This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
KQED had a show on about it on Friday. listening to them it seemed to make sense. --evrik (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
--evrik (talk) 14:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw your comment in the CFD re Ghettos, where you indicated support for Category:Economically disadvantaged communities in the United States. That newly-created category has also been taken to CFD, so you may wish to participate in the new discussion as well. Cgingold (talk) 02:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Would you consider adding any input to our proposal regarding the DSM-IV. Input is being collected on our talk page. Thanks! Mindsite (talk) 22:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Damn! I thought we finally solved that problem! Oh lord. No matter how often we use the term, "original research", they don't seem to get it, do they?
Anyway, based on information provided on Thoric's user page, I did a search for his real name (Derek Snider) on google. It doesn't look like this guy is any type of serious drug researcher (other than perhaps the type that experiments on himself, possibly?). A linkedin profile indicates he's either a retail manager of a computer shop, a "Senior Software Architect", or a "Contributing Sports Writer"; though I suspect "Senior Software Architect" could be resume-speak for, "I've hacked a few programs on the internet and played around", and "Contributing Sports Writer" could be interpreted as, "sports blogger". Anyway, not to be mean, but I think this guy might've been using some of the drugs he's listing on the chart, probably quite heavily,... Dr. Cash (talk) 03:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
So now i have to figure out how to add one of these cool leave me a message things on my user talk page. :) ---- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oaktownolivia (talk • contribs) 04:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! Oaktownolivia (talk) 04:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
so that was a no on the ice-cream??? Oaktownolivia (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
When you nominate an article for deletion, it is considered courteous to notify the creator as well as the main and recent contributors of the article about the nomination for deletion. You don't seem to be doing any of that, which is why I'm reminding you of this point. --AB (talk) 03:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I've blocked the user for obvious disruption. However, could you provide a list of the other accounts he has had (that you know about)? I'd like to tag the user as a sockpuppet account if it is obviously one. Thanks. Okiefromokla questions? 01:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Steve CarlsonTalk 01:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, sorry. I'm new at adminning. If he vandalizes again, he's history. And I'll watch the other guy to. J.delanoygabsadds 03:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Observer effect (physics), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Observer effect. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on MINUIT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add ((hangon))
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Siwel Ziva (talk) 06:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
In regard to your article. . my sincerest apologies . . --Siwel Ziva (talk) 06:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent comment on my talk page. Your points are well-taken. --Law Lord (talk) 12:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Steve, thanks for making the section changes to our Norkom Wikipedia page...it looks good! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.145.2.199 (talk) 15:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Polysubstance abuse, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polysubstance abuse. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?
ThanatosComplex —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThanatosComplex (talk • contribs) 04:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I redirected that page to polysubstance dependence rather than simply deleting it. If editors who know the subject well create articles under the wrong name, other people may make the same mistake. If this was for whatever reason the wrong thing to do, please let me know. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello there, Mr. Carlson. I notice you clim to over 1300 edits to wikipedia, but it states here you've done 2070. Do you mind updating it?--Supersonic Pokémon (contact me) (global contributions and blocks) (local contributions and logs) (Barnstars) 17:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Parafon Forte a candidate for the Pharmacology Collaboration of the Month. Please click here to support or comment on the nomination. You are getting this message as a WikiProject Pharmacology Member |
--Cssiitcic (talk) 20:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
This is just a simple note. I started the "scarab artifact" article some months ago, ... as it was long overdue. I had been meaning to do it before, .... the time was never right. So this is MIchael, from Arizona, the SonoranDesert of SW arizona. I've done Hieroglyphs, and the Amarna letters, and recently did some of the BC timeline stuff in WikiCommons. I just wanted to thank you for editting the Scarab artifact Introduction. But my comment is this: you totally left it as I had stated. I get a little torqued at so many editors, that are so High and Mighty(changing things-and it "Has" to be their way) cause they Know so much. ....(i assume you understand)
Apparently there was an Apache Indian saying: "I am what I do...". It kind of implies that eventually you can get it right, but there is a time for an article, and not....
The scarab artifact is sooooo....important in egyptology, as are the "graffitos" that help fill in all the "missising spaces"- the lacuna (manuscripts). I just started working on the (Sumerian)-disputations, that are mid 3rd millennium BC. There are 7, and they "made my (last six months)". to learn of them. (The disputation article in Wikipedia shows the "evolution of articles"-It is only focussed on Religion and the Middle Ages). (They-(the first Disputation 'Speeches') explain why humans have this desire to Express!...thus Talk pages). the 1st article is: Debate between bird and fish. (only 6 more to go, (by me or somebody)... Any how thanks. And i assume you have been given Barnstars?.... (I got one for the Category:Birds of the Amazon Basin, etc. by User:Jeff Dahl, (whose Egypt-Work I have run into, especially doing the Heiroglyphs in Commons- It's worth examining, since I then continued some of the same searching into "Category:Cuneiform on media" (after "Cat:Hieroglyphs on media").. So thanks for cleaning up the Scarab artifact Intro:....Michael ...
PS..I was wondering-(today) why the Greeks, or nobody else did Disputations before the Middle Ages. They are an "essay"-(maybe poetic, but I think more like a very, very short, Short-Story). I think the Greeks were too uppity, that use of slaves, and commerce of grain had created a 'better-than-thou' society. the Sumerians were carving out their first Mesopotamian- "riverworld".-(no Time for Uppitiness!)--(from the SonoranArizonaDesert, USA)..Mmcannis (talk) 03:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
This review is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007. The article Psychoactive drug has been re-reviewed and needs to be improved. The article will be placed on hold until issues can be addressed. If an editor does not express interest in addressing these issues within seven days, the article will be delisted. You are being notified due to your listing as one of the top editors (by number of edits) to this article. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 23:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Talk:Psychoactive_drug#Thoric.27s_chart. I have just removed the diagram (often added in "See also" sections) from several articles. Should something else be done about this? Thanks. Proofreader77 (talk) 17:34, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
San Francisco Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon! Who should come? You should. Really. | |
---|---|
The San Francisco Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon will be held on Saturday, March 17, 2012 at the the Wikimedia Foundation offices in San Francisco! Participate in editing subjects about women's history and beyond! Workshops will also be hosted. New and experienced editors (of any gender!) are welcome!
We look forward to seeing you there! |