This page was nominated for deletion on 9 November 2022. The result of the discussion was Speedy Blanked.

/Anchovy 1

There is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 00:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Debt of developing countries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Susan George (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Smokey. I have met Keith Vaz several times and spoke to Valerie on the phone but failed to get her to send me a photo. Any photo MUST be copyright free i.e. the photographer -or someone who paid for the photograph must be willing to allow free use as per prescribed text. If you have a photo, I'd be willing to help you upload it. Same applies to any other politician but its mostly Labour ones who miss out on what should be useful positive publicity. Regards JRPG (talk) 14:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new ((help me)) request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

As stated above. I appreciate the anonymous nature nature of the WWW but there must be some rough figure on this and I would to know it please. Thanks in advance. SmokeyTheCat 06:07, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There has been a lot of research done into this, and you can find it at m:gender gap. Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-02-07/Gender_gap has some direct stats and more information. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 06:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I see that you have created other pages before, so I'm a bit surprised that you didn't do better with Ameenah Kaplan. Please have another go; I have added various tags to guide you about the improvements needed. Let me know if you need help. – Fayenatic London 19:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for replying. I decided to remove it as it was too close a copy of [1] – Fayenatic London 16:54, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, SmokeyTheCat. You have new messages at Fayenatic london's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

The article Spirit of the Stairway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as per WP:DICTIONARY.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Gail Hornstein, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on SOFTtribe, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 18:44, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boris Johnson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. noq (talk) 09:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello SmokeyTheCat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Great Tradition for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Pjposullivan (talk) 15:49, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating The Great Tradition, SmokeyTheCat!

Wikipedia editor Pjposullivan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It's much better now, thank you for the article, happy editing

To reply, leave a comment on Pjposullivan's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

haha, ok, sorry for the misunderstanding. In that case, I would recommend this Wikipedia:Writing better articles. Happy editing! Pjposullivan (talk) 17:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noticed your comment on the talk page there. It seems to be the same situation with their sister party in the Republic of Ireland; a country where they actually have elected councillors, TDs (members of the Irish Parliament) and an MEP. It seems to have started when Clare Daly, a TD, resigned. Seems to be getting worse according to this http://cedarlounge.wordpress.com/2013/07/25/weekly-worker-article-on-the-sp/ CivisHibernius (talk) 01:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I merged it into the page for the author--there really wasn't enough content to justify two separate articles. I am very willing to have as many articles on serious books and authors as possible, but I wouldn't like to have to defend an article on a book which worldcat shows is in only 51 libraries. DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article [[verify] also a general google search show mostly questionable or unreliable articles. Page has been flagged since 7/24/14 for blp sources & notability, and no substantial work has been done on this page to bring it into compliance. ]] has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only reference is to a Linkedin page as such Fails [wp:verify

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on [[Talk:verify] also a general google search show mostly questionable or unreliable articles. Page has been flagged since 7/24/14 for blp sources & notability, and no substantial work has been done on this page to bring it into compliance. |the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Enfcer (talk) 20:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, SmokeyTheCat, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Gerald May, appears to be directly copied from http://www.harpercollins.com/authors/6407/Gerald_G_May/index.aspx. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Gerald May if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 14:38, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Gerald May requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.harpercollins.com/authors/6407/Gerald_G_May/index.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 16:19, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Marilyn and Ella requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. – Njol #T·C 12:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for expanding the article. Next time please make use of the preview button and/or place the template ((under construction)) on the article while you're working on it. – Njol #T·C 16:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cigarettes are sublime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Klein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, SmokeyTheCat. You have new messages at Talk:Bertrand Russell.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rachel Reeves may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• female UK champion <ref>http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/oct/18/match-with-chess-champion-mp] </ref>, but has little time for the game now.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Useless Inept Twat. Since you had some involvement with the Useless Inept Twat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 21:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Rich, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Avono♂ (talk) 10:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have often been tempted to add similar interpretations on song and album articles, but have been concerned they might be considered WP:OR. What is your view? Perhaps you have reliable sources? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Make your edits. What's the worst that can happen? SmokeyTheCat 19:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I guess you might interrupt someone's sorrow... Martinevans123 (talk) 19:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Complete cunt, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spencerk (talk) 01:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello SmokeyTheCat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fear of Fifty: a midlife memoir for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kunalforyou (talk) 13:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elvis Presley, you may be blocked from editing. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lib Peck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Reed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello SmokeyTheCat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Christelyn Karazin for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 (talk) 20:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello SmokeyTheCat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Christelyn Karazin for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Christelyn Karazin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christelyn Karazin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christelyn Karazin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 05:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello SmokeyTheCat,

I wanted to leave a note to let you know that I commented on at the AFD for the article you created entitled, Christelyn Karazin. You have done an excellent job in clearly referencing the article subject. The rationale I gave for strongly keeping the article is as follows, "With all of the following sources [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and [7], [8], [9], [10] and [11] it is quite clear that this article subject has had significant coverage in WP:RS including newspapers, magazines and other media outlets, so the article passes WP:GNG, and the article subject has far surpassed the threshold of notability.WP:N" Excellent work! Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 06:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Cheers! For your work on the Christelyn Karazin article. Thank you! WordSeventeen (talk) 06:33, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christelyn Karazin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's Day. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brixton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mick Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:World Population Growth 1750 - 2050 sourced by the World Bank.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:16, 20 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lib Peck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lib Peck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB190417 (talk) 12:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claire Thompson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Thompson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Anome (talk) 21:15, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:SmokeyTheCat, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SmokeyTheCat and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:SmokeyTheCat during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 16:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Fex urbis lex orbis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nonnotable phrase used in passing in a single book, and I can't find any evidence that it's actually by Jerome

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]