My talk page

Welcome to Wikipedia ! Hope you'll have a good time here. ^_^

P.S. : You don't need to mention your personal details here.

—Yuyutsu Ho (talk) 15:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Smilealwayswiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Nobody asked you, whether you edited as an IP before.

Nobody accused you of negatively contributing to Wikipedia, but you had to write on your user page that you will positively contribute to Wikipedia.

You answered these questions on your user page, before anybody asked you, as you knew you are not a new editor.

There is no need to mention one's name, and so you used a fake name. --ZebraaaLounge (talk) 07:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC) ZebraaaLounge Who invited you here ? ChalNikal. Smilealwayswiki (talk) 14:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Read Wikipedia:No personal attacks before using words as ChalNikal. ZebraaaLounge (talk) 04:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You did not give me even few minutes to respond. That article is target of bunch of right wing editors.They are writing incorrect and biased info about that org and portraying opinions written on some websites as fact. Smilealwayswiki (talk) 15:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you resume removing sourced material after this block expires, the next block will be indefinite. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

^Talk, i have every right to remove any contentious material about living person and any content which is poorly sourced and one sided biased edit. Smilealwayswiki (talk) 15:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Smilealwayswiki reported by User:Knight Skywalker (Result: ). Thank you. Knight Skywalker (talk) 13:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Casting WP:aspersions against other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. The page in dispute was Raza Academy. EdJohnston (talk) 22:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EdJohnston (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]