Welcome to Wikipedia, GhostP.! Thank you for your contributions. I am SchreiberBike and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type ((help me)) at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!  SchreiberBike | ⌨  23:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. This copyrighted image, which you uploaded on 3 October, needs to be made smaller and requires a fair use rationale. Instructions for resizing it are on the file page. Stay well and all the best, Miniapolis 15:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Skyshifter. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for I Still See Your Face at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 15:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Still See Your Face you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry if you were disappointed by me failing your GAN; take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VKTM and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sober (Inna song) to get a thorough understanding of why this had to be done. --K. Peake 09:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article I Still See Your Face you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:I Still See Your Face for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello GhostP., can you please explain to me what this is about - 1 -> 2. --Serols (talk) 07:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article In Decay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article In Decay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:In Decay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article In Decay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:In Decay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tru (Ovlov album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GhostP., per the GA nomination instructions, Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. Please do so, if you wish to nominate this article. For now, I have reverted your nomination, as was done previously. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Surprise album, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Bloody Valentine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bolsonarism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trump.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Iteration (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of VersaceSpace -- VersaceSpace (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Iteration (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Iteration (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of VersaceSpace -- VersaceSpace (talk) 17:01, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Iteration (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Iteration (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of VersaceSpace -- VersaceSpace (talk) 10:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Silicon Tare you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Silicon Tare you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Silicon Tare for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Silicon Tare you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Silicon Tare for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Skyshifter. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Disappearance of Bruno Borges at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, Baffle gab1978! Skyshifter ^talk 01:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disappearance of Bruno Borges you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Disappearance of Bruno Borges you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Disappearance of Bruno Borges for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Disappearance of Bruno Borges you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Disappearance of Bruno Borges for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 15:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Muscle March you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Muscle March you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Muscle March for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 12:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 29 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Disappearance of Bruno Borges, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brazilian student Bruno Borges disappeared, leaving fourteen handwritten encrypted books and a statue over two metres (6.6 ft) tall in his bedroom? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Disappearance of Bruno Borges. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Disappearance of Bruno Borges), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 25,298 views (1,054.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		A beer on me!
		One of the most interesting, well written, and impeccably sourced articles I've read in a while. The whole story is almost like something out of the work of a certain other Borges... CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Seems like it was well-liked! I guess we really do talk about bruno... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Untitled God of War sequel and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 5#Untitled God of War sequel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Neo-corelight (Talk) 09:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Era Extraña you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Era Extraña you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Era Extraña for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Era Extraña you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Era Extraña for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article An Empty Bliss Beyond This World you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wetrorave -- Wetrorave (talk) 13:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article An Empty Bliss Beyond This World you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:An Empty Bliss Beyond This World for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wetrorave -- Wetrorave (talk) 23:40, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article An Empty Bliss Beyond This World you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:An Empty Bliss Beyond This World for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wetrorave -- Wetrorave (talk) 19:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mrwhosetheboss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrwhosetheboss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there. I just saw your article for Slamfest and it looked interesting. Have you thought about nominating it for Did You Know? GamerPro64 02:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GamerPro64: Thanks :) Surprisingly DYK didn't cross my mind, but the article certainly has potential for it. I'll probably nominate it after a few more adjustments. Skyshifter ^talk 02:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pierre-sur-Haute military radio station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Pierre-sur-Haute military radio station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pierre-sur-Haute military radio station for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Pierre-sur-Haute military radio station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pierre-sur-Haute military radio station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Persuasion System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Under the Radar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, you mention in this edit that the "News/editorial part is reliable", however, Wikipedia's reliable sources page states that Know Your Meme is generally unreliable. Can you explain what you ment by this? TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@TheManInTheBlackHat: The reliable source page talks about Know Your Meme entries, which are user-generated (example). The source cited is not an entry, but a news article written by a senior editor, and is not user-generated. Skyshifter ^talk 01:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dariacore (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dariacore (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:42, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Twelves you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 04:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Twelves you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Twelves and Talk:Twelves/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 11:42, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quando (e se) o artigo de Twelves se tornar um bom artigo, acho que valeria a pena sugerir outra curiosidade para o WP:DYK. Creio que seja possível. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RodRabelo7: Infelizmente não é possível, por WP:DYKCRIT critério 1c. Skyshifter ^talk 22:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah, que pena. Não sabia desse detalhe. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive is at the halfway mark, and has seen incredible progress, dropping the backlog from 638 to 359 unreviewed articles -- a 43.7% reduction in only fifteen days! But we still have over two weeks to go, and there are plenty of articles left to review:

• We've gone from 14 nominations 270+ days old and 65 nominations 180+ days old to 2 and 0 respectively. No more articles will reach 270+ status during the drive, and only three more will reach 180+ if unreviewed, so this is your last chance to get the higher age bonuses!
• We still have plenty of articles in the 90+ range, but the list is shrinking fast.
• Some articles need new reviewers, either because they're officially on second opinion or because the original reviews were deleted or invalidated. You can help prevent these articles from waiting longer!
• While there are starting to be clear favourites for the Content Review Medal of Merit, the field is still very open. A late entrant can still pull an upset to get the most reviews in the drive!

And remember: if you've done reviews, you should log them at the backlog drive page for points, so they can be tracked towards your awards at the end.

Thanks for signing up for the drive, and I hope to see you reviewing! Vaticidalprophet 02:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have received this message as a participant in the August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive who has logged one or no reviews. This is a one-off massmessage. If you wish to opt out of all massmessages, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

The article Twelves you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Twelves for comments about the article, and Talk:Twelves/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 10:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think I might have found a way to resolve the issue. In a recent GA, Sanctioned Suicide, the quote is translated with an ((efn)) at the end to transcribe the original quote. Maybe it can work on this article, but since there are many quotes, you may have to paraphrase some to lower the amount of quotes in the article. Spinixster (chat!) 01:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Spinixter: sorry, I forgot to respond. I still would like to know what policy or recommendation says that this must be done. Skyshifter ^talk 17:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Would be interesting for that article to be a GA. Thou, I don't work at development section since it hard. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 01:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Greenish Pickle!: Would be nice, but I think it's very far from it. Skyshifter ^talk 12:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Indeed. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 12:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited On & On (Cartoon song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comente lá.

Assinado

Fox de Quintal (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 18 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bomba Patch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the name of the video game mod series Bomba Patch was inspired by éclairs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bomba Patch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bomba Patch), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 12:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gardevoir by jtveemo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pokémon and pornography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon and pornography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NegativeMP1 09:41, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article OneShot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTarantula -- TrademarkedTarantula (talk) 01:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article OneShot you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:OneShot for comments about the article, and Talk:OneShot/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTarantula -- TrademarkedTarantula (talk) 05:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTarantula -- TrademarkedTarantula (talk) 04:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect SSSniperWolf has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 21 § SSSniperWolf until a consensus is reached. Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Skyshifter, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 18:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bomba Patch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Bomba Patch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bomba Patch and Talk:Bomba Patch/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Bomba Patch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bomba Patch for comments about the article, and Talk:Bomba Patch/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

From what I can find, even the news entries for KYM are unreliable. See this archive. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 14:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: I think the best thing here would be to open another discussion at WP:RSP. I don't think the case at The Amazing Digital Circus can be compared to the one you cited, as it was being used for extremely serious claims in a BLP, and the author apparently didn't have any credentials at all. TADC is an entertainment subject, non-BLP, and the author at least has worked for IGN before. I feel like KYM staff articles would at least be considered situational, usable for entertainment, non-BLP/non-controversial claims, in my opinion. Skyshifter ^talk 14:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

While I do understand, I'm mainly looking at the statement "I don't think that even KYM's staff-written articles have the reputation for fact-checking and accuracy required by WP:RS". Now if this isn't a "staff-written article" then I'd be willing to at least discuss the general reliability of the news articles on KYM. Regardless the source does nothing for the notability of the show since it fails WP:SIGCOV. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 14:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also I think you mean WP:RSN and not WP:RSP. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 14:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: Yes, I linked the wrong page. I will open a discussion there, I think it's the best option here to remove all doubts. Skyshifter ^talk 14:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't worry I did the exact same thing last night. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 14:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: I saw it. But I want to open a discussion only about KYM. I've used in other articles too, such as Summoning Salt. Skyshifter ^talk 14:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wasn't referring to that, I was meaning I has referred to it as WP:RSP rather than WP:RSN last night on the Discord server. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 14:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Blaze Wolf:, ah, I'm sorry, I thought you were reffering to WP:RSN#Sources on The Amazing Digital Circus. But yeah, I'm still not used to the shortcuts :p also I didn't know there was a Discord server? Skyshifter ^talk 14:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nah you're good. And yeah there is, see WP:DISCORD. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 14:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Donkey Kong Country into Aquatic Ambience. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry. Skyshifter ^talk 15:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Editor's Barnstar

Por seu trabalho em Death of Ana Clara Benevides. Todo o contexto de omissão e descaso por trás dessa morte, inclusive vindo de uma artista que de “jovenzinha inocente” nada tem, é por si só já horrível. A subsequente tentativa de supressão dos fatos, por motivos a mim obscuros, que vem acontecendo naquele artigo me deixa ainda mais indignado. Obrigado por criar o artigo na Wikipédia em português e se dar ao trabalho de traduzi-lo para cá. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RodRabelo7: muito obrigado. É realmente tudo muito estranho. Skyshifter ^talk 11:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It seems that the nomination has been put on hold for over seven days now. Do you have any final opinions on the article? Does it pass or fail? — Davest3r08 >:) ^(talk) 21:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Davest3r08: PerfectSoundWhatever is the nominator and main contributor of the article, they should review the changes first. Skyshifter ^talk 23:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@PerfectSoundWhatever, what do you think then? — Davest3r08 >:) ^(talk) 23:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virtual Self (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Untitled Grand Theft Auto game, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. The reason is explained in edit summary of revertion. Thank you. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 15:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ExclusiveEditor: I believe that was unintentional. Skyshifter ^talk 15:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 15:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hope you're well! I noticed that your signature contains the markup <big>. This doesn't appear to be expressly forbidden but it's discouraged per WP:SIGAPP, so I figured you should at least be aware. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 02:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rhain: Thank you, I didn't know that. I'll remove it. Skyshifter ^talk 02:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Virtual Self (EP) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TechnoSquirrel69 -- TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Virtual Self (EP) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Virtual Self (EP) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TechnoSquirrel69 -- TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Skyshifter, it's been a couple of days since you checked in at the GA review page, during which time I've addressed all of your comments; is there any update on that front? I sincerely hope that there are no hard feelings between us after the quick-fail and subsequent content dispute, but I understand if you're not in the right headspace at the moment to conduct a review for one of my GANs. Let me know either way! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@TechnoSquirrel69: no hard feelings at all! I agree that some content there could need adjusting; just unsure to what extent. I've posted it to WP:3O yesterday, so hopefully we can get another opinion soon. In any case I'll probably open a PR before another GAN, as my long-term plan is to nominate it to FA.

Regarding Nurture, I actually tend to delay some of my reviews and I'm sorry for that. More comments should be coming very soon. I've skimmed through the article and it should be just minor prose adjustments. Skyshiftertalk 01:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your response! I did see your request on 3O as well as the Wikimedia Discord, I hope we can get a response on that as well. No worries about the GA review; I'm in no rush with it, but just wanted to check in to see how it was coming along. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@TechnoSquirrel69: Updates: I'm finally catching up on Nurture's GAN. I'm probably finished with the Background section and comments on the next sections should come very soon. Regarding Virtual Self, we got a comment from a user who saw it at 3O. I've added more secondary sources to "Background" accordingly. Since they said the article could be renominated, I've done so following these changes. Skyshiftertalk 23:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Skyshifter, a quick note about the header style that you use in your reviews: I'd recommend that you use fifth-level headers (=====) instead of semicolons per MOS:PSEUDOHEAD, as this makes pages less accessible for people using screen readers. I've switched them over at Talk:Nurture (album)/GA1, but thought I'd let you know for future reference. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	For your review of Skibidi Toilet :) Pamzeis (talk) 15:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! Skyshiftertalk 18:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTarantula -- TrademarkedTarantula (talk) 04:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Taubaté pregnancy hoax, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page G1.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 17:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! Skyshiftertalk 23:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Hard-earned and well-deserved; congratulations on the promotion of OneShot to featured article status! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! Skyshiftertalk 23:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Congratulations, Skyshifter! The article you nominated, OneShot, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Anitta's anal tattoo—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 05:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Prhartcom -- Prhartcom (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Skyshifter! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:55, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

The article Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident and Talk:Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Prhartcom -- Prhartcom (talk) 23:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident for comments about the article, and Talk:Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Prhartcom -- Prhartcom (talk) 02:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Skyshifter, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. Unfortunately, Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident is not eligible for GA points, as you were not a significant contributor to the article. According to XTools, you aren't listed as one of the top 10 editors by either edit count, added text, or authorship. Additionally, looking at Talk:Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident/GA2, you made a single comment at the review, whereas Feoffer primarily worked on resolving the issues with the article.

I know that this can be disappointing, but according to Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring#General rules, All reviewed content must have been worked on significantly by you to receive points. "Drive by" nominations are not permitted. As a rule of thumb, I would say that, if you've authored at least 5-10% of an article or are listed in the top 10 editors by authorship (excluding things such as archiving references), you would be eligible to claim GA points. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Epicgenius: Sure thing, I understand the decision. Skyshiftertalk 15:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why are you requesting another peer review of that article that you never contributed to, Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident? I gave it yet another peer review during my GA review. Why not revert your edit and instead, do the normal step after GA: Submit an interesting fact from the article to Wikipedia:Did you know? Prhartcom (talk) 22:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Prhartcom: I would've applied your suggestions as the nominator in the GAN review, but Feoffer always got to them before I could. Nothing I could do if that's what they wanted to do. The reason why I opened a PR is because I want to bring it to FAC. But yes, I can also get it to DYK. Skyshiftertalk 22:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK. This article doesn't need another PR right now; I would revert that; I've always considered PR below GA, and then that's it ... next is FAC. Go for it. Prhartcom (talk) 00:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Prhartcom: ah, I never saw it that way. A lot of people open PRs before opening a FAC, even when the article is already a GA. But to be honest, I don't know if I should go to FAC, at least right now, as I'm planning to nominate other articles instead soon. I'll think about it. Skyshiftertalk 01:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 6 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article I'm God, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that it took eleven years for the instrumental track "I'm God" to receive an official release? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/I'm God. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, I'm God), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
• Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
• MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
• Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
• voorts (submissions) and Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]