Hello, Steven Muhadi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a ((Talkback)) message on my talk page. @ 05:58, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A tag has been placed on Seventeen (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 17:14, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daud Yordan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MGM Grand. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited OkeVision, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Comedy Channel and Sundance Channel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Vision 2 Drama because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gennady Golovkin vs David Lemiuex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WBA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fox Networks Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Empire (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Table tennis at the 2016 Summer Paralympics – Men's individual – Class 10, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Jacobs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Steven Muhadi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Steven Muhadi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AcademicNinja. I noticed that you recently removed content from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Liga_3 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Academic Ninja (talk) 07:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Bridge (2011 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaysian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St3095 Loves MU. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm UtopianPoyzin. An edit that you recently made to Park Hae-joon seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! UtopianPoyzin (talk) 04:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Have a nice day.Jjaey (talk) 03:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KBS Drama Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Choi Kang-hee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of South Korean films of 2020, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ordinary People (2018 film). Since you had some involvement with the Ordinary People (2018 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Concours D'Elegance. Since you had some involvement with the Concours D'Elegance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. StonyBrook (talk) 09:04, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, in all of your latest RMs you are placing the discussion at the top, while it should be the last one at the bottom per WP:BOTTOMPOST. Please don't keep doing this. --Gonnym (talk) 07:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your WP:RM/TR request. That section is for requests to move back undiscussed moves. Parasite (film) just went through a thorough move discussion. Station1 (talk) 07:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, to be clear, MNC Channel was directly replaced by OKTV on March 13, and that should have its own article? Raymie (t • c) 17:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Raymie: yes. St3095 ^(?) 17:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, re: this, you shouldn't be refactoring other people's talk page comments, and it's generally considered bad form to edit your own comment after someone has responded to it. What you can do, is strikethrough the wrong pronouns by using <s></s> around them, then append a comment to the end of your existing comment. Like:

The next day, MarnetteD moved my request from #Edit request to #New parameter (then "New field") and finally she he opposed the parameter, then I replied her him to support per #Oppose removal by ProcrastinatingReader. It means the result of the discussion on the section will not add "raised" parameter. Is it so? -St3095 ^(?) 15:46, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Fixed erroneous gender pronouns. Sorry. St3095 ^(?) 05:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This way you acknowledge the error without deleting the error from existence. I have reverted your edits. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thanks for your closes at TfD. Regarding the relists here, though, I think both were suitable for closure. Guidelines generally suggest not relisting more than two times. Soliciting further outside opinion may be a good reason to do that, but that was attempted after the 2nd relist. Regarding Licht, I would've closed it as keep personally, especially considering arguments from the previous opera TfDs. Quorums at TfD are often smaller than quorums at, say, AfD, so 2 well-formed arguments are generally sufficient for consensus, especially for smaller matters.

My general rule for XfDs is: if I wouldn't be confident or willing in closing a discussion as keep/delete (assuming, hypothetically, some post-relist opinions were there creating a consensus), I won't relist said discussion either. Reason being, some other closer with more familiarity with the matter and/or relevant policy may see a consensus where I may not see one. Perhaps this thought will help you too? Best, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ProcrastinatingReader: Sorry. I purposely relisted it twice a week. St3095 ^(?) 13:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This close was also a full 24 hours early, and most definitely should not have been relisted. I'm going to have to ask that if you are not capable of closing appropriately, that you cease to do so. Primefac (talk) 20:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And I came here asking about Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#Template:Lower case first letter italic title. Participants were evenly split, and the concerns with deletion that were brought up towards the end of the discussion were not addressed. I don't see how this could have been closed the way it was. – Uanfala (talk) 23:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Stop relisting TFDs. Please. Just stop. You clearly do not understand when to close a discussion and when to relist. This is a ludicrous relist. Primefac (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: so, I can't relist again? I didn't know when I want to relist again. St3095 ^(?) 02:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am saying that you have not demonstrated the ability to know when it is appropriate to close a discussion listed at TFD. Thus, I am asking you to stop performing non-admin closes at TFD. To make it easier, I would suggest turning off XFDCloser in your preferences. Primefac (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: I've already turned it off, but please don't get mad! St3095 ^(?) 16:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mad, just making sure you understood my concerns. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 17:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The King and the Queen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The King and the Queen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 06:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St3095! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SK2242 (talk) 06:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bridge (2018 TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:YG Entertainment artist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 12:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please get yourself familarize with the template documentation and instructions before using them. I noticed that you converting all YouTube references on The Penthouse: War in Life to use ((Youtube)), however as per the template documentation, quote This is not a citation template. Use ((cite AV media)) to provide bibliographic citations in footnotes. Alternatively, use ((cite news)) if the video is a newscast, or ((cite episode)) if the video is in an episodic format., it is not a citation template.

In addition, you also replaced Netflix references on Hot Stove League (TV series) which again according to the Template:Netflix title documentation, quote Note: This template should only be added to Netflix original programs, original films and original stand-up comedy specials articles..

However fear not, I reverted some articles that are on my watchlist. Please be careful with your future edits. — Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 14:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:2AM (band), is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. EN-Jungwon 15:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw that you were working on a draft for the upcoming Netflix series Undercover, so I just wanted to let you know that the English name has been changed to My Name ([1]) in case you haven't since the update yet. Have a nice day! - Seokgjin (talk) 08:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your edit at Diva (disambiguation). Feel free to edit the new article Diva (2020 film) if you think you can improve it.

(An article on Cho Seul-ye wouldn't be bad, either.) TJRC (talk) 21:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NACTOR. Two mentions in local newspapers don’t establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 23:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

No change from previous review

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 03:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

until she has sufficient activities independent of iz*one, she won't be satisfy the WP:BANDMEMBER criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lee Chae-yeon (singer, born 2000) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lee Chae-yeon (singer, born 2000), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i'm already make the Taejong Yi Bang-won (TV series) but i just know if you're Indonesian.....if you don't mind can you talk where do you come from senior??, even i'm not came from +62, but i can speak with that language, so, please don't mind to use indonesian if you have request article on me, Have a Nice Day! Ningsih ODINN (talk) 03:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ningsih ODINN: How did you know "I'm Indonesia" from my profile? -St3095 ^(?) 09:37, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ofc, i just red it....So, which indonesian city you came from? Ningsih ODINN (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ningsih ODINN: I'm from Jakarta. -St3095 ^(?) 12:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St3095. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:My Name (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St3095. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:T1 Entertainment artist, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St3095. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:T1 Entertainment artist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:20, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 Taiwanese television series debuts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Izzy Canillo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izzy Canillo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series set in 2022 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NLIST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Empress Cheonchu cast members and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Empress Cheonchu cast members, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Pbrks ^(t • c) 17:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Premier League overseas broadcasters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 02:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still mostly unsourced and does not have the source to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

International Stadium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eagleash (talk) 11:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Infinite (group). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- EN-Jungwon 12:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Kapamilya Channel‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -112.202.226.91 (talk) 06:57, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, who are you? And why did you not have to log in or sign up to Wikipedia? -St3095 ^(?) 08:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St3095. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Empress Cheonchu cast members, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Doric Loon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is basically just a list of the subject's appearances, and although at first sight it looks impressively long, they all seem to be fairly minor. For example, our own article on The World of the Married, supposedly the series in which he made his big breakthrough, does not suggest that is character is terribly important. If he really is notable, I would expect a section on his career with at least two paragraphs of text. However, given that he is only 16, I suspect there is not enough career there to merit this. I would recommend saving this draft on your harddrive and revisiting it in a couple of years. Incidentally, although there is nothing wrong with Korean-language sources, it would greatly enhance the claim of notability if an interview with him or a profile of him in the international press could be cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Doric Loon (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St3095. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Viu original programming/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Winners-2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:16th Seoul International Drama Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

if we want a list of his works without a proper biography of him, we can just go to IMDb, DramaWiki or AsianWiki.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeon Jin-seo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 16:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17:34, 4 March 2023 diff hist 0‎ m Talk:Astro (South Korean band) ‎ Pop Pause moved page Talk:Astro (South Korean band) to Talk:Astro (group) thank Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

17:34, 4 March 2023 diff hist 0‎ m Astro (South Korean band) ‎ Pop Pause moved page Astro (South Korean band) to Astro (group) thank Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

19:33, 16 February 2023 diff hist 0‎ m Talk:Highlight (band) ‎ Pop Pause moved page Talk:Highlight (band) to Talk:Highlight (group) thank Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

19:33, 16 February 2023 diff hist 0‎ m Highlight (band) ‎ Pop Pause moved page Highlight (band) to Highlight (group) thank Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

11:22, 6 February 2023 diff hist 0‎ m Talk:A.C.E (South Korean band) ‎ Pop Pause moved page Talk:A.C.E (South Korean band) to Talk:A.C.E (group) thank Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

11:22, 6 February 2023 diff hist 0‎ m A.C.E (South Korean band) ‎ Pop Pause moved page A.C.E (South Korean band) to A.C.E (group) thank Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

Can you please explain these moves? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@In ictu oculi: You said these titles are "stable", right? If these titles are "band", then members have instruments to perform. Else "group", members can perform without all instruments according to WP:GROUPDAB. -St3095 ^(?) 16:35, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen that you have undone my revision of your edit on March 7, 2023, at 06:35 UTC on List of Boys Planet contestants. Please stop doing this as most of your changes are against Wikipedia's Manual of Style. For example, you have cited MOS:FLAG and removed the flagicons from the K-Group/G-Group table headers. However, flagicons are allowed in tables as long as they serve a purpose, as stated here:

In lists or tables, flag icons may be relevant when such representation of different subjects is pertinent to the purpose of the list or table itself.

The flags are not decorative and serve the purpose of quickly and briefly informing readers which countries are represented in each group. The note you have added might also inform them but notes should be reserved for additional information or references, not primary/central information, which this is. Please see List of Girls Planet 999 contestants for a precedent of this formatting being used for the same purpose. Also, as said page is for the prequel to Boys Planet, it is only consistent to use the same formatting.

Furthermore, please don't use ((vanchor)) in section headings as it is against the template's usage rules:

This template should not be used within section headings. Doing so will result in broken links in edit summaries, as well as possible duplicate anchors.

RueNightshade (talk) 20:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

G-Group notes appeared in K-Group please fix it or I will restore the old revision. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ • (🆃🅰🅻🅺) 15:20, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I cannot separate the long notelist. So I tried to type other EFNs. -St3095 ^(?) 15:53, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St3095. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Viu original programming, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have a source excluding Sri Lanka from qualifying. Wait for an announcement or the draw. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:05, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JalenFolf: sorry, I edited the page without sources redudantly. -St3095 ^(?) 09:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paper9oll was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:16th Seoul International Drama Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Albie Casiño. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St3095. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Idol Band, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Alienoid 2, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 16:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]