Hello there, and welcome! I just saw your recent addition to Adam Air Flight 574, about Qantas. I was wondering if you could rovide me a source for that? Don't worry about trying to source it with the templates in the article - that's hard - but show me where you got it and I'll sort things out for you. Thanks for helping out!

Also, there is a standard welcome message full of handy links. Here's a copy:

Welcome!

Hello, Suastiastu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((helpme)) before the question. Again, welcome! Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 09:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Joko Widodo , but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:54, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:09, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello.., I just reverted your edits on Joko Widodo, since your edits, phrases and tones seems to contains original research, and skewed opinion filled with negativity, almost sounds like a smear campaign against Joko Widodo. Please stay neutral and refrain on using Wikipedia articles to forward your agenda or sentiments, whatever that is. Thank you. Gunkarta  talk  18:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, in fact the information I have publiushed is objective, independently referenced material about the facts of Jokowi's actions as President. It does not cease to be so because you find it inconvenient. Suastiastu (talk) 10:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not skew the tone with the phrase/words that is not quoted in references. Remember, please try to stay out of bias and stay neutral. Your edited phrase: "Joko Widodo took harsh stance against human life," is false, over the top and dramatized, compare to "Joko Widodo took harsh stance against narcotics and drug-related crimes," you seems to insist on putting the blame on Joko Widodo and concealing the reasons and context of the whole issues, which was related to drug-related crimes and capital punishment in Indonesia. Gunkarta  talk  01:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Acuually - executing people on mass is "over-the top" - not describing the fact that it has been done. Most people will agree that killing people is a stance against human life. Jokowi's political motivations for his actions are no doubt contentious and subject to debate, but the objective fact he has defined his President by shooting a significant number of foreigners and removing a moratorium on the death penalty Suastiastu (talk) 10:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Suastiastu, you seems to deliberately ignoring your talk page and the article talk page. Please go to Talk:Joko Widodo#Jokowi's policy on drugs-related crime and capital punishment before any major changes in the article. I just return the article to the last stable version prior of your massive edits. Thank you. Gunkarta  talk  09:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Hello - there is no need to cast aspertions. I suggest you apply your own rules to your postings and keep them referenced to independently verifiable factsSuastiastu (talk) 10:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not remove well referenced, on point information on Jokowi. This is not a political spin page for promoting Jokowi but is supposed to be objective description about the events of his presidency and actions. Objectively his actions are not a "hard line against drugs" because in fact he has granted reprieve to some drugg dealers as referenced. i.e. please do not remove inconvenient facts....

On contrary dear suasti, you failed to present the whole picture, by quoting that the Filipina s' maid, Mary Jane Veloso, reprive was an exclusion case or soo called ASEAN political favour. It was because the last minute development in the Philippines court that "she was spared after someone suspected of recruiting her and tricking her into carrying drugs to Indonesia turned themselves in to authorities in the Philippines." Which might prove her innocence. That innocence or somebody turn in to prove their innocence is lacking in Australian counterpart (Bali nine Myuran-Chan case). I have to go now, I'll ask third person opinion about this. Gunkarta  talk  11:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not aware of any development in the Philipines court, but that would suggest a political issue between Philipines and Indonesia. I suggest you reference your source and include it rather than deleting factual material which does not suit your view.Suastiastu (talk) 01:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please learn Wikipedia:Quotations, Wikipedia do not quote itself (refering to Wikipedia article), plus the phrase "the first Indonesian president not to have emerged from the country’s political elite or an army general." in Joko Widodo article is preserved from quoted material, do not add any weird addition and linked to BJ Habibie (which could be categorized under country's political elite). Gunkarta  talk  13:34, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Suastiastu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 00:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Suastiastu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Suastiastu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]