Feel free to drop a message for me here! Also, please remember to sign your name here. I may not reply to every message I receive. (If you would like a reply, please indicate so.)

Note: Please place your new message at the end of this page, and remember to add a heading with two "==". Also, you can sign your name by using four tildes, like this: ( ~~~~ ) — Steve

Archive: /Archive1 /Archive2 /Archive3 /Archive4 /Archive5 /Archive6 /Archive7 /Archive8 /Archive9

Thanks a lot for your excellent work over the last few days on Ethiopian languages. I am really impressed. You don't see these languages getting that much good attention very often. Greetings, Landroving Linguist (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Landroving Linguist: These are really "divergent" or phylogenetically important languages that are likely isolates or small phyla, which is why I'm so keen on digging up obscure resources on them and summarizing them online. I've also just put this up - hope you might find this useful: Wiktionary:Appendix:Vocabulary lists of African languages — Stevey7788 (talk) 10:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Landroving Linguist (talk) 13:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 122.15.122.2 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:AGS Transact Technologies Limited (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Stevey, This is regarding the Wikipedia Article created by us "AGS Transact Technologies Limited" which is not approved by you. The Information and data provided by me is the information about our company AGS Transact Technologies Limited and Attached reference links are for the data accuracy/validity.

Kindly approve and suggest the way forward.

Regards, Vatsal Vyas

122.15.122.2 (talk) 05:27, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Vyas vatsal (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:AGS Transact Technologies Limited (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Stevey,

I have made the changes and resubmitted the article "AGS Transact Technologies Limited" as suggested by you. Kindly help me with your approval on the same.

Regards, Vatsal

Vyas vatsal (talk) 06:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. See my comments on the draft talk page. — Stevey7788 (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Henry Isaac Clore Lowe on 06:53:19, 30 March 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Vyas vatsal ==

Hello Stevey, This is regarding the Wikipedia Article created by me, Chester Buchanan on Dr. Henry I.C. Lowe. I posted a question on that article's talk page but I will post it here too:

You say "Sources are mostly self-published. Very few independent sources". To remedy this issue should I include more outside sources? I currently have 8 which come mostly from two Jamaican newspapers. How many outside sources would you deem acceptable (quantitatively) and would it be preferable if more of them came from sources outside the Jamaican Observer and the Jamaican Gleaner. Are the any other things which need to change?

Thank you for your time, Chester Chester Buchanan (talk) 18:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chester Buchanan (talk) 1 April 2019 (UTC)

@VChester Buchanan: Cite a wide variety of credible sources. And these sources need to show that subject is notable, per WP:BIO. — Stevey7788 (talk) 23:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stevey,

I have made the changes and resubmitted the article (AGS Transact Technologies Limited) as suggested by you.

Kindly help me with your approval on the same.

Regards, Vatsal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vyas vatsal (talk • contribs) 11:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vyas vatsal: Very little has changed, see here. You only have one reference and no inline citations. See WP:ILC. Article is blatantly promotional. — Stevey7788 (talk) 23:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stevey, Thanks for the help with the new page for Eton Shirts. Maybe it would be a good idea to add the new page to this page as well? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eton. Could you help out with that? Best, Swe jon (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Swe jon: Done. — Stevey7788 (talk) 12:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot - much appreciated! I just changed "American" to Swedish since the company origins from Sweden, hope that was ok. Swe jon (talk) 12:14, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Steve for getting our article up quickly! We will continue to add to it. HollisJeanne (talk) 00:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)HollisJeanne[reply]

@HollisJeanne: And thanks for writing up American history articles! — Stevey7788 (talk) 11:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stevey,

We have made the changes and resubmitted the article (AGS Transact Technologies Limited).

We have added the inline citation and references as required.

Kindly help us with your valuable feedback and on the same.

Regards,

Vatsal Vyas

Vyas vatsal (talk) 06:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vyas vatsal: Please cite more references. Read WP:ILC and WP:RS first. — Stevey7788 (talk) 11:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Stevey,

I have applied the changes you recommended. My draft article now cites 31 secondary sources, all of which give “considerable coverage” to Lowe. I should also note, that the majority of these sources are written solely about Lowe and his actions. This I believe should qualify as having “received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources”.

Although because this is to prove the notability of the subject, I will offer you a short precis of Lowe’s impressive career: he is perhaps the most important scientist Jamaica has ever produced (winner of The Centenary Medal in the field of Science (Institute of Jamaica, 1879-1979). He has received an honourary doctorate, is an honorary life member of the Caribbean association of pharmacists, has been named business leader of the year and has been appointed to the order of Jamaica. I have been able to track down 15 awards that he has won (admittedly some of them are trivial), but I suspect there are more; every day I seem to stumble on other honours he has been given. He also frequently meets with the Jamaican prime-minister and other high ranking officials.

Lastly, it does say in wp:rs that “Large blocks of material based purely on primary sources should be avoided “, but in wp:bio it says that many academics “are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources”. With both these in mind would you like me to remove/substantially trim down parts based on his auto-biography? Also are there any other things you would like me to change?

Thank you for your time, Chester

P.S. could you please not ask me to remove parts based on his auto-biography. it was hard work to create! it is all cited back to his book, statement by statement.

Chester Buchanan (talk) 21:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chester Buchanan 18:40, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chester Buchanan: Accepted. Notable, well-referenced encyclopedic content. Just needs a bit of copyediting (punctuation and so forth). Good job! — Stevey7788 (talk) 15:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevey7788: Thank you very much for the approval! I will continue to comb over it in the following days/week to try to improve it and to correct grammar.Chester Buchanan (talk) 18:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I created Zamindars of Bihar, if you have time, could you please review it since it hasn't been patrolled yet? Thank you.Monkey607 (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Monkey607: It's already been reviewed. — Stevey7788 (talk) 05:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for revision of my article Draft:Technology maturity evolution. Could you or your community colleagues recommend some changes for acceptance of the article? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vojtasu (talk • contribs) 08:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vojtasu: Again, you need more references and inline citations. Please read WP:RS and WP:ILC. — Stevey7788 (talk) 05:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stevey,

We have added the citation for our article AGS Transact Technologies Limited as required.

currently we added total 8 cite references and 4 external links.

Kindly help us with your valuable feedback and approval on the same.

Regards,

Vyas vatsal (talk) 10:41, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vyas vatsal: Please post your request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. This still does not look like an acceptable article due to all the issues with copyediting, formatting, and tone. Your article still looks like an advertisement. — Stevey7788 (talk) 05:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Steve, thanks for the kind words, I would welcome some further guidance on your advise for me to merge my draft "West London, England" with "West London (sub-region).

Makes perfect sense to me as the West London sub-region is the only S-R with a page of its own, and the area as a whole (unlike N.Lon, E.Lon etc) lacks a page

As the existing article has a narrower scope, would it be better to: - Merge the existing article into my draft (if that's possible), that would allow a new name without the "(sub-region)" suffix or - Copy my content into the existing article (that would mean the article had been re-scoped, but the suffix still referred to the older, narrower subject scope. - Some other approach, such as adding more content to the article

Thanks very much for your time and apologies if this is not the best way to have sought advice

User: AlasdairDaw

@AlasdairDaw: Your article looks great. Just merge it and you'll be fine (1st option). 2nd option is also good. — Stevey7788 (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please take a look at this edit. Does the AFCH tool allow for checking whether banners already exist on a talk page? If not, maybe a bug should be filed with the tool. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul 012: No it doesn't. A bot should be much better. — Stevey7788 (talk) 09:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Kansas City Chiefs vs Los Angeles Rams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Kansas City Chiefs vs Los Angeles Rams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 12:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello @Stevey7788:! Thank you for reviewing an article that I created, 2018 Kansas City Chiefs vs Los Angeles Rams! Sadly, after just 2 hours, it is being considered for deletion. I know you are a busy man, but I earnestly ask that you would back me up on the talk page. It would help to have a more experienced Wikipedian on my side, and would be much appreciated. EDG 543 (talk) 12:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@EDG 543: Unanimous vote to keep. I'm familiar with WP:GNG and knew that this was certainly a keeper. — Stevey7788 (talk) 17:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stevey7788,

It's me who sent you a Wikipedia message asking about Chamberlain email and notifying you about the Japanese nationalist party.

I have just sent you a new Wikipedia email. I'm not sure if you have received it? This time, I have found out who is behind this Wixsite [1]. They are a Vietnamese and Russian cooperated disinformation campaign against pan-Turkism, South Korea and Japan. To obtain academic information for their disinformation efforts, these Vietnamese and Russian launch cyber espionage campaigns against scholars and researchers working on Tai-Kadai, Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Dravadian, Sinitic, Japonic, Koreanic, Tungusic, Mongolic, Turkic, Altaic, Ural-Altaic linguistics, genetics, origins, one of whom is likely you as you have worked on various language families in Southeast and East Asia. Please Read my Wikipedia email sent you in which I described what's going on.

I also tried to contact you via Facebook by an account named Marc Howlett, but I have no longer been able to find you. It is as if you have blocked me. Did you block the account Marc Howlett ?

One of the active troll accounts of the Russian-Vietnamese cooperated disinformation campaign against pan-Turkism, Japan and South Korea is AsadalEditor [2]. 14.207.103.53 (talk) 16:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. — Stevey7788 (talk) 17:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful as they have members working as staffs/engineers/administrators/moderators of Google, Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, Quora, etc. and they have a very sophisticated spying malware. If your computer often has this icon http://imgbox.com/ghsDZyfX shown up too often without any reason, it is likely that your computer is already infected by the spying malware, and that you are watched. Senturan53 (talk) 08:19, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Senturan53: Yes, I understand. Please, that's enough for now. Thanks. — Stevey7788 (talk) 08:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Stevey, I uploaded a Draft for my first Wikipedia Article yesterday. You said that it is quit interesting but reads too much like a promotional brochure. Do you have any suggestions how to rewrite it. I´m an internship at AWI and I´m currently working on the project Year of Polar Prediction. For me a wrote the Article from the view of an student. So I have no idea how to improve and re-write it. Would be nice if you can give me some suggestions. Kim.schnackenberg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kim.schnackenberg (talk • contribs) 09:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kim.schnackenberg: You need internal citations, see WP:ILC. Titles like "Who is involved?" should be reworded as "Participants." — Stevey7788 (talk) 09:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:1974 Jackson State Tigers football team
• Draft:1975 Temple Owls football team
• Draft:1978 Morehead State Eagles football team
• Draft:1979 UTEP Miners football team
• Draft:1993 Dartmouth Big Green football team
• Draft:2002 Villanova Wildcats football team
• Draft:1980–81 Cornell Big Red men's basketball team
• Draft:1980–81 Marquette Warriors men's basketball team
• Draft:1980–81 Notre Dame Fighting Irish men's basketball team — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:140D:4903:8C4D:9275:D169:E74E (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@2605:A000:140D:4903:8C4D:9275:D169:E74E: Some are notable, some are not. — Stevey7788 (talk) 09:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Stevey7788!!

I appreciate you taking a look at my article that I tried publishing and the feedback you left! May you go into detail about what was missing from it? I changed the sources multiple times and added a couple of them from actual news articles. Please help me understand what I can do to improve. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlyKiinz (talk • contribs) 15:22, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SlyKiinz: Add more references. Please read WP:RS, WP:NCORP, and WP:ILC. Make sure the article does not look like a promotional advertisement. — Stevey7788 (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Citybird767 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Airport Express Shuttle Bus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there. This topic "Airport Express Shuttle Bus" is already exist in Japanese and Traditional Chinese in Wiki. I just help to translate it into English version. Would you mind guiding me through the way?

Citybird767 (talk) 01:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Citybird767: The Japanese and Chinese wikis are less strict and accept a wider range of articles. One way might be to link them to already existing English Wikipedia articles. Although I have ridden the HK Airport bus myself and like it a lot, I don't think it is necessarily notable on the English Wikipedia. — Stevey7788 (talk) 08:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Pinklich (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Devendra Gupta (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Stevey7788, thanks for reviewing my First Draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Devendra_Gupta) and giving me feedback. The article was declined due to insufficient secondary sources. I've found three relevant links: https://www.aps.org/programs/honors/fellowships/archive-all.cfm?initial=G, https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/builders/builders_reference.html and https://www.amazon.com/Diffusion-Processes-Technological-Materials-Technology/dp/0815515014. Would these be sufficient for the article to be approved? Kind regards, Pinklich (talk) 11:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Pinklich[reply]

Pinklich (talk) 11:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Pinklich: Amazon is not an acceptable source. Be sure to read WP:RS and make sure to cite external secondary sources. — Stevey7788 (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming that the article was deleted (created by a sock) before you had a chance to read the comments made by Bishonen and me. I had to spend a bit of time on the article and I think you should know why. Here is what I wrote to you on the talk page as well as Bish's comment:

I'm not sure why this was moved out of draft space in its current condition. The grammar is terrible. The lead contradicts itself saying that it is an 8th century temple and "So no proof of who made and how" which is OR. Did you read this Hindi source?[3] It's clearly fringe and claims that the temple is 1.5 million years old. I had Chrome translate it and I found copyvio, which is why I deleted it twice before. One of the sources[4] is the Hindi Wikipedia. Anyway, I've done a bit. The lead needs a complete rewrite. Did you notice one section heading is spelled "cculpture"? Doug Weller talk 15:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article is awful, even after your deletions, Doug Weller. Before them, it was worse, of course, both in grammar and in the claims made. Bishonen | talk 15:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

I admire the idea of AfC and I hate to be critical of another editor. I can easily tell from your talk page that you don't blindly accept AfCs, so I assume this one was an exception. I know I like to be told about any issues other good editors have with my editing. Doug Weller talk 10:16, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft did indeed require some copyediting. It was accepted because it looked it could be a good article once it is improved, but I should have taken a closer look at the specific contents in there and placed various tags. Thanks for letting me know about this though - I should have taken a much closer look at all the fringe theories in there. And for some very unfortunate reasons not clear to me, it seems like South Asian topics often tend to require massive amounts of cleanup. — Stevey7788 (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. No real problem. But I agree entirely about South Asian topics. There are various reasons I'm sure. The copyvio problem may be because some areas of the world don't see a serious problem with it, or even it as showing respect for the originator. Doug Weller talk 15:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Agreed. I'll give such topics a much closer look in the future. Another AfC article that got accepted by a different reviewer was Negro-Egyptian languages. It looked very well-written to the untrained eye, but it was a fringe theory article that made absolutely no sense. With practice, reviewers can learn to spot such non-"Wikiworthy" articles with much better accuracy. — Stevey7788 (talk) 15:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I had assumed that it could be notable and encyclopedic since there was an article about it on the Hindi Wikipedia. — Stevey7788 (talk) 15:11, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stevey, thank you for reviewing the page I tried to create *Draft:Forester Life and giving me suggestions on how to site my sources. I have attempted to add as many third party sources as possible (apart from their board which I can only find on their website). Would these be sufficient for the article to be approved? Many Thanks (Daniel886 (talk) 12:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

I am not sure if the other reviewers will accept this new draft, so be sure that you follow WP:RS. — Stevey7788 (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hertz Vectors in Electromagnetic Theory. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:10, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this article is in the mainspace now without any tags or major issues. — Stevey7788 (talk) 13:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sir,

My journal got rejected. Kindly help me to correct those issues. Vigneswarapandian (talk) 04:21, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vigneswarapandian: Which one? You had written up a few different drafts before. — Stevey7788 (talk) 10:57, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Lesenwriter (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Thamizhachi Thangapandian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Lesenwriter (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lesenwriter: What is your particular request? — Stevey7788 (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevey7788:I have expanded the page and added more references with latest information as per suggestion . May i kindly ask you to go through and review my page please ? -Lesenwriter (talk) 13:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevey7788:Improved the article.Kindly approve please — User:Lesenwriter (talk) 9:20, 21 May 2019 (UTC)))

A tag has been placed on Photo (bollywood song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

[Not Useful]

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CptViraj 03:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

I had just moved the page because the original article title was not very good. I had thought about tagging this article for AfD though. — Stevey7788 (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Somdip Dey, Stevey7788.

Dreamy Jazz has gone over this page again and marked it as unpatrolled. Their note is:

Creator reported for sockpuppetry, as a recent case was about editors trying to get the draft published. It seems like a copy-and-paste move from a draft previously WP:G11'd (per evidence at the SPI page), so marking unreviewed for full further review (if you did do a full review before, just rereview it).

Please contact Dreamy Jazz for any further query. Thanks.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz: Thanks for pointing this out. The guy looked notable and the article did not look like your run-of-the-mill spam content, but I didn't know all this had been going on. Good luck with the SPI. — Stevey7788 (talk) 13:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stevey7788, Check User said the accounts were unrelated, so I have re-reviewed the draft Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for review my article , i hane revised and i hope it better than old version, sincerely regards. (Branbfh (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)).[reply]

@Branbfh: You mean for Draft:Dr. Kamol Pansritum, M.D.? — Stevey7788 (talk) 19:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Firstly, this Topic is very important for all public (i.e. Government) servants; yet, many of them are not aware of the correct statutory Law on this subject-matter. And they are searching for the same Online; the Law cited in this Article is directly linked to relevant Government's websites.

Secondly, the prominent Judge-made Law -- which supplements, modifies & supersedes these statutory Laws -- is also cited, i.e. the Judgments themselves are cited in the Article and, moreso, the Court-recognised Law-Reports (which reproduce these Judgments) are linked (cited). There cannot be more reliable 'sources' than Government's websites and Court-recognised Law-Reports, plz.

If this information is not available on Wikipedia, then millions of public servants (which include those employed in public sector undertakings, Nationalised Banks, etc) will turn to another competing Wiki, and patronise the one that they find informative; it will, therefore, help Wikipedia alone to show such important information, plz.

BTW, I am on the Editorial Boards of three International Research Journals, and am a Peer-Reviewer of an International Research Journal published on behalf of Cambridge University (UK); I also teach HRD, Law, Economics & IT to MBA Courses. My Research Papers have been presented at many International Conferences & Seminars, and the Suggestions made therein have been implemented by the concerned Government & other Authorities.

Best Wishes, Philhorn (talk) 11:17, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Philhorn: Yes, I understand, but please read the reviewers' comments and follow WP:GNG. — Stevey7788 (talk) 11:22, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevey7788: Thanks, needful has been done after your suggestions and those of other Editors during my Live-Chat, and the Article has been extensively revised -- many secondary sources have also been added. Please Review it again. Thanks and Best Wishes!Philhorn (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank for reviewing my article. I understand your remark that I'm citing only one webiste, but to be honest there is no other reliable source of information regarding EPS. Do you have any suggestions what I can do to resolve this issue? Best,

Agata G.D. (talk) 13:00, 10 May 2019 (UTC) Agata G.D.[reply]

@Agata G.D.: Check Google and Google News for reliable sources. Also be sure to read WP:NORG and WP:RS. — Stevey7788 (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I hope I'm entering this correctly. You commented that the draft I submitted could use some further copy editing. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Many thanks for your comments! Amarna58 (talk) 19:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC) user: amarna58[reply]

@Amarna58: I've fixed it myself. Other reviewers will need to look through it. — Stevey7788 (talk) 12:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

When we rely upon primary data (e.g. original research or documents) we are referring to Facts and not Opinions; hence, 'neutrality' is automatically ensured. Moreso, we are not expressing an opinion that the subject-matter is good or bad. This Article refers to and cites primary documents, viz. Government & Court-records (with first hand Links provided to these sources). Secondly, it is the importance of the subject-matter (e.g. when a statute or court lays down a new Law or interpretation that creates a watershed between the new and the old legal thought & systems) then the change is noteworthy, i.e. 'notable'; the mere 'numbers' do not make it notable, e.g. the number of times it has been applauded or criticised by people who are not recognised Subject-Experts.

Best Wishes, Philhorn (talk) 01:19, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Philhorn: Please read the draft comments. — Stevey7788 (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stevey, You made a comment on my Glomesh draft that said 'Notable or not?' You mean to ask is the brand worth noting as a page on Wiki? It is very famous in Australia so I believe so - it is a big part of Australia's fashion history. There are brands and designers that haven't been around nearly as long who do have pages. Please let me know if there are other ways I can improve the article and thanks so much for taking the time to read it. Regards, Miss Abbey Jane

Miss Abbey Jane (talk) 02:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Miss Abbey Jane: If it is famous in Australia, then we have to show that it is indeed notable and famous in Australia using reliable secondary, exteral sources per Wikipedia's policy. Even if something is famous, if there are no reliable sources, we can't really include that on Wikipedia. — Stevey7788 (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stevey, Thanks so much for reviewing my draft so fast. I'll be sure to find more reliable secondary sources before submitting again. It's all a great learning curve anyway so I can continue to accurately contribute to Wikipedia.

Miss Abbey Jane (talk) 08:59, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Miss Abbey Jane: Good luck! Wikipedia can be a tough place for beginners. Please don't hesitate to drop me a line if you've got any questions. — Stevey7788 (talk) 09:54, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the incredibly speedy review Steve!

It's tough to get references for something new, but I'll endeavour to source some and I'll edit the draft at that time.

Hopefully it was neutral - writing about your own product is much harder than I imagined! Thanks again, Psjelliott (talk) 16:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)Psjelliott[reply]

@Psjelliott: Good luck! Please read: WP:NSOFTWARE, WP:RS, WP:ILC, and more. Make sure that it's encyclopedic, not like a spammy-looking ad. — Stevey7788 (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Thanks very much for your edits. The organization is a bit tighter. I appreciate the input. Amarna58 (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC)User:amarna58[reply]

@Amarna58: Great, let me know if you have any questions. — Stevey7788 (talk) 15:19, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am working on Draft:Shian-Jiann_Lin. I got a message from you saying to improve the references; what precisely are you referring to? I see that references 2 and 9 are not quite formatted correctly but I have not yet figured out how to do this; could you help? Thanks. Lharris411 (talk) 14:04, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lharris411: It's much improved now. Now just make sure it meets the policies and guidelines set out at WP:NSCIENTIST. — Stevey7788 (talk) 15:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevey7788: I have added a citation to the subject's naming as a fellow of the American Meteorological Society, and there is also a link to his recent profile in Time magazine. Lharris411 (talk) 03:32, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Ellemcp (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC) Ellemcpa--Ellemcp (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC) --[reply]

Hello! I recently submitted a page for review -- United States Agency for International Development Bureau for Europe and Eurasia -- that was rejected on the grounds that there is not sufficient information to warrant an independent page. I am confused by this feedback, as I have seen pages with very little information whereas I built out a robust page describing my topic. It would be useful to understand this discrepency. If there is a way to improve this page to meet the standards for an individual page, that would be very helpful. Ellemcp (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellemcp: If we improve it according to the guidelines at WP:RS and WP:NORG, then we should be good to go. — Stevey7788 (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please get back to me AgentAndrew0 (talk) 17:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there @AgentAndrew0:. Welcome to Wikipedia. Please add more information and links so that readers know what the article is about. — Stevey7788 (talk) 17:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do I make a link to another Wikipedia page

Use [[]] — Stevey7788 (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why won’t Rusty’s Real Deal Baseball link

Oh thx, how do I add new sections and photos

Please read Wikipedia:Your first article. — Stevey7788 (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thx AgentAndrew0 (talk) 18:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Steve, for your feedback to my draft article about the rate of wrongful convictions in the U.S. Could you please give me some examples of how my entry reads to you as a personal essay rather than an encyclopedia article? Otherwise, any tips for improving it, such as helpful links to Wikipedia articles? Thanks. Mino-wiijiindi (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mino-wiijiindi: Please read WP:NOTESSAY. — Stevey7788 (talk) 18:57, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stevey7788,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

• Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
• Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News

• Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Discussions of interest

• A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
• There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
• What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good work guys. It's not easy patrolling the world's largest online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and trying to curate the sum of all human knowledge. But (hopefully) we're getting there, inch by inch. — Stevey7788 (talk) 19:20, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing privileges to move undisclosed paid editing into mainspace Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Japanelemu‎.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  SmartSE (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your email - if you wish to dispute your direct involvement, please use the unblock template to request a review and I will discuss my reasoning with the reviewing admin. I wouldn't block without being extremely confident that your involvement was not coincidental. SmartSE (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Do Women Have a Higher Sex Drive?, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Beytussebab rebellion, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:55, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Gloria Lozano, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:56, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, NeuroVault, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:57, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, María Paredes (film editor), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:57, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Barak Raviv, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pop Life TV, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Prithvi Hatte, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:00, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kalanag (magician), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:00, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Emeryville Public Market, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Miss Earth Myanmar, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Circular procurement, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:02, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, The Question of the Left and Its Future, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:02, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Walter Schiess, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:03, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Amanda Quick (comics), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:03, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Fading puppy syndrome, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, back in March you proposed that the new Usukawa Manju be merged into the existing Manjū but missed some steps in initiating a discussion. See Talk:Manjū#Merger_proposal. I am impartial myself. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:07, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Umemploy oakland1.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I believe that this should have been deleted with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maps of Oakland, California. It has been orphaned ever since.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 21:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Renter sf1.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I believe that this should have been deleted with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maps of San Jose, California, and likely has been orphaned ever since.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 21:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

I have updated the requirements as per your guidance and left you a comment 9 days ago, I highly appreciate if you can take a look and guide me if there is anything I can do to explain the case.

Appreciate it Aladdinabil (talk) 16:46, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stevey,

This is regarding the Bishop Maximus page , i have followed your guidance and updated the article with refrences and citation to showcase the notability of the subject of the article, i would appreciate if you can take a look on it and tell me your comments , i understand i might still be a newbie but i am doing my best to learn :) appreciate your guidance.

Regards, Aladdin Nabil

Aladdin Nabil (talk) 06:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aladdinabil: Stevey7788 is blocked from editing. It does not look as if you have made any changes since their review in April however: [5]. At the moment it is not clear whether the notability requirements for biographies is met. You also need to remove language such as "his eminence". SmartSE (talk) 19:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stevey7788,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spears, Brittany. Since you had some involvement with the Spears, Brittany redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:45, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Gabria51 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Surkhab Tv (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Gabria51 (talk) 02:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Gabria51 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Surkhab Tv (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Gabria51 (talk) 07:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve,

Do you know if Koireng, Kwoireng and Kohlreng are the same Kukish language, or is 'Koireng' just a homonym? Someone just recreated Koireng, and it duplicates material at Zeme. If they're not the same, I should clean that up. Please ping me if you respond. — kwami (talk) 17:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is "How the 1% Scrubs Its Image Online" from The Wall Street Journal. The discussion is about the topic undisclosed paid editing. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 10:39, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Puffs (facial tissue) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG. A trivial article based on their own website and an advert in NYT. A search turns up nothing more than websites trying to sell the product. It is already mentioned in List of Procter & Gamble brands, which is where this should be a redirect to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RexxS (talk) 00:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stevey7788! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afa (mythology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afa (mythology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 18:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory Anderson (linguist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Anderson (linguist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help! - typo?) 00:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bad English la1.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 08:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Natural la1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 20:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the article on the Lô Lô people of Vietnam is currently on draft submission: Draft:Lô Lô people for verification. You are invited for an expert opinion on the subject of the article. Thank you. Sgnpkd (talk) 18:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Longjia people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longjia people until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rastinition (talk) 15:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stevey7788

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Zamia nana for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 ^Talk 09:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Italian1346.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect I love eBay and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 14#I love eBay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Languages of the Pygmies has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]