This is SuperFlash101's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

Hey. I've nominated What Is and What Should Never Be (Supernatural) for FAC here. It's been a week, and there has been little response. Do you mind reviewing it? Thanks. Ωphois 21:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just giving a heads up that I think the FAC will be closing within a couple days. Thanks. Ωphois 22:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Let My Babies Go! A Passover Story, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! I'll take another look when I find a few minutes. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Left some responses. Still a couple of outstanding issues. J Milburn (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking on the review! I've responded to your initial comments. — Hunter Kahn 21:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• No problem, thanks for the review! I think I've addressed everything, but let me know if there's anything else! — Hunter Kahn 22:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. Well done. J Milburn (talk) 01:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, I appreciate the move so that we try clearing things up and solve the problem peacefully, I never intended for this to be a war, I'm just doing what I think is right, needless to say that I didn't like your comments in the history page.

As you explained yourself, I would also like to explain myself. I know and understand that this was the first episode produced for the show and I have no objection to it being labeled Pilot because of this fact, however I disagree that it is the first episode. If you visit the show's official website http://www.fxnetworks.com//shows/originals/archer/episode.php you can see that it is labeled Season 1 | Episode 2, so it is not the fact that it aired after Training Day that is making it Episode 2, it is the fact that it is officially the second episode of the show! So that was not merely a rerun, that was THE second episode of the show and it is the previous airing that is "merely" a sneak preview of the show, you said it yourself "it previously aired during an unannounced preview" so it was just a sneak preview of the second episode, even if it was the first episode produced for the show, it does not mean that it is Episode 1, they chose to air it as Episode 2. The previous sneak preview was unscheduled, unannounced and not official. It was the official airing as Episode 2 that was scheduled, announced and official!

I know it is still indeed the Pilot, but I believe that we should make it clear that even though it is the Pilot, it is Episode 2 and this will not be "cooky" because everything will be explained! I believe that someone accessing this page on Wikipedia and reading that it is Episode 1 and then accessing the official page and reading that it is Episode 2 will be more confused that someone reading the explanation as to why it is the Pilot and Episode 2!

I hope I explained myself and as result, I'm going to have to undo your changes again and I hope this is the end of it! All I want is improving the wiki after all ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mschumacher69 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...how'd you like "Hunting Trip"? lol. That was one of the sort of wackier episodes of the season, but it had a lot of Ron Swanson, which is always good in my book... :D — Hunter Kahn 05:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Flash. I've conducted GAN reviews of both The Uncertainty Principle (The Spectacular Spider-Man) and Reaction (The Spectacular Spider-Man). Check out the review pages when you can. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 01:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SuperFlash, how's it going? Good work on "Mole Hunt" and your other episode articles. Listen, I have a favor, if you have time can you look over the Reception section for "St. Valentine's Day" and let me know if it's alright or not? I kinda been going back-and-forth with the article. I know your super busy, so if you don't have the time all is cool. But if you do, whatever I can help you with, I'll try to do. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work on what you suggested. Man, I kinda knew that the Star-Ledger bit would haunt me. I'll see if I can make it read better. Thanks Flash, I appreciate you taking your time to look it over. :) Oh, you're welcome. It was a good article, it deserved to be pass. Also, cause I'm a fan of Archer, so. Anyways, thanks again. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the great work on the Spectacular Spider-Man articles, Flash! I'm looking forward to voting in favor of the season 1 good topic soon! :D — Hunter Kahn 03:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! I've added it to the article. — Hunter Kahn 18:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the copyedit! Much appreciated. :D Theleftorium 09:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any more Rugrats GACs coming soon? Let me know, I enjoy reviewing them! CTJF83 GoUSA 21:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Right now, I'm working on "A Rugrat's Kwanzaa" here, and then I'm gonna take a stab at the pilot, "Tommy's First Birthday." Meanwhile, I was wondering if you had time to review "It's About Time! (Phineas and Ferb)"? Cheers, The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 23:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll go ahead and review Phineas and Ferb...keep me posted. CTJF83 GoUSA 02:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great job overall on the GA Reivew. Just a few minor issues that need fixing. CTJF83 GoUSA 20:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done passed CTJF83 GoUSA 05:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you look at a page and tell me from one to 10 how good is it and if it's close to GA standerds. The artical is the Godfather of Gameing. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 00:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Training Day (Archer), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Flash, sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I'm afraid, however, that I'm probably not going to prove very helpful to you. My access to Lexis at work has become much more limited in recent weeks, so if I am able to look this up for you, it probably won't be until next week at the very earliest. However, I'm willing to bet that I won't have much luck in any case, as Nielsen ratings info for cable programs is very hard to come by on Lexis. I can direct you to TV by the Numbers, which in my experience is the best source for this kind of thing, but I've sure you've probably already checked there. I'll try to look next week for you, but I wouldn't count on anything. :( — Hunter Kahn 23:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not really an expert at translating the rating/share stuff myself; I usually depend on the source to say how many households or viewers it translates to. Unfortunately, I think a ratings point translates to a different amount of household viewers depending on what year it is. If the source gives you a rating but not an amount of viewers, maybe you can find a source that says what a rating translates to that year and you can do the math? — Hunter Kahn 02:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutely! I'll review it either tonight or tomorrow. — Hunter Kahn 22:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've placed the GAN on hold. — Hunter Kahn 00:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • I passed it. Nicely done! I've only seen a few episodes of Home Movies, but I really enjoyed them. — Hunter Kahn 02:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Flash. Maybe if you get a chance some time, you wouldn't mind taking a look at some of the articles I have nominated in GAN. I have a bunch of episode related articles out there at the moment (South Park, Parks and Recreation, The Office and even some Desperate Housewives) and many of them are WikiCup noms, so any help you could give would be appreciated! — Hunter Kahn 03:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks! Much appreciated! — Hunter Kahn 05:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you are involved with most of the Spectacular Spider-Man tv series episode articles from season one. And I just stopped by to say I would love to see articles on the rest of the episodes of the Spectacular Spider-Man. Jhenderson777 (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem at all! I've responded at the review page. Take all the time you need. — Hunter Kahn 04:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Just so you know, I added a new fact to the music section about the Lady Gaga song, in case you've already looked over that section and might miss the new addition. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 19:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your most recent comments. I've responded, but please let me know if it needs further work. — Hunter Kahn 02:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rugrats at the movies parody.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! I've nominated it for good topic now thanks to your help! I appreciate the ratings info too, I'll add it to the Sexual Healing (South Park) article tomorrow. Thanks again! — Hunter Kahn 04:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Archer title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! I've added it to the Season 13 article. — Hunter Kahn 16:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! If you are free, please give a Peer Review the article Sarah Geronimo. The article went through copyedit, grammar fixing, source formatting, and neutralization. Any comments that you think the article lacks to become a GA will be appreciated. Thank you!--White paladin888 (talk) 15:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Flash, do you think you could help tidy up the article Ricky Wilson (American musician) and maybe help with sourcing it? Thanks! -Phil Fry (talk) 17:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Flash. I've responded to your comments at the Woman of the Year GAN review. I know everybody's conducting lots of reviews these days because of the backlog drive, so if you watchlist your reviews, let me know and I won't remind you every time you do one. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 02:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Flash. Regarding the commentary, I wish I could be more help, but usually I can find my SP commentaries either on the website Southparkstuff.com, or on YouTube simply by searching for the episode and commentary. It seems neither site has them (this is the SPS.com site for this episode but there's no commentary download link; there is some trivia that might be helpful to you, but you'd need to find a source for it all). Other than those sites, all I can recommend is renting the disc if you can.

As far as the one week turnaround for episodes, perhaps I can be more helpful. If you check out this really cool NPR interview with Trey and Matt, not too far into the transcript, look at the response to the question, "After you did the episode, Comedy Central, which broadcasts your show, which shows "South Park," was pretty upset about it, and you ended up having to pull a scene." Matt and Trey talk about how they do their episodes within one week, and then they talk specifically about Cartoon Wars, and how they were using this method on that episode. Since that episode is a Season 10 episode, and Le Petit Tourette is a Season 11 episode, you can cite this NPR interview and reasonably conclude that it was done in the one week turnaround, I think... — Hunter Kahn 13:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flash. I was about to start reviewing "The Otto Show" at GAN (after seeing no one had claimed it for review yet), but when I claimed it and went to review it, I saw you had already started a review. I'm going to remove my tag, so this is just a reminder for you to put up a ((GAReview)) template or whatever. Thanks, Mm40 (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Art of the Sucker Punch you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Art of the Sucker Punch for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nowhere boy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PhineasGuitarRacing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First off, on behalf of myself and my co-coordinator Wizardman, I would like to thank you for the efforts that you have made so far in this GAN backlog elimination drive. It has been nothing short of a success, and that is thanks to you. See this Signpost article about what this drive has achieved so far. We're currently heading into the final week of the drive. At this time, if you have any GANs on review or on hold, you should be finishing off those reviews. Right now, we have more GANs on review or on hold than we do unreviewed. If you're going to start a GA review, please do so now so you can complete it by the end of the month and so that the nominator has a full 7-day window to address any concerns. See you at the finish!

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 16:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned you in a discussion on Commons, here. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 14:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Art of the Sucker Punch. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you had weighed in on the previous FLC for Family Guy (season 5), and I was hoping you could voice your support or opposition to the renomination of the article. Gage (talk) 05:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GAN backlog elimination drives chart up to 1 May On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, I'd like to especially thank you for your efforts over this past month's GAN backlog elimination drive. It has been nothing short of a complete success, which hopefully results in more expedient good article reviews, increasing users' confidence in the good article nomination processes. Even if you made just a small contribution, it still helped contribute to the success of this drive. Here is what we have accomplished this last month in this drive. 661 total nominations were reviewed. 541 of them passed (~81.8%), 97 (~14.7%) failed, and 23 (~3.5%) ended on hold. The WP:GAN page started at 110,126 bytes length on 1 April and ended at 43,387 bytes length at the end of 30 April (a 66,739 byte reduction in the page, about 60.6% less). Excluding extremes, the longest wait for someone's GAN to be review was about 11.5 weeks at the beginning. (I mistook the figure when I reported to the Signpost that it was 13.) At the end, with the exception of one that was relisted, the longest wait is now at 10 days. 63 different users participated, each having completed at least one GAN, with others also having helped out behind-the-scenes in making the drive a success. The drive started with 463 GA nominations remaining and 388 unreviewed. At the end of the month, we ended with 89 remaining (374 or about 80.8% less) and 47 unreviewed (341 or about 87.9% less). For those who have accomplished certain objectives in the drive, awards will be coming shortly. Again, thank you for your help in the drive, and I hope you continue to help review GA nominations and overall improve the quality of articles here on Wikipedia.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For reviewing 5 good article nominations during the April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive, I hereby present you The Working Man's Barnstar. Nice job! –MuZemike 23:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's a new candidate for the main infobox image I've decided to present, and I'd appreciate your thoughts at Talk:Flash (Barry Allen)#Infobox image 2010. Thanks! --CmdrClow (talk) 00:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I have nominated Fresh Blood (Supernatural) for FA here. Only one person has really responded, so would you mind taking a look? Thanks. Ωphois 15:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remember this person who did Rocko's Modern Life edits on the PnF wiki and was blocked for 3 months for it?

Look what I had undone on the Song Come Home Perry in the List of PnF songs page:

| rowspan=1 | All of Danville(Mainly Phineas, Rocko, Heffer, Isabella and Candace)

It is now:

| rowspan=1 | All of Danville(Mainly Phineas, Isabella, and Candace)

The bolded part is what was undone by myself.

You may want to block this person so it can't do the edits anytime soon. Thanks! 69.228.89.220 (talk) 17:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He/she struck again yesterday with the edits of the List of PnF episodes page by adding Rocko's Modern Life on it. You may want to get an admin to block the address if this happens again. Thanks!! 69.228.89.220 (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The user got blocked for 24 hours starting at 22:05 yesterday for their edits. 69.228.89.220 (talk) 01:59, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you get the former List of Phineas and Ferb characters picture (The one with Stacy, Isabella, Adyson, etc.) to a different name for others to look at? Also do we need the season 3 section for the PnF episodes page? Checker Fred has reverted it a few times due to it being not said by Disney by his mind, but that is false. After all, wasn't over a year now that it was confirmed? You may want a discussion with him about it and let me know about it. A person even added a source for season 3, but it got reverted too by him as well. I also think it should be on since other current series have future seasons on it (Like Spongebob Squarepants) for example. Thanks! Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 02:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

==Fair use rationale for File:PhineasFerbPaint designs.jpg==

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PhineasFerbPaint designs.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Animated Program (for Programming Less Than One Hour). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Not sure why wholly unsourced additions were added to this page? -- Cirt (talk) 21:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Heinz Doofenshmirtz.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey flash could you do me a favor and review Baby Not on Board. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:36, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, dude! You probably know me for awarding you that barnstar. Anyway, your contributions to Phineas and Ferb are very spectacular, so would you consider joining WikiProject Phineas and Ferb? It is a project that most tasks are to improve all articles with tags, and at least get some of the articles to featured article status. Brawlmantis80 (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found you in the FAC review for Parks and Recreation (season 1). I am trying to get an opinion on whether Glee (season 1) might in fact also meet the criteria for FA. It is currently listed for FLC. Would you mind giving it a quick view and giving me an opinion one way or the other? Frickative and I are currently considering whether to change the nomination.

Your feedback is appreciated! CycloneGU (talk) 20:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick thank you for your opinion, much appreciated. =) CycloneGU (talk) 03:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've started the discussion on DVD releases and order of sections at WT:MOSTV#Updates to the MOS.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 14:02, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've offered a review and placed the article on hold. I'm watching the page, but feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted! Well done. J Milburn (talk) 10:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you help build Isabella Garcia-Shapiro? Thanks --Confession0791 (talk) 18:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I just recently created the article List of The Spectacular Spider-Man characters and I could use someone with your expertise to make an article like this better. Also I am sure there's a few mistakes or typos lying around. Thanks! ;) Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 01:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OnceFutureThing2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, would you mind reviewing the film Taare Zameen Par for FA here? Thanks. Ωphois 22:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is fantastic... do you mind if I nominate it from Featured Article status? -- Zanimum (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Too often great editors like you are overlooked and not given the credit deserved for all their great contributions. So I am awarding you this barnstar to let you know I greatly appreciate all you do for Wikipedia, and please keep up the outstanding work!! CTJF83 chat 03:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Phineas and Ferb logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Phineas and Ferb logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just looking for some episode summaries and found that several of these articles are outstanding! Thanks for making these articles fun to read and so informative! – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 20:58, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, would you mind reviewing the article Taare Zameen Par for FAC here? Thanks. Ωphois 22:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Flash. Just wanted to bring your attention to this and this. — Hunter Kahn 03:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stumbled upon your user page on him while cleaning up references using Icon group International. Unfortunately, Icon Group International is not a reliable source - their books are computer-generated, with most of the text copied from Wikipedia (most entries have [WP] by them to indicate this, see e.g.[1]). Despite giving an appearance of reliability, the name "Webster's" has been public domain since the late 19th century. Another publisher to be wary of as they reuse Wikipedia articles is Alphascript Publishing. No problem, just thought you should know. Dougweller (talk) 13:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PaF science fair ep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Animation newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 23:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and nominations received by Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk) 17:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Store Wars (Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Store Wars (Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're listed as being a member of Category:WikiProject Phineas and Ferb members, which I've deleted under speedy deletion criterion G8 — the wikiproject was deleted last year, and there's no point in having a category for members of something that doesn't exist. I've not edited your userpage, so I'm notifying you in case you'd like to remove yourself from a nonexistent category. Nyttend (talk) 13:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Store Wars (Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Store Wars (Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends)(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:02, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, WikiProject Disney has been rather inactive recently. I saw that you are a member of the project. If you still consider yourself to be an active member, leave a response on the Project's talk page. Hopefully we can get the project up and running again. Thanks!--GroovySandwich 00:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Store Wars Foster's.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 14:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Phineas Flynn.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a ((helpme)) template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added A Rugrats Chanukah to the list of pending requests at WP:TFAR for the first day of Chanukah. It has 2 points now and could get 3 if you nominate it (assuming you haven't had other TFARs in the past). –Dream out loud (talk) 09:18, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of A Rugrats Chanukah know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on December 21, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 21, 2011. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

"A Rugrats Chanukah" is a special episode of Nickelodeon's animated television series Rugrats. The first episode of the show's fourth season, it tells the story of the Jewish holiday Chanukah through the eyes of the Rugrats, who imagine themselves as the main characters. The idea of a Rugrats Chanukah special was pitched by Nickelodeon executives in 1992, but the concept was revised and became the 1995 special, "A Rugrats Passover". After production of the Passover episode wrapped, the crew returned to the Chanukah idea. Nickelodeon broadcast "A Rugrats Chanukah" on December 4, 1996; the episode received a Nielsen rating of 7.9 and positive reviews from television critics. Along with other Rugrats episodes featuring Grandpa Boris and his wife, the special attracted controversy when the Anti-Defamation League compared the character designs to anti-Semitic drawings from a 1930s Nazi newspaper. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 10:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Phineas and Ferb snow level.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your userboxes, I feel I should inform you of a drive at Wikipedia:Television_episodes#Episodes to create articles for some of the most important episodes and seasons in television history. Please try to help out.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You were the image reviewer at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pilot (Parks and Recreation)/archive1 which was promoted to FA on 8 March 2010. This included a review of the infobox image File:Pilot parks and recreation.jpg. I am in a debate at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 April 15#File:Pilot .28The Cosby Show.29 monopoly lesson.png, which is a debate over the infobox image for a television episode. The reviewer believes that the image currently violates WP:NFCC. I was hoping you might weigh in on this debate.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Perry the Platypus in game.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you have not been very active lately, but if that changes, I could really use your help with Phineas and Ferb: Mission Marvel. I created a sandbox for it at User:JDDJS/Phineas and Ferb: Mission Marvel. If you can, please help me with it. JDDJS (talk) 01:13, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Great Wife Hope Simpsons.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rugrats movie characters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Heinz Doofenshmirtz.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Wanted to thank you for your work on Judaism in Rugrats. I came to find out which parents were Jewish and was surprised not just to find any article on the Chanukah special at all, but your whole good topic. Excellent work and a pleasure to read! – czar 16:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Competition Spectacular Spider-Man.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four year ago, you were recipient no. 1331 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please visit Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors today. There's a question about an article currently on main page that you are the main contributor to. Thanks. --Dweller (talk) 10:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brian K. cropped.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Love Handel 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Love Handel concert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Archer pilot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In your substantial edit, you included the phrase: "...Phineas and Ferb building an extremely large roller coaster panning from their backyard to throughout the city."

I am unfamiliar with the use of the word 'panning' in this sense. I would tend to replace it with the word 'running', but I'm assuming you know a new meaning for the word. Please enlighten me (or adjust the entry as you see fit).

Thanks, WesT (talk) 19:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Destination Imagination.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The file File:Dee Bradley Baker cropped.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poor quality and blurry orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MassMasterCloud1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Destination Imagination.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I do not know if you will read this message as it appears that you are inactive on here, but I just wanted to thank you for all of your work with Rugrats articles. You actually inspired me to create the articles for the Rugrats Mother's Day and Kwanzaa specials. Honestly, without your previous work, I would not considered it possible so I greatly appreciate your work here. I just wanted to let you know that you did leave an impact. I hope you are doing well! Aoba47 (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:SSM Reaction episode.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not substantially different from the depiction of the character in the infobox. There are several images of the figure in slightly different illustration styles/live action; one at most is needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Perry the Platypus.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm just checking to see if you're still active on Wikipedia and Wikia (now known as Fandom). Vozhan 19:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vozhan (talk • contribs)

Thanks for uploading File:Home Movies sucker punch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Povenmire has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 07:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Phineas Ferb space.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rugrats maccababies.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PhineasGuitarRacing.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 00:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Phineas Flynn.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Interactions (The Spectacular Spider-Man) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 15:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]