| occupation =

Squidward With Hair, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Squidward With Hair! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirl (Wanna chat?) 19:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm crying[edit]

I love your username. It is so great. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:21, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Occupation edits and article moves[edit]

Squidward With Hair, regarding this, this and this, I reverted you because they are not primarily known for those occupations. In the lead, we should stick to the most well-known occupations, or at the least more well-known ones, for public figures. I pointed to this discussion including Popcornduff, SNUGGUMS and others. Also, when adding such content, you should not mark the edits as minor. They are not minor; read WP:MINOR.

Regarding article moves, you need to discuss those. You moved DMX (rapper) to DMX (musician) and Redman (rapper) to Redman (musician), but these two are better known for being rappers. You also cited WP:BLP and vandalism for the DMX move and "Age from 37-47 nonstop" for the Redman move, but those are invalid move rationales for these moves. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC) Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Alvini, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:50, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)). Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 16:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Squidward With Hair/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Squidward With Hair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]