Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SonicClub/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:SonicClub/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:43, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 02:43, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This submission needs references that demonstrate notability in order for it to be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SonicClub/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:SonicClub/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of one-shot Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer animated shorts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re this: we need to have reliable sources to prove notability; otherwise, we are publishing original research. These are core policies on Wikipedia--please familiarize yourself with them. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:09, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Night Before Christmas (1941 film) User:Koavf has used merge as a curious way around WP:Prod. On scores of articles. WP:Preserve. This has got to be taken to a higher level. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:19, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are (1) content disputes that (2) should be addressed on the talk page and (3) should be the subject of a deletion nomination (if that is where you intend to go), and (4) not a unilateral merger. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen, As I have said many times, I don't think they should be deleted. Why do you keep on willfully mischaracterizing me? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Again, we cannot have articles without sources. Please see WP:SOURCE, WP:OR, WP:NOTABLE, WP:RELIABLE. Feel free to also join the conversation where I pinged you at WT:ANIMATION. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I have mentioned to you several times, we cannot have unsourced articles. Why do you keep on reinserting this unverifiable information into Wikipedia? Why do you refuse to post to WT:ANIMATION or abide by the users there advocating redirection? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have you looked at any of the policy pages I have recommended? Why do you think that we can have unsourced, unverifiable articles on Wikipedia? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you have to stop just reverting. Please see the above pages and also WP:3RR. We cannot have unsourced articles: I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative "I heard it somewhere" pseudo information is to be tagged with a "needs a cite" tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons. – Jimbo Wales, 16 May 2006 ^[1] Please also see WP:ATD-R: "If the change is disputed, an attempt should be made to reach a consensus before restoring the redirect." I am begging you to please actually try to collaborate and I have shown you where to do it (WT:ANIMATION) and you insist on not discussing, being willfully ignorant, and refusing to abide by the most basic policies here. You have to stop this. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:00, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Ren & Stimpy Show episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Linguist111^{my talk page} 23:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did at List of I Am Weasel episodes. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you think that the page should be deleted, please read Wikipedia:How to delete a page. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:50, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fraidy Cat (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael O'Connor

Screwy Squirrel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Undercurrent

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wanted to let you know that I commented out the "Files I uploaded" section of your user page, because File:Tom and Jerry SNES cover art.jpg is a non-free image and can only be used on the article about that game. Trivialist (talk) 06:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit here because non-free images cannot be used in draft namespace (or any other namespace other than in regular article namespace). Please stop edit warring with the bot to restore the image, it is not a productive use of time. Let me know if you have questions. Aoi (青い) (talk) 05:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed". Please do not add unsourced material to Wikipedia. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is still a rule here. You need to add reliable sources to information that you add to this encyclopedia. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerky Turkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Ad Orientem (talk) 00:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing history is highly disruptive, including edit warring, repeatedly adding poorly or completely unsourced material, and personal attacks on other editors. All of which despite repeated efforts to reach out to you and even warnings as evidenced by your talk page. As far as I can tell you have not responded once. This is a collaborative project and that will not do. If this pattern of behavior resumes after your current block expires, the next one is likely to be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SonicClub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm very sorry for editing The Midnight Snack and Tom & Jerry Kids, I'm never do it again.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. You've quite missed the point. It is not what you edited but your edit warring, repeatedly adding poorly or completely unsourced material, and personal attacks on other editors. Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Points to ponder:

Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.

WP:CIVIL is one of the Five Pillars.

"All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking."

To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what it all means. Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra 02:07, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Droopy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep on adding unsourced material? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:43, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the sentiment as your edits to at least two other articles have been reverted by myself and an anonymous user for the same reason. Please review WP:RS as I don't think you understand what a reliable source is. Thank you, Aoi (青い) (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Ad Orientem (talk) 03:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SonicClub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm sorry, I'm never be vandalized.

Decline reason:

Last time you were blocked, you said "I'm sorry, I'll never do it again.". You did it again. Why should we believe you this time, when you have already demonstrated that your promises do not hold water? Yunshui ^雲_水 10:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's unfortunate that it came to this: I was really hoping that we could collaborate. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that you forced me to block you. Believe it or not, I really hate blocking editors who are not obvious cases of WP:NOTHERE. But your recent behavior left me no choice. What did you think was going to happen when you turned another editor's page into a redirect to a porn site? Yes, I have received your email, which sadly only confirms my judgement in this case. I am revoking both your talk page access and your access to wiki-email. Good bye. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SonicClub, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Aoi (青い) (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Super Mario Bros. (2022 film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Sonic the Hedgehog television series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Top Cat".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Loopy De Loop filmography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 20:58, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Porky Pig 101".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:28, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Tom and Jerry home media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deputy Droopy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom and Jerry (1991 video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Butch Cat (Tom and Jerry), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom and Jerry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Cat in the Hat (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wags to Riches, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Look Out Below and George and Junior's Christmas Spectacular, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom and Jerry (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wags to Riches".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Look Out Below and George and Junior's Christmas Spectacular".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:04, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub

Thank you for creating Oggy Oggy.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

It might be worth slimming the table, so it fits. Get rid of the Original Column for example. The table can be slimmed even if you keep the column.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Scope creep)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 14:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rocket J. Squirrel.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SonicClub. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom and Jerry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:59, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]