Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Hi Spicy, I come from Spanish Wikipedia. I was noticing that a category has been created for the sockpuppets of the user Exactamente, however I also noticed that there is a category for one of their puppets Viva la independencia. If it is possible to review the category on the Spanish Wikipedia, you observe that all of them are actually socks of Exactamente, which is the master. Merging the SPIs and categories maybe is more easy to react against Exactamente's vandalism. Thank you. Taichi (talk) 22:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Taichi, I've merged the cases. Spicy (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I needed that information to be oversighted fast. Don't want anybody else attacking me. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Saw [[1]] after coming to [[2]] from WP:Teahouse#Reporting an administrator / moderator. Seems to be a few more editors there possibly associated with the subject, and [3] seems to be a paid editor given their statement about signing an NDA. I'm not sure they are a sock, or if either of the other SPAs are. Over to you if you want to investigate. Doug Weller talk 13:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Doug Weller, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OscarSammeli. Spicy (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Doug Weller talk 08:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would like to discuss with you lifting the ban, I refer to this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maneesh#c-Spicy-20240207104100-Notice_that_you_are_now_subject_to_an_arbitration_enforcement_sanction-1

You recommended that User:Maneesh appeal the ban. However, appealing the ban may presume that the initial reasons were incorrect. This is my understanding of appeal. I would, however, ask whether there is a different procedure, i.e. lifting the ban after substantial time have passed, without re-considering the initial reason of the ban?

Thank you in advance for your reply. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If the ban was meant to be temporary the administrator would have defined it as such. Please read the information at WP:AE. My decline of the unblock request was procedural and I have no interest in this matter other than that. Spicy (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, hope you’re fine. a User, Khwiser moved Asjad Raza Khan to Draft and now moved Mufti Salman Azhari, he just installed MovetoDraft tool and moved it to draft after 3 minutes of Installation, i hope the user is attacking on Barelvi articles. The user is also saying that they’ll report about my multiple accounts which i have already disclosed. Hope you’ll look into the matter. The user having a less number of edits, who have never drafted such articles in past, started from here only and undiscussed move is done. — QuadriSyedSahab(T · C 11:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The user moved it by writing “This article was sent to AFD. There were two keep votes from the now banned sockpupe at that time. This cleric is not notable.” But you can have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asjad Raza Khan and also at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asjad Raza Khan (2nd nomination) when there was sock strike and then the nominator had withdrawn the nomination. I hope if the user wants to Draft or want to get it deleted, they should try AfD. Waiting for the response. — QuadriSyedSahab(T · C 14:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]