Even though I still have school going on until July 1st, 2023, if needed please contact me, I still exist here, I will return full-time during the summer.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

On 16 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 National Arena League season, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 2022 National Arena League season, a player hit a referee? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 National Arena League season. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2022 National Arena League season), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sportsfangnome, it's good to see your interest in the GA nomination process. As you're new to it, I wanted to let you know about a couple of important facets that you don't seem to have noticed.

If you wish to nominate an article that you haven't done significant work on, per the GA nomination instructions, Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. You haven't done this for any of your six nominations (none of which you have made significant contributions to), including the three you made a little while ago, so I've reverted your out-of-process nominations for Quarterback, Tom Brady, and Vince Lombardi. If you wish to pursue any of these three nominations, you'll first need to do the consultation, and once people have had a chance to respond (seven days is standard), if a consensus agrees that a particular article is ready to go (meets or is very close to meeting the GA criteria), then you're welcome to renominate it. Do note that you will expect to be the point person to address any issues that are raised on your nominations during the course of the review.

I also reverted your prior changes of both Vince Lombardi and Quarterback to A-class from B-class in the American Football WikiProject. A-class is actually a higher class than GA, and before articles rise to A, they are supposed to go through a rigorous, formal review process that is described here. I saw no evidence of this on either article's talk page, hence the restoration to B-class.

You have three other GA nominations: Early history of American football, Bugs Bunny, and 2020 NFL season. As these are up to a month old and would lose seniority if reverted, if you wish to continue these nominations, you can start the consultation on them (or those you still wish to pursue) now. Best of luck with them going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 26 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Len Dawson, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 19:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Sportsfangnome (talk) 19:45, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI, I saw your edit here giving ITN recognition for Dawson. Typically, that is not done until after an item is posted on ITN. Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah I accidentally did that, oops. Sportsfangnome (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed your page says you're a newer editor, which is great. Wikipedia always needs fresh users. I also saw that you've had trouble getting your Good Article nominations passed. As another user has pointed out, you haven't done significant, or in some cases any, work to any of your nominations, which, while not required, is highly encouraged. Especially for longer articles like the ones you've nominated, more senior users may assume you are a rookie who will not stick through the review and refuse to review them. I've also noticed that many of your edits have been reverted. If you need any help with policies or rules, feel free to contact me or any other more experienced editor.

Best wishes, An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 02:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Sportsfangnome (talk) 13:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bugs Bunny you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Orson12345 -- Orson12345 (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Finally! TYSM. Sportsfangnome (talk) 22:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Nobody has expressed interests in fixing the issue I found, if you do not wish to fix it yourself, I’m going to fail the review. You can resubmit for review once the issues are fixed, Regards, Orson12345 (Talk • Contribs) 18:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Bugs Bunny you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bugs Bunny for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Orson12345 -- Orson12345 (talk) 20:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Bugs Bunny you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bugs Bunny for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Orson12345 -- Orson12345 (talk) 19:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I moved your page to User:Sportsfangnome/Rest in Peace as it incorrectly existed in the user space of a non-existent user. Uhai (talk) 20:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Sportsfangnome (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I noticed you left criticism on another sports person related article and suggested improvements for it and I was wondering if you would have any input on Draft:Davis Cheek and what could be improved or added to make it suitable to be moved from draft status. Thank you. Thetreesarespeakingtome (talk) 12:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ill see what I can do. Sportsfangnome (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I looked it over briefly and I think it is fine, however, take my statement with a grain of salt please. Sportsfangnome (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Early history of American football you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 07:44, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Early history of American football you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Early history of American football for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 09:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article 2020 NFL season you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2020 NFL season for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sportsfangnome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 A7FL championship, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 18:00, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! Sportsfangnome (talk) 22:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year!

Sportsfangnome,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 17:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 17:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much! Sportsfangnome (talk) 22:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sportsfangnome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2022 A7FL championship".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sportsfangnome. Thank you for your work on Fayetteville Mustangs. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! I trust you're enjoying a wonderful day. I wanted to express my gratitude for your valuable contribution to Wikipedia through your article. I'm pleased to let you know that your article fully complies with Wikipedia's guidelines, so I've officially marked it as reviewed. Wishing you and your loved ones a fantastic day ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@SunDawn: thank you so much, I truly appreciate it!

Sportsfangnome (talk) 00:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect San Antonio Gunslingers has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 24 § San Antonio Gunslingers until a consensus is reached. —Bagumba (talk) 10:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]