Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Hawks (band).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 14:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, THX1136! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Hawks (band).
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Hawks (band). Huon (talk) 00:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all.

Hawks (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 17:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, the current correct usage for possessive proper names ending in "s" is to include the possessive s after the apostrophe. This has been the case for the past 20 or so years. Even though there are those that still do not use this format (like the serial comma, it has become somewhat optional), the possessive s is the preferred form, even for names like Jesus, Moses, Judas, etc. I'm letting you know so you don't end up wasting your time. I'm going to revert your changes to Jesus Christ Superstar. Thanks. If there's any clarification needed, discuss on that Talk page. Thanks, and happy editing! Softlavender (talk) 00:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

While the "s" usually follows the apostrophe in most situations involving apostrophized possessives, there should be an exception in this situation. For instance, if the word already has a plural "s" before it becomes possessive, then when turned into a possessive, the apostrophe will come after the "...s" that was already on the word. If the word is singular, but already ends in an "...s" before it becomes a possessive, then, when turned into a possessive, the apostrophe comes after the "s." This is how it should look:

• Mr. Fullerton's watch (regular singular possessive)
• The Fullertons' car (i.e. the family--plural possessive)
• James' car (possessive for singular word already has an "s" at the end)

It depends on the situation. Changes in placement of the apostrophe (for possessives) are done so that we can be clear what we mean. Garagepunk66 (talk) 21:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your argument would have to be taken up with Softlavender. I had done the edits s/he referred to according to the guidelines you suggest - that's the way I have always understood this situation. Softlavender suggests otherwise and appears to have the cred to back up the claim. Makes no difference to me either way. I just want to do things correctly and avoid unnecessary work during editing. Thanks for your input.THX1136 (talk) 01:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, you discussed this band awhile ago on its talk page, citing how much improvement it needed. I wanted you to know I did my best to rewrite it. I was wondering, if you have time of course, if you could read it and tell me if you are satisfied with its additions. I thought they deserved a better article and I gave an effort to do so, so hopefully you will like some of it.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm glad you like the improvements. I always liked the band and thought it was a shame that the article did not equate to their importance. Thanks for fixing the grammatical errors, my mistake.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am currently developing a page for a garage rock task force. Would you be interested in participating when it is completed? It will have noticed of objectives for garage rock-related articles and all I ask is editors enjoy 60s music and are willing to help. Get back to me when possible, thank you.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello again, the task force is up and running here. Please add yourself and feel free to add the userbox available there.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Only the Explore Okoboji story may grant notability. The book appears self-published, none of the other sources appear to count towards WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iowa Great Lakes Recording Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Iowa Great Lakes Recording Company, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 04:07, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Iowa Great Lakes Recording Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 13:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, THX1136! Thanks for contributing to BRight Choices discussion on the Baskin-Robbins article's Talk page. I was wondering if you'd be willing to review my request at Talk:Baskin-Robbins/Archive 1#Updates_to_History as well. The article is a bit outdated so I'm trying to suggest a few improvements. Thanks again! EC at Dunkin' Brands (talk) 23:50, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You might want to do it in a draft space or a temp space because the method you've elected is leaving duplicate information in the article. Also, the rewrite needs references and Wikilinks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I realize I'm doing it the hard way, but I do not know how to use a draft space. I rewrote the history portion in a word processor with the cite refs so I could copy and paste along with doing the cites in the appropriate spots. If you can offer some direction I would appreciate the help. Thanks, Walter.THX1136 (talk) 20:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I started a new discussion on inclusion. I we need a consensus on variants and chocolates not in bar form. I removed After Eight, Bun Bars, Cherry Mash, Glossettes, Rolo. They are not bars. We need a discussion so a consensus is reached for criteria for inclusion. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 15:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I did some major edits and additions to the list. Now to find more references. You can help with that. Also responded to you on the talk page. Actually ping me using ((Ping|Fishhead2100)) or ((u|Fishhead2100)). This way I will see your responses instantly when I am on. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 02:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop editing talk page comments of other editors, such as at Talk:Chuck Jones. Please see Wikipedia:Refactoring talk pages where it is noted that "correcting other users' spelling or grammar is discouraged".--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My apologies. I was unaware of that prohibition. Wanted to make the two editors look 'intelligent'. With all sincerity, thank you for letting me know about this guideline.THX1136 (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Howard Roberts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hiya. Fephisto (talk) 00:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello THX1136 (talk) 20:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am reverting your addition of a citation to findagrave.com on Pat Buttram. Unfortunately, that source is not reliable because it is user-generated. (See WP:USERGENERATED for comments and names of some other sources that are in this category.) Eddie Blick (talk) 22:27, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cool. Thanks!THX1136 (talk) 22:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've started a discussion on the list of chocolate bar brands about date format for sources. Any input is welcomed. It is at Talk:List of chocolate bar brands/Archive 1#Date Format for Sources. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 23:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I just added a big expansion of text to the Glyn Johns article. While I was working on it in may sandbox over the last few years, I took extra care to make sure that each person's contributions stayed in the article--so I would make regular periodic checks and updates of everyone's edits and insert them into my sandbox text.

I noticed that you made several very fine edits to the article, so I made sure to keep that material in the article. In some cases, I moved certain statements to other places, etc. I liked the rf method of citations when you made references from Glyn Johns' book. However, since I had all of these other references from his book in my sandbox already done in the Harvard stye (sfn and sfnm notes along with bibliography entries), I merged your citations into the sfn/sfnm format, so they would all be congruent. All of your citations are still there--same page #s just embedded into the other format.

Best wishes to you! Garagepunk66 (talk) 06:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the update and thanks for your work on the article! It was good to hear from you too. THX1136 (talk) 13:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You too! You'll notice that I am now editing with a new name: GloryRoad66. I'll still keep doing the garage stuff. So the name may be different, but I'm still the same. Good luck! GloryRoad66 (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I started a discussion on List of chocolate bar brands about a product called Kazabars. Your input is appreciated. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 00:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a discussion at Talk:List of chocolate bar brands#Chocolate content. This was never brought up in the inclusion discussion. It's about the percentage of chocolate in a bar to be considered for inclusion in the list. Your thoughts and comments would be appreciated. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 01:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]