Would you like to conduct a GA review on Dookudu Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey it is not really recommended that you edit the article and make changes to it when you are doing the GAN of the same. It's not wrong though. I suggest you let Pavan make the changes to the article himself. That gives him the satisfaction of a GAN too. Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle 13:37, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Strike Eagle: Ok, its just the images basically, and one url gone wrong, that's all. Will continue on the review the day after tmrw, bro, as Pavan informed me that he would be out of station. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 13:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssven2: Bro, my journey has been cancelled due to an unforeseen mishap. Thus lets continue the review from tomorrow itself. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything more left in the GAR? Please let me know after going through it once. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ssven2,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

@Bzuk: Thanks Bzuk! Same to you too! — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 04:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Moondram Pirai you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All the best for Moondram Pirai GAR Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks bro! — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 04:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Ssven2,
Rock this coming new year just as how rocking you are. Wish you and your lovely family a prosperous, productive and enjoyable happy new year.

Arjann (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjann: Thanks, and HNY to your family too! — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 03:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor is restoring a POV partial filmography to Amy Adams though three editors, yourself included, have removed it. In the interest of preventing further edit-war, you may want to visit this article. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Puthiya Paravai, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Puthiya Paravai (1964) was the first Tamil film to be produced by Sivaji Films? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Puthiya Paravai. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 00:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will, but only after completing our collaboration with Kailash, Mayabazar. And i will add refs from other sources as well later as i am busy with Mayabazar and others. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Glad to hear it. If there is one guy who has captivated me in the Telugu industry, that's Power Star. Big fan of him, BTW. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One thing, The film was never dubbed into Tamil i believe. Then how could you watch it? Do you understand the language or with the help of subs? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Torrent downloaded both Gabbar Singh and Attarintiki Daredi and watched it with subs. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Strangely, i met Pawan Kalyan on the sets of the latter during the film's shoot at RFC. Sadly i was not allowed to take an image as Trivikram's ADs wanted to maintain secrecy. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Nice! Got his autograph at least? — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I could, if i was not one among hundreds of PK fans there. I just managed to shake hands. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: I also watched a few Telugu films like Annamayya, Sri Ramadasu, Sri Rama Rajyam, Baadshah, Dookudu, Adhurs, Seethamma Vakitlo Sirimalle Chettu and Iddarammayilatho. Learning Telugu that way. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I too watched Tamil films to learn the language after my Tamil friends left. The last one was VIP. I wanted to watch Lingaa too, but i watched it first day morning show in Hyderabad in Telugu. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Padayappa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All the best for the GAR bro. And i am also adding few refs below The Hindu refs. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Imsai Arasan 23rd Pulikecei you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Imsai Arasan 23rd Pulikecei for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your efforts in making Imsai Arasan 23rd Pulikecei a GA! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks, bro. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 07:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Padayappa you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Padayappa for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Moondram Pirai you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Moondram Pirai for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 13:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For greatly improving the quality of Tamil film articles and your phenomenal contributions in taking them to GA status, particularly for your most recent success Moondram Pirai. Great going! -- Sriram speak up 15:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For Moondram Pirai's GA success, which helped you achieve a double hat-trick in scoring GA's! Kailash29792 (talk) 16:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: and @Sriram Vikram: Thanks for the barnstars! — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 16:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Padayappa you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Padayappa for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tamil barnstar
	For fulfilling my desire to see a GA/FA in every decade of Tamil cinema! And also congrats on two GA's in 24 hours! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Well, it wouldn't have been possible without your support. Thanks again, bro. Can you send me Alaipayuthey from both the books to shaun.srini152415@gmail.com? BTW, it looks like you could use a little help with Meera (1945 film). — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 04:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For bringing Moondram Pirai and Padayappa to GA status within 24 hours. A rare feat, that too for the second time. Cheers! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your efforts in bringing Moondram Pirai, one of my all-time favourites, to GA. Just came to know that Padayappa was promoted as well! —Vensatry (ping) 08:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have nominated the list for FLC and I invite you to review the nomination and suggest improvements, if any. Here is the nomination page. Thanks. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 12:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, if possible, can you do me a favour? I'm unable to access webarchive and the list has a few dead links. Can you help me archive the links that haven't been archived yet? -- Sriram ^{speak up} 12:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have you marked which ones are dead links? It would be helpful. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 12:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There aren't too many. Just two or three. But, it would be safe to archive all links now. I would have done it if I could. But, my ISP has blocked the site! -- Sriram ^{speak up} 12:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I have started a discussion on the reliability of IndiaGlitz in qualifying for WP:RS, at the noticeboard. Can you spare a moment and comment there? -- Sriram ^{speak up} 07:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since Krimuk raised a lot of concerns with the prose, I have reworked it twice. Pls. take a look and update your comments. Thanks. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 17:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again! While, waiting for Krimuk's return to the FLC, I read a few existing FLs and have attempted rewriting the prose. You might have to look into it too. Sorry for the trouble and thanks. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 18:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that in Chandramukhi, several Hindu links had unneeded apostrophes in their URLs (eg: "todays" was written as "today's" in many URLs), rendering them inaccessible. Was that your unintentional doing? But never mind, its been solved. But just in case any link seems no longer accessible, don't just remove it straight away; try searching it's title in google and use the new URL, if any found. BTW, are you using twinkle to counter vandalism? Kailash29792 (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Yes, I am using twinkle. As for the references, I might have overlooked them. Thanks for looking them up. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 03:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Can't believe it has failed! — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 07:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, yes, and according to User:Ian Rose (the FAC coordinator), support was given by "only two of the eight or nine reviewers", which means us both. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I happened to find this link which explains about a book on the making of the film. If there is anyone who has it, it would be great. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 17:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have mailed you Ramachandran and Dhananjayan's writings on the film. Opened your mail yet? And would it be wise to rename the article to Sivaji: The Boss? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I will do it after the reassessment. Don't want it to happen like for Pulikecei, remember bro? — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 05:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do remember. And I don't think it is wrong for a film article's title to include its subtitle, as long as it is significant, eg: Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl, (although its initial posters hid the subtitle due to the director's dislike for it) Atlantis: The Lost Empire and the Star Trek films from II to VI. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: True, but as I have stated above, I will do the name changing after the reassessment has been completed. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 06:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Pongal bro, BTW do you think Apoorva Sagotharargal and Guna needs even more references to make it GA and are you satisfied with the way i have edited the articles. Srivin (talk) 04:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Srivin: Both need more references and detail for it to be made as GAs. You have done a great job expanding them BTW. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you perform a c/e on the whole Production section? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you expressed interest in conducting its GA review, you may go ahead and start; but if the lack of a proper prose stops you from doing so, then please just create the GAR page and put the review on hold till your concerns are met. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Alright, I'll start once Onel5969 finishes the c/e process. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 16:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page was badly damaged after it passed its GA review. Since you GA reviewed the article, why not see if you can clean it again? The nominator seems to have retired. BTW, how did your exams go? Are you an AVK now? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: If you mean "Avuththu Vutta Kazhudhai" then yes I am. Exams went very well indeed. I'll be focussing on Cary Grant starting from this weekend.  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In a rare move for a Tamil film, User:Materialscientist has protected Veeram indefinitely from IP-user editing, which could be one's best chance at making it a GA as there would be no disruptive edit wars. However, users who are not autoconfirmed may still be able to edit it. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Moondram Pirai, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the song "Kanne Kalaimane" from the 1982 Tamil film Moondram Pirai was the last song Kannadasan wrote before his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Moondram Pirai. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 02:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^[dead link] Archived page — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 03:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enthiran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is this? Do you have trouble reading "Do not edit the contents of this page" written in bold at the top of the page? You are not supposed to edit or make changes to archived pages with the exception of your talk page. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 07:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sriram Vikram: Sorry, overlooked it. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 08:43, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Just make a note of it. Btw, I got a suggestion: Whenever you start a new conversation in any talk page, it is advisable to use "New section" on the top of the page, instead of editing the last section as you usually do. Just a suggestion, coz it makes navigation easier. Thanks. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 10:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sriram Vikram: Thanks 4 d tip. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 10:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. Btw, you should probably take a look at this. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 10:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guess what, we're so involved in editing the article, I finished writing authors for nearly the entire article and I hit save, a big edit conflict notice, I click cancel, and it's all gone. What do I do now? Seriously that is a tough task and to see it wasted (well, you may know how it feels) Ethically^Yours! 09:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ethically Yours: Oh, you shouldn't have clicked cancel. You could have maybe copied whatever you wrote and then cancelled it so that you can paste it later on. Finish it off again if that is the case. No other choice :( — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some user has slightly messed up the plot. Can you please see what to fix? Kailash29792 (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Enthiran page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: The dialogue by Rajinikanth in Enthiran "Who is the black sheep?", was originally spoken by Vadivelu in Pudhumai Pithan. Here is the link. Watch carefully at 01:30 to 01:35 of the scene. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 07:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I saw that. And there is also a song in Pilot Premnath named "Black sheep". Kailash29792 (talk) 07:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	For reviewing Chennai Express, and passing my first GA. Thanks a lot. EthicallyYours! 16:54, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ethically Yours: You're welcome. Happy to review the article, BTW. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 16:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this gives you relaxation after conducting a tiring GA Review Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And also, congrats for completing your fifth successful GAR. I do not consider Vivah for sure as it's GAR was mostly one-sided. The nominator showed no interest then. Hope you continue to conduct GARs and promoting articles to GAs and FAs if possible. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks, bro! — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 04:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, how was your vacation? Where had you been for only one day? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: It was actually a drop off. One of my distant relatives visited my house. He was on his way to Mettur to visit his in-laws. It is a long drive from Chennai to there (I like long drives BTW). Me and my family dropped him off at Trichy. From there he went to Mettur. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 07:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know when you nom Enthiran, I'd be happy to review that one for you!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Hope you're well. I was wondering if you could review one my FLCs: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Kajol filmography/archive1. It's a humble request. I know many people do not like reviewing and they do not bother to reply, but I have seen you around (reviewing FLCs), therefore requesting you. Hope to get a reply :) --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 19:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! What is this? PK Hai Kya? -- Sriram ^{speak up} 12:29, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sriram Vikram: You were right. I felt that it was best to shift the entire soundtrack article to here until one of the FAC reviewers might suggest it. You did tell me about this a few months back that you preferred the soundtrack section need not have a separate article. It also adds a better look to the article. Good joke using PK, BTW, and I am not drunk (I don't drink). — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 12:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then I hope you have taken care there are no duplicate references. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 12:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sriram Vikram: No duplicate references found. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 16:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enthiran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun TV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What made you develop interest in this article to make it a GA? I am keen to know that. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Actually, if it were made a GA, it would be a tribute to director Bapu . BTW, can you help me find references from newspapers regarding the film (particularly TOI)? — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course a noble intention and hats off. I've added a few from TOI and Sify and will add the remaining soon. But what makes me surprised is what made you focus on this film all of a sudden? I don't see it connected to any of your ongoing commitments. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ssven2! Would you like to do a review of Argo (2012 film)? --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 17:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Captain Assassin!: I recommend that you get the article copyedited before the review. It needs to have a c/e done. The "Historical inaccuracies" sections are in point form. Change it to paragraph form and find suitable sources for each of the points. After the c/e, I'll take up the review. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 17:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's better idea, thanks. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 17:36, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Padayappa, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although not his final release, Padayappa (1999) was the last film that Sivaji Ganesan worked? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Padayappa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 14:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^[dead link] Archived page — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 11:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: what is meant by 'mosquito' in this sentence here: 'The character of Ranguski, the mosquito whom Chitti has an encounter with, was also the childhood pet name of Sujatha Rangarajan'? Thanks. LouiseS1979 ^(pigeonhole) 11:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, I've gone over the article. I used Visual Editor, so concentrated on the text rather than any coding, but hopefully that's good for a first pass. Let me know if you want anything more looked at (apart from the mosquito issue, which needs a little bit more explanation in English as I'm sure it's not referring to the insect). LouiseS1979 ^(pigeonhole) 13:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lstanley1979: Yes, it refers to the insect. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 13:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited that sentence now to reflect better style. LouiseS1979 ^(pigeonhole) 14:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Enthiran you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question, a vandal removed the archive box from my talk page and placed his name there, which you undid, but restored the box much later. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from The Terminator (rogue robot) and Frankenstein (creation turning against creator), did you notice Enthiran having similarities to any other work? Because if you did, all that can be in a potential section named "Themes and influences". Kailash29792 (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Will do so. BTW, can you send me Dhananjayan's and Ramachandran's info on the film? Also Dhananjayan's info on Dasavathaaram? — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 04:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use all you can. And did you get the mail containing Dhananjayan's writings on Dasavatharam? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:17, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And here is Enthiran by Danny. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Thanks. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 17:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Bro, in page 232 of Ramachandran's book, after the sentence "I had to work very hard for Vaseegaran", there is a reference number 21. Can you tell me what it is? If it is from any newspaper or magazine (reputed) please state its name. BTW, you are also a co-nominator for its FAC. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I don't have the book (I've been photographing its pages from Express Avenue Mall!) I'll go again and find out. How about we do one thing? You nominate Enthiran for GA, and I for FA (listing you as co-nominator). That way it'll be 50:50. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Actually, I plan take it straight to FA after the article gets a peer review and a good copyedit. Most of the faults can be resolved in the peer review itself. But, if you feel that nominating for GA first, then FA, is better, then it's fine with me. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a PR and GOCE-edit may occur with no problems. But I feel a GAN is necessary as a GA success eases the chance of FA success. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Alright then, it is settled. GA first, then FA. BTW, Lstanley1979 copeditied the plot and release sections of Sivaji and said she would help if there is anything further to edit. Do you think that the article can be kept as a GA now that we both have made edits to it? — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think a GA-Reassessment is like a PR/FAC, so more than one reviewer should be there. I sent you information from both Dhananjayan and Ramachandran, did you not expand the article using them? After doing that, you can invite more editors to post their comments. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Well then, I'll work on Sivaji and Enthiran in tandem. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 14:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: In this link, there is a line that states “Hollywood technicians made 40 versions of Rajni, which were multiplied several times over for the scene where Chitti looks for scientist Vaseegaran from among innumerable robots — that famous ‘Mae Mae' scene, where Chitti bleats?”, how do I interpret and write it in the article? — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 03:35, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll find a way. Till then just keep it as a quote. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Ok. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 04:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have done my best and fixed all BOI links in Enthiran. Can you do your part now, by correcting the titles of the BOI links, and removing all duplicate links if any? You can use a gadget like ProveIt. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the burning building scene in Enthiran was crucial to the development of Chitti the robot. Here is the line as in Dhananjayan's book: Vasee's efforts once again fail when he deploys Chitti to save people from a fire accident. Chitti saves most of the people and finally a nude girl from a bathtub, which is covered live by the media, without knowing its implications on the girl. Feeling disgraced at being shown nude on TV, the girl commits suicide. Write it as you please. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: In this link Srinivas Mohan says his team "used Doom Light Stage to scan Rajnikanth's face..." what does Doom Light Stage mean? — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 07:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also @Kailash29792: Are you guys working on Enthiran? While I welcome that, why do I see entire sentences including a note lifted from Anniyan and used in the "Origin" section? Also, the MOS seems to mostly identical to that in Anniyan! -- Sriram ^{speak up} 07:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sriram Vikram: We are still working on it. I added the note as it was related to the article, bro. As for the MOS, which places do you think the words are identical? BTW, please create a userpage so that I can ping you, bro. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 07:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information on this "Doom Light Stage" technique is here. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In Anniyan, the time period the film is set is out of scope. Hence I decided to have it as a note so that it doesn't veer out of context. Since Enthiran is its parent article, I think the note can be converted to main space text. Also, was the film actually set in the said period? I don't think so. In that case, it could be said that the film was reported to be set in 2200 or 3000. Btw, as I already told you, Rajnikanth said that he was narrated the storyline way back in 1996-97. Don't you think it was where the film originated? -- Sriram ^{speak up} 16:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sriram Vikram: Will do as you suggested regarding the note. As for Rajinikanth, I think you are referring to this interview. But can you help me find a better source as YouTube references are not that appropriate. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 17:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't find public domain videos or those published by Sun Network, then you can just state the fact with a cite AV media as reference where you don't fill the url. Check this. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 17:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I read this source which says that the film "is said to be based" on Sujatha's novels. It does not confirm that the film was based on them. Moreover, Shankar claimed that the film was very "original", something I disagree with. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I found this interview with Banu which elaborates on Chitti's bad robot look. See what you can do with it. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792:  Done used. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 07:50, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ssven2, I have rolled back all of your edits to Tintin in Tibet, as neither of those two pieces of information are correct. I will explain, but first please be more careful in the future: This article is FA and I went through a great deal of scrutiny from around a dozen editors and over a hundred observations of theirs to get the article to this point, so I believe it is probably in good shape. For your first piece of added information, you must not have read the footnote appearing right next to the footnote you added, which directly contradicts your incorrect information and which apparently comes from your WP:OR (and it even directly contradicts a DYK from this article). For your second piece of added information, I checked the strange source you provided and it says nothing of the sort and reveals that this incorrect information is apparently more OR; a quick check of IMDb gives the real story. I appreciate your attempts to help. Prhartcom (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prhartcom, who was the villain of Castafiore Emerald? The Magpie, or the photographer? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kailash29792 and Ssven2: Read that portion of the article (Tintin in Tibet#cite_ref-10, click the "a". The DYK is here).

Ssven2, An update: Of the two Tintin voice actors, L'officer had only mentioned the one actor, which is why we had not put the other actor in the article, but clearly Colin O'Meara is the voice in English based on IMDb and I also checked the DVD of the show (Thierry Wermuth is the voice in French). I'm a little upset that we don't have a book source, but since we are sure of this information and since this is the English Wikipedia, perhaps we should change all of our Tintin articles to Colin O'Meara's name, even providing a link to his article. Prhartcom (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update:if this helps, you can preview your edits before saving them, then perhaps edit some more and preview, and repeat until finally saving. Prhartcom (talk) 16:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prhartcom: Thanks, will implement it in the future. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 16:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Enthiran you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Enthiran for reasons why the nomination passed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it passed; don't know what went wrong. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well congrats on passing the GA straight. So what now? PR or FAC? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: PR first. Then FAC. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 07:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krimuk90: Thanks very much, Krimuk. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For bringing Enthiran to GA status. And that too, getting a GAR completed from Dr. Blofeld without any concerns raised and at one go, you are a champ. Blofeld was right. You really excelled yourself with this one. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you re-direct this to Enthiran? Given the size of both the articles, it's warranted to have a standalone article. —Vensatry _(ping) 09:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: I actually want to have the soundtrack section in the main article for FAC. I don't know whether the soundtrack section of a film (for FAC consideration) should have a separate article or not. Should it? If then, I will remove the redirect portion and restore the soundtrack article with its talk page. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think merging enhances comprehensiveness. You can still add a summary on teh soundtrack in the parent article while having a separate article. If you feel that the articles should be merged, you should have probably initiated a WP:RM instead. —Vensatry _(ping) 09:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: So, nothing wrong in having a separate article, then? — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I too feel a separate article for the soundtrack will help ease the chances of FAC success as the article will become shorter; recently, Shah Rukh Khan failed its FAC due to its excessiveness. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792 and Vensatry: It is done. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, it's good to have a separate article as the soundtrack article was in good shape and has a lot of scope to be developed further. It was one of the top albums in 2010 isn't it? :) —Vensatry _(ping) 09:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some sources that could prove Behindwoods' notability.

• http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/Dhanush-Lesser-known-facts/photostory/45939894.cms
• http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/article1302814.ece
• http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/low-on-budget-high-on-dreams/article2760871.ece
• http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topiclist/Companies-based-in-Chennai
• http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/hits-and-likes/article4397078.ece
• http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/radio-and-tv/article6365104.ece
• http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/trisha-krishnan-to-get-engaged-to-beau-varun-this-month-announces-her-engagement-on-twitter/
• http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/programmes/behindwoods-film-festival/params/tvprogramme/programmeid-30000000550003047/channelid-10000000002990000/starttime-201502081130
• http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-metroplus/robot-in-real-life/article1021621.ece

Hope they prove for the best. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ssven2, I have fixed the issues you had raised at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Abhishek Bachchan filmography/archive1. Please add your opinion (support/oppose) there. Thanks, Jim Carter 10:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valentine Greets!!!

Hello Ssven2, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve, Happy editing,  - T H (here I am) 12:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding ((subst:Valentine Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

@The Herald: Thanks! — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 15:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What you want me exactly to do about the BO section. I could not get it. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: I'll start on that tmrw. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 17:07, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the robot in Enthiran can have a separate article on it. Try finding significant sources. Thanks.--Skr15081997 (talk) 12:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Skr15081997: There used to be an article named Chitti (character) about the robot which was redirected to Enthiran. You can refer this for further details. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This may help in finding sufficient content. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I'll start work on the peer review comments first thing tmrw. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 15:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I got a piece of the plot from Dhananjayan's book. See what can fit:

To protect himself, Chitti uses Bohra's lab and creates robots by transferring his program to them. When Bohra arrives and objects, he kills Bohra and declares war on Vasee for opposing his love for Sana. He occupies the AIRD as his operating centre and creates a robotic army of his clones that causes mayhem in the entire city. He informs Sana that he has even acquired the human ability to procreate and seeks to marry her. so that for the first time, a machine and a human being can give birth to a preprogrammed child and create a new world but Sana refuses. Chitti decides to eliminate Vasee in order to make her accept him. His war with Vasee and thousands of army and police personnel leads to the death of large numbers of humans and destruction of property. Finally, Vasee gets Chitti on a magnetic mode into his van and removes the destruction program chip. Chitti returns to normal behaviour but by then, huge damage has taken place. The court pronounces the death sentence for Vasee for creating this dangerous robot. However. Chitti argues the case and presents evidence that it was Bohra who inserted the destruction chip, leading to Chitti's destructive behaviour. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what say you? And I noticed inconsistencies in these sources regarding the decision to rename Robot in Tamil:

• Behindwoods says the film was retitled EnthiraN to seek tax exemption from the TN government.
• CNN-IBN supports this claim.
• Rediff contradicts them, claiming that Shankar wanted to honour the government's "commitment to patronise films with Tamil titles", rather than seek tax exemption. It also states that the film was first renamed EnthiraM, while the above two sources say EnthiraN. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: We follow BW and CNN-IBN for the tax exemption. While we can use Rediff to state that the film was first named Enthiram but was later changed to Enthiran. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 09:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AP/Nizam means Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Bellary, Raichur and other parts of Karnataka border. Not Nizamabad district. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Then add a Footnote regarding them at one place. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 08:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting SRK at FA. As you may know, it failed mainly due to length issues. I have a new peer review open, and would like to get your opinion on a particular issue that I raised in a a section called 'Question from Bollyjeff' here: Wikipedia:Peer review/Shah Rukh Khan/archive2. Thanks, BollyJeff | talk 21:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, while a person's user page is certainly not owned by that person, normally by convention, a person's user page is not edited by others. WP:UP#OWN. Prhartcom (talk) 00:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prhartcom: Understood. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just for fun, I'll tell you I recently had to edit a person's user page. According to the X! tools (here) they had received their Wikipedia username about a year ago and were up to 200 edits, however they were displaying "This user is a Master Editor". I left a message on their talk page asking them to remove that badge (I would like to be a Master editor too) but checked a month later and they had deleted my request. So I went to their user page and removed it for them. Prhartcom (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ssven2, I just wanted to say again that The Castafiore Emerald is looking really good. I have seen many editors come along over the years and try to improve the Tintin articles, and your commitment has topped them all. You remind me of Bob de Moor who perfectly emulated the style of Hergé. Maybe I can step in with my copies of the sources and improve the article as well. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Check out what I'm working on (the image is temporary): User:Prhartcom/sandbox/other2. Someday we could even have an article for the moon rocket. Prhartcom (talk) 15:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prhartcom: Thank you very much for your support. I will add a separate "Themes" section for the book as it has a lot of explanation from Farr. Can you find out more on Hergé's inspirations for the Gypsies as Farr just says it is from a photo but doesn't reveal much info on it. I will also add a bit about Calculus's attempt at colour television. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 15:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, see if you can stick to the same structure and sub-heading names as set by Midnightblueowl. Yes, as time permits, I will read the sources and stop by later with some expansion/improvements/possible editing. We need to add the wonderful quote Thompson said about this book that I included in Tintin in Tibet. Prhartcom (talk) 15:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Did Dhananjayan write about it? If so can you e-mail the pics to me? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 16:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's good that you archive all the links before it becomes dead. But it's not necessary to include the archived URLs in the articles. —Vensatry _(ping) 07:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: Kailash's articles which he took to GA and FA were archived (Although Andha Naal is your nomination). I just simply wanted to maintain it. The NDTV link is dead BTW. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 07:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I said earlier it's not mandatory. —Vensatry _(ping) 07:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This requires a Notelist template. Considering the fact that it was created five days ago, you should have rectified it earlier. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thx 4 reminding me. Added the footnotes there. BTW, do inform me when Manam is ready as I'll review it. You can ask Jaguar to review GAV. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lstanley1979 wants to complete the c/e on Manam by the middle of this week and i shall inform you when it is done. But, are you sure you want to conduct a GAR on Manam? What excited you to do that? Can you tell me if any, no matter how trivial it may be Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: I watched the film last July and it moved me. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In multiplex or DVD/Blu Ray? Well, i watched it in theaters first. While working on Mayabazar, i felt expanding Manam may not be a difficult task. Sometimes, i just imagine who would suit those three in the Tamil remake if any. For me, the other inspiration for working on Manam was the expression of ANR when Rao accepts Anjali's proposal. Incidentally, that was the last shot he acted in. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to know that you don't always have to refer to a site with its extension (like .com, .org etc.), except maybe when it is mentioned for the first time in an article. And the Behindwoods article no longer has the ".com" in the title. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Thanks for the notification. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 16:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I said you that the article is still in the midway of a complete c/e right? I've asked Onel5969 to complete the remaining and till then, list the issues at the GAR page except for Reception, BO and Legacy which should be c/ed by Onel5969. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: I have checked the Reception and Legacy sections and shouldn't be a problem. Just a few minor corrections which I will pinpoint to you during the GAR after the c/e there. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 completed the process. Thus i would begin my part in the GAR shortly. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chennai Express, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Chennai Express is the third-highest-grossing Bollywood film of all time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chennai Express. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	For reviewing Manam which marks the fourth time you reviewed an article nominated by me. Hope you do that for many others in the upcoming future. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: IMHO, I think Enthiran is ready for FAC. Shall we close the PR now that many of the editors have posted their comments? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PR's usually close by admin actions. But you just leave it unattended, eventually it will be closed. And because I think I played a great deal in the article, please list me as co-nominator; you are of course the main nominator. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I have asked Onel5969 to give a copyedit as two users (Shailendra and SchroCat) have suggested a c/e for the article. Once that's finished, I'll nominate it for FAC, listing you as co-nominator. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 07:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I happened to see the PR on Gary Cooper and Bede735 has closed it on his own. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I had added the Guardian source, because it talks about the plot details of Frankenstein and could help viewers understand the similarities between it and Enthiran. But never mind, as this existing source says that Chitti, "like Frankenstein turns against his creator." Kailash29792 (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thank you so much for your input on Kareena Kapoor Khan filmography. It just passed its nomination for featured list consideration. Currently, I have one nom. Let's see where does this one go. :) --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 21:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Join the discussion in the article's talk page if interested. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't usually edit another user's own page. Prhartcom (talk) 05:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May i know the article's present status? Any update from your side about its journey from GA to FAC? What about Onel5969's c/e? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Onel has finished. User:Prhartcom is doing a review of the article and fine-tuning it, after which its on its way to FAC. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All the best. I am in the final stages of completing Mayabazar which has been delayed due to several reasons and even now due to my worsened health conditions. Once i get it c/ed, i would approach Dr. Blofeld for reviewing. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Good! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:53, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If Enthiran's done, what's your next project? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Will take a break, be back in June 2015 and figure it out then. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 02:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck bro. By late March 2015, i hope i would bring Mayabazar, GAV and Gopala Gopala to GA status. Then i would be less active here till mid May 2015. Then i too shall think of future plans. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pavan, me and Ssven are planning to bring Sivaji to FA status once its GA reassessment ends; at least he is. And Ssven: is Hansraj Saxena still the CEO of Sun Network as Enthiran mentions he is? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I thought that Sivaji GA reassessment has been completed. Also, Ssven2 has stopped showing any progress in his sandbox article of Sivaji which i once saw recently while visiting Mayabazar ref page. Thus, i beleived that it was ready for FA. Anyways, all the best to you both and, wishing you both a happy Holi! (I believe that you are not allergic to that festival). Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NZ is confirmed for 6 days now. :-)--2003:5F:3E3D:B83:485:5C09:717D:A9DE (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All the best for Enthiran FAC, and your exams. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: My exams commence in June 2015 only but there are a few small tests in between. Thanks. As I mentioned in your talk page, I will put up the wikibreak sign tomorrow. So. please take care of the comments provided by the reviewers at FAC as co-nominator. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 15:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just one clarification: Is Hansraj Saxena still CEO of Sun Network, as Enthiran mentions? His Wiki article seems to contradict this. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ssven2. As far as I know, you are one of the best reviewers of filmographies. Do you think Rama Rao Jr.'s filmography can be nominated for FLC. I worked for one week to clean up the whole filmography.

Thank you, Maheshreddy2 (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Maheshreddy2: Thanks for the compliment. As a list, it looks good. But, it's best if you get someone to copyedit the lead section prose. You can ask Onel5969 or Lstanley1979 to do it. Also move the awards section to the main article as this list is about his films, not his awards. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

check this one. Very rare indeed. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your cooperation in Jr. NTR's filmography. I fixed it as per your guidance, and it looks ready for nomination. I sure do owe you a big favor soon man.

See you soon, Maheshreddy2 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi bro, could u please help in expanding the article of Telugu film Gabbar Singh since I have managed to edit the article so far as much as possible. Srivin (talk) 10:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Srivin, I think you read that note on the top of his talk page. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi bro, could u mind if you mention any reliable sources for box office collection of the film. Srivin (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the Prisoners of the Sun GAN! Much appreciated. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Midnightblueowl: No problem. Happy to do the GAR. Again, great job on the article. Looking forward to the Moon adventures. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A difficult situation. I don't think the prose is of such a concern that it should be immediately withdrawn. But I do think Sandy's comments and the response since is unlikely to convince the delegates that it's ready for FAC. Whatever Sandy has said to Tim, he didn't actually support it. Perhaps the best thing would be to withdraw for now, and try to get some more copyeditors on it. Like SRK though it's difficult to see where the support is going to come from, even withdrawing and renominating at a later stage. Indian cinema articles in general really suffer at FAC, I don't think many take them seriously, Indian English and customs is often at odds with some of the reviewers. When I said it had FA potential though I meant it, and I'm rarely wrong about that. Sorry I wasn't of more use in the earlier stages, Sandy had a point about a fair bit of it, but I always have a job finding those minor MoS glitches. In its current condition I can't see any major problem with it, but what do I know...? .Also best to avoid using graphic smileys at FAC as they make you look like a thirteen-year-old! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which reviewer said that the plagiarism section could be removed from the article? Kailash29792 (talk) 03:55, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: That doubt you mentioned about Cinemalead's content from Wikipedia in the PR made me do it. RHM22 brought up the issue at the FAC stating that the reference is "inadmissable". I have saved it in my sandbox until we find a better source that states the plagiarism cases are solved. Can you help me with that please? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 03:59, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There may be Tamil language references for that. Try searching. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Found a source from TNIE. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That source mentions only one case being dismissed, that of Aarur Tamilnadan. You finding any more? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I feel that Aarur's case is the most significant as he is the only one who filed a complaint with the MHC while the others just sought clarification on the story. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Email me, I don't believe I have your address.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:18, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, guys. For the record, the source that I was referring to as unusable was the one which stated that all the plagiarism claims were false, because the source (a website) stated that the information came from "Wiki". I don't know which Wiki he was referring to, but we can't use information from Wikipedia or any other Wiki as a source. This is the reference to which I was referring: Endhiran. Notice that at the end it says "(Content source: Wiki)". That will not pass muster at FAC. The rest of the plagiarism section looked all right to me, but I didn't scrutinize all the refs.-RHM22 (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld and RHM22: RHM22, I understand what you meant and removed the other plagiarism cases (except Aarur's case, the reason which I stated above.) along with the Cinemalead reference. Dr. Blofeld my email is shaun.srini152415@gmail.com — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 04:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Origin" reads, " in October 2007, Khan and Shankar officially aborted the project, citing creative differences" but then the next line reads, " In January 2008, Eros International and the London-based Ayngaran International agreed to be the film's producers." Can we fill the bridge by writing about Robot's revival, or was it never shelved at all after SRK's exit? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Revival is better. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With the FAC now withdrawn, what next? A break as your talk page reads, or another PR? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: As Thalaivar quotes, "I have not failed. I have only postponed success." Another PR! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So good of you. But have all of SandyGeorgia's comments been resolved? There were the hardest to solve. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:57, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: He only listed a few of them at FAC. I have resolved some of them through Doc and RHM22. I have opened the 2nd PR. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edits. But, why removing the word "full scope"? Any particular reason? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: "full scope" sounded odd and didn't make sense. Do you mean "cinemascope"? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. I too lacked knowledge about that. Since The Hindu used it, i thought it should be a relevant term. Also, both Jaguar and Kailash left it unchanged. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mayabazar turns a GA! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to the question you asked the doctor is here. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Perfect. It's settled then. Mayabazar is onto FA. Your first. Kailash29792 will also be a co-nominator. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 03:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. What more can i ask if you both are on board along with me. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: You can start off by opening a peer review for the article. We'll invite Krimuk, Bollyjeff, Dwaipayanc, RHM22, Doc, Shshshsh, Jaguar, West Virginian, Tim riley, Skr15081997, SchroCat, Cassianto, Crisco1492 and SandyGerogia. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 03:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That means, are you on board as a co-nominator? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Kailash has thanked me for my edit about him. Yes, we both are co-nominators and you are the main man (tweaking Dustin Hoffman's dialogue from Rain Man (1988): P-A-V-A-N-J-A-N-D-H-Y-A-L-A. Our main man.) — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 04:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you guys. I've added ((subst:PR)) to its talk page. However i am unable to decide which category to select. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Arts. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 04:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Here it is. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Bollyjeff asked me to add alt text for the images in the article. I've added it to the poster. I don't know what to do for the rest. Can you help me? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Managed to get some free time during my exams (next is on 17th). Two finished smoothly (back to back 11th and 12th). Two more to go. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know that. Here, the PR is going smooth. Missamma in almost done except for a c/e which i should ask someone to do so today (as i have two pending requests at GOCE). Remaining are just happening that's all. Anyways, all the best for your exams. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks. I saw your message on Kailash's talk page about duplicate links. I am fixing some of them now. Ask Bollyjeff after I am done. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me with this? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the slight c/e. After a suggestion by Corinne and Jaguar, i have expanded the plot section. Visit it, and make changes if any if necessary. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! How I can inform about needed soures. Please answer me on my discussion page. Eurohunter (talk) 13:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Slideshows at Rediff are notorious because the URL's of specific portions of the slideshow will always redirect to the first slide. But I discovered that through print view, you can view all the slides together as if it is one page. So use the link I have pasted, in Enthiran. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is Bollywood Life a reliable source? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At first I too doubted the source's reliability, but Zee TV owns it. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The note for Sankranthi has been removed by TheRedPenOfDoom citing WP:OR and WP:COATRACK. Hope it helps. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 00:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check ref no. 14, it isn't correctly formatted. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks for the notification. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, greetings. Thanks for taking up the review. Since I have very busy personal life, so wasn't able to reply on time. I have corrected all the issues and renominated for GA. It would be helpful if you take a look. Thanks again--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 05:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@25 Cents FC: No probs. I have taken up the article for GAR again. Please be present to resolve my comments. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! for the Support. Just one thing. Could you place your support in the beggining. It would be better. Thanks!—Prashant 06:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prashant!:  Done — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I'd be happy, though I do not have enough time to spend on WP, so I can't promise, but I will take a look at it in coming days. Shahid • ^Talk2me 21:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ssven2. You have new messages at User talk:The Herald/Talkback.
Message added 05:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Please add a note on your user page that it was failed initially. Not a deterring one, but you should give complete info in such cases as a GA Reviewer. Of course it is optional but highly recommended. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 10:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains some useful info. Use what you can. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks mate for taking over the review. Appreciate it. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 18:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me about (if any) in the columns in the flc? I don't know much about column alignments.—Prashant 12:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You and Kailash and a few others here are really doing Indian cinema proud on here. In fact it seems as if there's more people working on Tamil cinema articles than old Hollywood ones! Keep up the good work and please give me a bell when you want another classic film reviewed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Gladly, Doc. I will start work on Apoorva Raagangal and Apoorva Sagodharargal in June 2015 after my exams end. I will take a wikibreak and make no edits to any article except Enthiran (as I will nominate it for FAC shortly after Easter). I will try to resolve comments at the FAC from time to time. As for Indian cinema, Hindi cinema is also on my mind. I am collecting refs for Dil Se.., Shree 420 and Mera Naam Joker. Will start these three with Sivaji and Dasavatharam on November 2015. For Hollywood, I am planning to take films like The Ten Commandments, The Bridge on the River Kwai, Lawrence of Arabia, Guns of Navarone and the LOTR trilogy to FA status. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Films like those I think we'd be better off getting hold of some books/biographies. I'd be interested in helping you promote those, but Ben Hur would be the obvious one to start with for FA. You know you can request books through the Wiki UK grant?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Ben-Hur it is. I knew I had to get a hold of some biographies. Can you tell me how to request them through Wiki UK grant? It would be really grateful. BTW, is it just me or does Jason Isaacs look a lot like Wikipedia's co-founder Jimmy Wales? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I checked, and they must be long-lost brothers! BTW, can you please convert the biggest footnote in Kattabomman to main text? It's too long to be a note. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For completing the third GA hat-trick! Hoping much more from you in the future. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: You're too kind. Thanks. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ssven, do you accept an FAC for the article? I believe it is capable of one. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:45, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Sure. It needs budget and BO info however. Do you have any inof about them? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Maybe we can take VK to A-class. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please copy-edit this article's "Themes and influences" section? I'm not sure whether such content should ideally be placed there. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala:  Done Better to wait until the film's release and reception (maybe a week or two after the release). Then expand the Themes section. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. As you said, i placed that text in the Characters section. Can you c/e that newly added portion there? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: I actually meant that the rest of the "Themes" section, not the IBTimes section, had to be placed elsewhere. I have included it in the "Development" section. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:31, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thanks for the c/e! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar, I appreciate it greatly. Shahid • ^Talk2me 00:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguar isn't on at the moment, any chance you could review? Good luck with Enthiran!♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Already begun. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 07:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	For the help you offered me in these ten GAs as a reviewer, a copy-editor, a random helper etc., especially for Govindudu Andarivadele which turned a GA today. Hoping for the best possible, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:53, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks. Happy to help with the article. BTW, good news. I have 5 supports for Enthiran's FAC. Looks like its well on its way. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to ask about the same and an edit conflict. Well, all the best. I too shall focus on making the Rajini award look better. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Yep, please do. You can have a look at Dr. Blofeld's barnstars and awards and use them as a model for the Rajini award maybe. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How about the model of "Auguste and Louis Lumiere Award"? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will you just let Ipigott edit it first and review the changes when he's finished Ssven? hes a regular collaborator of mine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Sure thing, Doc. In fact, his and Shahid's edits have made the article look much better. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:12, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed my work on Temper and nominated it for GA status. I've asked Onel5969 to give it a complete c/e and once he's done, i shall inform you and then, it is your wish to review it or not. Since you asked me to inform, i did my job. Rest is yours. Happy editing! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At first I thought Tintin in Tibet was the only story not to have an antagonist. But do you remember Red Rackham's Treasure? I think the Bird Brothers were arrested even before it, and the titular pirate had no role in the present. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Max Bird had escaped and was, according to the Thompsons, skulking near the trawler Sirius. Also, the sharks are taken into consideration. A shark attacks Tintin when he searches for the treasure. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 11:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's similar to the magpie from the Castafiore Emerald, although it did just what a typical magpie would do. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After a thorough and stimulating peer review I have put Maurice Ravel up for FAC. If you care to look in you will, as I hardly need say, be most welcome. – Tim riley talk 16:41, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you to change your wikibreak template text to "I will not be making major edits to any article except Enthiran and Apoorva Raagangal." Don't contradict the notice you kept. However its optional and depends on your perception on the latter. But considering your involvement, i can surely call it a major edit/expansion/reconstruction. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: I won't be making any more edits on AR till June 2015. The production section needed some expansion. Like Sivaji, I have expanded only the production section. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 00:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really sure about this? Well, as i said, its optional. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Yep. I am. Just like Sivaji. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 02:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. I thought it was going to be another VK as your sudden endeavour then changed your template last time. Happy editing! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Same to you. I expanded the production section to make my work in June 2015 less tedious. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 02:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the article. But the 'Introduction of Rajinikanth' section borders WP:UNDUE. 'The film is about ... while his father is drawn to Bhairavi's daughter Ranjini (Jayasudha).' It's actually the other way around – Jayasudha is drawn towards Major. This needs to be clarified. —Vensatry _(Talk) 08:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep moving the book sources I used most out of sources and into further reading? Further reading is for sources not used. Please move them back.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:49, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Done. Didn't know that, sorry (Well now I do, lol). IMHO, I thought that "Further reading" was for books which were used as the primary sources for expanding articles :) — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No LOL! I'm almost half way through the Baxter book now, and have the big Lo Brutto biography to still plough through. It's a huge topic, really difficult to research, I doubt I'll go for FA with him, but I'll probably get it to GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I almost forgot, did you say you were interested in the wiki grant and obtaining books to improve film articles?♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Better change my heading in Enthiran then. As I said a couple of months earlier, best of luck with Kubrick. His article really deserves to be FA as he is a game-changer for science fiction films (although IMHO, I found 2001 both boring and interesting, especially the pod bay door scene and when Bowman removes HAL's memory). Yep I am interested for the grant. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hated 2001 upon first viewing when I was younger! Also didn't like Citizen Kane at first. I now consider both among the greatest ever! If you want to borrow some books to improve articles you can request them here [1] You can email User:Richard Nevell (WMUK) if you want to understand more about it. Look on amazon.co.uk, any idea what books you might want to borrow to improve some films/actors?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: It would be good if I could get it for free. Mainly for hollywood articles, David lean biographies (for expanding his films) and film books (Lawrence of Arabia is a good one). — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's free, that's why it's a grant LOL. And it's freepost wikipedia sendng the books back too. You just have to pay £5 to WMUK to join. You could request books on [2], [3], [4], [5] ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That bad eh?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: What's bad? :) — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't say "Yes, I'll contact Richard and am thinking of putting in a request!. You went quiet! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: I will contact him. But not right now. I'll ask him around in June 2015, when my holidays come around after my exams end. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 10:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with your exams!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Thanks, Doc. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 10:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to give your input to this.—Prashant 13:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prashant!: Will start tomorrow. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask Jaguar to conduct a source review on Enthiran, if it hasn't commenced yet. Correct me if i'm wrong. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, here is Orlando Sentinel critic Roger Moore's archived review of Enthiran. Add it back if you want to. BTW, did you see that the film's RT score has changed? Please update it if needed. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Thanks. The RT score has changed because the same critic has written for two different tabloids. The review is the same. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What an unfair act of sockpuppetry! Or at least it looks that way. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Nevertheless, I have changed it. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Sivaji Ganesan won Best Actor for Veerapandiya Kattabomman at the 1960 Afro-Asian Film Festival, becoming the first Indian actor to win in that category in an international film festival? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 21:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	A long-overdue barnstar to one of the creative editors on Wikipedia. And, for your amazing work particularly on film articles. —Prashant 06:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prashant!: Thanks very much, bro. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The heading of this section is actually a possibility of an article of the same name whose feasibility was questioned by TheRedPenOfDoom to me this evening when i actually thanked him for removing a note related to Sankranthi in Naayak reviewed by you after which i followed your suggestion. Do you think there are sources for "Indian festival releases since 1930" to make it an article? Please comment. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: In my honest opinion, I suggest you add the note back with a reliable source that states that the film is a sankaranthi release. Naayak was reviewed by Jaguar. I did the other Sankaranthi release, Yevadu. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake bro! :P However, we already faced the Sankranthi note issue in the lead section of Yevadu and your suggestion was accepted there. Well, can you comment on its feasibility? After giving a thought, i felt that creating an article about "Holidays and Indian film releases" would remain incomplete for an uncertain, long period of time. Before i can convey the same to TheRedPenOfDoom, i thought i should seek your opinion on this. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Rajinikanth Award of Excellence and Bravery
	For bringing Enthiran to FA status after facing many hurdles with a brave smile comprising self-confidence and also for excelling in whatever you did. Since your efforts match Rajinikanth's persona which is known for winning highly difficult tasks with ease. — Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, in the note, mention the reviewer. Also mention Kailash as the co-nominator for the FA. It is unethical if we don't mention their names. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks! Added the names. I will be here a couple of days (till Sunday night). Then, I'll be taking a wikibreak and come back in 3rd week of June 2015. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then, what about the GAR of Temper? None are responding for GOCE requests and here you shall be for three days. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Oh yes. Don't worry. I'll look in from time to time (won't make any edits on Wikipedia). When the GOCE is done, message me here and I'll take it up tweaking the wikibreak message momentarily and finish the review. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. All the best for your academics. Study well and take care. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks. same to you! I'll be here till Sunday night if you need anything. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:30, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For taking Enthiran to FA status. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Krimuk|90 (talk) 13:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krimuk90: Thanks, Krimuk. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, that's great! BollyJeff | talk 14:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bollyjeff: Thanks, Bollyjeff! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article Enthiran From Dr. Blofeld to Ssven2, for taking Enthiran to FA, congratulations on your first, an achievement to be very proud of! May we see many more of these! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Nice barnstar, Dr. B! Thanks! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:43, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listen to some music to celebrate! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Will do! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I add my congratulations to those of Dr B, above. Tim riley talk 19:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tim riley: Thank you, Sir. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 23:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For all your efforts in getting Enthiran to FA status. Excellent work! —Vensatry (ping) 15:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: Thanks, Vensatry! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 15:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sorry for not having taken part in the FAC itself and landed my support in time, which I hope you know I had anyway. I don't think I deserve this kind of recognition, but I'm really grateful, but it's a great opportunity to come right back at you with this one. :)

		The Special Barnstar
		For the wonderful, wholehearted way with which you proved that hard work always pays off. Enthiran is merely the most recent example of your goodwill and dedication. I'm sure there are many more to come, keep up the good work. Shahid • Talk2me 16:39, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Shshshsh: Shukriya, Shahid! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 23:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ssven- there's nothing wrong with redlinks per se- quite the opposite, in fact. Per WP:REDLINK, "Red links for subjects that should have articles but do not, are not only acceptable, but needed in the articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it. Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject." For more information, see this signpost op-ed I wrote recently. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:43, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@J Milburn: Thank you for the notification regarding redlinks, Josh. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 23:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, woke up to a brilliant news that Enthiran has been promoted to FA. My heartiest congratulaions to you.—Prashant 03:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prashant!: Thanks, Prashant! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on Enthiran, and thanks for your edits on Twinkle Khanna. They have made my work a lot easier.--Skr15081997 (talk) 07:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Skr15081997: Thanks! Happy to help. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 07:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Before RHM22 can begin the c/e process, all of a sudden, without any request by me, Jaguar began the GAR yesterday after the city of New York being his 200th GA Review. So, it takes a lot of pain for me to tell you that you cannot review this film's GAN. Sorry for this unexpected development. Hope you understand. But, if you don't mind, can you tell me why you were interested in reviewing this film's GAN? BTW, List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra became an FL yesterday and i am updating the same on your user page. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Congrats to Jaguar for the double-century. I wanted to conduct the GAR because it was the first Jr. NTR film to be attempted for GA status. No need to feel sorry for this . Thanks for updating my user page and all the best for Temper's GAN. C u in June 2015! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 04:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temper turns a GA today! A true "Labour Day" gift indeed! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Congratulations! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Sivaji – The Boss, Ssven2!

Wikipedia editor Khocon just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

References are okay , Lead section is too long.

To reply, leave a comment on Khocon's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Would you mind leaving some comments? Thanks, All About That Bass (A word?? / Stalking not allowed...) 05:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MaranoFan: Thank you but I'm more into filmography FLs than american music as I am not familiar with the subject. Good luck with your FLC though! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your "moving" of Sivaji (film) was improper per WP:CUTPASTE. While the main article has been fixed, I request you to rectify your errors on the talk page. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

her look resembles Neelambari. May be something useful to add in its legacy section. BTW, your opinion on this? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:55, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe not, because the source makes no mention of Padayappa or Neelambari. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: This doesn't, but other reliable sources do. Search for her, i am sure you shall find a couple of ones. For example, what about this? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ssven2. Twinkle Khanna, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 02:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Twinkle Khanna, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Twinkle Khanna won the Filmfare Award for Best Female Debut for her performance in Barsaat? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Twinkle Khanna. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 18:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing that can be said about this source is that it is a part of Zee Network. Apart from that, i believe we cant prove a notability to this to-be-created article. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Oh. In that case you can add the review back in the reception section. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Irataba is back at FAC: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Irataba/archive3. We look forward to your comments there. RO^(talk) 16:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits, would you mind writing a few comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1. Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Again thanks for your edits, If you could please help resolving the comments of Skr15081997. Yashthepunisher (talk) 4:30, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Dasavathaaram has been badly damaged by unmonitored IP edits. Please see if you can undo the damage using Twinkle. This I ask of you because you seem to understand BO figures, the main info which has been played with. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: As it is. During my semester break (in a month's time), I will take care of it when I make the article better. Till then I have blanked the infobox information (I have placed it in the box office section). — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 00:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you can provide me with online refs for Avvaiyar, that would be great. Cos it is my next GA, and I have quite a few offline refs in the form of books. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ssven2, Pavanjandhyala has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding ((subst:Smile)) to their talk page with a friendly message.