I am not checking messages regularly. Please do not leave messages expecting they will be seen in less than several months

Hello - Just did some minor reformatting on the new BBC_Radio_Orkney page. Useful info, thanks! Patchen 13:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on James Edwin Orr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how James Edwin Orr is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template ((hangon)), and also put a note on Talk:James Edwin Orr saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. -- This article is a biography that does not assert actual notability as per requirements for articles that are biographies. Bladeswin | Talk to me | 23:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:0-8423-6061-1.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Before you get too far with those, they were discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Archive 6#Criterion Collection infoboxes and brought up again more recently at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films#The Return of the Criterion Collestion Succession Boxes. I was for them but they were voted down. Doctor Sunshine 01:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ted, it appears to me that many past contributors to the creation-evolution controversy have spent too much time using the article as a soapbox to promote the idea of "creationism is pseudoscience" POV, as opposed to objectively describing the controversy in a NPOV using RS. Could you take a look at the Rfc and chime in if you have an opinion? Thanks. ImprobabilityDrive 16:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please check your facts before removing legitimate information. Thanks. – Chacor 20:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Did you even read the link? Check the active time of the advisory. 5 pm EDT. This is how we update the hurricane pages and has been how it's been done for three seasons. – Chacor 20:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Always check with the official government site ;) – Chacor 20:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A number of the pages you have created are stub status and a few are only one line of information. After looking at these I conclued that most leave the reader at the same place he or she started and they learn nothing more from these pages. I do think that these articles are important and most link to relivant pages, but they need work and you should work on them. Also there are artilces such as The Nantucket Beacon which is almost pointless and will never be expanded.Yamaka122 20:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

=

Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:

• Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
• Join our mailing list
• Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com

Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 04:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there. To answer this question, there used to be a tool available here which kept a list of those pages to which you were the first contributor (after the equals sign at the end of the URL, you would have to insert your username, and it brought back a list of these articles). However, it has been offline for most of the year, and the only alternative I know of is to go through your contributions list yourself and make a note of those articles to which you were the first contributor - which can be hard work at times if you don't keep a dedicated list of them.

Similarly with userboxes, there used to be a tool which produced a list of userboxes in a neat, readable form, but I don't seem to be able to find it - and in the example userboxes that the random software gave (there were an impressive list of about 100, some serious, but most humorous), you could simply copy and paste the code.

I'm having trouble finding it right now, but I will contact you later if I find it. Bobo. 04:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Ted-m

I'm fairly sure the Bible Society will be willing to make a plan if you e-mail or phone them. Otherwise, my church has some SA language bibles which they may be willing to sell to you (if you don't want too many) - the church's website (including contact details) is at http://www.moederkerk.co.za —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve Kroon (talk • contribs) 07:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I've done a rough translation, feel free to check it out. --Slashme (talk) 10:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Another editor has added the "((prod))" template to the article Music in Brainiac: Science Abuse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the ((prod)) template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has nominated Music in Brainiac: Science Abuse, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music in Brainiac: Science Abuse and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have userfied the content on the deleted page to User:Ted-m/Music in Brainiac: Science Abuse. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 19:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not use Babelfish to create articles. It is about as much work to clean up Babelfish nonsense as it is to translate from scratch, and article creation is far more fun than improving poor translations. If you want to request a translation, please do so at Wikipedia:Translation. Thank you, Kusma (talk) 05:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem! Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This can only be performed by administrators. Adding ((sprotect)) does not protect the page.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there - many thanx for your kind words about my add-ons to your How High Is Up? article. Actually, thank you for creating it in the first place. As I began creating articles for all 190 shorts, it was always relieveing to find several films with articles already established! Yes, the Stoogeum idea is awesome. As long as Gary Lassin is ok with it, I do not see a problem with it. Let me know how you would like to address. Thanx! Oanabay04 (talk) 01:11, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I can e-mail you a copy, but you don't seem to have enabled e-mail. For future reference, any of us in Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles are able to help you with this sort of request. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 02:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm actually in that category, and I went ahead and restored the article for review before I saw Sarcasticidealist's note on WP:AN. Please let me know when you're done with your review--alternately, I'd be happy to userfy it for you. --jonny-mt 02:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seven hours is way too long to have a blank article sitting in articlespace, hence why we have WP:CSD#G1. It's been redeleted. Daniel (talk) 10:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Per your request, I've userfied the article to User:Ted-m/List of deus ex machina examples. Good luck! --jonny-mt 14:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

With great pleasure, but i have no time for wide edits in wiki till september. Kind regards --Rastrelli F (talk) 08:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure, I'll have a look at them. For further reference, you might also want to list foreign language Wiki articles at WP:translation if you'd like to have them translated from scratch. De728631 (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the John Calvin article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions. I have withdrawn the nomination, but hope you will work with others to improve the article. I would love to see it reach featured status, and a main page appearance for the 500th anniversary of his birth is a great goal, but the type of in-depth collaboration and improvement you appeared to be seeking in your FAC nomination should happen before FAC, which mainly serves as an assessment process. Good luck! Maralia (talk) 17:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Ted,

I don't mind at all! Thank you for making the suggestion. I take it as a great compliment.

Happy editing,

Neelix (talk) 02:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Ted! Glad to know that you are "the guy" for Eastern. I noticed some of your most recent edits and, while I've been meaning to do some cleanup myself, you're probably more motivated to do the truly substantive editing. I was glad to see a book source, but it's still not used in any inline citations. What I've done in the past is when I've had such a book, and I assume you do, is peruse it and use it as backup for any statements made in the article. Having citations and references is an essential part of Wikipedia, of course (WP:VERIFY is helpful). Another link for you that might help is WP:UNIGUIDE, a standards guide for Wikipedia articles about universities/colleges. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help; I'll make a few more fairly minor fixes in the mean time. Cheers! --Aepoutre (talk) 15:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you want all revisions deleted including the current one or just all the past ones?—Sandahl (talk) 23:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC) all past revisions, keep the current one.--Ted-m (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is done.—Sandahl (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks--Ted-m (talk) 23:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:EU-Seal.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I added a translation of the very first paragraph, but I have to run. If you feel like it, translate as best you can and I'll go over it later today. (Groceries cannot wait.) Try also, if you can, to hustle up some reliable sources--German articles aren't always as well-documented as they ought to be. Later, Drmies (talk) 20:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See: [1] JACOPLANE • 2009-12-6 21:25

Hello T1980! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,865 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the ((unreferencedBLP)) tag. Here is the article:

1. Erik Skjoldbjærg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You added your great grandfather to the list on the 100 yard dash. As an established user, you know you should also include some source to verify that claim. I'm not reverting it, the whole list is rather unsourced, though there are references available that back up some of those claimants. You know some day, some deletionist will find that article and clean house. With a source, your edit might survive. Trackinfo (talk) 03:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1018019/2/index.htm--T1980 (talk) 18:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You did fine inserting the reference. Since the table has a designated place for the reference, I moved it. Trackinfo (talk) 03:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you elaborate on [2]? Desert Island redirects to the wrong article, and Desert Island (album) is the right one. I can't see any display errors. 98.229.223.5 (talk) 07:43, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. As you asked me, I added more information to this article from Georgian Wikipedia. Sorry for being so late, I had to leave Tbilisi, where I live and work and that's why I couldn't finish editing the article earlier. With best regards. — Nodar Kherkheulidze ^Talk 12:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

On 21 March 2012 you added "Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571" to the assessment department of WikiProject Aviation requesting help on the article if you require help please remove the article from the assessment department and move it to WP:AVIATION/C where help will most likely be achieved.

Thanks

Gavbadger (talk) 14:48, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:T1980/Music in Brainiac: Science Abuse, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:T1980/Music in Brainiac: Science Abuse and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:T1980/Music in Brainiac: Science Abuse during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Ciro Dammicco has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 21:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may find Beaver Falls: Gem of Beaver County of use, as well as History of Beaver County Pennsylvania and Its Centennial Celebration. I've not yet checked them for relevant information, but they're detailed enough that they should be checked. You might also benefit from one of the links at the article on the city's public library; they have a good local history room (which I was using today) and might have some relevant online resources. I'm typically in the state of Indiana, about 400 miles from Beaver Falls, but I'm occasionally back in Beaver County; the past couple of days I was there on a makeshift Thanksgiving visit. I'll be happy to try to help with what I'm able; just please suggest something. Nyttend (talk) 04:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buzkashi Boys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dari language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Buzkashi Boys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OlYeller21^Talktome 03:02, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know if you're editing from 76.71.236.252 but if you are, I have reverted one of the additions made as it's clearly a copyright violation. You can see the talk page for proof if you need it. OlYeller21^Talktome 05:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Definately not me. This IP address is based in Montreal and I'm in Philadelphia. I've never even been to Canada. Are these the edits were the ones that led to the page deletion?--T1980 (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Walkers point 1960's.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, T1980. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 13:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi T1980, I would like to use your image of Jean Paul Sartre found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jean_Paul_Sartre_1967.jpg in a brazilian TV serie entitled "Critical Uncertainties". Please email me at teka.carbonell@gmail.com so we can talk a little bit more about my project. Thanks, Teka. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teka.carbonell (talk • contribs) 16:06, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Jan Vermeer van Delft 018 cropped.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused low quality crop of File:Jan Vermeer van Delft - The Glass of Wine - Google Art Project.jpg. Can be re-cropped if needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jan Vermeer van Delft 018 cropped.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]