News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Administrator changes

• Red-tailed hawk
• Robertsky

• Ameliorate!
• Ancheta Wis
• Anthony Bradbury (deceased)
• Cobi
• Ev
• Moondyne
• Worm That Turned

Bureaucrat changes

Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

• Enterprisey
• Izno

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

• Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
• Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
• Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
• The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with ((Unreferenced)). You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

You seem to have deleted (reverted) looted art related well-referenced text from Cleveland Museum of Art.

You did the same for the article regarding the museum director William Griswold with a comment "discussed in body". The well-referenced information (now deleted by you) is NOT discussed in the body in the way the main section claims "In the two instances that museum staff discovered the questionable provenance of one of its objects, he has personally led negotiations resulting in their return to their respective countries of origin." which paints a very positive picture of William Griswold. Whereas,the text (with credible references) deleted by you points to a different picture. That is; Cleveland Museum of Art has acquired the looted statue when no other museum wanted to touch it because of its dubious origins and even after it was recently confiscated by the law enforcement, the museum under the direction of William Griswold tries to cling on the looted material, yet alone "personally leading negotiations resulting to return to the country of origin".

Please could you explain why nave you deleted well-referenced counter-argument text?

Regs. Lightingci (talk) 02:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have no relationship with the Cleveland Museum of Art or to William Griswold. Please note my edit at Cleveland Museum of Art here that sought to include additional information regarding this topic in the body that was included in the reference, and I added information from the edit with neutral fashion. As for the William Griswold (museum director) article, the article must adhere closely to the Biographies of living persons policy. Neither reference mentions Griswold, and thus would be most appropriate for the CMA article rather than Griswold's, unless reliable sources mention a clear connection. I was mistaken in my edit summary and meant the main CMA article rather than the body of Griswold's article. I agree that the information can also be added to Griswold's article if a reliable sources makes a clear connection between his role in this, and you are welcome to go ahead and make such edits. Best, Spencer^T•C 08:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

story · music · places

Thank you for bringing Seiji Ozawa to the Main page! I thanked him, and have the story of Helga Paris today, a photographer of houses and faces. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and Vami_IV, a friend here. Listen to music by Tchaikovsky (an article where one of the four is pictured), sung by today's subject (whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, Spencer. You took care of the puppet (41.45.22.147). Not sure if he will go back to his original IP 197.63.167.27. This was him also: Solidarity. Regards, Bringingthewood (talk) 06:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]