Probably won't reply. Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars, especially when you're on the wrong end of an edit war. It's just silly.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh grow up. It's not a personal attack, it's a very well-known quote from a film, Babe, often used to signify the ending of something (like their time on this talk page). You probably already knew that, though. But, sure. – ².O.^Boxing 16:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dick at the state of you all lol every person raising their pitchforks again either knew the quote, or have since googled and found out. Hilariously pathetic. – ².O.^Boxing 16:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Squared.Circle.Boxing, please try and use adult language. Here's a news flash: when you say "pig" to someone and they think you called them a pig, it's not their fault; it's yours. It's not intent, it's how it lands. That people can Google stuff and then discover that perhaps you quoted a movie--well, how does that matter anyway? It's a quote from an old guy who calls a pig a pig. In what way does that pertain to the situation in which you used it? Now, I saw you revert your revert, "Fucking hilarious", and I assume you meant that Ritchie333's block was fucking hilarious (please inform me if that's also a quote from a movie). What I'm telling you is that you're lucky that Ritchie came by; you could have been blocked indefinitely already. Anyway, your edit summary prompted me to look into the ANI thread, and the older one about your transphobic comments, and I'm kind of wondering how you are still here.
  But like Ritchie, I'm not the meanest admin, and I am going to do you a favor: I am going to remove your access to the talk page, so that you can't make anymore dumb comments here. When you're in a hole, stop digging. When the block runs out, your behavior will determine your future. Drmies (talk) 16:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  You did do them a favor, but the CBAN proposal is near-unanimous so far for a reason: the strong sentiment is that they're either incapable or unwilling to refrain from dumb comments, and that there are only so many go-rounds per month at ANI we're up for tolerating. Ravenswing 00:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with the above block and TPA revocation. That being said, two hours before you were blocked, a user proposed community banning you. That proposal is currently gaining steam, and I do think you should have a chance to respond to that. So I'll tell you what: you can email me with anything you would like the community to know, and I'll post it at AN/I (retaining the right to make ((rpa)) redactions). Or don't. Entirely up to you. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Confirming that as of this timestamp, I haven't received an email from O2B. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 10:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop saying stupid things that get you in trouble. You were just topic banned, do you seriously want a Cban next? Dronebogus (talk) 22:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was consensus at this discussion to site ban you. To contest this, you'll need to make an unblock request using ((unblock)), which will be discussed by the community at the administrators' noticeboard. You can appeal this whenever you'd like, but, in practice, you'll need to wait several months to have a reasonable chance of succeeding. It may seem like it's hopeless, but people do come back from site bans. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User's response to this post was removed. jp×g 20:32, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a shame cooler heads couldn't have prevailed. Personally, I feel WikiProject Boxing just lost one of its most diligent and proactive participants. Your input over the years contributed a great deal towards MOS:BOXING, and I was actually looking forward to new discussion on other elements of it like the venue names. I'll continue to curate the Project as best as I can, but it won't be easy without you. Hope you make a grand return one day. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers mush. I enjoyed helping out where it was needed, but the overall experience was quickly soured by the distasteful environment.

Keep up the invaluable work at WP:BOXING. The topic would be a mess without your watchful eye. Apologies for leaving you to it. There's still a few good editors that are involved and I'm sure more will come along in the future. Good luck mate. It's been a pleasure. – ².O.^Boxing 00:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]