I've reverted your change. Please explain why you are deleting images and removing other content on the talk page. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear brother:

AS!

I also tried to remove the images of Shams-ul-Ambiya Sarkaar-e-Do Aalam Muhammad Mustafa [SAWS] from various articles, but could not be successful.

WS!

Kslall8765 (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't trying to remove any images. Opticals (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sodicadl. You have new messages at Talk:Islam.
Message added 11:46, 16 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Shaad lko (talk) 11:46, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Standing in salah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

how-to guide

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit made the history confusing. There are two "Expansions" and the one line about the Shia Safavids (1500-1700) is not in the right place. The Golden age is in the wrong place too.--NorthernPashtun (talk) 16:00, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want people to make changes please just consult with them. I spent months researching all this and you should have just asked before doing a mass delete. The changes you wanted, i.e moving some text was minor. You could have moved it your self rather than delete everything. I spent a lot of time linking everything on the islam page to the other Islam pages on wikipedia so that it flows correctly. Thanks --Johnleeds1 (talk) 22:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

left you a message of the talk section of the Islam page --Johnleeds1 (talk) 11:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When you get a chance can you please give me your comments. --Johnleeds1 (talk) 19:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have a new message at Talk:Islam/GA1#Comments --Tito Dutta ✉ 10:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Proposal for removing prefixes "Islamic views on xyz"
		I have started a request move to remove the prefixes Attached with the Prophets in Islam to there Names as in Islam. Like Islamic views on Abraham → Ibrahim as it becomes difficult to search the topic. Please participate in the discussion at Talk:Page Thanks. --Ibrahim ebi (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

During the last few months, I had some time off, so I looked at the pages relating to Islam on wikipedia. Over the last few years, a lot of incorrect material against Islam has built up on Wikipedia. I went through thousands of books in the London School of Oriental and African Studies library and on the internet. Looked through Sunni, Shia and the Roman books from that period. There is a lot of material on Wikipedia about Islam that is totally incorrect. One just has to look at the pages "Islamic views on slavery", "Muhammad and slavery" and "Ma malakat aymanukum". Even people Muhammad cared for deeply and provided for through the Bait Al Mall charity have been presented as slaves on wikipedia. Unfortunately the Muslims on Wikipedia spend more time fighting each other and discrediting people from the early history of Islam like Ali and Abu Bakr than they do actually going through wikipedia and correcting the incorrect material on Wikipedia that is in many cases totally incorrect and against Islam. In the process, unfortunately these arguments, give Muhammad and Islam a very bad name. I looked into Ali's family and Abu Bakrs family and realised that many early Scholars like Jafar al Sadiq and Qasim his grandfather from his mother side are as much related to Ali as they are to Abu Bakr. Ali even raised Abu Bakrs son Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr. Muslims are best off showing Ali's knowledge on the Ali's page and his scholarly achievements and his character. Fights between the Shias and the Sunnis give a very bad impression of Ali, Muhammad and Islam. The same is true on all the other Islam pages. Pushing sectarian views just gives a bad impression of Islam. Many of these views are based on history books written hundreds of years after the events and are exaggerated. Even Al Tabri and Nahj al-Balagha were history book written 300 years later. People ignore the Quran but concentrate on history books that were written 300 years later. Many of the conflicts on wikipedia are over the land at Fadak. Considering the level of resistance Muhammad was having at the time, I am sure many people at the time of Muhammad would have been saying Muhammad invented a religion to enrich his family. He took away the land from the Jews in Madina and gave it to his family members. Many people these days would then have said the same. You only get a complete picture once you read through the Sunni, Shia and the Roman books from the period. It was a tragic story of the Arabs going into Syria and Iraq that had just gone through the Byzantine-Sassanid Wars. Many people in Syria and Iraq hated each other. After going in, the Arabs from the desert started getting tempted by money and wealth in Syria and Iraq. What started as a small thing of Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr showing the Egyptians the house of Authman ended with Marwan and the Kawarij manipulating every one and a huge loss of life. Cousins fighting one another. Ali had a very difficult situation on his hand. Just image what was going through the minds of Hassan and Husein. Its a very tragic story, a lesson to all of us, a choice between Money and children or God. Aisha later realised she had been manipulated. When Marwan became the governor of Madina you could see the tensions between Aisha and Marwan. Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr and Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr were both killed by the umayyads. Later there were very close links between Abu Bakrs family and Alis family. Jafar al sadiq is a result of that. Its better to make the effort and find the truth, even if it hurts ones views and is contrary to ones views. If you have some time please look at the pages "Islamic views on slavery", "Muhammad and slavery" and "Ma malakat aymanukum". Try to be more constructive. We could change the future but not the past. Send me a message on my talk page if you want to assist in improving the image of Islam on Wikipedia. Thanks--Johnleeds1 (talk) 20:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not get discouraged by my deleting of your edits in the Islam page. Be bold, and keep editing. Those deletions were concerning certain Wikipedia policies, which are policies I agree with. If you need help with understanding any Wikipedia rules, ask me and I may be able to help. Sodicadl (talk) 18:19, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sodicadl why do you object to this diagram. This diagram shows the people behind these schools of thought, fiqh and the denominations. Many of these divisions are about people. The Salafi take the first generation of Muslims as exemplary models. The Sunni follow the books of the four imams Abu Hanifa, Ahmad bin Hanbal, Malik ibn Anas and al-Shafi'i. The various shia branches are distinguished by which brother that branch follows. There are hundreds of books on this and I could add the references. To truely understand these divisions you have to see the links between these people. Once you put it into a diagram form one, also finds that these divisions are exaggerated as the original jurists all worked together. The theological differences happened later because the early jurists all worked together. Some times you have to put aside your denominational differences and look at the facts, be truthful and truthful to these original jurists. It makes you wonder why their followers don't get on. --Johnleeds1 (talk) 20:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know you have previously had problems with Johnleeds1 (talk · contribs) regarding his misuse of sources. Would you be interested in starting an RFC against him? Pass a Method talk 17:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure I would go that far. Any harm from his edits are manageable as of now. Sodicadl (talk) 21:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The lead para start with "The Islamic Golden Age is an Abbasid historical period beginning in the mid 8th century lasting until the Mongol conquest of Baghdad in 1258.." and further describe only Abbasid.This era include Fatimid period 10th to 11th century which also part of Islamic golden age. My aim is not to give preference to any particular dynasty but to get included information regarding contribution they provided in education,artichecture etc. If we have objection to have this information in single para highlighting Fatimid we may include these information at relevant subjects.--Md iet (talk) 11:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pettah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

جزاك الله خيرا كثيرا على علومكم و مساهماتكم النافعة في ويكيبيديا و شكرا. ibensis (What’s the Story?) 18:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing sources from the article. All sources given regarding the growth of Islam state that it is the fastest growing major religion in the world. 4-6 million bahais are nothing compared to 1.6 billion Muslims. Thanks.Septate (talk) 04:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use the article's talk page.Sodicadl (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained your concerns regarding my edits on Islam, on talk:Islam. Please have a look. Thanks.Septate (talk) 07:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salam Sodicadl, the Salat postures image is design to give an overview of salat and not training on how to conduct salat. It does not show steps or sequence, only a glance and particularly to those who are unfamiliar with this ritual. I suggest keeping it in the definition section. Please note that from the perspective of someone who is looking for a definition, top section should have the information he/she is looking for. I like how you have the "Part of A Series on Islam, Akidah" but the information in the expanded "show" section of this box need a definition of their own and are not easy to understand. I suggest you default that top box to "Hide" and only show the top section with the words "Part of a series.." Jazaka Allahu Khairan.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zaidi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sodicadl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic Golden Age, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordoba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sodicadl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sodicadl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P31?P40? (talk) 10:46, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your edit of 02:03, 4 August 2010 of Islam, you inserted

<ref>Marilyn Jenkins-Madina, Richard Ettinghauset and Architecture 650-1250'', Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-08869-8, p.3</ref>

The problem is that the book with this ISBN is actually Richard Ettinghausen; Oleg Grabar; Marilyn Jenkins-Madina (August 1, 2003). Islamic Art and Architecture 650-1250 (2nd ed.). Yale University Press. I was going to ask you to fix it. Never mind, I've fixed it myself. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Islamic prayer has been nominated for merging with Template:The obligatory prayers. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 09:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islam in France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kerry James. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In your revision of 05:16, 23 February 2022, you refer to "Arabs clans". I'm guessing that's a typo. Can you please fix it? Thanks. Fabrickator (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Fixed. Sodicadl (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited God, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pythagorean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Islam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited God, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transcendence.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Islam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Islam for comments about the article, and Talk:Islam/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor is trying to remove reliable sources written by an Islamic author apparently for personal reasons. You have promoted the article on Islam and seem to know about this field. Is there a correct way to approach this situation on the Dune 2 Wikipedia article? HenryRoan (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with this field to make a contribution of significance. Sodicadl (talk) 22:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]