moved on from written articles and to a more credible video format)
Decline reason:
WP:NOTTHEM and WP:IDHT. Making the same unblock request again without adequately addressing the reason for your block will likely result in the loss of your talk page access. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Simonmana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
same as the above since it still is being ignored and not adressed and just to be safe since it doesnt mention if the old decission can be reverted great template design /s
Decline reason:
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked. See WP:UTRS if you want to make any further appeals. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Simonmana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #16268 was submitted on Aug 02, 2016 14:40:05. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 14:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Simonmana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #16272 was submitted on Aug 03, 2016 13:02:36. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 13:02, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Simonmana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #16273 was submitted on Aug 03, 2016 13:59:50. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 13:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Simonmana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'ts been way longer than 6 months. I dont plan on creating articles so as to avoid these kinds of situations. So i dont see this issue happening again. Simonmana (talk) 00:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm going to permit you to make an example of a substantive edit(not just a spelling or grammar correction) that you want to make. If you don't wish to do that, you are free to decline, but it could help you. This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
((infobox name|...))
);[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]
);[[Category:Name]]
);((Foo stub))
);== [[Article title]] ==
) the copied content but do not save yet;Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution.
"((reflist-talk))
. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "
" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 15:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
((Help me|your question here ~~~~))
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Simonmana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'ts been way longer than 6 months. I dont plan on creating articles so as to avoid these kinds of situations. So i dont see this issue happening again.Simonmana (talk) 16:56, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your attitude while requesting an unblock demonstrates that you do not have the collaborative skills or civility required to edit here. As you continue to make personal attacks and allegations against other editors, I have again revoked your talk page access. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Can anyone see past the enormous wood chip to a benefit to the project in unblocking? Thoroughly non-plussed by what I see on this talk page. Not outrightly declining, but jeez.-- Dlohcierekim 17:46, 13 August 2019 (UTC)