Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Wow, time flies. Thanks for the reminder! Steven Walling • talk 19:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Criticeditor (talk) Steve, Could you kindly review the article M_A_Varughese —Preceding undated comment added 13:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Steven Walling. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Mjs1991 (talk) 03:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Diversity winner
• Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steven! I recently stumbled upon the RfC you spearheaded back in 2013 about updating the left sidebar. I've long thought that it could use some revamping, and I would've supported most of your proposed changes had I been around back then, but sadly it looks like it didn't get enough consensus to go anywhere. So I'm wondering (a) have there been any updates in this area since 2013 that I should be aware of, and (b) do you have any suggestions about what I might be able to do to have a higher chance of getting this done? Cheers, Sdkb (talk) 07:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These templates which you created years ago are up for deletion. See the discussion here. If the research was done they may be worth tagging ((Historical)), if not you may wish to ((G7)) them, or have some other opinion to express. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:Goat curry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Goat curry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ghinga7 (talk) 02:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Steven Walling. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connectipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connectipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graywalls (talk) 20:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Denisarona (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding ((subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20)) to your friends' talk pages.

Steve, I noticed that the Fitbit article you created had a pretty major edit (sections removed) without any prior discussion on the talk page. I was going to revert, but do not have the bandwidth to get in an edit war, not that it's ever fruitful anyway.

• 21:55, 14 January 2021‎ Jawz101 talk contribs‎ 35,093 bytes −5,078‎ This was not a minor edit. I removed the accuracy and effectiveness sections and moved the recall further down in the article. It felt like filler to describe everything mentioned about a thing. Much of it could be for a discussion on activity trackers in general. The same could be said for running shorts.

I defer to your better judgment. Bobsd (talk) 15:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Connec+ipedia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Connec+ipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slow Food Nation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slow Food Nation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Platonk (talk) 19:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I have recently made a request for an assessment of the article Puppetry of the Penis on WikiProject Theatre. I have been editing this article for over a month, adding almost 3000 words, new sections, an infobox, media and more references for verifiability. I noticed you were a very active (and helpful) editor of WikiProject Theatre, and was wondering if you had the time if you could have a look at the article and provide me any feedback. Any general feedback would be much appreciated and possibly an assessment of the article for importance and quality. Thank you very much. Rubyredgirl (talk) 10:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rubyredgirl: I can take a look this weekend! Steven Walling • talk 15:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Steven Walling: Hello Steven Walling, thank you for taking the time to reply! The article has been assessed and some very helpful feedback was provided by other editors, but of course any suggestions for improvement from you would be greatly appreciated. No rush at all, I am grateful for your time. Have a lovely day! Rubyredgirl (talk) 02:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	You are a great Wikipedian. Keep up the good work! V. E. (talk) 21:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Thank you! Very kind. Steven Walling • talk 19:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timberline Trail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramona Falls. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Steven, good to see you around. Montanabw^(talk) 15:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Yeah this year I've been gnoming on some stubs again. Steven Walling • talk 17:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

A token of thanks Hi Steven Walling! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, ((u|Sdkb)) talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Wishing Steven Walling a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 15:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Steven - since you didn't respond to the ping from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs#Confirmation request, I thought it best to follow up with a post to see if you are still active on WP:WikiProject Dogs. I'm updating our list of participants and removing those who are no longer active. Please ping if you respond here, or better yet, respond to the ping and let us know if you're still active. Happy editing! Atsme 💬 📧 02:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've noticed that your signature is using the html5 obsolete tags <font style>. Would you be willing to change it to <span style> for the same look, but without the Lint errors?

This: <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]] • [[User talk:Steven Walling|<span style="color: #8080b0">talk</span>]]</span> gives you the visually identical: Steven Walling • talk

Thanks and have a great weekend, Zinnober9 (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah definitely. Thanks for the note! Steven Walling • talk 18:29, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zinnober9: Done! Let me know if there are any linter errors though. Steven Walling • talk 17:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No errors that I see. Thanks! I've adjusted your past signatures on this page to your current, so this page is now lint free. Zinnober9 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly, can the page Egyptians gets autoconfirmed access-only users like many big pages, since once the temporarily protection ends, IPs come and re-corrupt the page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 17:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fragrant Peony: Just the one set of recent IP edits was a content disagreement, not vandalism, so unless volume of spam or vandalism picks up more the right move is to leave it open, since we don't apply protection preemptively. Steven Walling • talk 17:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. They actually took massive content from Britannica [while removing/changing original words], and kept corrupting the page even though the source accompanied says otherwise. The main issue here is plagiarism too, this isn't the first time, so if the page is kept edited by autoconfirmed and experienced users that would indeed help. Fragrant Peony (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2022 Oregon ballot measures indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Given that in my edit summary when creating this I specifically said I was about to create articles for this category and it’s obviously a type of common elections category, was this really necessary? It hasn’t even been one day. This kind of useless bureaucratic nonsense is what drives editors away from the project. Steven Walling • talk 01:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Good Job Marah Gh 90 (talk) 06:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, User:Marah Gh 90 has been blocked as a sock of a persistent, forum-shopping LTA. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: Not surprised given that they sent me email spam asking me to create an article. Thanks for the heads up! Steven Walling • talk 15:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, why did you remove the category "succulent plants" from Delosperma lehmannii? It is a succulent, and the citation from Kew says so specifically. Am I misunderstanding the definition of "succulent"? User:Jonwilliamsl(talk|contribs) 16:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonwilliamsl: Thanks for pinging me. Including the individual species article isn't necessary / is duplicative, because the root genus (Delosperma) and the overall family Category:Aizoaceae is already included. There are thousands of succulent plant species, so the category is much easier to browse if we tag the root genera and family in cases where 100% of them are succulents. Steven Walling • talk 16:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Thanks :) User:Jonwilliamsl(talk|contribs) 16:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thanks for asking. Steven Walling • talk 17:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Steven Walling I recently created Draft:Darwin Del Fabro, about a queer Brazilian actor and was hoping that you or another member of WP:Theatre would be kind enough to take a look and let me know how it could be improved. Or, if it looks ok, to move it to the mainspace. Thank you in advance for your help and consideration Volcom95 (talk) 21:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Volcom95 (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Volcom95: Hi! This article generally looks fine, but I don't have time to review it in detail right now. Steven Walling • talk 20:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. Could you move it to the mainspace? I'm not comfortable doing that myself. Volcom95 (talk) 18:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you appear in my watchlist and even happier that you're still active here after all these years :) I hope you're well! Acalamari 20:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Acalamari: Good to hear from you! Also great to see you're still editing as well. I definitely took a break for a few years but 2022 and hopefully 2023 to has had more time for article writing. Steven Walling • talk 04:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This editor seems to be cherry picking facts based on personal bias and personal interpretations, cherry picking sources based on personal views. Newb here just learning wiki, trying to share facts. Editor has expressed disdain for “cyclists” and “Los Angeles” and the publication “Bicycling Magazine”.

Editor made false accusations as to my intent and personal identity. WP:PA

WP:NPOV All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.

WP:PA https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks Baudrillard6969 (talk) 23:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Baudrillard6969: You added a bunch of citations and references about a certain individual, watered down the language used by the sources, and then when I edited one of these items to make it more encylopedic, I immediately got a request on LinkedIn to connect to the person who is the subject of the references you added. How stupid do you think Wikipedia editors are? Please refrain from editing things about which you have a conflict of interest. This can and will result in being blocked from editing. Steven Walling • talk 23:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OUTING strange motivation, sounds like attempted outing. Why not just tell a wiki newb “hey don’t post so much about one topic it comes across as spammy” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?redirect=no&title=Wikipedia:OUTING

Baudrillard6969 (talk) 00:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Valereee (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep in mind that attempting to continue an edit war, especially while avoiding the talk page after previous requests for editors to use the talk page and in violation of WP:ONUS policy is extremely disruptive. That's doubly so for an admin to be doing it. The proper course of action then (or after a self-revert) would have been to read the previous edit summaries that made it clear it was time for you to come to the talk page. Instead, doubling down on the problem of editors refusing to get consensus for edits on the talk page and just continuing edit wars only hinders us regulars there trying to protect the page from it.

More concerning though is WP:INVOLVED though. When you take an admin action like closing a request and immediately go to the article to continue an edit war and violate policies like ONUS, that is a sign of a more serious problem. That really showed when you closed that saying to use the talk page and you did the opposite of your own advice. That very problem is what editors have been trying to protect the article from and isn't something an admin should be encouraging.

If you had read the talk page or history, you would have seen that us regulars had been dealing with promotional issues with this fringe group and had to focus on activities that had independent sources for WP:DUE to filter out those issues. That dispute led to reverts that we finally got mostly under control. The reason for RFPP was because an IP that appeared to be a logged out account was the only one continuing edit warring without using the talk. Instead of deescalating with semi-protection, we're now in a position where full protection may be justified after your edit. I alluded to this at the above ANI about you, but please take more care about making situations worse and in this case creating extra work for us volunteers trying to keep persistent edit warring behavior at least somewhat contained. KoA (talk) 05:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You brought a good faith content dispute to RFPP which is most definitely not a candidate for protection. I saw that and jumped in after you posted the obviously wrong request for protection application. You need to rethink the level of lecturing you're doing here. Edit wars sometimes merit full protection, and in this case no admin would do so, given that there's an active and completely normal Talk page discussion already underway. Steven Walling • talk 05:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steven,

Thanks for offering to be my mentor! I am very new to Wikipedia so I appreciate your taking the time out.

I've suggested an article for deletion because it's about a person who really isn't noteworthy. I don't really have a personal interest in the matter except that the article references people I do know.

Another user has said that deletion of the article ought to be discussed on the "Articles for Deletion" forum. I don't know how to do this. Can you help me move this forward?

Best,

Dan --Dan Sevastopol (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan Sevastopol: Yes, I can show you how to nominate something at Articles for Deletion. It's not super easy to understand, but there is a guide to nominating a page. Basically what you're doing is putting a tag on the article, which leads to a deletion discussion page. There will then be a week minimum for editors to discuss. If the template process is too daunting just let me know and we can screenshare. Steven Walling • talk 17:12, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider carefully whether it is appropriate to make accusations other editors over disagreements in a deletion discussion, as you did to User:Scope creep at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tines. Disagreement about independence and secondary sources is quite reasonable and deserves discussion, but if you question the good faith of their arguments, could you consider discussing it on the user's talk page before cluttering the deletion discussion? Is it WP:CIVIL to make this sort of threat? I worry that it could promote battleground behavior and discourage participation at WP:AfD, and I think we need more editors involved in deletion, don't you? — Jacona (talk) 17:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The argument made there is completely and totally ridiculous to the degree that it's either total ignorance of sourcing standards or made disingenuously. The nominator is not a new editor to say the least and should know the policies they are citing, which means pleading total ignorance of what constitutes a reliable source is not even remotely convincing. Steven Walling • talk 17:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was watching the Tines AfD, not really wanting to weigh in, but I clicked through to your profile after seeing you were taking such a beating.

There's a firmly held view, among the relatively small number of editors who make a habit of participating in corporation/organization deletions, that the "I" in SIRS means that only facts derived independently of any information from the article subject qualify for the purposes of notability. So a journalist can collect a hundred data points of information published by the company in press releases, interviews, earnings releases, etc. and synthesize it into a critique of the company, and it won't count for notability because the information itself isn't "independent content". Instead, so the logic goes, you have to first excise all of those tainted facts and then see if what's left of the article talks about the company in sufficient depth.

I have said, and I will continue to say (possibly to my peril), this is not a logical reading of NCORP/ORGIND but I am picking my battles. Some cats have claws.

When I looked at this AfD, I checked out some of the sources and it seemed to be more or less a lost cause for that reason. I don't think it should be deleted, because common sense says it's notable, but it's a close call. Oblivy (talk) 05:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, thanks for the note. That interpretation of SIRS makes no sense whatsoever to me. News organizations, book publishers, and journal peer reviews all have fact checking and editors whose function is to review work and challenge poor sourcing. Just because a news article or book direct quotes a source a few times doesn't mean the entire piece isn't reliable. If the New York Times quotes someone, it's still useful and verifiable material for referencing depending on what facts you're trying to add a citation for. This is why verification is a policy and notability is just a guideline where common sense should be applied. Steven Walling • talk 14:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It comes from the part of WP:ORGIND that uses the term "independent content". I can see a valid concern that journalists may be uncritically shoveling information provided by an executive or PR rep into articles - it happens - but that puts a pretty low opinion on journalists, editors, and outlets like the NYT. There is a modest proposal brewing over at the talk page for NCORP to add language saying non-independent sources don't include "earned media" but I'm not sure if it will fly. Oblivy (talk) 00:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do I create a brand new Wikipedia page using a mobile browser? --AxhtonCole (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have very much to post who are you? --Tux we do93 (talk) 02:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Exercise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fitness.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. The editor retention project was created back in July of 2012 and is still considered active. The lights are on and the rent is paid for the foreseeable future. Stop by for a chat. Start a thread. Nominate a fellow editor to be Editor of the Week. It was a good idea then and it's still a good idea. ―Buster7 ☎

Dyer Lum has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Grnrchst (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Crucible-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]